★★★ GameCredits - The future of in-game monetization ★★★

[Jack Kuveke]

'GameCredits takes on Apple and Google with its blockchain-based app store' GameCredits headlined an article in Venturebeat (a large tech magazine!). Attached is a Reddit post with the article linked. Be sure to upvote and help GAME get recognized!

https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/6uc7q3/gamecredits_takes_on_apple_and_google_with_its/

[1714840776]

1714840776

[1714840776]

1714840776

[1714840776]

1714840776

[1714840776]

1714840776

[1714840776]

1714840776

[1714840776]

1714840776

[ngin-x]

Have anyone bought some game with gamecredits?

Biggest looser 7days coinmarket
5th place
GameCredits   GAME   $2,769,090   $1.84    -36.84% in USD
BTC 7 days ~ +30% in USD

Maybe time to buy but not for me, thx. New low 0.00040900 BTC

Some whale got cheap coins.

You don't seem to understand how the market works. Recently there was an ICO of 0xProtocol, where ICO price was about $0.04 and today price jumped to $0.22. It is more than x5 in a couple of days. Of course, people are not going to hold old altcoins under these circumstances, where you can get such easy money. GameCredits have great potential, but the market is too volatile, there are opportunities to get easy x2-x5 every week (if you are lucky to get cheap coins on ICO), it is hard for old and solid altcoins to compete.

If you didn't take (and not going to take) any of those "easy money" opportunities, there is no point in selling GameCredits.

Who said old altcoins can't give good returns? In the last 365 days period, GameCredits price has multiplied 19x. NEM's price has multiplied 38.18x. Waves has multiplied 25.87x. Most of these projects have been in operation since 2014 or 2015. I can give many other examples like this.

Which new altcoin can boast of such returns? It always pays to hold solid old altcoins. If the fundamentals are good, long term returns will outstrip short terms gains by many folds.

[c4s7or]

i lost so much money on this coin that im starting to hate it lol. i like the idea, but the management of this coin doesnt know what are they doing.

Lol the management isnt responsible for the speculations of people trying to make fast money.

[c4s7or]

i lost so much money on this coin that im starting to hate it lol. i like the idea, but the management of this coin doesnt know what are they doing.

Lol the management isnt responsible for the speculations of people trying to make fast money.

management IS responsible for money of their investors. you should first learn something about investing. example: people can speculate about apple's stocks, but anyway, management's task is to push company on higher levels, earning money for their investors, for their company, and for themselves. speculations cant do much damage for good companies and good managements. good management also can turn speculations into the advantage and advantage of company they manage. you dont know shit about entrepreneurship, just like the team behind this coin.

Lol so you compare apple with Game. The big difference is that Game doesnt have a finished technology with a real usage. Apple sells products but Game is just developing something which nobody is using till now. Go cry somewhere else.

[Rogerdale]

Im not crying, i invest only what i can lose, and a little bit more, so there is nothing for i need to cry. . Im giving an arguments, and you are not in right, gamecredits have its product, and even that can be better.. But, even with bad product, great management still can make good results and if it will be needed, make even that fail product better. My point is that management is bad and doesnt understand some enterpreneurship basics, and how i see, you dont understand it either. As of what i see,  you work for someone, so you are even not relevant for discussion about this topic. I see that becouse if you eventually know something about thing im saying, you would understand that this critic can be positive for whole team and gamecredits, and even for you if you invested in them. as you see, i didnt shit on everything about gamecredits, i was pointing only on one thing which is not good. As i said, i like their idea, and i would be sad if it dies becouse of bad management and strategy.  they need more ppl with more knowledge becouse knowledge is fuel for succesfull company. And that advice i could give to you too.

I'm not sure what they can do to change the situation other than change proof-of-work method of mining to something like proof-of-game (where those who actively play at the moment generate new blocks and get rewards).

Anyway, I have a question: which twitter is correct: https://twitter.com/gamecredits or https://twitter.com/game_credits? They need to fix it definitely and configure a redirect or something.

[JCB44]

Anyway, I have a question: which twitter is correct: https://twitter.com/gamecredits or https://twitter.com/game_credits? They need to fix it definitely and configure a redirect or something.

First account is the correct one.
2nd is a clone created by unknown probably for scam or something similar

[Ale88]

Any light wallet?

[Majormax]

i lost so much money on this coin that im starting to hate it lol. i like the idea, but the management of this coin doesnt know what are they doing.

Lol the management isnt responsible for the speculations of people trying to make fast money.

Short term speculators are not helpful.

After a fall to $1 , most of the remaining holders would be in it for the long haul. The short term price does not need to be high to support development, now that a lot of funds have been raised from the MGO ICO.

[Jack Kuveke]

Anyway, I have a question: which twitter is correct: https://twitter.com/gamecredits or https://twitter.com/game_credits? They need to fix it definitely and configure a redirect or something.

First account is the correct one.
2nd is a clone created by unknown probably for scam or something similar

But coinmarketcap refers to the second account: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/gamecredits/#social

Isnt it proof of what am i saying? Isnt this bad management? We dont even know something like twitter link. Imagine them on bigger things then. And they didnt even answer on the questions of their members of community and possible investors, or future possible investors(less possible    ) You dont have money to pay someone to answer on few questions on daily basis? That is about 1h of total work.  I dont think so. This points only on really bad management who has no knoweledge of bussiness. Maybe they know how to do programing, but bussiness is the last thing you guys need to do. For start, at least, pay  only one person who knows how to manage organization like this, and who will make a strategy depended on visions and goals of founders of this project and then maybe you will come closer to your visions. And repeating: Which are big and great, but just becouse of that it needs big and great managers, or better to say - leader and his squad, to make it real. Ill sell my coins with loss becouse i dont see any improvents  in shorter time, but you lost more than me, you lost one investor, which is not big, and i cant hurt you. But the Problem is that one sparcle can burn a whole forests, and i see lots of sparkles here. And even bigger problem is, you are losing trust of your investors, and every person on this planet knows that trust is the hardest thing to get back. Cheers and good luck in future. You will need it if you keep this way.

Regarding the twitter account, we updated our twitter handle from Game_Credits to gamecredits and contacted CMC right away asking them to update it. They haven't done that yet. As for the website, I thought it was changed, but I just asked them to update it again.

Also, we're acting like a tech company releasing BETA products. No tech company mass markets their unfinished products to millions of people. That might be a management tactic in the crypto world, but it isn't one of a company aiming to become the next unicorn. You really have no idea what the management is like from the business side of gamecredits. Why? Because we're a company building proprietary products that can't possibly share everything we're working on, and we don't want to market our development because that would only lead to disaster giving our potential competitors insight onto how close we are to potential market success.

Now I have said in the past our marketing and transparency to the cryptocurrency world could be better. We had immense transparency up until about 2.5 months ago when we realized we had to buckle down and work in a bubble without giving people constant updates like we had been used to. HOWEVER, we said in the last week our transparency would be rising and from last week onward you would all get constant updates and more transparency. And guess what? Since then we've released a massive mobile MMORPG with hundreds of hours of game play USING gamecredits payments, a dedicated article regarding GameCredits was published in venturebeat with millions of active readers, we released 9 games in our web wallet for purchase with GAME(see this image below), we will be releasing another newsletter today with more updates, a post regarding the venturebeat article got hundreds of upvotes, Sergey Sholom our CEO was featured on CNBC India earning GAME free media coverage in India, AND GameCredits launched on BitBays new India exchange (one of six currencies available to trade. This all happened IN THE LAST WEEK. Give me a break, there is plenty going on, and our companies management is fucking killer. Now we will do better with transparency to the crypto world, but I think my list I just gave you proves we are.

[Majormax]

Regarding the twitter account, we updated our twitter handle from Game_Credits to gamecredits and contacted CMC right away asking them to update it. They haven't done that yet. As for the website, I thought it was changed, but I just asked them to update it again.

Also, we're acting like a tech company releasing BETA products. No tech company mass markets their unfinished products to millions of people. That might be a management tactic in the crypto world, but it isn't one of a company aiming to become the next unicorn. You really have no idea what the management is like from the business side of gamecredits. Why? Because we're a company building proprietary products that can't possibly share everything we're working on, and we don't want to market our development because that would only lead to disaster giving our potential competitors insight onto how close we are to potential market success.

Now I have said in the past our marketing and transparency to the cryptocurrency world could be better. We had immense transparency up until about 2.5 months ago when we realized we had to buckle down and work in a bubble without giving people constant updates like we had been used to. HOWEVER, we said in the last week our transparency would be rising and from last week onward you would all get constant updates and more transparency. And guess what? Since then we've released a massive mobile MMORPG with hundreds of hours of game play USING gamecredits payments, a dedicated article regarding GameCredits was published in venturebeat with millions of active readers, we released 9 games in our web wallet for purchase with GAME(see this image below), we will be releasing another newsletter today with more updates, a post regarding the venturebeat article got hundreds of upvotes, Sergey Sholom our CEO was featured on CNBC India earning GAME free media coverage in India, AND GameCredits launched on BitBays new India exchange (one of six currencies available to trade. This all happened IN THE LAST WEEK. Give me a break, there is plenty going on, and our companies management is fucking killer. Now we will do better with transparency to the crypto world, but I think my list I just gave you proves we are.

Thanks for that Jack.  Some of the sniping is irritating, but you are absolutely following the correct line IMHO.

Bitcointalk has become a messy forum now, so I would take many comments with a pinch of salt. Anyway , reducing expectations here is going to do no harm whatsoever. It is the actual management and development that counts, not the PR which panders to speculators.

[ngin-x]

Anyway, I have a question: which twitter is correct: https://twitter.com/gamecredits or https://twitter.com/game_credits? They need to fix it definitely and configure a redirect or something.

First account is the correct one.
2nd is a clone created by unknown probably for scam or something similar

But coinmarketcap refers to the second account: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/gamecredits/#social

Isnt it proof of what am i saying? Isnt this bad management? We dont even know something like twitter link. Imagine them on bigger things then. And they didnt even answer on the questions of their members of community and possible investors, or future possible investors(less possible   ) You dont have money to pay someone to answer on few questions on daily basis? That is about 1h of total work.  I dont think so. This points only on really bad management who has no knoweledge of bussiness. Maybe they know how to do programing, but bussiness is the last thing you guys need to do. For start, at least, pay  only one person who knows how to manage organization like this, and who will make a strategy depended on visions and goals of founders of this project and then maybe you will come closer to your visions. And repeating: Which are big and great, but just becouse of that it needs big and great managers, or better to say - leader and his squad, to make it real. Ill sell my coins with loss becouse i dont see any improvents  in shorter time, but you lost more than me, you lost one investor, which is not big, and i cant hurt you. But the Problem is that one sparcle can burn a whole forests, and i see lots of sparkles here. And even bigger problem is, you are losing trust of your investors, and every person on this planet knows that trust is the hardest thing to get back. Cheers and good luck in future. You will need it if you keep this way.

Regarding the twitter account, we updated our twitter handle from Game_Credits to gamecredits and contacted CMC right away asking them to update it. They haven't done that yet. As for the website, I thought it was changed, but I just asked them to update it again.

Also, we're acting like a tech company releasing BETA products. No tech company mass markets their unfinished products to millions of people. That might be a management tactic in the crypto world, but it isn't one of a company aiming to become the next unicorn. You really have no idea what the management is like from the business side of gamecredits. Why? Because we're a company building proprietary products that can't possibly share everything we're working on, and we don't want to market our development because that would only lead to disaster giving our potential competitors insight onto how close we are to potential market success.

Now I have said in the past our marketing and transparency to the cryptocurrency world could be better. We had immense transparency up until about 2.5 months ago when we realized we had to buckle down and work in a bubble without giving people constant updates like we had been used to. HOWEVER, we said in the last week our transparency would be rising and from last week onward you would all get constant updates and more transparency. And guess what? Since then we've released a massive mobile MMORPG with hundreds of hours of game play USING gamecredits payments, a dedicated article regarding GameCredits was published in venturebeat with millions of active readers, we released 9 games in our web wallet for purchase with GAME(see this image below), we will be releasing another newsletter today with more updates, a post regarding the venturebeat article got hundreds of upvotes, Sergey Sholom our CEO was featured on CNBC India earning GAME free media coverage in India, AND GameCredits launched on BitBays new India exchange (one of six currencies available to trade. This all happened IN THE LAST WEEK. Give me a break, there is plenty going on, and our companies management is fucking killer. Now we will do better with transparency to the crypto world, but I think my list I just gave you proves we are.

Jack, please don't get riled up by these people who their lose head the moment the price heads south and starts finding non-existent cracks in the project. You guys have been around since 2014. Very few cryptocurrencies from 2014 are still around to this day and that itself proves that GameCredit's platform and dedication has stood the test of time. I have been very impressed by what you have accomplished so far. GameCredits is one of the few cryptos with a real working product and it's not just a platform anymore, you guys are also promoting some really popular games on it. This is a dream come true for the gaming community. Keep up the good work and get some more popular games. GameCredits has no competition at this stage.

[taipei]

Did you lose money? For you must be the only ones in all cryptoland   .

When I see you cry, what I do is buy more! I just bought 14K! And very cheap! LOL

[Jack Kuveke]

Appreciate the support guys! I promise these kinds of people don't truly get to me (maybe in the moment, but never more than that). I feel it's just important to respond factually and firmly. Think it can only breed confidence in new investors who venture to our thread.

[Rogerdale]

Appreciate the support guys! I promise these kinds of people don't truly get to me (maybe in the moment, but never more than that). I feel it's just important to respond factually and firmly. Think it can only breed confidence in new investors who venture to our thread.

I believe 130M cap is too small for a currency that is going to be a "national currency for all gamers". You can see that "national currency of darknet" Monero has 800M market cap. I expect GameCredits be somewhere there.

But guys, Scrypt mining algo is truly and obvious bad thing... To advance and be the first you need to be the leading currency in your mining algo, and now you are behind Litecoin.

[Albortz]

Appreciate the support guys! I promise these kinds of people don't truly get to me (maybe in the moment, but never more than that). I feel it's just important to respond factually and firmly. Think it can only breed confidence in new investors who venture to our thread.

I believe 130M cap is too small for a currency that is going to be a "national currency for all gamers". You can see that "national currency of darknet" Monero has 800M market cap. I expect GameCredits be somewhere there.

But guys, Scrypt mining algo is truly and obvious bad thing... To advance and be the first you need to be the leading currency in your mining algo, and now you are behind Litecoin.

Well I don't think so. You don't have to be leading in your algo class. LTC is known as silver to gold. I know that is BS but it is used in real life more often than GAME right now.

GAME (I love it) is used for micro payments.   LTC is used to move big amounts 100k+ because its fast and old and trusted.  It has a different angle which is good.


I believe in LTC as well as in GAME and I would just give it some time.  Its hard to get people to adapt to anything new. 

[Rogerdale]

Appreciate the support guys! I promise these kinds of people don't truly get to me (maybe in the moment, but never more than that). I feel it's just important to respond factually and firmly. Think it can only breed confidence in new investors who venture to our thread.

I believe 130M cap is too small for a currency that is going to be a "national currency for all gamers". You can see that "national currency of darknet" Monero has 800M market cap. I expect GameCredits be somewhere there.

But guys, Scrypt mining algo is truly and obvious bad thing... To advance and be the first you need to be the leading currency in your mining algo, and now you are behind Litecoin.

Well I don't think so. You don't have to be leading in your algo class. LTC is known as silver to gold. I know that is BS but it is used in real life more often than GAME right now.

GAME (I love it) is used for micro payments.   LTC is used to move big amounts 100k+ because its fast and old and trusted.  It has a different angle which is good.


I believe in LTC as well as in GAME and I would just give it some time.  Its hard to get people to adapt to anything new. 

No, because LTC miners will mine GAME only if it is more profitable comparing to LTC. And to secure this profit, they need to sell GAME as soon as possible, otherwise this switch doesn't really make sense.

[Jack Kuveke]

Appreciate the support guys! I promise these kinds of people don't truly get to me (maybe in the moment, but never more than that). I feel it's just important to respond factually and firmly. Think it can only breed confidence in new investors who venture to our thread.

I believe 130M cap is too small for a currency that is going to be a "national currency for all gamers". You can see that "national currency of darknet" Monero has 800M market cap. I expect GameCredits be somewhere there.

But guys, Scrypt mining algo is truly and obvious bad thing... To advance and be the first you need to be the leading currency in your mining algo, and now you are behind Litecoin.

We'll do whatever is best for the currency and project. We're not crazy people. But right now we're stable and growing, and if we think that might stop if we don't change we'll definitely begin thinking about the best course of action.

[Albortz]

Appreciate the support guys! I promise these kinds of people don't truly get to me (maybe in the moment, but never more than that). I feel it's just important to respond factually and firmly. Think it can only breed confidence in new investors who venture to our thread.

I believe 130M cap is too small for a currency that is going to be a "national currency for all gamers". You can see that "national currency of darknet" Monero has 800M market cap. I expect GameCredits be somewhere there.

But guys, Scrypt mining algo is truly and obvious bad thing... To advance and be the first you need to be the leading currency in your mining algo, and now you are behind Litecoin.

Well I don't think so. You don't have to be leading in your algo class. LTC is known as silver to gold. I know that is BS but it is used in real life more often than GAME right now.

GAME (I love it) is used for micro payments.   LTC is used to move big amounts 100k+ because its fast and old and trusted.  It has a different angle which is good.


I believe in LTC as well as in GAME and I would just give it some time.  Its hard to get people to adapt to anything new. 

No, because LTC miners will mine GAME only if it is more profitable comparing to LTC. And to secure this profit, they need to sell GAME as soon as possible, otherwise this switch doesn't really make sense.

But GAME is more profitable to mine than LTC....  Don't get me wrong most miners, exchange the bear minimum of their coins. Nomater what they mine.


Almost all of the miners I know, speculate of a bright future for crypto and they believe in all coins succeeding (more of less of course) but all coins will increase over time. And if the underlying tech or service associated with the coin is good, they mine it.


All these facts are in GAME.

[ngin-x]

Appreciate the support guys! I promise these kinds of people don't truly get to me (maybe in the moment, but never more than that). I feel it's just important to respond factually and firmly. Think it can only breed confidence in new investors who venture to our thread.

I believe 130M cap is too small for a currency that is going to be a "national currency for all gamers". You can see that "national currency of darknet" Monero has 800M market cap. I expect GameCredits be somewhere there.

But guys, Scrypt mining algo is truly and obvious bad thing... To advance and be the first you need to be the leading currency in your mining algo, and now you are behind Litecoin.

We'll do whatever is best for the currency and project. We're not crazy people. But right now we're stable and growing, and if we think that might stop if we don't change we'll definitely begin thinking about the best course of action.

Jack, I hope you are thinking about moving to POS at some point. POW is a dying consensus algo and should not be supported anyway as it's slow and wastes electricity. We gotta move with the times you know.

[shavers]

Appreciate the support guys! I promise these kinds of people don't truly get to me (maybe in the moment, but never more than that). I feel it's just important to respond factually and firmly. Think it can only breed confidence in new investors who venture to our thread.

I believe 130M cap is too small for a currency that is going to be a "national currency for all gamers". You can see that "national currency of darknet" Monero has 800M market cap. I expect GameCredits be somewhere there.

But guys, Scrypt mining algo is truly and obvious bad thing... To advance and be the first you need to be the leading currency in your mining algo, and now you are behind Litecoin.

We'll do whatever is best for the currency and project. We're not crazy people. But right now we're stable and growing, and if we think that might stop if we don't change we'll definitely begin thinking about the best course of action.

Jack, I hope you are thinking about moving to POS at some point. POW is a dying consensus algo and should not be supported anyway as it's slow and wastes electricity. We gotta move with the times you know.

We're not actually. GameCredits is Gamers' coin, thus mineable. That's another benefit for gamers and that was the idea from the beginning. Gamers should be able to put their GPUs into good use while not playing games. The new wallet will provide mining option out of the box.