kondiomir
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1000
Twitter @Acimirov
|
 |
November 24, 2015, 12:18:12 PM |
|
LoL new Op. Nice!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tontorus
|
|
November 24, 2015, 02:34:15 PM |
|
We definitely need a new exchange with better volume. Polo would be ideal. Bittrex would be good too. I've sent multiple requests to both. You should too! https://poloniex.com/coinRequestDone. Let's do it, guys! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
quantumgravity
|
|
November 24, 2015, 07:28:07 PM |
|
Wrong link. It is supposed to be fantom.blockpioneers.pw. |
|
|
|
drizzle2405
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 24, 2015, 07:57:57 PM |
|
Wrong link. It is supposed to be fantom.blockpioneers.pw. Ok looks like the OP has the wrong link. Needs to be updated... |
|
|
|
DuckYeah! (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
November 25, 2015, 05:41:20 AM |
|
Done
|
|
|
|
|
ethought
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 25, 2015, 09:56:39 AM
Last edit: November 25, 2015, 08:43:26 PM by ethought |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitdonator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1223
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 25, 2015, 10:28:24 AM |
|
Nice news ;-) .... but ticker is FCX ,not FNX. Dev please, decide about coin ticker and update wallet and other services. This is not good for coin, causing big confusion to existing and new Fantom users. |
|
|
|
|
MagicOne
Member
Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
|
|
November 25, 2015, 11:15:48 AM |
|
Specifications
| | | Name: | Fantom (FantomPay) | | Ticker: | FNX | Total Supply:
| 4 Million***
| Proof Of Work Reward**:
| 5 FNX
| | Proof Of Stake Reward**: | 0.1 FNX
| RPC Port:
| 31500 | P2P Port:
| 31000 | Premine:
| 8250 FCX (Giveaways) | Genesis Date:
| 3rd Sept '15 @ 00:00 IST
| Block Times:
| 28 Second |
Got confused by this? |
|
|
|
|
|
Bobekko
|
|
November 25, 2015, 11:30:50 AM |
|
FNX is clearer, there's no C in Fantom. Maybe ask C-Cex to change it too.
|
|
|
|
Bitdonator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1223
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 25, 2015, 02:29:36 PM |
|
Specifications
| | | Name: | Fantom (FantomPay) | | Ticker: | FNX | Total Supply:
| 4 Million***
| Proof Of Work Reward**:
| 5 FNX
| | Proof Of Stake Reward**: | 0.1 FNX
| RPC Port:
| 31500 | P2P Port:
| 31000 | Premine:
| 8250 FCX (Giveaways) | Genesis Date:
| 3rd Sept '15 @ 00:00 IST
| Block Times:
| 28 Second |
Got confused by this? Confuse is everywhere.... also, genesis block mined on 3. November, not 3. Sept. |
|
|
|
|
DuckYeah! (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
November 25, 2015, 02:49:42 PM |
|
Sorry for the mess, out of town using a shittastic crapberry
|
|
|
|
|
maccaspacca
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 278
Merit: 258
Twitter: @maccaspacca1
|
|
November 25, 2015, 08:03:29 PM |
|
Has someone got a GPU miner already?
One miner on coinspool running at 10x the hash of everyone else with quite a few invalid shares
Either they are running multiple cpu miners (160 cores equivalent by my estimate) or they have created a gpu miner and are not sharing
Just asking as that one address has quite a large % of the network hash
|
|
|
|
drizzle2405
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 25, 2015, 08:08:45 PM |
|
Has someone got a GPU miner already?
One miner on coinspool running at 10x the hash of everyone else with quite a few invalid shares
Either they are running multiple cpu miners (160 cores equivalent by my estimate) or they have created a gpu miner and are not sharing
Just asking as that one address has quite a large % of the network hash
Probably running virtual machines on Microsoft Azure using the CPU miner... |
|
|
|
maccaspacca
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 278
Merit: 258
Twitter: @maccaspacca1
|
|
November 25, 2015, 08:12:10 PM |
|
Has someone got a GPU miner already?
One miner on coinspool running at 10x the hash of everyone else with quite a few invalid shares
Either they are running multiple cpu miners (160 cores equivalent by my estimate) or they have created a gpu miner and are not sharing
Just asking as that one address has quite a large % of the network hash
Probably running virtual machines on Microsoft Azure using the CPU miner... Yep, that would explain it - more worried about the amount of hash in single hand Panic over maybe |
|
|
|
maccaspacca
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 278
Merit: 258
Twitter: @maccaspacca1
|
|
November 25, 2015, 08:35:45 PM |
|
Has someone got a GPU miner already?
One miner on coinspool running at 10x the hash of everyone else with quite a few invalid shares
Either they are running multiple cpu miners (160 cores equivalent by my estimate) or they have created a gpu miner and are not sharing
Just asking as that one address has quite a large % of the network hash
Probably running virtual machines on Microsoft Azure using the CPU miner... Yep, that would explain it - more worried about the amount of hash in single hand Panic over maybe Just spun up an azure machine with 16 cores, 128GB ram and I am getting 5.6khs - so 75khs say around 10 top level azure servers !!! - wow !! |
|
|
|
drizzle2405
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 25, 2015, 08:55:35 PM |
|
Has someone got a GPU miner already?
One miner on coinspool running at 10x the hash of everyone else with quite a few invalid shares
Either they are running multiple cpu miners (160 cores equivalent by my estimate) or they have created a gpu miner and are not sharing
Just asking as that one address has quite a large % of the network hash
Probably running virtual machines on Microsoft Azure using the CPU miner... Yep, that would explain it - more worried about the amount of hash in single hand Panic over maybe If he's not using the free money they give you, then quite frankly he is losing out with the current exchange price... Unless he is holding long term... |
|
|
|
maccaspacca
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 278
Merit: 258
Twitter: @maccaspacca1
|
|
November 25, 2015, 08:59:15 PM |
|
Spun up an azure ubuntu server - again 16 cores etc. and getting 8khs
|
|
|
|
|
quantumgravity
|
|
November 25, 2015, 10:55:10 PM |
|
I am getting a ton of orphans staking - like 60% or more. Is it a problem with the difficulty or what? Or is it because the block times are so quick? Probably a bit of both? DuckYeah! I remember you mentioning switching to 90 second blocks if you decide to implement a more robust algorithm. That may be a good solution.
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
