iGotSpots
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
|
|
July 28, 2016, 07:50:37 PM |
|
I'm trying to send the coins from one wallet to another - on another computer. Smaller amount had to be set (100k, 30k, 10k, 5k, 3k), because I received a message: "Creating a transaction failed" What should I do to send a larger packet of coins ? This is reaching the maximum byte size. Use Coin Control and ensure you have under 100k bytes (876 transcations) per send. Once combined, you can combine those together as well to get to 1 input
|
|
|
|
Nobitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
In holiday we trust
|
|
July 28, 2016, 08:59:01 PM |
|
I'll be bothering the c-cex chatbox until Yuriy gets his shit together and fixes the wallet. If anyone wants to join in, now is the time And I'm banned from chat for pointing out that their wallet still doesn't work. I'll be removing c-cex from everything today PLEASE REMOVE ALL FUNDS FROM HERE IMMEDIATELY, THEY ARE NOT TO BE TRUSTED ANYMORE - And this is coming from someone who used to be very good friends with them. Heed my warning or don't.. your call Lucky I'm just staking I always thought that this could happen.
|
|
|
|
D3m0nKinGx
|
|
July 29, 2016, 03:44:11 AM |
|
SPOTS i got a reply from yuriy on skype,
could you unblock me to send you a PM or if you want me to post it here, i'll do so. let me know.
|
.
| .
| . ▬◇ ▬◇▬◆ ▬◇▬◇▬◆
| .
| | .
| | .
| | .
| . ◇▬ ◆▬◇▬ ◆▬◇▬◇▬
| .
| .
|
|
|
|
iGotSpots
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
|
|
July 29, 2016, 04:01:18 AM |
|
You're not blocked. I'm fairly certain I already know what it says
|
|
|
|
barvas
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
July 29, 2016, 06:15:53 AM |
|
Respected. 18/07/2016 I do not have the ability to manage their funds (((c-cex Administrators and Administrators DIGICUBE not respect their customers as they can in the league (((
Увaжaeмый. Я c 18.07.2016 нe имeю вoзмoжнocть yпpaвлять cвoими cpeдcтвaми((( Aдминиcтpaтopы c-cex и aдминиcтpaтops DIGICUBE coвceм нe yвaжaют cвoиx клиeнтoв a мoжeт oни в cгoвope(((
|
|
|
|
iGotSpots
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
|
|
July 29, 2016, 07:10:13 AM |
|
Respected. 18/07/2016 I do not have the ability to manage their funds (((c-cex Administrators and Administrators DIGICUBE not respect their customers as they can in the league (((
Увaжaeмый. Я c 18.07.2016 нe имeю вoзмoжнocть yпpaвлять cвoими cpeдcтвaми((( Aдминиcтpaтopы c-cex и aдминиcтpaтops DIGICUBE coвceм нe yвaжaют cвoиx клиeнтoв a мoжeт oни в cгoвope(((
I have been doing my best to get it solved there for you. I have even been banned from chat twice for getting people too riled up
|
|
|
|
D3m0nKinGx
|
|
July 29, 2016, 01:00:07 PM |
|
yup there's a discrepancy in the timestamp, but is the timestamp correct in your wallet?
|
.
| .
| . ▬◇ ▬◇▬◆ ▬◇▬◇▬◆
| .
| | .
| | .
| | .
| . ◇▬ ◆▬◇▬ ◆▬◇▬◇▬
| .
| .
|
|
|
|
D3m0nKinGx
|
|
July 29, 2016, 01:17:55 PM |
|
yup there's a discrepancy in the timestamp, but is the timestamp correct in your wallet? not my wallet, it may be c-cex cold wallet, i recognize several tx's collecting coins from their deposit addresses, and 19 Jul is the date when all went down on maintenance I spoke with yuriy on skype, one of the issues going on with the wallet for the reason it was disabled for trading, is cause some transactions were getting stuck and not confirming, and he still has these tx there and can't clear them. And seems to be some other issue with the wallet being very slow in responding to RPC calls, which he thinks is due to many transactions going on at the same time and a lot of addresses in the wallet. One other issue is that some transactions wouldn't process because the wallet has a maximum bytes per transaction limit which wasn't working when his script was executing orders passed this limit. i'm not sure from a technical standpoint if number of addresses and many transactions happening would cause such an issue, but one thing for sure CUBE hasn't had any true stress tests done to see how it would handle under heavy transaction load etc. Also yuriy told me they are not staking the wallet (meaning it's always locked) and only unlocked for rpc calls/transactions. However that isn't to say in the moment that it gets unlocked to perform a transaction that any inputs in the wallet that are over the 24 hr threshold don't initiate a stake in that window the wallet gets unlocked. which would be out of yuriy's control.
|
.
| .
| . ▬◇ ▬◇▬◆ ▬◇▬◇▬◆
| .
| | .
| | .
| | .
| . ◇▬ ◆▬◇▬ ◆▬◇▬◇▬
| .
| .
|
|
|
|
D3m0nKinGx
|
|
July 29, 2016, 01:25:52 PM |
|
In addition to this, which i've experienced with the wallet running on my vps and the local one (i use to watch the wallet on the vps), for some reason if you have a wallet that is online and a backup of that wallet.dat, that backup wallet.dat file doesn't work after some time (i haven't determined the exact time frame) but it will not show the correct balance of the wallet, and becomes useless. I had to download the active wallet.dat file from my vps to my local wallet to see the correct balance again.
so i'm not sure if this is an issue with the wallet or what. and i'm sure wasn't the backup file being corrupt because that was backed up on google drive, and shouldn't have had an issue when i loaded it into the wallet. as i've done this with bitcoin and sprouts and had no problem like this.
Yuriy has this issue going on as well with his wallet with the balances not showing correctly, nor was he sure if the wallet was even synced up, cause seems the block explorer wasn't up at one point.
so in point, a backup wallet.dat file has to be kept updated i think daily otherwise it will go out of sync or not properly sync to the correct balance.
|
.
| .
| . ▬◇ ▬◇▬◆ ▬◇▬◇▬◆
| .
| | .
| | .
| | .
| . ◇▬ ◆▬◇▬ ◆▬◇▬◇▬
| .
| .
|
|
|
|
D3m0nKinGx
|
|
July 29, 2016, 01:53:23 PM |
|
This:
Transaction ID: 9bb4ce6e1931d8bdefec1c23d5e10986f53e53d857e6e629abc7f76afacd9cee Included in Block: 926022 Transaction Time: 21 Jul 2016 06:43:25
Output 1 : 10808370 sent to CJGo35J1q54wyQGiLXZ1V4wHFsmmCv72K2
Doesn't correlate with this from that deposit address:
Date In Block Transaction ID Sent 21 Jul 2016 926022 9bb4ce6e1931d8bdefec1c23d5e10986f53e53d857e6e629abc7f76afacd9cee 503,979.2660 (0.000 BTC)
There's more output then what was in the balance at that time... or the block explorer isn't displaying something correctly
|
.
| .
| . ▬◇ ▬◇▬◆ ▬◇▬◇▬◆
| .
| | .
| | .
| | .
| . ◇▬ ◆▬◇▬ ◆▬◇▬◇▬
| .
| .
|
|
|
|
D3m0nKinGx
|
|
July 29, 2016, 02:06:25 PM |
|
This:
Transaction ID: 9bb4ce6e1931d8bdefec1c23d5e10986f53e53d857e6e629abc7f76afacd9cee Included in Block: 926022 Transaction Time: 21 Jul 2016 06:43:25
Output 1 : 10808370 sent to CJGo35J1q54wyQGiLXZ1V4wHFsmmCv72K2
Doesn't correlate with this from that deposit address:
Date In Block Transaction ID Sent 21 Jul 2016 926022 9bb4ce6e1931d8bdefec1c23d5e10986f53e53d857e6e629abc7f76afacd9cee 503,979.2660 (0.000 BTC)
There's more output then what was in the balance at that time... or the block explorer isn't displaying something correctly
please look once again http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/CUBE/tx.php?tx=9bb4ce6e1931d8bdefec1c23d5e10986f53e53d857e6e629abc7f76afacd9ceethis tx is collecting coins from 58 inputs of several addresses, not only one deposit Yes you are right, there are multiple sources being deposited to this address, there's also a transaction that coins were sent back onto itself as well: Input 6 : 251989.635994 is sent from CYGDQCdq53v4xc7fcn3UDegkwhtsovXCEP Input Source: cd6788b2fb21514815f3179c91848e98a38f52267ef6089659cf1401d392abe4 But the Point is that on http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/CUBE/address.php?address=CYGDQCdq53v4xc7fcn3UDegkwhtsovXCEPit is showing that the last transaction that occured there was 503,979.2660 CUBES SENT from that addresses leaving it with a 0 balance.Address Summary CYGDQCdq53v4xc7fcn3UDegkwhtsovXCEP Transaction Count 52 Balance 0.000000Minted 129,721.556375 % of Balance from Minting 100 % However on http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/CUBE/tx.php?tx=9bb4ce6e1931d8bdefec1c23d5e10986f53e53d857e6e629abc7f76afacd9ceeit says that an Output 1 : 10808370 sent to CJGo35J1q54wyQGiLXZ1V4wHFsmmCv72K2You see the problem? there's a discrepency of the amount of coin "SENT" from this address ...
|
.
| .
| . ▬◇ ▬◇▬◆ ▬◇▬◇▬◆
| .
| | .
| | .
| | .
| . ◇▬ ◆▬◇▬ ◆▬◇▬◇▬
| .
| .
|
|
|
|
D3m0nKinGx
|
|
July 29, 2016, 02:09:49 PM |
|
|
.
| .
| . ▬◇ ▬◇▬◆ ▬◇▬◇▬◆
| .
| | .
| | .
| | .
| . ◇▬ ◆▬◇▬ ◆▬◇▬◇▬
| .
| .
|
|
|
|
Nobitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
In holiday we trust
|
|
July 29, 2016, 02:21:41 PM |
|
Is this what happens when you get the dev to remove the checkpoints ?
|
|
|
|
D3m0nKinGx
|
|
July 29, 2016, 02:25:41 PM |
|
thanks, i missed it didn't scroll down far enough cause the explorer doesn't have the transactions in order by date, so i thought i saw all the ones for the 21st.
Again this doesn't explain why it doesn't show Output 1 : 10808370 as the last amount sent from your deposit address instead of 503,979.2660
|
.
| .
| . ▬◇ ▬◇▬◆ ▬◇▬◇▬◆
| .
| | .
| | .
| | .
| . ◇▬ ◆▬◇▬ ◆▬◇▬◇▬
| .
| .
|
|
|
|
D3m0nKinGx
|
|
July 29, 2016, 02:27:41 PM |
|
Is this what happens when you get the dev to remove the checkpoints ?
no this isn't a problem with time stamps It's just an address that a bunch of coins were sent to from multiple other addresses. and then sent all together to another one. It's just a question of why the block explorer is showing two different amounts as the "last" sent amount from that address.
|
.
| .
| . ▬◇ ▬◇▬◆ ▬◇▬◇▬◆
| .
| | .
| | .
| | .
| . ◇▬ ◆▬◇▬ ◆▬◇▬◇▬
| .
| .
|
|
|
|
D3m0nKinGx
|
|
July 29, 2016, 02:38:12 PM |
|
Again this doesn't explain why it doesn't show Output 1 : 10808370 as the last amount sent from your deposit address instead of 503,979.2660
because only 503979 coins were sent from my deposit address in that tx, 10808370 coins were sent from several addresses including mine. i feel we're close to the point which you don't understand, but still can't figure out what it is Ya there was only two outputs from that address, and it's not showing the 503979 amount. where was that amount sent to? i just looked through all the transactions on my wallet and every output matches with the amount listed as "sent". Yours doesn't. But please explain what i'm not understanding.
|
.
| .
| . ▬◇ ▬◇▬◆ ▬◇▬◇▬◆
| .
| | .
| | .
| | .
| . ◇▬ ◆▬◇▬ ◆▬◇▬◇▬
| .
| .
|
|
|
|
iGotSpots
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
|
|
July 29, 2016, 02:44:21 PM |
|
Yuriy is feeding you a bunch of bullshit. If what he is saying is true, then they truly are incompetent
After a year of running perfectly it suddenly becomes unmanageable?
|
|
|
|
D3m0nKinGx
|
|
July 29, 2016, 02:59:45 PM |
|
Again this doesn't explain why it doesn't show Output 1 : 10808370 as the last amount sent from your deposit address instead of 503,979.2660
because only 503979 coins were sent from my deposit address in that tx, 10808370 coins were sent from several addresses including mine. i feel we're close to the point which you don't understand, but still can't figure out what it is Ya there was only two outputs from that address, and it's not showing the 503979 amount. where was that amount sent to? i just looked through all the transactions on my wallet and every output matches with the amount listed as "sent". Yours doesn't. But please explain what i'm not understanding. Input 5 : 251989.63 is sent from CYGDQCdq53v4xc7fcn3UDegkwhtsovXCEP Input Source: cd6788b2fb21514815f3179c91848e98a38f52267ef6089659cf1401d392abe4 Input 6 : 251989.635994 is sent from CYGDQCdq53v4xc7fcn3UDegkwhtsovXCEP Input Source: cd6788b2fb21514815f3179c91848e98a38f52267ef6089659cf1401d392abe4 251989.63 + 251989.635994 = 503979.265994 Right I got it, it only shows the "sent" from the input of the 'sent from' the deposit address. But ya I get the point that staking occurred on this address: http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/CUBE/tx.php?tx=cd6788b2fb21514815f3179c91848e98a38f52267ef6089659cf1401d392abe4after the coin was recombined on the 17th. Also on the 6th and 7th.
|
.
| .
| . ▬◇ ▬◇▬◆ ▬◇▬◇▬◆
| .
| | .
| | .
| | .
| . ◇▬ ◆▬◇▬ ◆▬◇▬◇▬
| .
| .
|
|
|
|
Nobitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
In holiday we trust
|
|
July 29, 2016, 03:03:08 PM |
|
On CCEX the balance was 180 million a couple of weeks ago now its 17 million. Could it be they are staking the 180 million and selling the stake ?
|
|
|
|
D3m0nKinGx
|
|
July 29, 2016, 03:07:33 PM |
|
Yuriy is feeding you a bunch of bullshit. If what he is saying is true, then they truly are incompetent
After a year of running perfectly it suddenly becomes unmanageable?
If they're staking yes lol, so he lied to me about not staking, or he just meant that right now in this moment he isn't.
|
.
| .
| . ▬◇ ▬◇▬◆ ▬◇▬◇▬◆
| .
| | .
| | .
| | .
| . ◇▬ ◆▬◇▬ ◆▬◇▬◇▬
| .
| .
|
|
|
|
|