crazyates (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 25, 2012, 06:59:58 PM Last edit: September 26, 2012, 06:49:13 PM by crazyates |
|
Taken from the BFL Facebook which linked to Codinginmysleep, here are some renderings of the SC Single: Seems each SC Single will use 8 chips (see them in the center?), which means each one will run at ~5GH/s each. Maybe the Jalapeno is just a downclocked (or lower power) version of a lone chip?
|
|
|
|
squall1066
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1032
|
|
September 25, 2012, 07:06:40 PM |
|
Thanks for the post, We are starved for information!
|
|
|
|
monstrs
|
|
September 25, 2012, 07:09:57 PM |
|
It would be wery nice to "unlock" japalenos Would need additional cooling i guess..
|
|
|
|
abeaulieu
|
|
September 25, 2012, 07:14:30 PM |
|
Looks good so far. There are a couple chips hanging off the end and colliding though. lol. I spy 8 LED's lined up supposedly for each of the ASICs
|
|
|
|
tytus
|
|
September 25, 2012, 07:18:29 PM |
|
no holes for ventilation on the box ? even with 600MHash/Joule the Single should generate 50Watt of heating.
|
|
|
|
psilan
|
|
September 25, 2012, 07:20:07 PM |
|
Looks good so far. There are a couple chips hanging off the end and colliding though.
Better cooling if the chip is suspended in mid air. Pretty early design, I hope.
|
dip
|
|
|
tgmarks
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
|
|
September 25, 2012, 07:27:34 PM |
|
Agreed but I bet it gets a fatty heatsink stuck right on those chips.
|
|
|
|
SLok
|
|
September 25, 2012, 07:32:26 PM |
|
It would be wery nice to "unlock" japalenos Would need additional cooling i guess.. +1 jalapenos in the fridge
|
WARNING! Don't trade BTC with Bruno Kucinskas aka Gleb Gamow, Phinnaeus Gage, etc Laundering BTC from anonymous sellers, avoid! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=649176.msg7279994#msg7279994 #TELLFBI #TELLKSAG #TELLIRS WARNING! Darin M. Bicknell, a proclaimed atheist, teaching at the Jakarta CanadianMontessori School. Drop your kids there at your own risk! WARNING! Christian Otzipka - Hildesheim is a known group-buy scammer, avoid! WARNING! Frizz Supertramp, faker with dozens of accounts here! WARNING! Christian "2 coins to see SLOk's" Antkow, still playing his little microphone... WARNING! Slobodan "Stolen Valor" Bogovac, faking being a Professor WARNING!Marion Sydney Lynn, google him, errr her, errr.. and lol
|
|
|
Photon939
|
|
September 25, 2012, 07:42:16 PM |
|
Looks good, sometimes the 3d modeling plugins for circuit board design programs aren't always the best hence the big square capacitors and weird floating chips. I labeled some stuff if anyone is interested in my spitballing:
|
|
|
|
Nolo
|
|
September 25, 2012, 07:44:45 PM |
|
Ooooh.....Ahhhhh....
|
Charlie Kelly: I'm pleading the 5th. The Attorney: I would advise you do that. Charlie Kelly: I'll take that advice under cooperation, alright? Now, let's say you and I go toe-to-toe on bird law and see who comes out the victor? The Attorney: You know, I don't think I'm going to do anything close to that and I can clearly see you know nothing about the law. 19GpqFsNGP8jS941YYZZjmCSrHwvX3QjiC
|
|
|
Glasswalker
|
|
September 25, 2012, 07:56:51 PM |
|
Where's the Flux Capacitor Damnit!?!?! What good is the blinky little box if I can't line 1.21 Jiggawatts of lightning into it and hash like it was the 80s!
|
|
|
|
fcmatt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1001
|
|
September 25, 2012, 08:13:30 PM |
|
40 gh/s divided by 8 asic chips is 5 gh/s per chip.
so the jally will be crippled to only run at 3.5 gh/s or worse?
|
|
|
|
AmDD
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1027
Merit: 1005
|
|
September 25, 2012, 08:21:36 PM |
|
40 gh/s divided by 8 asic chips is 5 gh/s per chip.
so the jally will be crippled to only run at 3.5 gh/s or worse?
BFL has been saying 3.5Ghs from the beginning, this is no surprise. How exactly they plan on doing this is a different tale...
|
BTC tip jar: 18EKpbrcXxbpzAZv3T58ccGcVis7W7JR9w LTC tip jar: Lgp8ERykAgx6Q8NdMqpi5vnVoUMD2hYn2a
|
|
|
jgarzik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1099
|
|
September 25, 2012, 08:32:08 PM |
|
40 gh/s divided by 8 asic chips is 5 gh/s per chip.
so the jally will be crippled to only run at 3.5 gh/s or worse?
BFL has been saying 3.5Ghs from the beginning, this is no surprise. How exactly they plan on doing this is a different tale... After big chip makers like AMD or Intel manufacture a chip, they run it through production quality control testing. A chip that is theoretically the same as another chip may exhibit different behaviors under stress. As a result, some chips in a batch may be binned and sold as 3 Ghz chips. Other chips in the same batch, that did not perform as well in testing, may be binned and sold as 1.5 Ghz chips. It is very realistic and following standard commercial practices that the same chips from the same batch might run at slightly different clock speeds, to avoid manufacturing imperfections or whatnot. So perhaps Jalapeno units are 5 Ghash/sec that did not pass quals at top speed, but do pass quals at lower speeds. Any sort of scenario like this is possible, standard for chip manufacturing, and not "cheating."
|
Jeff Garzik, Bloq CEO, former bitcoin core dev team; opinions are my own. Visit bloq.com / metronome.io Donations / tip jar: 1BrufViLKnSWtuWGkryPsKsxonV2NQ7Tcj
|
|
|
P_Shep
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1795
Merit: 1208
This is not OK.
|
|
September 25, 2012, 08:33:46 PM |
|
Maybe chips with flaws (they'll always be some in a batch) will be used for the Jally, Just like CPUs are tested then binned to run at certain speeds.
|
|
|
|
AmDD
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1027
Merit: 1005
|
|
September 25, 2012, 08:39:11 PM |
|
Totally agree. I wasnt implying that they would "cheat" us or anything. more of a serious question as to how they would lower the hash rate. Would it be lowering the clock speed? hardware side? firmware? Possibly software/protocol?
I guess i was really leaning more towards the idea of "Could we 'unlock' the jally and bump it up to 5Ghs? Or 4Ghs?
|
BTC tip jar: 18EKpbrcXxbpzAZv3T58ccGcVis7W7JR9w LTC tip jar: Lgp8ERykAgx6Q8NdMqpi5vnVoUMD2hYn2a
|
|
|
jgarzik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1099
|
|
September 25, 2012, 08:40:49 PM |
|
I guess i was really leaning more towards the idea of "Could we 'unlock' the jally and bump it up to 5Ghs? Or 4Ghs?
And the answer is probably predictable (I'm guessing, no inside info): "yes, but you void your warranty, fry your hardware, and have to deal with lockups"
|
Jeff Garzik, Bloq CEO, former bitcoin core dev team; opinions are my own. Visit bloq.com / metronome.io Donations / tip jar: 1BrufViLKnSWtuWGkryPsKsxonV2NQ7Tcj
|
|
|
P_Shep
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1795
Merit: 1208
This is not OK.
|
|
September 25, 2012, 09:05:23 PM |
|
of course if the yeild is so high they use full speed capable chips in the Jally, then those lucky people could up-clock it back to 5Gh/s.
I'm thinking though, rather then down-clock, they might disable hash-cores. (my thinking is the chip will work by having 1000's of individual hashing cores working simultaneosly)
|
|
|
|
Dexter770221
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1029
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 25, 2012, 09:22:57 PM |
|
My assumption was 10 chips @ 4GH/s each. In Jally 1 chip downclocked and downvolted just to met USB power specs. I wasn't wrong that much From my perspective it's oversized and overengeenered. It can be done much more simpler than that.
|
Under development Modular UPGRADEABLE Miner (MUM). Looking for investors. Changing one PCB with screwdriver and you have brand new miner in hand... Plug&Play, scalable from one module to thousands.
|
|
|
tytus
|
|
September 25, 2012, 10:41:16 PM |
|
USB power spec is 1 Watt. To get 3.5GH/s the chip would have to master 3500MH/Joule ... this is possible but unlikely.
|
|
|
|
|