thebitcoinquiz.com is an alt of puzzel.me

[gampher]

I have already agreed that I posses puzzel.me , mailmansdoge ( the address 1Km9U8gY4ZNjkAoLPiicQcw33JKL9yK4wL  is linked with mailmansdoge account, you forgot to mention it). And you never asked me about stellar69 , I also posses that account but they were all bought by me cause they were being offered for cheap prices and I thought they might have a market and I might earn some profit, but I failed to sell them(for a marginal profit), and so these account kept on stinking with me and I used these accounts to get my investment(which I used to buy these accounts) back by joining signature campaigns with them, and that's where I used those addresses. Those addresses are not linked to any scam and have been just used after November/december after I bought these accounts. I now don't know that how do these things makes me a culprit of all the things that other people did?
I've been telling you all these things since the beginning and I don't anything going wrong here. Yes those all addresses are linked and are owned by me cuz those accounts are also owned by me(since the time those addresses were posted I owned those accounts) and so its obvious that if I own an account then ill use m address with it. But there is a huge difference between owning it and creating it.

seller69 was tagged by BadBear both before and after the various addresses were posted. This should serve as evidence that the same person likely controlled the accounts both before and after he tagged the accounts as being probable alts of puzzle.me (the person why tried the failed blackmail attempt).

There is also the issue of the fact that puzzle.me's first post is essentially your handle.

most of the other posts here are "I hate quickseller" posts and are off topic.

Accusations had already been made against stellar69* back in mid of November, badbear just made the mark permanent after a month, it doesn't mean that I was an alt of puzzel.me, its that stellar69 was an alt lf puzzel.me back in November and badbear based on previous evidences left a neg trust in December.

P.S : I am not going to explain any further.

 Tldr; I am an account trader and traded a lot and lots of accounts back in December/november(all my customers were happy), I also bought stellar69, mailmansdoge, puzzel.me after they got negative trust(got em for cheap), and so I used those accounts and this guys is indirectly/unknowingly harassing me for using those accounts.
 bye
Edit: You all are free to give me negative trust if you believe in quickseller. Thanks

So yet another story. So you mean you bought both puzzel.me and stellar69. Also you stated they were both from different buyers and different places. And now you say that "co-incidentally" stellar69 proved out to be puzzel.me's alt.
Wow, So Weird Story. I tried a lot to make myself think its true but sadly my brain and heart don't agree.

Interesting how puzzel.me is disagreeing with himself.....or maybe he just can't see my rating on his other account by default.

On other account? And lol yes he is disagreeing with himself because he is making stories.

[1714857463]

1714857463

[1714857463]

1714857463

[1714857463]

1714857463

[1714857463]

1714857463

[1714857463]

1714857463

[thebitcoinquiz.com]

Jus a simple question, does buying negative trusted account and then using them for signature ads and reselling is something against the forum?? I don't think so, and in short that's what I did. I personally do respect each and every member out here and respect their opinions, but really am I being punished for buying negatively trusted accounts? Wow, I really feel these proofs aren't watertight and I just think after qs's few claims went wrong now quickseller is doing all this just to gain name/fame on the forum by pushing down people and making assumptions based on incomplete proofs.
Thanks

[Quickseller]

Jus a simple question, does buying negative trusted account and then using them for signature ads and reselling is something against the forum?? I don't think so, and in short that's what I did. I personally do respect each and every member out here and respect their opinions, but really am I being punished for buying negatively trusted accounts? Wow, I really feel these proofs aren't watertight and I just think after qs's few claims went wrong now quickseller is doing all this just to gain name/fame on the forum by pushing down people and making assumptions based on incomplete proofs.
Thanks

No that is not against any rule however the evidence shows that is most likely something that did not happen. As I mentioned previously addresses were posted that connected you with puzzle.me both before and after BadBear outed his alts. If the addresses were only posted after his alts were outed then it would be understandable/believable that you purchased all the accounts from him but this isn't what happened.

There is also the issue that there is zero evidence that the account was purchased (you just so happened to delete the PM's).

Then to top it off there is the issue that puzzle.me created a thread whose title matches your name on his first post.  

Edit: to add further suspicion, the posts that both you and several of your alts have created were edited with the addresses removed to make it more difficult to track your alts.

[thebitcoinquiz.com]

Jus a simple question, does buying negative trusted account and then using them for signature ads and reselling is something against the forum?? I don't think so, and in short that's what I did. I personally do respect each and every member out here and respect their opinions, but really am I being punished for buying negatively trusted accounts? Wow, I really feel these proofs aren't watertight and I just think after qs's few claims went wrong now quickseller is doing all this just to gain name/fame on the forum by pushing down people and making assumptions based on incomplete proofs.
Thanks

No that is not against any rule however the evidence shows that is most likely something that did not happen. As I mentioned previously addresses were posted that connected you with puzzle.me both before and after BadBear outed his alts. If the addresses were only posted after his alts were outed then it would be understandable/believable that you purchased all the accounts from him but this isn't what happened.

There is also the issue that there is zero evidence that the account was purchased (you just so happened to delete the PM's).

Then to top it off there is the issue that puzzle.me created a thread whose title matches your name on his first post.  

Edit: to add further suspicion, the posts that both you and several of your alts have created were edited with the addresses removed to make it more difficult to track your alts.

the alts had already got negative trust from others one month before badbear's rating came, and I bought the accounts after those trust rating and I didn't buy em all at the same time. Deals for them were made at different times.
And so hence, badbear's rating doesn't add up to timeline and so is invaluable to the present timeline.
All the other proofs are based on your certain assumptions and suppositions, and they aren't substantial enough to prove that I am wrong.

[gampher]

Jus a simple question, does buying negative trusted account and then using them for signature ads and reselling is something against the forum?? I don't think so, and in short that's what I did. I personally do respect each and every member out here and respect their opinions, but really am I being punished for buying negatively trusted accounts? Wow, I really feel these proofs aren't watertight and I just think after qs's few claims went wrong now quickseller is doing all this just to gain name/fame on the forum by pushing down people and making assumptions based on incomplete proofs.
Thanks

No that is not against any rule however the evidence shows that is most likely something that did not happen. As I mentioned previously addresses were posted that connected you with puzzle.me both before and after BadBear outed his alts. If the addresses were only posted after his alts were outed then it would be understandable/believable that you purchased all the accounts from him but this isn't what happened.

There is also the issue that there is zero evidence that the account was purchased (you just so happened to delete the PM's).

Then to top it off there is the issue that puzzle.me created a thread whose title matches your name on his first post.  

Edit: to add further suspicion, the posts that both you and several of your alts have created were edited with the addresses removed to make it more difficult to track your alts.

the alts had already got negative trust from others one month before badbear's rating came, and I bought the accounts after those trust rating and I didn't buy em all at the same time. Deals for them were made at different times.
And so hence, badbear's rating doesn't add up to timeline and so is invaluable to the present timeline.
All the other proofs are based on your certain assumptions and suppositions, and they aren't substantial enough to prove that I am wrong.

Stop making further stories. You personally also know that now you can't help yourself so stop wasting your time. Nice find Quickseller. Thankyou Tomatocage for leaving a neg. feedback.

[thebitcoinquiz.com]

Jus a simple question, does buying negative trusted account and then using them for signature ads and reselling is something against the forum?? I don't think so, and in short that's what I did. I personally do respect each and every member out here and respect their opinions, but really am I being punished for buying negatively trusted accounts? Wow, I really feel these proofs aren't watertight and I just think after qs's few claims went wrong now quickseller is doing all this just to gain name/fame on the forum by pushing down people and making assumptions based on incomplete proofs.
Thanks

No that is not against any rule however the evidence shows that is most likely something that did not happen. As I mentioned previously addresses were posted that connected you with puzzle.me both before and after BadBear outed his alts. If the addresses were only posted after his alts were outed then it would be understandable/believable that you purchased all the accounts from him but this isn't what happened.

There is also the issue that there is zero evidence that the account was purchased (you just so happened to delete the PM's).

Then to top it off there is the issue that puzzle.me created a thread whose title matches your name on his first post.  

Edit: to add further suspicion, the posts that both you and several of your alts have created were edited with the addresses removed to make it more difficult to track your alts.

the alts had already got negative trust from others one month before badbear's rating came, and I bought the accounts after those trust rating and I didn't buy em all at the same time. Deals for them were made at different times.
And so hence, badbear's rating doesn't add up to timeline and so is invaluable to the present timeline.
All the other proofs are based on your certain assumptions and suppositions, and they aren't substantial enough to prove that I am wrong.

Stop making further stories. You personally also know that now you can't help yourself so stop wasting your time. Nice find Quickseller. Thankyou Tomatocage for leaving a neg. feedback.

Who the fuck are you to stop me from telling my reason? I am just telling you what I've been speaking since the beginning.
Go spam you fake ass scam/paid signature somewhere else.

[thebitcoinquiz.com]

You are really butt hurt when you tried to frame ndnhc but you failed now you are looking for some other fish so that you can satisfy your ego and gain back your faith amongst the people. This line is clearly a proof of this - "This is one that I am not wrong about.".

You are trying anything and everything to accuse me. You even said that my account got sold and said that you read it somewhere, and you also said that my address is linked with the address which was used to scam jhonny, but when asked upon to show the proof to show that my account is sold, you failed to provide any proof for it.
Clearly you are saying anything and everything and are saying things that don't even have any substance.

Accusing me for a part for which you have some evidence is still fine(although the truth is different from your proofs), but being a dick and accusing me of things for which u don't have a single proof(my account is sold) is insane.

[BitcoinAddicts]

there are many proven alts of puzzle.me like cryptocause  the guy who has positive feedback even after he was proven as alt of puzzle.me
he has a clean account with positive feedback so he can scam anyone with his positive trust

quickseller already posted proofs about him, relation between puzzle.me and cryptocause
there are 2-3 more alts of him

[cryptoforcause]

there are many proven alts of puzzle.me like cryptocause  the guy who has positive feedback even after he was proven as alt of puzzle.me
he has a clean account with positive feedback so he can scam anyone with his positive trust

quickseller already posted proofs about him, relation between puzzle.me and cryptocause
there are 2-3 more alts of him

I ain't Puzzel.me's alt. If you can check that meta post you will find that I posted over there only that its thebitcoinquiz.com who is his alt not me but I didn't have any proofs at that time. I contacted MZ in PM and showed him a few proofs but later I thought it isn't worth, you can ask MZ about this.
I knew that thebitcoinquiz was holding this account when I got accused of being puzzel's alt which am not.
Idk who the actual person behind puzzel.me is but earlier I had some troubles with this guy and he intentionally posted my address to destroy my account, and so now as it has been proven the thebitcoinquiz.com is puzzel.me so it proves that I am innocent and the negative rating should be taken off my profile.

QS now u know thebitcoinquiz.com is real puzzel.me so please remove my neg trust. Also if you think am an alt of thebitcoinquiz.com  , then why would I have stated that thebitcoinquiz is puzzel's alt in my Meta post, why would I destroy a close to Sr. Member account seeing one of my account already destroyed? This will be dumb and am not dumb.


And if you still think am his alt then show that am his alt, show that any of my transaction is linked with him (signed by both of us) or provide a solid proof that am him, If you do this I will suck you Dick 
I am not an alt, I am original Cryptoforcause

[cryptoforcause]

Found that post over here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1053201.0

If you want me something else to provide as a proof, I will do, just ask me.

[thebitcoinquiz.com]

When being asked upon further questions and explanations Quickseller replied me that now he wont explain anything further to me about how he assumed that those accounts were my alts cuz he thinks that I am learning from his responses. He has even blocked my PMs now.

Clearly he doesn't have anything to explain and thus cannot explain it and in this situation where QS has failed to explain his proofs further, I believe that now I don't deserve that negative trust.

This is again a case of quickseller rushing toward making bad decisions and destroying other's account. And now he is again fearful of being wrong again and hence my PMs have been blocked.

[Quickseller]

When being asked upon further questions and explanations Quickseller replied me that now he wont explain anything further to me about how he assumed that those accounts were my alts cuz he thinks that I am learning from his responses. He has even blocked my PMs now.

Clearly he doesn't have anything to explain and thus cannot explain it and in this situation where QS has failed to explain his proofs further, I believe that now I don't deserve that negative trust.

This is again a case of quickseller rushing toward making bad decisions and destroying other's account. And now he is again fearful of being wrong again and hence my PMs have been blocked.

I am not wrong. Stop talking to yourself with your alts on here, it is very annoying. IMO it is pretty clear that you are trying to make it appear as if your alts are not actually controlled by you.

[thebitcoinquiz.com]

When being asked upon further questions and explanations Quickseller replied me that now he wont explain anything further to me about how he assumed that those accounts were my alts cuz he thinks that I am learning from his responses. He has even blocked my PMs now.

Clearly he doesn't have anything to explain and thus cannot explain it and in this situation where QS has failed to explain his proofs further, I believe that now I don't deserve that negative trust.

This is again a case of quickseller rushing toward making bad decisions and destroying other's account. And now he is again fearful of being wrong again and hence my PMs have been blocked.

I am not wrong. Stop talking to yourself with your alts on here, it is very annoying. IMO it is pretty clear that you are trying to make it appear as if your alts are not actually controlled by you.

I swear to god or whomsoever you want, I've not accessed even a single alt account after you made this post.

Please start showing proofs rather than trying to divert the topic. You know your proofs cannot show that  I "created and scammed" with the accounts I bought for reselling, you are making false assumptions based on the facts that I myself clearly told you. You don't even have explanations.
It would be good if you apologize for your wrong accusation and then we can browse the forum peacefully.

[Quickseller]

When being asked upon further questions and explanations Quickseller replied me that now he wont explain anything further to me about how he assumed that those accounts were my alts cuz he thinks that I am learning from his responses. He has even blocked my PMs now.

Clearly he doesn't have anything to explain and thus cannot explain it and in this situation where QS has failed to explain his proofs further, I believe that now I don't deserve that negative trust.

This is again a case of quickseller rushing toward making bad decisions and destroying other's account. And now he is again fearful of being wrong again and hence my PMs have been blocked.

I am not wrong. Stop talking to yourself with your alts on here, it is very annoying. IMO it is pretty clear that you are trying to make it appear as if your alts are not actually controlled by you.

I swear to god or whomsoever you want, I've not accessed even a single alt account after you made this post.

Please start showing proofs rather than trying to divert the topic. You know your proofs cannot show that  I "created and scammed" with the accounts I bought for reselling, you are making false assumptions based on the facts that I myself clearly told you. You don't even have explanations.
It would be good if you apologize for your wrong accusation and then we can browse the forum peacefully.

My proof is in the OP. If you don't understand how my proof connections your two accounts then feel free to open a thread asking for an explanation. The connection is solid

[Muhammed Zakir]

there are many proven alts of puzzle.me like cryptocause  the guy who has positive feedback even after he was proven as alt of puzzle.me
he has a clean account with positive feedback so he can scam anyone with his positive trust

quickseller already posted proofs about him, relation between puzzle.me and cryptocause
there are 2-3 more alts of him

I ain't Puzzel.me's alt. If you can check that meta post you will find that I posted over there only that its thebitcoinquiz.com who is his alt not me but I didn't have any proofs at that time. I contacted MZ in PM and showed him a few proofs but later I thought it isn't worth, you can ask MZ about this.
I knew that thebitcoinquiz was holding this account when I got accused of being puzzel's alt which am not.

It wasn't proofs. He sent me a few messages between him and thebitcoinquiz.com. I believe he faked it because he is a liar. In those PMs he sent me is that bitcoinquiz.com did say puzzel.me was under his control. Remember, I am saying this by looking at those PMs he sent me. I haven't verfied it by logging into his account or in other ways.

Idk who the actual person behind puzzel.me is

Another lie.

First of all, that post was made 7 months back and the owner of Puzzel.me is my classmate and he has most probably done that because of some personal issues  Angry
I know his present account on here too.

Also for Quickseller, The loan needs to be repayed on 16th.

Why did Quickseller add negative trust saying I am an alt of Puzzel.me? I don't even know what/who is puzzel.me?

but earlier I had some troubles with this guy and he intentionally posted my address to destroy my account, and so now as it has been proven the thebitcoinquiz.com is puzzel.me so it proves that I am innocent and the negative rating should be taken off my profile.

QS now u know thebitcoinquiz.com is real puzzel.me so please remove my neg trust. Also if you think am an alt of thebitcoinquiz.com  , then why would I have stated that thebitcoinquiz is puzzel's alt in my Meta post, why would I destroy a close to Sr. Member account seeing one of my account already destroyed? This will be dumb and am not dumb.

And if you still think am his alt then show that am his alt, show that any of my transaction is linked with him (signed by both of us) or provide a solid proof that am him, If you do this I will suck you Dick 
I am not an alt, I am original Cryptoforcause

It is quite sure puzzel.me didn't impersonate you rather you impersonated him which is very unlikely. See dates.

My user- I am The Best

My Bitcoin Addy- 1BtBqWDJ28o1pWYiqtX1oUcBKpU1d86XSC

Please pay me for my reviews.

https://archive.is/Szcn0

Loan amount required: 0.005BTC
110% - 150% Collateral (if you want a sure deal): None but If you need- My BCT Account
Term length: 24 hours
Interest: You Say
Bitcoin address: 1BtBqWDJ28o1pWYiqtX1oUcBKpU1d86XSC

Reason: Need 0.005 quick as am short of 0.005 for buying a domain. And withdrawal from an exchange hasn't been processed since 2 hours. Will return in 24 hours as the ticket I filed says I will get my BTC in 24 hours

https://archive.is/5EPbW

[thebitcoinquiz.com]

When being asked upon further questions and explanations Quickseller replied me that now he wont explain anything further to me about how he assumed that those accounts were my alts cuz he thinks that I am learning from his responses. He has even blocked my PMs now.

Clearly he doesn't have anything to explain and thus cannot explain it and in this situation where QS has failed to explain his proofs further, I believe that now I don't deserve that negative trust.

This is again a case of quickseller rushing toward making bad decisions and destroying other's account. And now he is again fearful of being wrong again and hence my PMs have been blocked.

I am not wrong. Stop talking to yourself with your alts on here, it is very annoying. IMO it is pretty clear that you are trying to make it appear as if your alts are not actually controlled by you.

I swear to god or whomsoever you want, I've not accessed even a single alt account after you made this post.

Please start showing proofs rather than trying to divert the topic. You know your proofs cannot show that  I "created and scammed" with the accounts I bought for reselling, you are making false assumptions based on the facts that I myself clearly told you. You don't even have explanations.
It would be good if you apologize for your wrong accusation and then we can browse the forum peacefully.

My proof is in the OP. If you don't understand how my proof connections your two accounts then feel free to open a thread asking for an explanation. The connection is solid

Your proofs don't explain that how is it possible that I couldn't have bought these accounts in November/december?

I am myself accepting that I was using these accounts since November /december, and all the addresses you mentioned in the OP have been used since november/december, and I was trading in a lot of forum accounts at that time. I am myself accepting those addresses are mine?
What proof are you giving? Nothing? You are just saying what I've told you but how can you claim that I didn't buy these accounts?

[Quickseller]

When being asked upon further questions and explanations Quickseller replied me that now he wont explain anything further to me about how he assumed that those accounts were my alts cuz he thinks that I am learning from his responses. He has even blocked my PMs now.

Clearly he doesn't have anything to explain and thus cannot explain it and in this situation where QS has failed to explain his proofs further, I believe that now I don't deserve that negative trust.

This is again a case of quickseller rushing toward making bad decisions and destroying other's account. And now he is again fearful of being wrong again and hence my PMs have been blocked.

I am not wrong. Stop talking to yourself with your alts on here, it is very annoying. IMO it is pretty clear that you are trying to make it appear as if your alts are not actually controlled by you.

I swear to god or whomsoever you want, I've not accessed even a single alt account after you made this post.

Please start showing proofs rather than trying to divert the topic. You know your proofs cannot show that  I "created and scammed" with the accounts I bought for reselling, you are making false assumptions based on the facts that I myself clearly told you. You don't even have explanations.
It would be good if you apologize for your wrong accusation and then we can browse the forum peacefully.

My proof is in the OP. If you don't understand how my proof connections your two accounts then feel free to open a thread asking for an explanation. The connection is solid

Your proofs don't explain that how is it possible that I couldn't have bought these accounts in November/december?

I am myself accepting that I was using these accounts since November /december, and all the addresses you mentioned in the OP have been used since november/december, and I was trading in a lot of forum accounts at that time. I am myself accepting those addresses are mine?
What proof are you giving? Nothing? You are just saying what I've told you but how can you claim that I didn't buy these accounts?

stellar69 is tagged as being a probable alt of puzzel.me by BadBear (in mid December). This account asked for a loan on this post to be funded to 1DDpkieFmJuRAskNYzDAdDfjhFqRHAmeNk which also signed the above transaction. Not only that, but since he offered collateral, he got the loan and repaid it via txid a54650f6ce38ddd5b46606fa94d4ee0f50bfd9ec025b0dc3d259b7a2baafbd5c which he posted here and had inputs from 1DDpkieFmJuRAskNYzDAdDfjhFqRHAmeNk

edit: Also the very first post by puzzel.me is this which was a contest entitled "The Bitcoin Quiz! Win Upto 1BTC! From 5th August to 11th August "

[thebitcoinquiz.com]

When being asked upon further questions and explanations Quickseller replied me that now he wont explain anything further to me about how he assumed that those accounts were my alts cuz he thinks that I am learning from his responses. He has even blocked my PMs now.

Clearly he doesn't have anything to explain and thus cannot explain it and in this situation where QS has failed to explain his proofs further, I believe that now I don't deserve that negative trust.

This is again a case of quickseller rushing toward making bad decisions and destroying other's account. And now he is again fearful of being wrong again and hence my PMs have been blocked.

I am not wrong. Stop talking to yourself with your alts on here, it is very annoying. IMO it is pretty clear that you are trying to make it appear as if your alts are not actually controlled by you.

I swear to god or whomsoever you want, I've not accessed even a single alt account after you made this post.

Please start showing proofs rather than trying to divert the topic. You know your proofs cannot show that  I "created and scammed" with the accounts I bought for reselling, you are making false assumptions based on the facts that I myself clearly told you. You don't even have explanations.
It would be good if you apologize for your wrong accusation and then we can browse the forum peacefully.

My proof is in the OP. If you don't understand how my proof connections your two accounts then feel free to open a thread asking for an explanation. The connection is solid

Your proofs don't explain that how is it possible that I couldn't have bought these accounts in November/december?

I am myself accepting that I was using these accounts since November /december, and all the addresses you mentioned in the OP have been used since november/december, and I was trading in a lot of forum accounts at that time. I am myself accepting those addresses are mine?
What proof are you giving? Nothing? You are just saying what I've told you but how can you claim that I didn't buy these accounts?

stellar69 is tagged as being a probable alt of puzzel.me by BadBear (in mid December). This account asked for a loan on this post to be funded to 1DDpkieFmJuRAskNYzDAdDfjhFqRHAmeNk which also signed the above transaction. Not only that, but since he offered collateral, he got the loan and repaid it via txid a54650f6ce38ddd5b46606fa94d4ee0f50bfd9ec025b0dc3d259b7a2baafbd5c which he posted here and had inputs from 1DDpkieFmJuRAskNYzDAdDfjhFqRHAmeNk

edit: Also the very first post by puzzel.me is this which was a contest entitled "The Bitcoin Quiz! Win Upto 1BTC! From 5th August to 11th August "

He got neg trust from Badbear in mid December but he had already got negative trust in November by others and this never spoiled the timeline! I've been explaining everything to you since the beginning. Stop harassing me and asking me for same things multiple times.

[Quickseller]

The first post of puzzle.me is also matching your handle. How do you plan on explaining that?

[Muhammed Zakir]

The first post of puzzle.me is also matching your handle. How do you plan on explaining that?

@thebitcoinquiz.com: Can't you just agree now that you are an alt of puzzel.me?