🌱[ANN] SOIL | Environmental | Agriculture | Smart Contracts | Sustainable

[abvhiael]

regarding SIOLcoin relisting on bittrex:

ive been waiting in my open conversation with julian yap for about a week, hes the guy who processes the coin additions on bittrex, aside from his other positins with cryptocurrency projects elsewhere. hes generally dealing with between 25-50 coin listing requests at any one time, so it WILL be a waiting game for us to be relisted on bittrex. i will admit to getting frustrated, and wrote to @bittrex-bill, the founder of the company, because it was taking so long to get any responses from julian. im not normally the lose my patience type, but ive been working very hard to convince bittrex to relist SOIL, and it began to feel like i was simply repeatedly running myself headfirst into a brick wall.

bill basically told me that they dont generally say no to many projects, but that they wont announce, even to me, that theyre listing it until its reset on the exchange.

"so basically, the fact that its not on the exchange just means its not on right now but might be in the future"

if you want to speed things along, as before, get on slack.bittrex.com and tell them that. tag @bittrex-julian and @bittrex-bill and let them know you are an active trader on bittrex, and that you want SOIL back on the market. send them a tweet @BittrexExchange and @richiela and let them know that SOIL is BACK and better than ever.

dont just pop in and ask them to relist SOIL and pop back out. they want to see an involved community that is supporting the project. there truly is only so much that a developer CAN do to get a project listed, and my time away due to health reasons is a mark against me. they have been informed as to our new development team, and the protection of shared credentials for the [ANN] thread and social media presences (apart from the facebook group which is attached to my personal facebook account) but overall they want the community to let them know how badly they want the listing on bittrex again.

ive had a few people promise to build up decent buy walls when do get listed, and would like to take one moment to remind everyone that the order book from bittrex was deleted upon delisting, and that while valuation at close of exchange may have represented the state of the project at that time, i feel we have reinvigorated SOIL in the past few weeks with small steady improvements and work. in other words, when we do get listed (and be sure to follow richie from bittrex as he is generally the first to tweet about the market inclusion with a cute little pun) dont feel beholden to your positions on the previous market wall. when we were sitting at 5000 satoshi, people were still saying we were a grossly undervalued project. our close at 78 satoshi was a rough one, but theres no reason to reopen ANY market with that valuation haunting us.

as usual, i wont take any position on the market, only to put up a first trade when i do get informed of the market opening to initiate the trade book if its not already done. 

i hope to get our social media presences more up-to-date, but am concentrating on finding a market for SOILcoin in the first and foremost. hope everyones weekend is going great!

[frostminer]

I like what im seeing here.
Seeing abvhiael is back in the stride, better than ever 

Ill get on rex's slack.

[abvhiael]

....and on the subject of bittrex.....

just as a reminder, especially as we approach the changeover to Homestead compliance, to make sure you take whatever SOIL you have remaining on bittrex off the exchange as soon as possible. they will be updating the wallet to ver.1.4.4 but theres no guarantee they get to it before the fork, meaning that any coins sent out from the bittrex wallets AFTERWARDS could get lost in the great unknown with all those ETH that got mined to 0x0000000000000000000 that first day....

[martymcfly2015]

I have started over the weekend to update our current GUI wallet aka SOILsafe to the latest MIST/Meteor-dapp-wallet code base. Unfortunately, we need to hit a higher ethereum code base with gsoil before it will work properly. Anyway, it's prepared! As abvhiael metioned, I have updated gsoil and we will hit homestead at block 2,000,000 together with a reward upgrade (3 soil as of block 2,000,100). Please update your current gsoil. The new gsoil v1.4.4 command line client and the SOILsafe wallet with the new client is available here:
https://github.com/martymcfly2015/go-soil/releases

I'm doing this for fun and because I like soil, but donations give me some incentive (I got 1500 soil yet). If you like my work, please tip me please .
[SOIL] 0x663682fd2d96064fdb2f152a56bab75d921065c0
BTC 17vKnSGtuegVi8LsSpQbJwDsNFdgrkwuwf

[llexx]

I have updated gsoil and we will hit homested at block 2,000,000 together with a reward upgrade (3 soil as of block 2,000,100). Please update your current gsoil

http://soil.miners-zone.net/#/blocks
2,000,118   0xeed0c5a34a2e5f62338255d567c4467b404a884f9215a45b3fdf419f2272110e   11.04.2017, 2:47:41   44%   1.000000
block 2,000,118------reward 1 !!!!!!!!!!!

[frostminer]

Any node lists?

Having problems starting the sync with 1.4.4

[arch365]

Any node lists?

Having problems starting the sync with 1.4.4

i don't have issues with the sync

[martymcfly2015]

I have updated gsoil and we will hit homested at block 2,000,000 together with a reward upgrade (3 soil as of block 2,000,100). Please update your current gsoil

http://soil.miners-zone.net/#/blocks
2,000,118   0xeed0c5a34a2e5f62338255d567c4467b404a884f9215a45b3fdf419f2272110e   11.04.2017, 2:47:41   44%   1.000000
block 2,000,118------reward 1 !!!!!!!!!!!

reward 1 is hardcoded in the pool !!!!!!!!!!!

[martymcfly2015]

Any node lists?

Having problems starting the sync with 1.4.4

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1176709.msg12385424#post_nodes

[wariner]

Pool updated to new wallet and block reward 3 soilcoin

Pls, change block reward on first post to 3 

[Shkembe]

If some bagholder want to sell I am buying. 

[frostminer]

Any node lists?

Having problems starting the sync with 1.4.4

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1176709.msg12385424#post_nodes

Jeezes... i noobed it out with a local ip collision.
Had a power outage yesterday... havent gone over everything yet.


Conclusion:

Synch is fine, the problem was local.... me.

[arch365]

Any node lists?

Having problems starting the sync with 1.4.4

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1176709.msg12385424#post_nodes

Jeezes... i noobed it out with a local ip collision.
Had a power outage yesterday... havent gone over everything yet.


Conclusion:

Synch is fine, the problem was local.... me.

use this .bat= gsoil.exe --rpc --rpcaddr "localhost" --rpcport 39420 --etherbase yourwallethere --cache=2048

[arch365]

If some bagholder want to sell I am buying. 

here at 3000 sat per soil

[logictense]

If some bagholder want to sell I am buying. 

No bagholders here, everyone sold and moved on. I can tell u why SOIL is not in demand and why its long-standing supporters wanna part with it. Here is the situation. Topicstarter yesterday got in touch with boinc representatives and demanded that they issue a clearly defined statement on collaboration with this coin. What he did wrong is called boinc chat representative a fucker. The guy ended the convo and put him on ignore. Im an unbiased party and have no interest in it, just telling u how it went.

[arch365]

If some bagholder want to sell I am buying.  

No bagholders here, everyone sold and moved on. I can tell u why SOIL is not in demand and why its long-standing supporters wanna part with it. Here is the situation. Topicstarter yesterday got in touch with boinc representatives and demanded that they issue a clearly defined statement on collaboration with this coin. What he did wrong is called boinc chat representative a fucker. The guy ended the convo and put him on ignore. Im an unbiased party and have no interest in it, just telling u how it went.

all we need to do is be bagholders the experience tell us that   i loose 80.000 shift of my wallet because i don't make the swap, at actual rate 80.000 shift = 10 btc

Soil is like a dejavu for me

[Dunkelheit667]

Well, I guess... The crashing nodes are back with 1.4.4.

Code:

Gsoil_MMF/v1.4.4-bcb00548/linux/go1.7.5

And here is a pastebin from my last crash: https://pastebin.com/6wDesSWQ - maybe it helps.

[martymcfly2015]

Well, I guess... The crashing nodes are back with 1.4.4.

Code:

Gsoil_MMF/v1.4.4-bcb00548/linux/go1.7.5

And here is a pastebin from my last crash: https://pastebin.com/6wDesSWQ - maybe it helps.

I guess this will happen till we're going to reach geth code level 1.5.0
https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/issues/3125

[abvhiael]

If some bagholder want to sell I am buying. 

No bagholders here, everyone sold and moved on. I can tell u why SOIL is not in demand and why its long-standing supporters wanna part with it. Here is the situation. Topicstarter yesterday got in touch with boinc representatives and demanded that they issue a clearly defined statement on collaboration with this coin. What he did wrong is called boinc chat representative a fucker. The guy ended the convo and put him on ignore. Im an unbiased party and have no interest in it, just telling u how it went.

ok, ive never claimed collaboration with BOINC, what ive said repeatedly is that we are interested in building BOINC on the EVM and to structure it so that we are providing distributed scientific computing along the same structure for climateprediction.net. there have been several projects that have started looking into this, as the use of libraries with the opcode SETDELEGATE is becoming more of a realization.

also, i have never demanded anything of any sort, including statements of collaboration, from anyone involved with boinc, nor would i ever call anyone a "fucker". thats something very much not in my style. so, id love to see the chat logs from this supposed conversation i had with a boinc rep, or produce the name of the boinc chat rep that i supposedly cursed out so that i can get the logs from him, because you are outright lying in every aspect of your statement. 

i am not in collaboration with boinc, nor have i ever requested it. theyre open source, and as such, most investigation has been how to adjust parameters via smart contract to allow oracles to communicate with an on-chain "climate coin" to release proportional dividends for total work performed on climate models. i keep abreast of the other projects that are working to build a BOINC-type distributed computing dApp, and there are a few out there that are getting close.

but it has never been my style to accost anyone to call anyone names. even at launch, we had a user who did not provide any details to his contributions on the testnet, and deleted his keystore for the testnet after mainnet launch. i got called all sorts of names. and i didnt reply in any manner likewise, in fact we ended up giving him a bounty, not as much as he wanted (he expected the capped bounty) but SOMETHING. i dont operate in the way you describe, my conduct over the last year and a half on this forum should be testament to that.

even to you, sir, who is slandering me personally and making up stories, i wouldnt cast dark language upon, because i carry myself in a professional manner in every aspect of my life. im a freemason, and its my oath to act honestly and forthright. i would appreciate proof (which doesnt exist because you are lying thru your teeth) or a retraction.

[Dunkelheit667]

Well, I guess... The crashing nodes are back with 1.4.4.

Code:

Gsoil_MMF/v1.4.4-bcb00548/linux/go1.7.5

And here is a pastebin from my last crash: https://pastebin.com/6wDesSWQ - maybe it helps.

I guess this will happen till we're going to reach geth code level 1.5.0
https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/issues/3125

Thanks for the reference!

I'll try to modify the affected 1.4.4 file and check if it'll run smoother: https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/pull/3162/files