The OP has been tagged as a SCAMMER by the forum mods, I wouldn't go near that pool with that in mind.
I suggest you add him to you ignore list to avoid being sucked in.
|
|
|
whats the diff of YAC and RYC
im 2 lazy to look up. anyone
YAC is designed for CPU miners only, RYC is designed for GPU miners, they are totally difference audiences.
|
|
|
Sorry the last 5 posters are already on my ignore list so I will just proceed from my last post. Upon further investigation, USPS charge about $80 for an international Express parcel, 3-5 business days delivery http://postcalc.usps.com/ so the current $88 shipping charge for the 5GH/s miner is reasonable. The original $38 charge was too low, and probably assumed only national customers not international.
|
|
|
RYC so far has been a flop, not a successful pump and dump.
And now that YAC is dying, people are moving back to RYC. Hashrate up 500% now, since 24 hrs gao Please explain to me why a CPU miner of YAC would even contemplate RYC for a second?
|
|
|
RYC so far has been a flop, not a successful pump and dump.
|
|
|
We don't need any more coins, focus on using the ones we have.
|
|
|
Gee another coin just what we need like we don't have enough to choose from!
nty
|
|
|
Should be able to seed the network with: -n ADDR[:PORT], --p2pool-node ADDR[:PORT] connect to existing p2pool node at ADDR listening on port PORT (defaults to default p2pool P2P port) in addition to builtin addresses
-n 198.84.186.74:12561 Yep that seemed to work. We have a little p2pool going at least Any other nodes out there? try me also I hope that messing other scrypt pools will be fixed soon. The pools are connecting but the share submission is failing. The pools for YAC are pretty sad, yac.dontmine.me keeps being unreachable, I assume it's overloaded. p2pool is the best option, we need it pretty quickly or many people will simply abandon YAC.
|
|
|
What I don't understand it in the past month, the standard shipping price on a 5GH/s miner has risen from $38 to $88 that's 50 bucks more for what?
|
|
|
The variable "keystore" is the keys(pubkey pubkey_hash privatekey etc.) of your wallet. That means if you submit a block, you should sign it up with the pubkeys from your wallet, but username-as-address mode just only sends p2pool your pubkey_hash. you can easily get a pubkey_hash with an address, but never get pubkey, just like you want to get the text password from md5. I've already found a tricky way to fix this problem, just wait for the next version Why in heavens name did they do that? What was wrong with the old method?
|
|
|
UPDATE: mmh, there is still something wrong with the payment system In other words, ppcoin novacoin yacoin basiclly don't support paid-by-worker mode( -u username as address). You can only run p2pool minerd yacoind on your own machine and pay to yourselft.
So if I've been running this P2Pool on my server overnight, connected miners in the usual P2Pool way (address as username, any password), and found a couple of blocks, where would the payouts have gone to? Also, for a complete noob like me, how do I go about changing my setup for now, so that all work goes towards the single wallet address on my server? Thanks for your help.. will definitely be giving you a solid tip once the teething problems are fixed. If you didn't specify your payout address as the username, then the p2pool default wallet gets the reward and you miss out.
|
|
|
Should be able to seed the network with: -n ADDR[:PORT], --p2pool-node ADDR[:PORT] connect to existing p2pool node at ADDR listening on port PORT (defaults to default p2pool P2P port) in addition to builtin addresses
-n 198.84.186.74:12561 Yep that seemed to work. We have a little p2pool going at least Any other nodes out there?
|
|
|
seems to be running fine but no connections
Same I am not getting any peers with this p2pool port I suspect the BOOTSTRAP_ADDRS='linode.bitcn.org'.split(' '), in networks.py is not responding. Anyone got another node to use as a BOOTSTRAP_ADDRS ? Or just give me an IP of their test node an will see if the two talk to each other.
|
|
|
There is at least one exchange coming
Which one?
|
|
|
Royal Coins kind of flopped without an exchange didn't it.
|
|
|
I'll keep this short and sweet. There are now so many alt-coins that it has become the same thing as hyperinflation. The value of alt-coins is trending towards zero. Great job guys! soooo, now's the time to buy alts!!!! what's happening though,inmho, alts FTC/CNC are a btc siphon, which have depressed BTC a little as early sellers may cash out their BTC's There is no such thing as a BTC siphon, the BTC simply changes hands, it's not siphoned out of the system.
|
|
|
cashflow problems! They started R&D from scratch with coustomers preorder money. Failed! PCB, Chips, Casing... burning money every day... Now they need fresh money to order parts...
You seem to be ignoring their past FPGA products and the cashflow from that.
|
|
|
The problem with the flood of alt coins is not the people that are making them for a quick pump and dump, it's the stoopid exchanges that are accepting them. Buy endorsing a coin that is only going to go downwards, you create people that are either scared off or bored with alt coins, either way you loose business, exchanges need coins that slowly rise in value to attract more investors and transactions. Imagine if the stock market worked the same way as the alt coin exchanges and there was no due diligence for an IPO, nobody would buy shares!
|
|
|
The trouble with PPC is the developers have dropped the ball, have a read of the main PPC thread on this forum and you will see what I mean, the last few pages are full of discussion about pretty icons for the web site, no important issues like why there is still no p2pool for PPC when Novacoin, a scrypt based PPC fork, has had p2pool support for ages. Nor is there any meaningful discussion on promoting PPC. If there is going to be Proof of stake coiin that survives then its not going to be the from the current PPC group unless some radical change in attitude happens.
|
|
|
|