Bitcoin Forum
December 09, 2016, 03:26:54 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Old simplecoin thread  (Read 93939 times)
simplecoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406



View Profile WWW
July 17, 2011, 07:05:40 PM
 #601

No, not confirmed yet, once we hit block 126803 it will be confirmed

We should be confirmed by now. Block 136583 +120 confirms = Block 136703
The current block is 136738.

Oh yah that's right.

Yes, it is confirmed now... I'm working on fixing payout (not sure why it didn't move to balance).

UPDATE: Seems like an issue with the new bitcoin client. Trying to fix it without bringing down the pool.

UPDATE #2. pulled the client offline, looks like there was an error in payout. Working on it now....

UPDATE #3: Pool is back online, payout is disabled until I straighten out the data.

UPDATE #4: Everything is cleared up! enjoy your btc!

UPDATE #5: 2nd round Bonus BTC sent to sirky!

Donations: 1VjGJHPtLodwCFBDWsHJMdEhqRcRKdBQk
1481297214
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481297214

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481297214
Reply with quote  #2

1481297214
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481297214
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481297214

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481297214
Reply with quote  #2

1481297214
Report to moderator
1481297214
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481297214

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481297214
Reply with quote  #2

1481297214
Report to moderator
simplecoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406



View Profile WWW
July 17, 2011, 09:27:33 PM
 #602

Have you decided what payout system you're switching to

I like proportional but that's just me

Currently it's a cheat-proof version of proportional, but I'd be happy to switch to pure proportional if everyone wanted.

Donations: 1VjGJHPtLodwCFBDWsHJMdEhqRcRKdBQk
simplecoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406



View Profile WWW
July 17, 2011, 09:39:00 PM
 #603

Looks like payout notification emails are working nicely too Smiley

Donations: 1VjGJHPtLodwCFBDWsHJMdEhqRcRKdBQk
RyNinDaCleM
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Legen -wait for it- dary


View Profile
July 17, 2011, 10:15:30 PM
 #604

Have you decided what payout system you're switching to

I like proportional but that's just me

Currently it's a cheat-proof version of proportional, but I'd be happy to switch to pure proportional if everyone wanted.
I for one, like "cheat-proof"! Though, I don't know how it would change being pure prop!

Additional comment:
After the payout, I had 3.35 estimated/1.78 current. I cashed out, then I refreshed, and the est. dropped to .85!?!
Was there some reworking to be done? or am I missing something?

Kintera
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28


Who says i can't be silly for the fun of it.


View Profile
July 17, 2011, 10:35:44 PM
 #605

I am actually unable to cashout from the site....

edit: i'm receiving:  "Fatal error: Uncaught BitcoinClientException: [ 0]: Didn't receive 200 OK from remote server. (HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error) thrown in on line 0" when i attempt payout.

edit edit: Also seem like auto payout is broken as it didn't attempt to.

User error or some weird bug fixed now

Rigs x2
CPU: Athlon II 255 @ 3.1 GHz Dual-cores
RAM: 2 GB Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 ram
MOBO: MSI 890FXA-G70
PSU: Antec 1200 watt (1.2Kw) Modular
HDD: 500 GB SATA 3 WD 7200 RPM
GPU's: 4x 6870's

And various other systems
RyNinDaCleM
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Legen -wait for it- dary


View Profile
July 17, 2011, 10:42:18 PM
 #606

Now my lifetime shares are at 50% what they were :30 mins ago!?!

kiwiasian
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168


View Profile
July 17, 2011, 10:42:54 PM
 #607



0.01 BTC fee?

Tradehill referral link, save 10% | http://www.tradehill.com/?r=TH-R12328
www.payb.tc/kiwiasian | 1LHNW1JGMBo2e7rKiiFz7KJPKE57bqCdEC
Kintera
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28


Who says i can't be silly for the fun of it.


View Profile
July 17, 2011, 10:44:31 PM
 #608

And there was someone with 309xxx share that just disappeared from the list.

Rigs x2
CPU: Athlon II 255 @ 3.1 GHz Dual-cores
RAM: 2 GB Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 ram
MOBO: MSI 890FXA-G70
PSU: Antec 1200 watt (1.2Kw) Modular
HDD: 500 GB SATA 3 WD 7200 RPM
GPU's: 4x 6870's

And various other systems
simplecoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406



View Profile WWW
July 18, 2011, 01:09:13 AM
 #609

Have you decided what payout system you're switching to

I like proportional but that's just me

Currently it's a cheat-proof version of proportional, but I'd be happy to switch to pure proportional if everyone wanted.
I for one, like "cheat-proof"! Though, I don't know how it would change being pure prop!

Additional comment:
After the payout, I had 3.35 estimated/1.78 current. I cashed out, then I refreshed, and the est. dropped to .85!?!
Was there some reworking to be done? or am I missing something?

That's just the revolving stats, I'm working on a better way to make them all sync. Also, the estimate is the new round, since you were generating after the last round.

Donations: 1VjGJHPtLodwCFBDWsHJMdEhqRcRKdBQk
simplecoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406



View Profile WWW
July 18, 2011, 01:11:36 AM
 #610

I am actually unable to cashout from the site....

edit: i'm receiving:  "Fatal error: Uncaught BitcoinClientException: [ 0]: Didn't receive 200 OK from remote server. (HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error) thrown in on line 0" when i attempt payout.

edit edit: Also seem like auto payout is broken as it didn't attempt to.

Hmm, that's the error the new bitcoin client was giving the cronjob..... If I have to pay you out manually I will. Sorry for the inconvenience.


Donations: 1VjGJHPtLodwCFBDWsHJMdEhqRcRKdBQk
simplecoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406



View Profile WWW
July 18, 2011, 01:13:15 AM
 #611



0.01 BTC fee?

Yes.... It will be removed after this next round is confirmed.

Donations: 1VjGJHPtLodwCFBDWsHJMdEhqRcRKdBQk
cbbitcoin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26


View Profile
July 18, 2011, 01:51:27 AM
 #612

Have you decided what payout system you're switching to

I like proportional but that's just me

I like the cheat-proof scoring we're using now.

Also, you aren't actively mining at this pool, so why would it matter to you? Do you think proportional scoring is so much better that you'd mine here if this pool used that payout scheme? Just curious...
simplecoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406



View Profile WWW
July 18, 2011, 02:02:02 AM
 #613

Have you decided what payout system you're switching to

I like proportional but that's just me

I like the cheat-proof scoring we're using now.

Also, you aren't actively mining at this pool, so why would it matter to you? Do you think proportional scoring is so much better that you'd mine here if this pool used that payout scheme? Just curious...

Well, I know it would attract more pool hoppers, which is more hashing power, but they will devalue the payout when it is in their interest.

Donations: 1VjGJHPtLodwCFBDWsHJMdEhqRcRKdBQk
cbbitcoin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26


View Profile
July 18, 2011, 02:33:15 AM
 #614

Have you decided what payout system you're switching to

I like proportional but that's just me

I like the cheat-proof scoring we're using now.

Also, you aren't actively mining at this pool, so why would it matter to you? Do you think proportional scoring is so much better that you'd mine here if this pool used that payout scheme? Just curious...

Well, I know it would attract more pool hoppers, which is more hashing power, but they will devalue the payout when it is in their interest.
Right, that's pretty much what I was implying. Proportional is good for pool hoppers. Cheat-proof is good for everybody else. If you're mining 24/7 you need to either be a hopper or be in a non-proportional pool (since you'll lose money due to the hoppers over the long run in a proportional pool).

Do you really think being a proportional pool would add a lot of hashing power SC (at least at the beginning of rounds)? Maybe I'm underestimating the number of hoppers...

kiwiasian
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168


View Profile
July 18, 2011, 02:37:25 AM
 #615

Have you decided what payout system you're switching to

I like proportional but that's just me

I like the cheat-proof scoring we're using now.

Also, you aren't actively mining at this pool, so why would it matter to you? Do you think proportional scoring is so much better that you'd mine here if this pool used that payout scheme? Just curious...

I'd mine here if the combined hashing rate wasn't so low. At the current hash rate there is too much variance in luck (like the last block)
It would only make sense to have proportional payouts, otherwise people would lose too much money. I want to be paid for the work that I did contribute, even if I leave the round.

Edit:
For example. If the next round lasted a month like the last one, and someone was mining for a week with no success, they would just move to another pool to get their time's worth. With proportional scoring he would get maybe 50% of the reward he would potentially have a month later, but it's better than not being rewarded at all (score system).
As opposed to "forcing" someone to stay in a month-long round, which yields up to a 50% loss in profit

Tradehill referral link, save 10% | http://www.tradehill.com/?r=TH-R12328
www.payb.tc/kiwiasian | 1LHNW1JGMBo2e7rKiiFz7KJPKE57bqCdEC
sirky
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 407



View Profile
July 18, 2011, 03:04:05 AM
 #616

I got the bonus thanks.

FYI: The estimated earnings are WAY off:


Current Shares:   91958
Round Shares:   337276
Est. Earnings:   2.94163254 BTC
cbbitcoin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26


View Profile
July 18, 2011, 03:29:09 AM
 #617

I got the bonus thanks.

FYI: The estimated earnings are WAY off:


Current Shares:   91958
Round Shares:   337276
Est. Earnings:   2.94163254 BTC


They are way off.
SC - maybe change that calculation to the basic (current shares/round shares) * 49.5 = est. earnings. With a disclaimer that this is only an estimate and may be off by a bit since it's cheat-proof scoring.
That way people don't get freaked out.
simplecoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406



View Profile WWW
July 18, 2011, 04:08:27 AM
 #618

I got the bonus thanks.

FYI: The estimated earnings are WAY off:


Current Shares:   91958
Round Shares:   337276
Est. Earnings:   2.94163254 BTC


Yes, the earnings estimates are off for proportional scoring..... mostly due to a lot of early users seeing their estimates stay the same or dropping (then freaking out).

Estimates currently climb until difficulty is reached (like a pps counter).

If enough people prefer pure estimates, I'm happy to recode it.

Donations: 1VjGJHPtLodwCFBDWsHJMdEhqRcRKdBQk
Wolenber
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22


View Profile
July 18, 2011, 04:20:44 AM
 #619

I'd prefer pure estimates, but I'm not a powerful hasher right now, so if other people disagree they're higher priority.
RyNinDaCleM
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Legen -wait for it- dary


View Profile
July 18, 2011, 04:31:33 AM
 #620

I got the bonus thanks.

FYI: The estimated earnings are WAY off:


Current Shares:   91958
Round Shares:   337276
Est. Earnings:   2.94163254 BTC


Yes, the earnings estimates are off for proportional scoring..... mostly due to a lot of early users seeing their estimates stay the same or dropping (then freaking out).

Estimates currently climb until difficulty is reached (like a pps counter).

If enough people prefer pure estimates, I'm happy to recode it.
It is a little disheartening, to see it rise fast, then watch it slowly tick away on a long round!

Hell! I don't really care, as long as it's all the same! Wink

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!