Proof that Quickseller is BiPolarBob/PistolPete AND intended to SCAM!

[worhiper_-_]

All I see here is speculation. A valid counter argument would be that those two accounts were created for completely different purposes. Quickseller was a default trust cowboy and bob was supposedly a persn wanting to do good and giving away money or gifts. TO believe that he would ROI from a single scam is kinda crazy IMO after he's been doing what he's doing for so long.

In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money

Minimum wage obviously isn't what most people lurking here are looking for but I sort of agree. Although I'm no supporter of you, I don't think that you have anything to do with BPB. And even if you were, I don't get how people see as something worthy of a scam accusation. Being someone that gives away money sounds like a compliment to me.

[Quickseller]

I believe that bipolarbob still paid back his "loans" after the whole QS drama flared up.

Of course he did. it's his only high-trust account left. He's gotta keep it looking good 

Spot on I loved your thread btw, just saw it now.

Want an extra helping of irony? in his 'loans' he borrowed btc to buy trust from redsn0w. you can't make this shit up!

If BPB was in fact buying trust from Redsn0w, then he could not have picked a worse of a person to buy trust from lol

BUT... it happened!!!!!!!!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1179492.msg12410140#msg12410140

He gives money away to many people......

And they give him green trust in return 

It is actually called positive trust, not green trust (this is what I am assuming you are talking about). And like I said, positive trust from Redsn0w is pretty close to the most worthless positive trust to have

[Brad Harrison]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1175806.msg12384427#msg12384427

[Zackgeno96]

I believe that bipolarbob still paid back his "loans" after the whole QS drama flared up.

Of course he did. it's his only high-trust account left. He's gotta keep it looking good  

Spot on I loved your thread btw, just saw it now.

Want an extra helping of irony? in his 'loans' he borrowed btc to buy trust from redsn0w. you can't make this shit up!

If BPB was in fact buying trust from Redsn0w, then he could not have picked a worse of a person to buy trust from lol

BUT... it happened!!!!!!!!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1179492.msg12410140#msg12410140

He gives money away to many people......

And they give him green trust in return  

It is actually called positive trust, not green trust (this is what I am assuming you are talking about). And like I said, positive trust from Redsn0w is pretty close to the most worthless positive trust to have

who cares if QS used third party escrow and who cares if people give bipolarbob positive trust for giving out 10+btc and several steamcards/giftcards who did they ever scam...... this is after all a thread under scam accusations..... i haven't seen one person say i was scammed by QS for xx amount so..... 

[snailmen]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1175806.msg12384427#msg12384427

Amazing. Added into OP, great job helping

[Quickseller]

All I see here is speculation. A valid counter argument would be that those two accounts were created for completely different purposes. Quickseller was a default trust cowboy and bob was supposedly a persn wanting to do good and giving away money or gifts. TO believe that he would ROI from a single scam is kinda crazy IMO after he's been doing what he's doing for so long.

In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money

Minimum wage obviously isn't what most people lurking here are looking for but I sort of agree. Although I'm no supporter of you, I don't think that you have anything to do with BPB. And even if you were, I don't get how people see as something worthy of a scam accusation. Being someone that gives away money sounds like a compliment to me.

Well if my goal was to turn my time here into something more then minimum wage then my scam would have needed to be even larger.

To put things in perspective, this amount would need to be more then double the amount of what Maidak is claimed to have stolen, including a $10,000 claimed theft that there is zero evidence of, and nearly 7x the amount of money that there is substantial evidence that Maidak had stolen. This is when I was making zero active efforts into holding increasingly larger amounts of other's money.

[Vod]

In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money

Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.    This allows you to scam while you are at work.

BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof.  Just coincidence.  

[snailmen]

In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money

Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.    This allows you to scam while you are at work.

BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof.  Just coincidence.  

I'd consider it a strong accusation as it is quite clear that my claims have a high chance of being correct.

[btcscriptpremium]

In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money

Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.    This allows you to scam while you are at work.

BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof.  Just coincidence.  

Also, working at home on your computer as a hobby does not have to have minimum wage either. If I had a main job, and intended to scam, I wouldn't weight the amount I would get against minimum wage, because this is my free time and extra time. I wouldn't be working during this time as well as the time I am already working.

Its easy to manage escrow/bitcointalk for hours a day after a regular job, in the morning at at night, could easily get more than 6 hours per day online even with a 10 hour work day, and a good sleep as well.

[Vod]

In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money

Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.    This allows you to scam while you are at work.

BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof.  Just coincidence.  

I'd consider it a strong accusation as it is quite clear that my claims have a high chance of being correct.

I believe you.  They could be correct - certainly you think they are.

Coincidence will not hold up in court though.  Not the same as QS lying outright "I am not Panthers52".   Look for proof like that.  

[Quickseller]

In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money

Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.     This allows you to scam while you are at work.

BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof.  Just coincidence. 

I think a low level supervisor  at CVS would make slightly more then minimum wage, probably closer to $13-$14 per hour

[Vod]

In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money

Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.     This allows you to scam while you are at work.

BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof.  Just coincidence. 

I think a low level supervisor  at CVS would make slightly more then minimum wage, probably closer to $13-$14 per hour

You would know.  That's what your Linkedin profile says.

[Quickseller]

In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money

Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.     This allows you to scam while you are at work.

BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof.  Just coincidence. 

I think a low level supervisor  at CVS would make slightly more then minimum wage, probably closer to $13-$14 per hour

You would know.  That's what your Linkedin profile says.

You must want me shaking in my boots

[snailmen]

In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money

Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.     This allows you to scam while you are at work.

BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof.  Just coincidence. 

I think a low level supervisor  at CVS would make slightly more then minimum wage, probably closer to $13-$14 per hour

You would know.  That's what your Linkedin profile says.

l
m
f
a
o

[Vod]

In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money

Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.     This allows you to scam while you are at work.

BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof.  Just coincidence. 

I think a low level supervisor  at CVS would make slightly more then minimum wage, probably closer to $13-$14 per hour

You would know.  That's what your Linkedin profile says.

You must want me shaking in my boots

Hey - you're the one who threatened to sue me first.  

[btcscriptpremium]

In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money

Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.     This allows you to scam while you are at work.

BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof.  Just coincidence. 

I think a low level supervisor  at CVS would make slightly more then minimum wage, probably closer to $13-$14 per hour

You would know.  That's what your Linkedin profile says.

rekt
e
k
t

[poeEDgar]

All I see here is speculation. A valid counter argument would be that those two accounts were created for completely different purposes. Quickseller was a default trust cowboy and bob was supposedly a persn wanting to do good and giving away money or gifts. TO believe that he would ROI from a single scam is kinda crazy IMO after he's been doing what he's doing for so long.

In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money

Notice in my previous mention of "long con" that I specified coins, not dollars at current exchange rates. That's a nice deflection, though. It was always about the coins for you. You're smart enough to know not to bottom sell two years into a downtrend. And we all know that 150BTC is a paltry sum for a widely trusted escrow.

[Quickseller]

All I see here is speculation. A valid counter argument would be that those two accounts were created for completely different purposes. Quickseller was a default trust cowboy and bob was supposedly a persn wanting to do good and giving away money or gifts. TO believe that he would ROI from a single scam is kinda crazy IMO after he's been doing what he's doing for so long.

In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money

Notice in my previous mention of "long con" that I specified coins, not dollars at current exchange rates. That's a nice deflection, though. It was always about the coins for you. You're smart enough to know not to bottom sell two years into a downtrend. And we all know that 150BTC is a paltry sum for a widely trusted escrow.

I think the number of antiXT shills in the various QS threads is pretty interesting.

[allyouracid]

In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money

Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.    This allows you to scam while you are at work.

BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof.  Just coincidence.  

I absolutely agree on this. What I wonder even more is why so many users jump in and take that nonsense from the OP as evidence.
The experiment with language analysis, which tsacepilot ran was way more interesting and trustworthy (even though I still think it might be some sort of coincidence... I don't know that much about this topic, so...)

Give this guy a rest. He was already removed from default trust.
Some people just won't stop until the corpse is fully desecrated.

[cjmoles]

In order to have earned minimum wage (based on US federal rates) for the time spent online in a long con, I would need to scam ~150BTC based on current exchange rates. This is while I was making zero effort into holding other people's money for extended periods of time, and making zero effort to hold increasingly larger sums of other's money

Not if you are working a minimum wage job (like at CVS Pharmacy) as a low level supervisor which gives you access to a web enabled computer during work hours.     This allows you to scam while you are at work.

BTW - Nothing the OP has posted is proof.  Just coincidence. 

I think a low level supervisor  at CVS would make slightly more then minimum wage, probably closer to $13-$14 per hour

You would know.  That's what your Linkedin profile says.

You must want me shaking in my boots

Whatever you do, please don't give away any money to me for trust.  They might think I'm you!  But just in case, here's my addie anyway: 1Q3Y5CTRUSTBpFkdPW7pLDMONEYGc3Kgcix

SMILE---Just think it's all funny