I'm certainly hoping it's not a bunch of miners firing back up old gear just to mine and dump. I'm also hoping that it's not a new 20PH farm that's come online either... in any case, though, certainly looks like we're in for a positive adjustment. Hopefully this is just some variance spiking and it'll come back down
I suspect some big farms keep some marginal gear on hand just for an occasion like this. Price spike of 10% flip a switch and turn on 1ph of s-3's
Do you? I was thinking something like that, but then I had to think of the space that would take up, the effort to maintain all the hardware that you rarely use, etc. etc. and I just don't see it as a very profitable or workable theory. If a farm has the rack space then they're probably using it for gear that's running. Marginal gear does not get left sitting around, hooked up and ready to go. It gets removed from the farm to make room for more gear!
I think the profit margin dictates this behavior and the corners farms cut to maintain a profit lead me to think that the scenario of keeping marginal gear around and connected to network and power to only be used on rare occasions just doesn't make accounting sense.
it does if your are selling off s-5's and replacing with s-7's. Then have the s-5's go back to mining while still having them listed for sale.
I should have been more clear. oh 176 blocks made today with 40 minutes to go.
https://blockchain.info/blocksLater today I will map out what I said a little more clearly
While your math makes sense, I can tell you that no one is doing this. No large farm has that kind of space available. All the majors are constantly looking to fill any spare space, and they'll pay more than your old gear will make you. Go ahead, get a MW set up and ready to fill and cool. And then wait for the price. You don't: you fill it with someone willing to pay. Simple business. No one is sitting on MWs of capacity. I would guess that "spare" capacity is less than 5 MW through the entire network of space that has low enough costs to be competitive.
disagree but my example takes into account a lot more info then yours. It hinges on my belief that asics builders have tried to keep diff lower in order to avoid an arms race.
No matter what anyone says diff has been checked since last fall here are the numbers:
Difficulty History
Date Difficulty Change Hash Rate
Jun 28 2015 49,402,014,931 -0.58% 353,633,397 GH/s
Jun 14 2015 49,692,386,355 4.42% 355,711,957 GH/s
May 31 2015 47,589,591,154 -2.50% 340,659,563 GH/s
May 17 2015 48,807,487,245 2.44% 349,377,603 GH/s
May 03 2015 47,643,398,018 0.07% 341,044,727 GH/s
Apr 19 2015 47,610,564,513 -3.71% 340,809,696 GH/s
Apr 05 2015 49,446,390,688 5.84% 353,951,052 GH/s
Mar 22 2015 46,717,549,645 -1.50% 334,417,246 GH/s
Mar 08 2015 47,427,554,951 1.59% 339,499,662 GH/s
Feb 22 2015 46,684,376,317 5.01% 334,179,783 GH/s
Feb 09 2015 44,455,415,962 7.71% 318,224,263 GH/s
Jan 27 2015 41,272,873,895 -6.14% 295,442,739 GH/s
Jan 12 2015 43,971,662,056 8.20% 314,761,417 GH/s
Dec 30 2014 40,640,955,017 3.00% 290,919,288 GH/s
Dec 17 2014 39,457,671,307 -1.37% 282,449,013 GH/s
Dec 02 2014 40,007,470,271 -0.73% 286,384,627 GH/s
Nov 18 2014 40,300,030,328 1.76% 288,478,854 GH/s
So in the fall I am Bitmaintech I swapped out my s-3's for s-5's
Now in the spring summer I swapped out my s-5's for s-7's
I don't try to grow like mad I grow a little and I lowered power bills with better gear.
If I fully swapped out from s-3's to s-5' to s-7's the network would have grown faster.
Same goes for the other companies.
If companies fully swapped and kept all places maxxed the hash rate would be better. more like 400 or 425ph.