$XQN Quotient Takeover #Board Of Community #Asset Fund

[MikeMike]

Being a PoW/PoS coin, when trying to implement the newer BTC codebase, I suspect that there were issues with HDF sync and the PoS block validation?

I wish I understood what that means.
All I can tell you is what I know,... we started with the clean newest BTC core and went from there
integrating all we wanted to see in it.
The Coder did an awesome job doing something that had never been done before.
He had it functioning well in Linux 8 months ago, but gettng it compiled in Windows was the issue.
What I cannot or will not at this time is get into specifics as to the tech or features
we decided to include.

Hope you understand...

Yeah I understand...completely

Many of the newer BTC innovations were designed solely for use with BTC. Porting those innovations over to altcoins, and especially altcoins with a non-proof-of-work base is a nightmare to say the least.

HDF = Headers First. It is the method that bitcoin versions 0.10+ have used for new clients to sync with the existing network. This system, without HEAVY modifications, simply will not work with PoS enabled blockchains. A number of projects have tried to integrate this feature before...none have successfully done so.

Thanks for the explanations and for understanding.
What we have for KORE is good enough to release even if the BTC core is a little outdated.
It will still be one of the few at the version it is till we move forward with where we want it to go
which is dependent upon some Coders we are trying to get on board and funded.
I like to learn what I can but have also learned to stop asking the Coders 20 questions
for everything I just have never heard before nor get fully,... so I don't distract them.

ask questions dude! I mean, if you (or someone you represent) are paying for work to be done...ask away!


I myself when taking on paid work am never closed off to questions being asked...thats part of the job!

I agree paid or not,... but you are you, and they are them...
Does not mean they are unjustified since they only have so much time.
Plus I have learned to appreciate some very heavily talented Coders might be a bit eccentric
and/or know they must stay in "the zone" if they are to do their work effectively
for the time they can afford to invest to get done what they need to.
I have also been privileged to learn what a Coder must do and go through
by a highly talented and respected lone wolf Coder.
Not to say I dont have my own issues...

[Fuzzbawls]

Being a PoW/PoS coin, when trying to implement the newer BTC codebase, I suspect that there were issues with HDF sync and the PoS block validation?

I wish I understood what that means.
All I can tell you is what I know,... we started with the clean newest BTC core and went from there
integrating all we wanted to see in it.
The Coder did an awesome job doing something that had never been done before.
He had it functioning well in Linux 8 months ago, but gettng it compiled in Windows was the issue.
What I cannot or will not at this time is get into specifics as to the tech or features
we decided to include.

Hope you understand...

Yeah I understand...completely

Many of the newer BTC innovations were designed solely for use with BTC. Porting those innovations over to altcoins, and especially altcoins with a non-proof-of-work base is a nightmare to say the least.

HDF = Headers First. It is the method that bitcoin versions 0.10+ have used for new clients to sync with the existing network. This system, without HEAVY modifications, simply will not work with PoS enabled blockchains. A number of projects have tried to integrate this feature before...none have successfully done so.

Thanks for the explanations and for understanding.
What we have for KORE is good enough to release even if the BTC core is a little outdated.
It will still be one of the few at the version it is till we move forward with where we want it to go
which is dependent upon some Coders we are trying to get on board and funded.
I like to learn what I can but have also learned to stop asking the Coders 20 questions
for everything I just have never heard before nor get fully,... so I don't distract them.

ask questions dude! I mean, if you (or someone you represent) are paying for work to be done...ask away!


I myself when taking on paid work am never closed off to questions being asked...thats part of the job!

I agree paid or not,... but you are you, and they are them...
Does not mean they are unjustified since they only have so much time.
Plus I have learned to appreciate some very heavily talented Coders might be a bit eccentric
and/or know they must stay in "the zone" if they are to do their work effectively
for the time they can afford to invest to get done what they need to.
I have also been privileged to learn what a Coder must do and go through
by a highly talented and respected lone wolf Coder.
Not to say I dont have my own issues...

Understood.

Just throwing out my own opinion having been in a situation where someone was paying me to do coding work for them. Sure, there are times where writing code needs NO interruption at all and any interruptions can really screw with forward progress. But, at the same time, I at least always provide an alternative means of communication that is not real-time (ie, email) that someone can send messages to in the "heat of the moment" and they will be seen at an appropriate time.


All this being said, I fully understand that you (and any unnamed powers that be) are working to get things in order. That is of the utmost priority and the details of how that is being done come secondary.

I'm glad to engage with a "project lead" (pardon my reassignment of termonology here, but a "developer" you are not by your own admission...which is perfectly OK) that understands and accepts the semantics and the hardships that come with being a freelance programmer. If there is anything that I can assist with, do let me know (I don't work for "free", but my prices are VERY competitive (depending on what you need, of course)

[MikeMike]

Being a PoW/PoS coin, when trying to implement the newer BTC codebase, I suspect that there were issues with HDF sync and the PoS block validation?

I wish I understood what that means.
All I can tell you is what I know,... we started with the clean newest BTC core and went from there
integrating all we wanted to see in it.
The Coder did an awesome job doing something that had never been done before.
He had it functioning well in Linux 8 months ago, but gettng it compiled in Windows was the issue.
What I cannot or will not at this time is get into specifics as to the tech or features
we decided to include.

Hope you understand...

Yeah I understand...completely

Many of the newer BTC innovations were designed solely for use with BTC. Porting those innovations over to altcoins, and especially altcoins with a non-proof-of-work base is a nightmare to say the least.

HDF = Headers First. It is the method that bitcoin versions 0.10+ have used for new clients to sync with the existing network. This system, without HEAVY modifications, simply will not work with PoS enabled blockchains. A number of projects have tried to integrate this feature before...none have successfully done so.

Thanks for the explanations and for understanding.
What we have for KORE is good enough to release even if the BTC core is a little outdated.
It will still be one of the few at the version it is till we move forward with where we want it to go
which is dependent upon some Coders we are trying to get on board and funded.
I like to learn what I can but have also learned to stop asking the Coders 20 questions
for everything I just have never heard before nor get fully,... so I don't distract them.

ask questions dude! I mean, if you (or someone you represent) are paying for work to be done...ask away!


I myself when taking on paid work am never closed off to questions being asked...thats part of the job!

I agree paid or not,... but you are you, and they are them...
Does not mean they are unjustified since they only have so much time.
Plus I have learned to appreciate some very heavily talented Coders might be a bit eccentric
and/or know they must stay in "the zone" if they are to do their work effectively
for the time they can afford to invest to get done what they need to.
I have also been privileged to learn what a Coder must do and go through
by a highly talented and respected lone wolf Coder.
Not to say I dont have my own issues...

Understood.

Just throwing out my own opinion having been in a situation where someone was paying me to do coding work for them. Sure, there are times where writing code needs NO interruption at all and any interruptions can really screw with forward progress. But, at the same time, I at least always provide an alternative means of communication that is not real-time (ie, email) that someone can send messages to in the "heat of the moment" and they will be seen at an appropriate time.


All this being said, I fully understand that you (and any unnamed powers that be) are working to get things in order. That is of the utmost priority and the details of how that is being done come secondary.

I'm glad to engage with a "project lead" (pardon my reassignment of termonology here, but a "developer" you are not by your own admission...which is perfectly OK) that understands and accepts the semantics and the hardships that come with being a freelance programmer. If there is anything that I can assist with, do let me know (I don't work for "free", but my prices are VERY competitive (depending on what you need, of course)

You are correct and I fully accept that I do not fit the title "Developer" in the coding sense of the term.
If not that could seriously damage a project or Team.
We have attracted some really decent awesome people with varying skill sets and
I think most or all agree that we work well together each doing what we do best
and overlapping where and when needed trying not to cause too much damage and the most benefit.
We decided to allow delays to the projects than align ourselves with unscrupulous people.
RE: "working to provide an alternative to the norm in the crypto space" which is a goal of ours
and yet still we are compiling some interesting stories,...lol.
I find it interesting how an opportunity to make 100 or 1,000+ fold is thrown away for their short term whims
denoting the obvious, it is way more varied and complicated than that...
Crowetic and Teams have been an awesome, capable, balanced person/Teams to align ourselves with.
He has enough various coding experience putting him in the ideal place to deal directly with the Coders.

I enjoyed our conversation and appreciate the offer you have extended.
I will be running it by Crowetic/Team and send you a PM
and link to our slack like chat where the instructions are for a secure VoIP
where we three could have a meet and greet etc.
We do our best to never discuss specifics here or on other platforms that are not ours.

[presstab]

HDF = Headers First. It is the method that bitcoin versions 0.10+ have used for new clients to sync with the existing network. This system, without HEAVY modifications, simply will not work with PoS enabled blockchains. A number of projects have tried to integrate this feature before...none have successfully done so.

I found it easier just to disable the headers first and switch to blocks only. The other route would be to add the necessary information to the header that is missing.

[anticlimax]

It looks like Xqn was delisted from bittrex.

[DragoStefan]

No, it's not delisted but they are assholes because they incresed the daily average 50% from 0.2 to 0.3. Sent them a ticket and the answer is commentless..

[skidog]

No, it's not delisted but they are assholes because they incresed the daily average 50% from 0.2 to 0.3. Sent them a ticket and the answer is commentless..

I think they did this to all coins. Will need some sort of a white paper explaining what we are doing with this coin for people to trust it. In the mean time i will try to keep it listed.

[DragoStefan]

Thank You skidog! That's very nice of You. I Will return home only on 16 october so till then i really can't do much.

[BTC-BTC-BTC]

XQN still on Bittrex but de-listing again on the 7th if last 14 days not exceeds .3 btc per day that is like 4.2 btc volume.

"This market is in danger of de-listing due to low trade volume and lack of user interest. It may be removed on Friday, October 7th 2016 unless the average daily trade volume for the last 14 days exceeds 0.3 BTC. If you would like to keep the market listed, please encourage the development team to contact us at support@bittrex.com."

[skidog]

Maybe we can post some future plans. That might make this coin more desirable.

[skidog]

If you want to save this coin please open a ticket at Bittrex asking them to re-open XQN.

[MikeMike]

XQN still on Bittrex but de-listing again on the 7th if last 14 days not exceeds .3 btc per day that is like 4.2 btc volume.

"This market is in danger of de-listing due to low trade volume and lack of user interest. It may be removed on Friday, October 7th 2016 unless the average daily trade volume for the last 14 days exceeds 0.3 BTC. If you would like to keep the market listed, please encourage the development team to contact us at support@bittrex.com."

You are correct, 4.2BTC volume total over 2 weeks.
At least it is every two weeks....
That is 2.1 BTC in Volume per week.
Bill from Bittrex replied and they will not sign our NDA even though they asked for it and said they would sign it.
I presume they reviewed it and now have a new policy.
Bill sent us their NDA and I will be meeting with Crowetic to review it and discuss how to proceed.
I am sure we will be signing it but this is a Team effort.
I also asked them to relist VIOR as it also was very close in volume.
Not that the volume should matter. We are keeping these projects under wraps and
not hyping them.
It would be nice for Bittrex to be reasonable in at least our circumstances as we are
honest with them.

MM

[MikeMike]

To the Community,

I lined up a meeting with Bill at Bittrex to discuss all our coins, projects and their listings on Bittrex.
We asked them to sign our NDA and Bill asked us to send it to them.
I just heard back from Bill the other day and he mentioned Bittrex will only sign their Mutually protective NDA and sent me a copy.
I sent it to Crowetic and most likely a Lawyer will look it over prior to our signing it.
Most likely it will be another week or two before Crowetic and/or I will be able to setup this meeting...

I am still away and might be yet for another 1 to 2 weeks and it has been tough to
align meetings etc while away and I informed Bittrex of this and asked them to postpone any delistings till we have our meeting
filling them in and reassuring them these are legit coins/projects that will have their tech released in the future.
It is unfortunate Bittrex new policy is even making it harder for Teams with legit coins/projects
that keep things under wraps and have dealt with much difficulty including these threats of delisting.
We do hope that we will be able to setup an arrangement that will be reasonable and just.
For the hundreds of scam coins that had been listed on Bittrex we at least have a few of ours that
are legitimate.
IF you would like Bittrex to work with us on all our projects/coins you could let them know.
KORE, VIOR, XQN, GLOBE.

Sincerely,
MikeMike

[MikeMike]

Maybe we can post some future plans. That might make this coin more desirable.

In good time yes we will.
First we/the Team need to have a few meetings in chat and mumble to finalize a few things and talk to the Coders.
Also preferably after we meet with Bill from Bittrex.
Sorry my being away has been delaying matters...

MikeMike

[skidog]

Maybe we can post some future plans. That might make this coin more desirable.

In good time yes we will.
First we/the Team need to have a few meetings in chat and mumble to finalize a few things and talk to the Coders.
Also preferably after we meet with Bill from Bittrex.
Sorry my being away has been delaying matters...

MikeMike

Sometimes life slows us down, as along as we keep moving forward.

[skidog]

We are going to need some volume again...

[MikeMike]

We are going to need some volume again...

I'm away and not much access to the net.
MM

[skidog]

I will do what I can. Hoping for some help.

[syberwolfen]

i will love too, what is the next move

[blaster3ski]

Personally like this coin's wallet, It stakes like crazy
Just put a few coins in and hold on.