I can confirm 1070 doing over 1300kH neoscrypt if You don't mind high power consumption.
Just use klaust miner and intensity -i 17.6
My clocks are around 2000Mhz gpu and 4500Mhz vram.
Than you are lucky, on my rigs intensities over 17 always say out of memory  Also high consumption you mean like 175W+? It would be good to state your model. |
|
|
|
Smartcash sp-mod is very profitable right now.. (keccak)
1650.mhash 1080ti
As always you "forget" to mention that it's "overclocked like there's no tomorrow" 1080 ti.  And an average undervolted 1080 ti is more like 1450-1500 MH/s. Yeah the 1080tis have a problem with cooling in such a state |
|
|
|
Also not sure why you'd go through the trouble of forcing p0 when you could just OC the memory right out of the gate. Less messing around. Maybe makes your OCD feel better? It doesn't seem to increase voltage to the memory and it doesn't allow you to OC the memory further.
Because there's a bug (or is that a feature?) in nvidia drivers or mining software that makes the memory clock jump ~ 200 MHz up when you close the miner's window. I didn't spend too much time investigating it, so maybe it's not all driver versions and/or not all miners that do that, but every single one I tried behaved that way. Let's say you've got gtx 1080 and your stock memory clock is supposed to be 5000. When you set OC to +400 (in MSI AB, for example), and run the miner, your actual memclock will be ~ 5200 or smth like that, and not 5400 (because cuda apps run in p2 instead of p0). Which would be ok, you could just add +600 instead to reach the clock you wanted (5400)... except when you close the miner, the memclock will jump to 5600 for a brief moment. And that is a problem - if you're pushing you memory overclock close to its max, then you'll get the driver crash in that short moment when the clock jumps to +200 more. If you force cuda apps to run in p0 mode, then that jump is gone, the memory clock stays at whatever you set it to even when you close the miner window. And yeah, it does allow you to OC memory further, because without that weird jump you don't have to leave so much headroom for that brief clock increase and can set higher memclock. Without a load on the GPU it shouldn't cause a crash. If you're getting crashes from +200 without a load you're already unstable. For instance you can do +800 on the desktop for pretty much any GPU and it wont crash. I would say +1000, but that's very close to absolute maximum and may crash just by sneezing at it. +500 for instance is a pretty universally accepted memory OC across all my gpus when mining Ethereum (I haven't OC'd memory while mining Cryptonote or NeoS yet, so that might change). I was running them at p2. They don't crash even though they went +700 upon exiting the miner. However. If I ran +700, almost none of them could run the miner at that, not just when closing the miner. Maybe you're running super bleeding edge, so I guess, but for all intents and purposes most people aren't going to run into that. No he is right. Forcing P0 is important for memory intensive algos, you will never get high OC stable unless you force it. I dont know what +500 is, but every 1070 card brand and type of memory runs easily on 4400 MHZ, the better ones, samsung especially can go over 4500 being stable all the time. |
|
|
|
Version 2.1.0 released!Please see github for details. https://github.com/Optiminer/OptiminerEquihashThis version fixes some problems and brings compatibility with more cards. The next big target will be to rewrite the kernel for CUDA to better support Nvidia cards. This will happen before a first windows release. Why? The experience of OptiminerZero has shown that the current OpenCL solution works very poorly under windows. Therefore, releasing a windows version at the moment would not be much worth and therefore a waste of time. Happy mining! Great thanks! No performance imrpovements at all? |
|
|
|
Bitcore airdrop today. I think a nice day to buy for a quick trade profit.
Lux sp-mod (0.05btc) is very profitable to mine right now.
LUX rally on the exchanges..
Well luxcoin WAS profitable until you mentioned it here. The diff instantly jumped almost twice. Nevermind though there are still better options to mine at this moment. |
|
|
|
Ran the same settings on both miners and it's more like 4-5% more than EWBF. 1080 + 1070 =~1020 Sol/s on Bminer with 60% Power limit and 350 W at the wall. On EWBF it's ~970 Sol/s for both. The 1080 gets the biggest boost on Bminer about 10% ~574 Sol/s with 60% power limit. I'm mining on Flypool which only shows the effective hash rate, so it will take a while to be accurate but it seems legit.
The issue is that ewbf is not the fastest miner availible so it should be compared to dtsm´s miner and the increases are not that significant. But the 1080 boost seems nice, i will test it on my rigs. |
|
|
|
It's faster. Getting 10-15% more than EWBF.
Tested on a 1070ti just briefly, for me it is roughly 2-3% faster than dtsm miner. |
|
|
|
Any new ETA when the mining will begin? Will it be today? Or postponed a little? Thanks! someone from the team said will be delayed but they will try today if its possible. I dont mind it being delayed but i sure wish they actually gave a heads up and something like a timer to launch so we dont have to wait like this, yeah dealys are quite normal and fine by me also, but I would also like to know the exact time of the start  |
|
|
|
Any new ETA when the mining will begin? Will it be today? Or postponed a little? Thanks! |
|
|
|
It is still saying invalid license for poloniex . What should I do? Contact the person that you bought that licence from. Purchased from cryptobot, I have already contacted them. Are they legit? No response |
|
|
|
It is still saying invalid license for poloniex . What should I do? |
|
|
|
Do you force your cards to have P0 state when using compute applications? You will never get stable high memory OC without it unless you you have samsung memory.
Well, to be honest the P2 issue is universal, and cards with Samsung memory suffer from it the same way as the cards with Micron. The problem, as you probably know it, is not that the card mines in P2 mode, but that when you close the miner window the memory clock jumps up for just a moment, and in that moment the driver/rig crashes. You set the memory to +500 in the MSI AB, but when you close the miner, the clock jumps to +700 for a bit. That can be avoided when you force cuda apps to run in P0 via nvidia profile inspector. It doesn't just change the mode for cuda apps to P0, but gets rid of that weird P2=>P0 jump so that the memory clock doesn't ever go higher than you set it with the +xxx offset. Yes we are on the same page It was just my bad wording, i was reffering to the +550 clock offset regarding the samsung memory. You will get +550 with samsung even on the P2 state, since most samsung cards will not fail when they jump to +750 for a second. |
|
|
|
At that wattage your PSU is not the most efficient, but it is definitely safe to run it. But only if you manage to run it cool, PSUs hate high temperatures. The PSU is made to run at those wattages and if it burns, it would probably burn even at lower wattages, because it would mean that it is faulty. Also regarding the efficiency calculation the senior guys here are right - I would recommend not to listen the noobies in this thread . There is no need to waste additional money on 1200PSU and please calculate your return when buying platinum PSU and dont buy them blindly just because somebody else told you. The additional price for it rarely pays off vs a cheaper gold PSU. |
|
|
|
Micron garbage memory and the temp is fine, never gets above 55C. I tried lowering OC settings and it still errors out of EWBF. Its basically a worse 1070. My 3x 1070s are pushing +200/+600 no issues @ 70 TDP (and they have Micron mem as well). This 1070 Ti cant hold +50/+200 at 80 TDP for more than a hour maybe two. Hashrate is equal to or a little less than the 1070s. Disappointing.
Even tried putting all my 1070s on the risers and the 1070 Ti directly on the MB but still same issue.
Did you try overclocking them separately? It's always +xx/+xx @ xx TDP in your posts, so it's hard to be sure what's what. Set the powerlimit to 100, don't touch the core clock and simply increase the memclock to check the actual memory OC limit. Cause +200 max doesn't sound plausible, it should be able to OC more. All 3 of my MSI 1070 run stable at +200 core +600 Mem at 70 TDP The EVGA 1070 Ti is my only issue. I will try tonight to leave TDP at 100 and then slowly up the memory to see when it fails. My concern is the same, it should be able to handle +200 memory with no issue. Depends in part on where it sets the STOCK clock of the memory - part of the reason my EVGA 1070 ti SC cards overclock memory so well is that the BASE MEMORY CLOCK is underclocked when they are running a mining program. Card models VARY, and even individual CARDS of the SAME model can vary - memory brand seems to make a big difference, and EVGA (like ALL card makers) tends to use whatever memory it can get ahold of to make a batch of cards, even if it's not the SAME brand as what went into a previous batch of the same card model. MSI Armor Gaming 1070 card is a VERY GOOD example of the "variation in TDP between models" issue - 240 watt TDP by factory default, where MOST 1070 models are 151 or 180 watts. For the record, I've NEVER had a 1070 model that could do "+600" in afterburner settings AT ALL, most were unstable at +550 and at least a couple unstable at +500 - even on models other folks reported being able to STABLE overclock more. Like I said, cards VARY. Do you force your cards to have P0 state when using compute applications? You will never get stable high memory OC without it unless you you have samsung memory. |
|
|
|
I got it working, but only getting 27 with 1070 after overclocking, that seems really slow compared to what i get in windows 31MH+ . Is that normal? |
|
|
|
I think electroneum is a fancy way of saying they can run a miner on a phone. In case you really want to mine you'll need a Computer. Has anybody seen the actual PC Linux system/Win version of the mining signal? I am questioning whether or not they will undoubtedly perform a past due discharge of this and instead perform a huge earlier mining with their host farming.
Please inform yourself of the project before posting BS. If you read the whitepaper you will understand how will the mining on phones look like and it is a great idea to get it to people. |
|
|
|
Story of mining shitcoins.
1) You must know how this shit works.
2) After some research you have found something that could work, you have them gpu's anyway so why not?
3) Mine it, no need for an optimized miner, people are busy buying hardware.
4) Sooner or later, it pumps.
5) Sell it.
This is where it goes ugly.
6) sp_ knows how this shit works, you will see a screenshot of a moon.
7) You are late. Miner is always late.
8 ) Denial mode, we can still make this work. We are printing future money here, we start buying even more expensive gpu's that can't do more than ancient gpu's from 2014. It must be profitable. It must.
9a) You buy an optimized miner.
9b) You start thinking where profits were actually made.
Looking back btx was the most profitable nvidia coin to mine back in 5-6/2017, those who hodled made 30-50x.
As always, no offence guys, I love you all.
+100 Great post !  |
|
|
|
WTS 4500 POLY, PM me your price |
|
|
|
You can talk fairy tales about 30 seconds to someone else. It is 3 clicks and vs several dosen  . But anyway it is possible to set curve and really save it and spread on other cards by editing file directly. If it takes you a lot more than 30 seconds then you're doing it wrong. With curves in MSI AB all you need to do is set one point precisely, smth like 1911@0.85V. All the other points you just drag superfast down to random clocks, it doesn't matter which, they simply all need to be lower than the only clock you actually set. Then you hit "apply" and your curve is automatically made straight by the program. I've just done it with one of my cards in the test rig, and it took me ~ 30 seconds. Again, if it takes you a lot more than you're either doing it wrong or might want to learn how to handle a mouse. I mean, there's plenty of people out there who actually drag all the points to make a straight line or something. That takes a lot of time and is completely unnecessary. As to applying the same curve to different cards — I don't know whether it's possible. Doesn't make much sense to me since all the cards are different and curves are by their nature designed for precise tuning of each card. Those that don't care about this kind of precision might just go with +/- clocks/limit adjustment, which can be synced between all the cards in the rig. Still this is only manageble if you mine one algo. I for example switch coins couple times a week and dont remember when I was mining the same coin for 14 days. Each algo stresses your card differently so the curves are not transferable unless you set it really low which kind of nulifies the effort. |
|
|
|
yeah but no +1000% yet either +400% since the first pink discussion. Bitcoin pink is bether than bitcoin gold right? Shut up and collect your insider take in the game.. ouch nice one for bitcore today, yes bitcore > btcgold |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
