hi, could you give more details, with 5700 or XT? settings? power use? tx
|
|
|
in claymore's thread a user reported 51Mh/s ETH
|
|
|
I also have one Sapphire Vega56 with Samsung (not flashed, stock bios) that I tested with. Core/Mem settings: 1407/975 @ 905mV.
I have 3 of those, for ETH mining, push -REF 65500. => 46 MH/S with much lower clock and much lower power (140 to 150W@wall). Could you share you core/mem clocks and the whole rig power? Are the bioses flashed to 64? With bios flashed they do 49.5 MH/S @1150 cclock/1050 to 1080 mclock depending the card and 843mv (set 863 to get 843). This is my current setting and I don't remember the setting without flashing it was something like 950 Cclock/ 950 Mclock@800mV with stock timings apart from -REF 655535. Depending the settings used you get beetween 145w per card (46mh/s) and 180 W.
|
|
|
I also have one Sapphire Vega56 with Samsung (not flashed, stock bios) that I tested with. Core/Mem settings: 1407/975 @ 905mV.
I have 3 of those, for ETH mining, push -REF 65500. => 46 MH/S with much lower clock and much lower power (140 to 150W@wall).
|
|
|
Hi folks.
Like many miners I stoped my rigs last summer more because it was too hot than because of the crypto winter (and because a new job took my brains out), but with the depressed mining return, It was pointless to turn them on again... Until this march because I needed some heat in my garage.
And now my wife needs some heat in the basement for faster drying clothes :-)
Then, this WE out of boredom I ordered my first ASIC, a cheap S9 to play around.
Who knows, with the prices on the rise It could be a winner move.
I plan to test Braiins OS. Is it easy to handle or is there a steep learning curve to get good efficiency?
|
|
|
my tests Claymore v14.4 1050 Ti ~ 17.7 strap 5 1060 6Gb ~ 26.5 to 27.6 strap 1 (depends on card) 1070 ~ 33.5 to 34.7 strap 1 (depends on card) 1080 ~ 44.3 strap 2 (without pill)
Any estimate of 1080 ti? I think it should be at about 48 if the basic 1080 is at 44. I did some quick tests and got 48/49 with 1080TI while Pill gives 52@160W. 1070 arround 34@100W. I wonder If it will be stable over night. Are you sure about 34@100W on 1070? I mine Ethereum and one 1070 gives 33.6@110W, another 34.7@114W Sorry for replying late, Well it's what I read in GPU-Z and it's consistent with the read at the wall, but the 1070s are not alone on the rig so hard to say at +-10W. Power at 50% and mem +600 (Micron) Ok, just to be sure I run the settings again and that's what I got for 1070( MSI aero and colorful, both Micvron mem): PW:50% Core: +220 Mem: +600 Strap: 4 33.6@95W PW:53% same strap, core and mem 34.05@100W
|
|
|
my tests Claymore v14.4 1050 Ti ~ 17.7 strap 5 1060 6Gb ~ 26.5 to 27.6 strap 1 (depends on card) 1070 ~ 33.5 to 34.7 strap 1 (depends on card) 1080 ~ 44.3 strap 2 (without pill)
Any estimate of 1080 ti? I think it should be at about 48 if the basic 1080 is at 44. I did some quick tests and got 48/49 with 1080TI while Pill gives 52@160W. 1070 arround 34@100W. I wonder If it will be stable over night. Are you sure about 34@100W on 1070? I mine Ethereum and one 1070 gives 33.6@110W, another 34.7@114W Sorry for replying late, Well it's what I read in GPU-Z and it's consistent with the read at the wall, but the 1070s are not alone on the rig so hard to say at +-10W. Power at 50% and mem +600 (Micron)
|
|
|
my tests Claymore v14.4 1050 Ti ~ 17.7 strap 5 1060 6Gb ~ 26.5 to 27.6 strap 1 (depends on card) 1070 ~ 33.5 to 34.7 strap 1 (depends on card) 1080 ~ 44.3 strap 2 (without pill)
Any estimate of 1080 ti? I think it should be at about 48 if the basic 1080 is at 44. I did some quick tests and got 48/49 with 1080TI while Pill gives 52@160W. 1070 arround 34@100W. I wonder If it will be stable over night.
|
|
|
decreased rfc:
--CL 16 --RAS 30 --RCDRD 12 --RCDWR 5 --RC 44 --RP 10 --RRDS 3 --RRDL 5 --RTP 5 --FAW 20 --CWL 7 --WTRS 4 --WTRL 9 --WR 16 --WRRD 1 --RDWR 19 --REF 17550 --MRD 8 --MOD 15 --PD 8 --CKSRE 10 --CKSRX 10 --RFC 250
Edit: eth/claymore crashes win rig ; SRBminer/XMR seems ok for now at 2150kh/s but power hungry.
|
|
|
Hi, those where stable for me overnigh with 5% boost on CNR: CL: 16 RAS: 30 RCDRD: 12 RCDWR: 5 Timing 2 RCAb (RC): 44 RCPb (RC): 44 RPAb (RP): 10 RPPb (RP): 10 Timing 3 RRDS: 3 RRDL: 5 RTP: 5 Timing 4 FAW: 20 Timing 5 CWL: 7 WTRS: 4 WTRL: 9 Timing 6 WR: 16 Timing 10 WRRD: 1 RDWR: 19 Timing 12 REF: 17550 Timing 13 MRD: 8 MOD: 15 Timing 17 PD: 8 CKSRE: 10 CKSRX: 10 RFC Timing RFC: 300
--CL 16 --RAS 30 --RCDRD 12 --RCDWR 5 --RC 44 --RP 10 --RRDS 3 --RRDL 5 --RTP 5 --FAW 20 --CWL 7 --WTRS 4 --WTRL 9 --WR 16 --WRRD 1 --RDWR 19 --REF 17550 --MRD 8 --MOD 15 --PD 8 --CKSRE 10 --CKSRX 10 --RFC 300
|
|
|
first steps with hiveos...any hints where i can find the tool or how to set it in hiveos?!
Hello on first page you have the link to github where it's explained (appart from the mentionned packages to install where he doesn't give the command "apt install packagename" I did it on hiveOs through the "shell in a box".
|
|
|
Currently have my AMD rigs on moneroocean (using SRBminer to auto-switch between Cryptonight-based algos, and exchanging to XMR). Quite happy with that solution atm.
Interesting, I did not know MoneroOcean. Lately Cryptonight is at the top of profitability considering it consumes less energy. I will need to check it out myself. I was able to get 4 msi vega 56 cards new at very good prices . they do 1700 easy no flash no work just 18.8.1 and msi afterburner. I have had them for under a week I will be trying to see what I can do with them. The best vega 56 are the original blower fan type,as you can flash them with vega 64 bios and have almost same perf > 2000H/s
|
|
|
I stopped using power play tables since 18+ drivers. overdriventool is enough to achieve full hashrate at 165W with vega 64 and modified vega 56. clock: set to 1600, voltage set to 850mV mem: set to 1100, voltage set to 860mV real clock is 1400 to 1500 depending of the card ; real voltage: 885 mV; shown in GPUZ.
4 cards rig is at 700W, system uses roughly 35W
|
|
|
hello, I tried with my vegas, vega 64 I got same speed than other miners, but not with vega 56 flashed to 64...those are a bit lazy. But well I'm not sure I found best intensity.
This miner does not support Nicehash, does he?
|
|
|
and we will have a really low power consumption for people around the world.
Why should consumption be lower? People will just add more asics or FPGA because right now electricity is the limiting factor. So there's no way global consumption will reduce.
|
|
|
Heads up CNv7's price spiked hard on Nicehash, could it be a 51% attack on some coin ? or is there a coin I'm missing?
Could be Electronero, an electroneum fork.
|
|
|
Try to increase virtual memory.
I have set VM on 16000 Last I added a card on nvidia rig, I had to go over 26000 VM for 5 cards, it may be even more with eight cards.
|
|
|
The OhGodACompany team have announced that they may start working on a (devfee) hashrate fix for Vega cards. Will we finally hit the theoretical limit of 70+ MHs on Ethereum? Lmao wut? Complete bullshit. Even if it was true you would still make more money on CN-7, CN-LiteV1 and CN-Heavy over Ethash. 70Mh/s barely makes it somewhat an option. Nope, you'd make more with Etash in that case. Probably not, because everybody (well not exactly but it's for rough explanation) will have the same raise and then at the end you won't be doing 60% more reward as expected.
|
|
|
Mega Like for this topic! However, im concerned about efficiency per Watt, try with 65% ~ 80%PL
Why is that important? As long as it's profitable, I mine at 100 pl because otherwise I don't earn as much as I could. Why leave capacity unused, even if it is somewhat less profitable above 80 pl... Some people like to factor in cost in electricity. But if that coin goes from $0.05 to $10, that cost savings actually hurts you. I'm with you on running it at most optimal point of hash rate instead of hash per kwh. But for each there own, so I ain't bashing opinions on savings. Well, a lot of home miner are limited global power wise more than investment wise, so it can make sense to have best efficiency per card.
|
|
|
|