kkraus69
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 29, 2016, 05:18:59 PM |
|
By the way... Tomorrow, May 3oth is XDN's second year anniversary! ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) of the blockchain
|
|
|
|
dNote (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 29, 2016, 08:26:59 PM |
|
By the way... Tomorrow, May 3oth is XDN's second year anniversary! ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) of the blockchain And the releases week is coming ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
kkraus69
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 29, 2016, 09:17:43 PM |
|
Exactly what I'm dreaming of... ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) There is such a large demand in the world coming for encryption and I am looking forward to seeing it within the underlying soul of DigitalNote.
|
|
|
|
CryptoJohn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1003
Well, That's Crypto :-\
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 30, 2016, 05:30:50 AM |
|
Happy 2nd Birthday Digitalnote![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fphotos.smugmug.com%2Fphotos%2Fi-K5J77WJ%2F0%2FO%2Fi-K5J77WJ.gif&t=665&c=dtka3bmTi2JSRQ)
|
|
|
|
kkraus69
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 30, 2016, 05:57:27 AM |
|
Happy Birthday!
|
|
|
|
bytemuma
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 30, 2016, 08:47:54 AM |
|
Happy 2nd Birthday XDN Digitalnote ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
dNote (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 30, 2016, 04:50:56 PM Last edit: June 06, 2016, 10:34:16 AM by dNote |
|
Happy Birthday DigitalNote XDN. Meet Messages 2.0 with DigitalNote XDN 3.1.1-beta and DarkNote and duckNote too ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Today is the second year anniversary. Even after 2 year of progress we can say: it is only the beginning. We already have an incredible product, but things that are coming will elevate it on new, global level of adoption. We will keep adding new features to XDN blockchain and will extend it as a base layer for future decentralized applications, like wallets, messengers, document storage, Digital ID, etc. One privacy protected blockchain. XDN DigitalNote DarkNote duckNote stages.
- duckNote XDN. Released with active promotion around cryptocurrency communities, online and offline. With an idea of no ICO, IPO, etc, but the idea of Free Market Economy. First year was the year of major XDN rewards for early adopters and technology supporters, it was also a year of huge XDN trades and investments. Let it spread itself, let it live itself. duckNote was a release for freedom and we glad you support that freedom. duckNote stage features. May 30 2014 Cryptonote features- untraceable payments - unlinkable transactions - blockchain analysis resistance - adaptive parameters - CryptoNight. CPU-efficient ASIC-resistant PoW mining process. duckNote stage featuresXDN introducKtion. 0% premine.- halvings of block rewards. first in cryptonote - CORS support - html GUI wallet - first desktop GUI wallet - 4 minute block target time - no blockchain dust - smallest transaction size - increased default tx median - total XDN: 8 589 869 056 is a perfect number - emission curve adopted to Free Market Economy and real life use DarkNote stage featuresCrypto messages introduction- encrypted messages in core. Untraceable, unlinkable. --encrypted Transaction Comments - messages in GUI - wallet pool miner - XDN paper wallet - plain text private keys export - QT GUI wallet - improvements, improvements, improvements DigitalNote stage features May 30 2015Blockchain deposits introduction- multi-signatures - blockchain based deposits with interest rate. XDN is a first cryptocurrency that implemented that kind of technology as a base for future Proof of Activity - PoA development - improvements, improvements, improvements DigitalNote XDN blockchain second year anniversary May 30 2016Messages 2.0 introduction- new instance: messages not stored in blockchain - message self destruction timer - send to many feature - first version of Messages API in simplewallet. Send and receive message. Build your applications around XDN blockchain, use it with existing services. - messages fee counter in GUI with fixed character price = 0.01 XDN Under active development and will be released- PoA - PoW for message sending - blockchain document upload with high fee - extended Messages API for simplewallet and walletd - mobile messaging applications working with Messages API
Today we intoduce DigitalNote XDN Messages 2.0 and Messages API.New messages type - messages not stored in blockchain. This messages will not be included in blockchain and will be destroyed after some time. You can set self destruction timer for message. In future we will add Proof of work for message sending, so you will need to do some 10-60s PoW mining to send message with no XDN charge. New simplewallet Messages API for sending and receiving crypto messages, using XDN blockchain. Today we release DigitalNote XDN 3.1.1-beta version with- Messages 2.0 core support - Messages API for simplewallet - Basic Access Authentication This week we will release:- Messages 2.0 in GUI with self destruction timer - Send to many feature in GUI Happy birthday and happy releases week! https://github.com/xdn-project/digitalnote/commit/bdea9dd303637f3e85d7f6e44f0ea93ef95b7871 https://github.com/xdn-project/digitalnote/releases/tag/v3.1.0-beta <- Binaries
|
|
|
|
dNote (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 30, 2016, 05:15:29 PM |
|
DigitalNote GUI with Messages 2.0 support will be introduced in next 48 hours. Also we will bring some new 2 year XDN stats this week, enjoy.
|
|
|
|
dNote (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 30, 2016, 06:02:43 PM |
|
Please update your daemons to the latest XDN version
|
|
|
|
vlom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1117
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 30, 2016, 06:52:19 PM |
|
Happy Birthday DigitalNote XDN. Meet Messages 2.0 with DigitalNote XDN 3.1.0-beta Today we intoduce DigitalNote XDN Messages 2.0 and Messages API.[/b][/size] New messages type - messages not stored in blockchain. This messages will not be included in blockchain and will be destroyed after some time. You can set self destruction timer for message. In future we will add Proof of work for message sending, so you will need to do some 10-60s PoW mining to send message with no XDN charge. New simplewallet Messages API for sending and receiving crypto messages, using XDN blockchain. Today we release DigitalNote XDN 3.1.0-beta version with- Messages 2.0 core support - Messages API for simplewallet - Basic Access Authentication This week we will release:- Messages 2.0 in GUI with self destruction timer - Send to many feature in GUI Happy birthday and happy releases week! https://github.com/xdn-project/digitalnote/commit/bdea9dd303637f3e85d7f6e44f0ea93ef95b7871 https://github.com/xdn-project/digitalnote/releases/tag/v3.1.0-beta <- Binaries finally. thank you. i have to wait for the gui wallet. after that i will give the message feature a try. and happy b-day. thank you for your work. a work that does not make you rich i think. something that is really unusual in the altcoin community.
|
|
|
|
kkraus69
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 30, 2016, 07:09:40 PM |
|
Yes,
In today's world of 'instant everything', technological advancements and readily available credit have allowed us to obtain, experience, and consume practically anything we want - almost immediately. Do we even need to be patient anymore? Well, if we want to reach our goals and achieve personal peace, the answer is a resounding yes!
it's probably harder now to be patient than historically it has ever been.
Anything worthwhile and of importance cannot take place right away. It takes time, dedication and effort to achieve;
Patience is a virtue, dedication is everything.
|
|
|
|
bytemuma
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 31, 2016, 09:04:04 AM |
|
This update is truly another proof that XDN is the most advanced cryptonote coin. I simply don't understand the lack of interest of the community for DigitalNote. ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Congrats Dev for your hard work. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
dNote (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 31, 2016, 09:27:35 AM |
|
Please, wait with update, we will upload some fixes today with GUI wallet.
|
|
|
|
dNote (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 31, 2016, 10:31:53 AM |
|
I simply don't understand the lack of interest of the community for DigitalNote. ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) sooner or later anyone wakes up
|
|
|
|
jwinterm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1116
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 31, 2016, 01:23:35 PM |
|
This update is truly another proof that XDN is the most advanced cryptonote coin. I simply don't understand the lack of interest of the community for DigitalNote. ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Congrats Dev for your hard work. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) If I had to guess, I would say the very fast emission in conjunction with the name changes. Imagine that Bitcoin launched with Satoshi having mined 80+% of all coins that would ever exist, rather than 5% or so. Then, a few months later, a series of forks were launched with different emission parameters, different names, and maybe slightly different technology. One of those coins, let's call it SuperFunJumBucks, decided to emit over 85% of all coins that would ever exist in 3 months, while it was pretty unknown, had low community interest, and a silly name. Then SuperFunJumBucks decided to change its name to SecretDarkStealthDollars, and at the same time added some interesting messaging technology; it was still pretty unknown at this point, but during these next few "dark" months it emitted another 8 or 9% of the total that would ever exist to take the emission curve near to completion. Now, it decides to change its name again to VerySeriousHighTechNotes, and adds some other very interesting tech such as locking coins with interest, and maybe in the future Proof-of-activity, more messaging features etc. IMO, this is essentially the situation Digitalnote finds itself in. If you were interested in the tech behind the coin, why not just fork it, or buy/mine a fork that has a slower emission schedule (bitcedi, for instance), so you don't have to worry about some (the?) early miner dumping 50+% of all coins that will ever exist at some point? (This is not to mention the Monero research paper that suggests if there is some entity controlling a large percentage of the utxo set, that they can deanonymize others ring txs.)
|
|
|
|
bytemuma
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 31, 2016, 01:32:56 PM |
|
This update is truly another proof that XDN is the most advanced cryptonote coin. I simply don't understand the lack of interest of the community for DigitalNote. ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Congrats Dev for your hard work. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) If I had to guess, I would say the very fast emission in conjunction with the name changes. Imagine that Bitcoin launched with Satoshi having mined 80+% of all coins that would ever exist, rather than 5% or so. Then, a few months later, a series of forks were launched with different emission parameters, different names, and maybe slightly different technology. One of those coins, let's call it SuperFunJumBucks, decided to emit over 85% of all coins that would ever exist in 3 months, while it was pretty unknown, had low community interest, and a silly name. Then SuperFunJumBucks decided to change its name to SecretDarkStealthDollars, and at the same time added some interesting messaging technology; it was still pretty unknown at this point, but during these next few "dark" months it emitted another 8 or 9% of the total that would ever exist to take the emission curve near to completion. Now, it decides to change its name again to VerySeriousHighTechNotes, and adds some other very interesting tech such as locking coins with interest, and maybe in the future Proof-of-activity, more messaging features etc. IMO, this is essentially the situation Digitalnote finds itself in. If you were interested in the tech behind the coin, why not just fork it, or buy/mine a fork that has a slower emission schedule (bitcedi, for instance), so you don't have to worry about some (the?) early miner dumping 50+% of all coins that will ever exist at some point? (This is not to mention the Monero research paper that suggests if there is some entity controlling a large percentage of the utxo set, that they can deanonymize others ring txs.) @dNote, can you explain why this decisions were made? thanks.
|
|
|
|
vlom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1117
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 31, 2016, 07:03:54 PM |
|
This update is truly another proof that XDN is the most advanced cryptonote coin. I simply don't understand the lack of interest of the community for DigitalNote. ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Congrats Dev for your hard work. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) If I had to guess, I would say the very fast emission in conjunction with the name changes. Imagine that Bitcoin launched with Satoshi having mined 80+% of all coins that would ever exist, rather than 5% or so. Then, a few months later, a series of forks were launched with different emission parameters, different names, and maybe slightly different technology. One of those coins, let's call it SuperFunJumBucks, decided to emit over 85% of all coins that would ever exist in 3 months, while it was pretty unknown, had low community interest, and a silly name. Then SuperFunJumBucks decided to change its name to SecretDarkStealthDollars, and at the same time added some interesting messaging technology; it was still pretty unknown at this point, but during these next few "dark" months it emitted another 8 or 9% of the total that would ever exist to take the emission curve near to completion. Now, it decides to change its name again to VerySeriousHighTechNotes, and adds some other very interesting tech such as locking coins with interest, and maybe in the future Proof-of-activity, more messaging features etc. IMO, this is essentially the situation Digitalnote finds itself in. If you were interested in the tech behind the coin, why not just fork it, or buy/mine a fork that has a slower emission schedule (bitcedi, for instance), so you don't have to worry about some (the?) early miner dumping 50+% of all coins that will ever exist at some point? (This is not to mention the Monero research paper that suggests if there is some entity controlling a large percentage of the utxo set, that they can deanonymize others ring txs.) puhh, i did not know this. if this is true then xdn is just a other bullshit altcoin. please dNote explain us what do you think about that. i am curious to know your opinion. thanks. i this is true then i have to dump and never look back xdn.
|
|
|
|
ikanunaki
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 31, 2016, 07:27:36 PM |
|
This update is truly another proof that XDN is the most advanced cryptonote coin. I simply don't understand the lack of interest of the community for DigitalNote. ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Congrats Dev for your hard work. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) If I had to guess, I would say the very fast emission in conjunction with the name changes. Imagine that Bitcoin launched with Satoshi having mined 80+% of all coins that would ever exist, rather than 5% or so. Then, a few months later, a series of forks were launched with different emission parameters, different names, and maybe slightly different technology. One of those coins, let's call it SuperFunJumBucks, decided to emit over 85% of all coins that would ever exist in 3 months, while it was pretty unknown, had low community interest, and a silly name. Then SuperFunJumBucks decided to change its name to SecretDarkStealthDollars, and at the same time added some interesting messaging technology; it was still pretty unknown at this point, but during these next few "dark" months it emitted another 8 or 9% of the total that would ever exist to take the emission curve near to completion. Now, it decides to change its name again to VerySeriousHighTechNotes, and adds some other very interesting tech such as locking coins with interest, and maybe in the future Proof-of-activity, more messaging features etc. IMO, this is essentially the situation Digitalnote finds itself in. If you were interested in the tech behind the coin, why not just fork it, or buy/mine a fork that has a slower emission schedule (bitcedi, for instance), so you don't have to worry about some (the?) early miner dumping 50+% of all coins that will ever exist at some point? (This is not to mention the Monero research paper that suggests if there is some entity controlling a large percentage of the utxo set, that they can deanonymize others ring txs.) puhh, i did not know this. if this is true then xdn is just a other bullshit altcoin. please dNote explain us what do you think about that. i am curious to know your opinion. thanks. i this is true then i have to dump and never look back xdn. you can see in first page of DigitalNote. Here are detailed XDN base block rewards specifications: 1 month - 320 000 XDN duckNote - loud announce on the very 1st block. no premine or instamine. 2 month - 160 000 XDN duckNote 3 month - 80 000 XDN duckNote 4 month - 40 000 XDN DarkNote 5 month - 20 000 XDN DarkNote 6 month - 10 000 XDN DarkNote 7 month - 5 000 XDN DarkNote 8 month - 2 500 XDN DarkNote 9 month - 1250 XDN DarkNote 10 month - 625 XDN DarkNote 11 month - 312.5 XDN DarkNote 12 month - 156.25 XDN DarkNote 13 month - 150 XDN DigitalNote 14 month -150 XDN DigitalNote 15 month - 150 XDN DigitalNote etc DigitalNote etc. DigitalNote 150 XDN DigitalNote DuckNote ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=632595.0) you can read this info from first day. DarkNote ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=788916.0) first page DigitalNote ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1082745.0) first page.
|
|
|
|
kkraus69
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 31, 2016, 07:50:57 PM Last edit: May 31, 2016, 08:08:37 PM by kkraus69 |
|
I've been here since the beginning. Have a look at the first page of this thread to see information about XDN history. Right now you can get over 50 million XDN for under 10BTC on Poloniex alone. If you put a buy order for 50,000,000XDN @ 17sat, you might get them for 8.5BTC. I sold most of what I mined at the beginning for between 7 - 10 sat to cover expenses and since then have bought them back on the cheap. I don't know what peoples' problems are for not being here from the start. It would have been nice if I new about bitcoin and bought 10,000 of them for about $20 or a couple pizzas. My wife just bought one bitcoin for $699CAD and I just bought 1 million XDN for about $120CAD.
XDN is the best cryptonote available so I have been trying to build up a small stash with my limited income for literally years now.
DigitalNote is still at the beginning with lots more development to come. I'm excited.
|
|
|
|
jwinterm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1116
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 31, 2016, 08:08:23 PM |
|
This update is truly another proof that XDN is the most advanced cryptonote coin. I simply don't understand the lack of interest of the community for DigitalNote. ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Congrats Dev for your hard work. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) If I had to guess, I would say the very fast emission in conjunction with the name changes. Imagine that Bitcoin launched with Satoshi having mined 80+% of all coins that would ever exist, rather than 5% or so. Then, a few months later, a series of forks were launched with different emission parameters, different names, and maybe slightly different technology. One of those coins, let's call it SuperFunJumBucks, decided to emit over 85% of all coins that would ever exist in 3 months, while it was pretty unknown, had low community interest, and a silly name. Then SuperFunJumBucks decided to change its name to SecretDarkStealthDollars, and at the same time added some interesting messaging technology; it was still pretty unknown at this point, but during these next few "dark" months it emitted another 8 or 9% of the total that would ever exist to take the emission curve near to completion. Now, it decides to change its name again to VerySeriousHighTechNotes, and adds some other very interesting tech such as locking coins with interest, and maybe in the future Proof-of-activity, more messaging features etc. IMO, this is essentially the situation Digitalnote finds itself in. If you were interested in the tech behind the coin, why not just fork it, or buy/mine a fork that has a slower emission schedule (bitcedi, for instance), so you don't have to worry about some (the?) early miner dumping 50+% of all coins that will ever exist at some point? (This is not to mention the Monero research paper that suggests if there is some entity controlling a large percentage of the utxo set, that they can deanonymize others ring txs.) puhh, i did not know this. if this is true then xdn is just a other bullshit altcoin. please dNote explain us what do you think about that. i am curious to know your opinion. thanks. i this is true then i have to dump and never look back xdn. In case the analogy was unclear: Satoshi mining 80+% of Bitcoin = Bytecoin SuperFunJumBucks = Ducknote SecretDarkStealthDollars = Darknote VerySeriousHighTechNotes = Digitalnote I'm not criticizing or anything, the decision was made by the dev(s) at launch (I'm assuming the name changes were planned), and I was just offering my little parable and opinion on why Digitalnote hasn't managed to capture the attention of more people. There is uncertainty about who mined how much. Go look at the difficulty over the first three months when 85+% of total coins were emitted; it was pretty anemic.
|
|
|
|
|