bones261
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
|
|
November 15, 2015, 06:13:53 AM |
|
Just as a outsider looking in why would you ask a question of your holders and supporters with a poll and then steam roll ahead against what the poll answered lol??
Just my opinion and im not say its gotta be done but if i was you id rethink that move for quite obvious reasons
Dev's going to do whatever he wants. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjCHD41I7ok
|
|
|
|
DuckYeah! (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
November 15, 2015, 06:27:30 AM |
|
Just as a outsider looking in why would you ask a question of your holders and supporters with a poll and then steam roll ahead against what the poll answered lol??
Just my opinion and im not say its gotta be done but if i was you id rethink that move for quite obvious reasons
Dev's going to do whatever he wants. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjCHD41I7okFine! No AuxPoW or MultiPoW with GPU or ASIC Algos
|
|
|
|
Shkembe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1560
Merit: 1001
Epic Private Internet Cash
|
|
November 15, 2015, 07:32:28 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
kondiomir
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1000
Twitter @Acimirov
|
|
November 15, 2015, 08:36:55 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
bazsy
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
November 15, 2015, 08:45:06 AM |
|
Pool?
|
|
|
|
DuckYeah! (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
November 15, 2015, 08:59:34 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Shkembe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1560
Merit: 1001
Epic Private Internet Cash
|
|
November 15, 2015, 09:04:52 AM |
|
Well done Dev! Now some twitter presure and they will add it!
|
|
|
|
DuckYeah! (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
November 15, 2015, 09:28:47 AM Last edit: November 15, 2015, 09:45:37 AM by DuckYeah! |
|
Well done Dev! Now some twitter presure and they will add it! Oooh Yeah! Also, I am gonna try to enable MNodes in the next version, also - what are good GPU and ASIC Resistant Algorithms: Should we allow those communities as well? - I am currently updating and thinking if adding support for Magi-M7 and BitQuark is a good idea, obviously the community hates GPU and ASIC and therefore, Please suggest EDIT: I have chosen - Clean YeScrypt (GPU Resistant) - Velvet (Obviously) - BitQuark - MagiM7 - Skeind
|
|
|
|
casper77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2884
Merit: 1035
|
|
November 15, 2015, 11:01:36 AM |
|
I have chosen - Clean YeScrypt (GPU Resistant) - Velvet (Obviously) - BitQuark - MagiM7 - Skeind
it will be "AND" or "OR" ?
|
|
|
|
DuckYeah! (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
November 15, 2015, 11:38:58 AM |
|
I have chosen - Clean YeScrypt (GPU Resistant) - Velvet (Obviously) - BitQuark - MagiM7 - Skeind
it will be "AND" or "OR" ? AND, not OR
|
|
|
|
casper77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2884
Merit: 1035
|
|
November 15, 2015, 11:55:28 AM |
|
good why although ver is 1.0.3 it shows v1.0.0.0e4b5fe9 Fluffy in "about Fantom" ?
|
|
|
|
jc12345
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1013
|
|
November 15, 2015, 12:12:14 PM |
|
good why although ver is 1.0.3 it shows v1.0.0.0e4b5fe9 Fluffy in "about Fantom" ?
This is exactly my argument that the dev must first fix the small but important things before he starts to think about fancy stuff like multi-algo. Another important thing is why the warning about experimental test code that is displayed. Fix it so that the message is not necessary anymore. Then later he can start to do the fancy stuff. Yet he still keeps posting again about stuff like multi-algo. Those things can be considered, but only after the basics have been fixed and some listings secured.
|
|
|
|
joshafest
|
|
November 15, 2015, 12:14:57 PM |
|
I have chosen - Clean YeScrypt (GPU Resistant) - Velvet (Obviously) - BitQuark - MagiM7 - Skeind
yes!they all are good.....but why don't you make another good new mining algo....? i think you need miners to mine your coin but don't worry if you have pos.
|
|
|
|
casper77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2884
Merit: 1035
|
|
November 15, 2015, 01:39:44 PM |
|
is there a way to know own hashrate in built-in miner ?
|
|
|
|
l8nit3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1007
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 15, 2015, 01:59:31 PM |
|
is there a way to know own hashrate in built-in miner ?
so far only debug.log
|
|
|
|
DuckYeah! (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
November 15, 2015, 02:01:13 PM |
|
good why although ver is 1.0.3 it shows v1.0.0.0e4b5fe9 Fluffy in "about Fantom" ?
This is exactly my argument that the dev must first fix the small but important things before he starts to think about fancy stuff like multi-algo. Another important thing is why the warning about experimental test code that is displayed. Fix it so that the message is not necessary anymore. Then later he can start to do the fancy stuff. Yet he still keeps posting again about stuff like multi-algo. Those things can be considered, but only after the basics have been fixed and some listings secured. That is still under consideration, multiPoW
|
|
|
|
casper77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2884
Merit: 1035
|
|
November 15, 2015, 02:21:31 PM |
|
is there a way to know own hashrate in built-in miner ?
so far only debug.log it says i am 13 Mhs and net hashrate is 0.03 Mhs in getmininginfo strangely
|
|
|
|
DuckYeah! (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
November 15, 2015, 02:28:41 PM |
|
is there a way to know own hashrate in built-in miner ?
so far only debug.log it says i am 13 Mhs and net hashrate is 0.03 Mhs in getmininginfo strangely That is inaccurate, in console, type getmininginfo
|
|
|
|
lockepi
|
|
November 15, 2015, 02:41:43 PM |
|
still buying coins
|
|
|
|
zoneout
|
|
November 15, 2015, 02:45:10 PM |
|
Ways to trade coins? No exchanges?
|
|
|
|
|