No, it is not because of that reason. Either way, I have not changed my mind not to advertise anything unethical in my signature, but I need more solid evidence that can convince me. It is just that your allegation is not convincing to me to think otherwise.
There are tons of allegations I've made, you don't think I've provided enough solid evidence?
How about the issue with players email/login info getting into the hands of phishers?
Do you think it's acceptable for them to simply ignore all questions about the obvious security breach? This isn't about the security breach itself, it's about how they handle situations like this.
They've acknowledged the phishing attempts in various forum posts like this one most recently:
https://www.betcoin.ag/ignore-phishing-attempts-betcoin-not-offering-bonus-change-passwordYou can see examples of other attempts here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1379083.0Players have been asking how the scammers got our info months ago:
And still asking today:
In their only response, they claim they have not been hacked. (The email security system they mention is virtually useless)
so betcoin.ag was hacked?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=424598.680i got the same phising email, so i assume all usernames and emails have leaked, why has there been no update on this?
Betcoin.ag has not been hacked but just a target of a pretty elaborate phishing scheme for which we have developed an email security verification system which will be further explained in the next post and Betcoin.ag will never ask you for your password or to download anything via an email anytime. Thank you.
What about their pathetic "google has scam accusations also/ty detractors for helping our business" comment. Doesn't that make anything clear for you?
Also, every company that achieves some notoriety will not be able to please 100% of the people 100% of the time, though we continue to try, search Google is a Scam for example. Each comment from a detractor only serves to bump our thread which creates more interest in Betcoin and drives more traffic to Betcoin. Once the traffic arrives, they stay and we are thankful for that.
And how about your campaign managers comment he refuses to elaborate on:
to be honest with you I'm very sure that your accusations against Betcoin.ag are false.
Don't you find that pretty fucked up to just tell people he's sure I'm wrong but refuse to explain any further? Perhaps he won't explain further because he's the one full of shit, not me?
