Why would Quark developers not implement masternodes technology in their coin? With this technology, the coin will get a new life and will have a very huge increase in price.
Problem with masternodes is that Quark is already mined,so masternodes like ones in DASH are not applicable.There are no mining reward for them.Though,going completely POS with 2.5-3% annual reward for masternodes(1 mil Quarks),where 10% goes for developpers work could be sucessfull. 1 million is a bit steep I was thinking more 250k quark. 1 million is very hard to get hold of once max announces the upgrade plan and price get's back on track.... 1 million was just suggestion.I agree that 250K ~ 1000 masternodes, will be more appropriate |
|
|
|
Seems like the DOGE pump is starting.. i got a turtle strategy signal saying its a BUY right now.. afaik doge also follows LTC pretty closely
DOGE has always followed BTC,not LTC.If it follows LTC,DOGE would be now around 70 satoshis,not 40. |
|
|
|
Why would Quark developers not implement masternodes technology in their coin? With this technology, the coin will get a new life and will have a very huge increase in price.
Problem with masternodes is that Quark is already mined,so masternodes like ones in DASH are not applicable.There are no mining reward for them.Though,going completely POS with 2.5-3% annual reward for masternodes(1 mil Quarks),where 10% goes for developpers work could be sucessfull. |
|
|
|
DOGE price has been holding up very nicely since the pump - still at 32sat and a pretty large buy wall under it, DOGE is looking good =D
Nah,that was not a pump.It was just very short time speculation,price did not hold more than few minutes.Probably someone who has not enough money for real pump push price quickly higher and dump hard Doge he bought very cheap.BTC volume was 15X less than it was to VTC pump(VTC is not nearly big as DOGE) - which was real example of classic pump and dump. |
|
|
|
Chinese put Vernon company on theirs blacklist due to conducting serious illegal business :
|
|
|
|
You are probably running out of memory. Decrease the dbcache and the maxmempool parameters (defaults for both is 300 IIRC).
Yeah that is what I thought, because the application is completely freezing, I can't force close it, nor move the mouse for that matter. I've lowered the dbcache to 100.. Not sure about the maxmempoool. From your debug log I can see you limited dbcache to 100MB, but your mempool is still on 300MB You have to change mempool database size to 100MB too Put in your bitcoin.conf file: maxmempool=100 Yeah that seems to have helped, it has lasted quite a bit longer. I will update if it crashes again. It seems that 0.14 wallet has quite a big memory leaking problem. I tested mine machine (4 GB RAM) with 0.13.2 wallet and dbcache set to 500 MB.It crashed (run out of memory) after 10-12 hours of continuous working,while with 0.14 crashed after 30 minutes. Setting dbcache on 300MB on 0.13.2 works fine for now after more than 18 hours of contionuos working. I think that low RAM computers (2GB) should set dbcache and maxmempool to 150 MB or less(maybe 100MB will be optimum) and try to run 0.13.2 wallet |
|
|
|
You are probably running out of memory. Decrease the dbcache and the maxmempool parameters (defaults for both is 300 IIRC).
Yeah that is what I thought, because the application is completely freezing, I can't force close it, nor move the mouse for that matter. I've lowered the dbcache to 100.. Not sure about the maxmempoool. From your debug log I can see you limited dbcache to 100MB, but your mempool is still on 300MB You have to change mempool database size to 100MB too Put in your bitcoin.conf file: maxmempool=100 |
|
|
|
Just upgrade from bitcoin core 1.32 to 1.4.0 , after upgrade , i ran it , few minutes after that pop up error message >> microsoft visual c++ runtime library
This aplication has requested the runtime to terminate it in an un usual way. Please contact the aplication's support team for more information. <<
Trying to restart computer and start to run again, but same issue still pop up with same message , i cant sync and do anything with this new wallet software . please help
I have same problem with 0.14(W7- 32bit) and also the others: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9969Also 0.14 ran slower than 0.13.2 despite developpers promise it is faster and less resources consuming I had to revert to 0.13.2 until this problem is properly solved. |
|
|
|
I think that POS+POW cant help WDC now.Simply it is matter of will of Chinese "investors" that took over WDC,DOGE,QRK,even LTC and some other coins.They want complete control over coins and do not like any idea of competition with other big investors.They does not want stable coin and frankly they dont know how to do that.Theirs scheme is simple from the beginning of crypto world - dump coins to oblivion and pump into space. Of course,no serious investor like that and that is why these coins are so unstable and have price goes down constantly between pumps which happened once a year or more.
Yes, but if you look at the charts, you will see that the strong fluctuations in the price are mostly susceptible to coins on a POW basis. Coins that have a POS or POS & POW system are more stable in their capitalization and value. Yes,POS+POW coins are generally more stable,but how much POS rate for WDC should be if we want to see significant difference?1 or 2% is far from enough. Honestly,I think that only paying masternodes POS system like DASH has, can make longterm sustainable difference and secure network. For WDC it can be about 250.000 WDCs per masternode ~ 1000 masternodes I think that with current inflation it would be prudent to distribute the POW award by 50%. There are 50% POW and 50% POS (or 8 coins will be mining through POW and 8 coins via POS) Agree, 50-50 POW-POS will be best solution with current inflation |
|
|
|
I think that POS+POW cant help WDC now.Simply it is matter of will of Chinese "investors" that took over WDC,DOGE,QRK,even LTC and some other coins.They want complete control over coins and do not like any idea of competition with other big investors.They does not want stable coin and frankly they dont know how to do that.Theirs scheme is simple from the beginning of crypto world - dump coins to oblivion and pump into space. Of course,no serious investor like that and that is why these coins are so unstable and have price goes down constantly between pumps which happened once a year or more.
Yes, but if you look at the charts, you will see that the strong fluctuations in the price are mostly susceptible to coins on a POW basis. Coins that have a POS or POS & POW system are more stable in their capitalization and value. Yes,POS+POW coins are generally more stable,but how much POS rate for WDC should be if we want to see significant difference?1 or 2% is far from enough. Honestly,I think that only paying masternodes POS system like DASH has, can make longterm sustainable difference and secure network. For WDC it can be about 250.000 WDCs per masternode ~ 1000 masternodes |
|
|
|
Hello! I am back!
Work issues as always :S
We will change chain tech for sure, no way around it, the problem is that PoW + PoS is a temporary solution that we will need to change in the future again anyway
I am waiting for a strong backed technology that solves the problem (check hyperledger for example) that will probably emerge in the coming years, meanwhile we will develop the environment and tools so when this technology emerges (hyperledger? ) we will already have tools and services in place to become the best coin around. That's why I bothered to split the daemon from the wallet so we can adapt to any chain that wins the race.
I would not have any problem if some one helps making the switch to PoS + PoW as a temporary measure meanwhile (we will need a little coordination to integrate smoothly to the wallet, that's all), but certainly it's not an strategic development therefore I can't personally invest time on that.
Hi. I agree that there are many different interesting technologies (perhaps in the future there will be even more). But get me right, the big WDC owners are constantly losing a lot of money. And this process is on the increase. What's wrong with the fact that they will receive fair compensation in the form of POS ? Just look at the situation - http://coinmarketcap.com/ and you will understand that it's not just the wallet itself and its new opportunities. If we move another 20-50 points down, then we will get into such a pit from which it will be almost impossible to get out.. There is nothing wrong with earnings. But to be more clear, assume that hyperledger is the winner of the race. This will happen if we implement Pos + PoW (Amounts are just for making the point clear) 1] Current Market cap : 300 000 $us 2] 3 - 6 months invested implementing and supporting PoS + PoW. Market Cap: 3 000 000 $us 3] 3 - 6 months invested implementing and supporting Hyperledger. Market Cap: 30 000 000 $us If I go according to my plan, this is what will happen: 1] Current Market cap : 300 000 $us 3] 3 - 6 months invested implementing and supporting Hyperledger. Market Cap: 30 000 000 $us So, why exactly should I invest 3 - 6 months in PoW Pos knowing that we will change again in the future and the team won't sell any coins until then? As I said I don't have any problem that someone invest his time in point 2] but for me personally it doesn't make any sense because I do not care on short time earnings, I want the final solution PD: I expect hyperledger to make its big entrance in 2 or 3 years Why do you think that hyperledger will be possible only for WDC? A lot of other coins will also switch to this technology if it becomes popular. Against the backdrop of growing competition, people will choose those coins that firmly existed on the market. What do you think will be related to investment assets that fell hundreds of times? Look at Ethereum .. Their POW stage is on the verge of completion and they are preparing for the transition to POS. If the POS was an unreliable option for the future, they would not ruin a coin with a capitalization of one and a half billion dollars. I do not see any justice if after a year of continuing falling prices for WDC and lack of POS mode, what kind of speculator will be able to buy a several million WDC for a one bitcoin. And believe me, these people simply will not give the opportunity to return the former capitalization for WDC because buying coins for a pittance, they will manipulate the market as they please, scaring off investors and new users. If you want the WDC project to remain unchanged for a few more years, it means a severe sentence with oblivion ( With a series of forks that will soon begin to occur). Just recall that when the project was launched under the name Friecoin ( Money Gesell), this supposed the title of the most fair and truthful crypto project, in which to avoid the accumulation of coins in large wallets, they just burned with time. Now you can only find a reference to this project, since no one in their right mind would agree to invest in such a project and burning own money. I hope that you do not want to do something similar with WDC? I think that POS+POW cant help WDC now.Simply it is matter of will of Chinese "investors" that took over WDC,DOGE,QRK,even LTC and some other coins.They want complete control over coins and do not like any idea of competition with other big investors.They does not want stable coin and frankly they dont know how to do that.Theirs scheme is simple from the beginning of crypto world - dump coins to oblivion and pump into space. Of course,no serious investor like that and that is why these coins are so unstable and have price goes down constantly between pumps which happened once a year or more. |
|
|
|
BTC 38 reopened theirs RIC wallet finally  |
|
|
|
Just fork the fucking dog to a fixed supply! and...btw... add segwit too
It seems that new DOGE wallet will be finished soon,but without Segwit. Yes,cutting supply from 5% to 0.5% will help somewhat to stabilize price. |
|
|
|
The most constant cryptocurrency ever
I love DOGE
Maybe it would be better constant going up , but itīs a real thing , itīs the most constant. Market cap for DOGE is almost a straight line - Its great to have a bit of stability in such a volatile arena =) It is straight line,because DOGE is dead,no heartbeats any more |
|
|
|
Good question, that's almost 50% of the current supply. Guessing it's Polo's wallet maybe, no txn for quite some time from that wallet so guessing it's an exchange most likely...maybe btc38 So guessing this coin is dead, dev is active but doesn't seem to be working on anything. Pretty old coin and interesting to still be on Polo but guessing that wont be for long as this seems to be fading away. It is BTC38 cold wallet |
|
|
|
What was the reason for the pump today?
Pump does not need any reason, it just happen. RIC wallet on BTC38 is out of use for a long time - they say it would need dev help to restore it |
|
|
|
I think the time is right for a DOGE re-brand. If this was taken forward & done right you would see DOGE back in the top 10 again. Just of course my humble opinion It does not help to restore the situation to the price of DOGE, I bought at a high price, and was forced to sell at a low price, this I have a negative attitude to this coin, and rebranded it is unlikely this will change Agree,rebranding will do nothing.DOGE is poorely managed coin,2-3 days pump/dump,then free fall during 10,12 months or more and becomes "stable" only when hit a very low price.Maybe it is result that DOGE(also LTC) is mainly in chinese hands and their big holders love such quick pump/dump.Problem is that you can do 2-3 times and coin becomes dead after it,because no serious investor like such things.If we look on other big coins like DASH or ETH which mainly are not in chinese hands,they are much more stable in mid-price range,no such 3 days big pump/dump.Also there are no development of wallet and DOGE is looking like abandoned big ship on the ocean,where it is just matter of time when it will strike some rock and sunk.A lot of money fly away from slow dying DOGE and there are no much chances it will come back any time soon. |
|
|
|
7 nodes in the network..
price goes down day by day...
Still lot of orphans everyday and nobody can solomine cause the riepool fork.
There are 2 solutions. Stop mining riepool or Simone (Simba84) stops forking the chain.
If not, this coin is going to disappear.
Gatra let's find a way to exclude rouge nodes in the network, or blacklist them. Simba84 has always been hostile against this coin. 25-50% of all mined blocks are orphans - riecoin network is on the brink of complete collapse. How to prevent that: maybe to add much more confirmations ~ 100 for block to be valid and/or to change difficulty adjustments to every 1 hour(24 blocks) to prevent massive jumping in to network after 12h high difficulty period is off. Second measure - change how network operates - to make nodes auto-rejects of orphan blocks solutions,so every block will be mined until we get a valid block solution on network. |
|
|
|
Can someone point me to a source to learn about how is possible extremes of inputing prime numbers into base32 encryption which bitcoin uses correct which is Hex-64 bit characters?
Does the 64 bit character limit the infinite size of possible Prime numbers that can be generated usin 256 Sha-2?
Thanks to whoever can answer this for me! Or correct me in how prime numbers are inputed using the 256 Sha-2.
I don't understand what it is that you are asking... base32 is just a method for data representation and is not used by the protocol itself so it does not limit how Riecoin or Bitcoin work internally. http://riecoin.org/faq.html has an explanation of how the primes should be built. The size of the primes is defined by the "difficulty" value and the use of SHA256 does not impose an upper limit. BTC38 said the ric was under the maintenance and is there any problems with the ric blockchain? Yesterday I got reply from BTC38 that RIC wallet is faulty and cant be repair without help of RIC devs. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
