Idiots of Bitcointalk

[TTMNewsMJ]

Who's the idiots of bitcointalk ?

[1714099954]

1714099954

[1714099954]

1714099954

[1714099954]

1714099954

[1714099954]

1714099954

[1714099954]

1714099954

[Kassenzettel]

all are idiots here, except some

[GannickusX]

It must be that I am an idiot because I have some idiot accusation against me AND my team.

You know why Bitcoin is not mainstream and never will be? People like you. associating and accusing someone incorrectly.

Yes you have ruined our service, It is a scam? No it is not. It is fully legit and all funds are kept in separate accounts and then fed off to dice sites. Once there is a profit or loss its reported back.

Summary. You guys are the idiots. You just ruined a fully above board service that works well.

I hope you are happy with yourselves. I know you get some perverse pleasure from calling someone a scammer even when you have no evidence.

Here is the evidence: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1266058.20 You are guaranteeing profit meaning that your site is either a direct scam or a ponzi, both cases, same story.

There is no evidence. Because we are not scamming anyone.

We have NEVER said we guarantee profit ever. Actually far from it, Its gambling. we have turned people away who have asked us otherwise.

So before you join the scam bandwaggon. please read.

So, what's the point of your site then? I might aswell just gamble myself instead of paying for bots to gamble for me when they can lose just as easily? I see no point there and it's obvious that you are trying to scam people.

[PassiveDice]

It must be that I am an idiot because I have some idiot accusation against me AND my team.

You know why Bitcoin is not mainstream and never will be? People like you. associating and accusing someone incorrectly.

Yes you have ruined our service, It is a scam? No it is not. It is fully legit and all funds are kept in separate accounts and then fed off to dice sites. Once there is a profit or loss its reported back.

Summary. You guys are the idiots. You just ruined a fully above board service that works well.

I hope you are happy with yourselves. I know you get some perverse pleasure from calling someone a scammer even when you have no evidence.

Here is the evidence: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1266058.20 You are guaranteeing profit meaning that your site is either a direct scam or a ponzi, both cases, same story.

There is no evidence. Because we are not scamming anyone.

We have NEVER said we guarantee profit ever. Actually far from it, Its gambling. we have turned people away who have asked us otherwise.

So before you join the scam bandwaggon. please read.

So, what's the point of your site then? I might aswell just gamble myself instead of paying for bots to gamble for me when they can lose just as easily? I see no point there and it's obvious that you are trying to scam people.

The bot is a better gambler than you as it doesn't make rash decisions. Its tried and tested and gambles 24/7 for 30 days. Because it is a standalone bot It has no house edge like the dice sites automated bots. Yes it can lose, but any gambling can lose. But it is more likely to make a profit compared to humans.

If you can do that I would be very impressed.

It's not obvious, because we are not. This service is fully legit. But if you want to join the haters go for it.

[allyouracid]

Maybe you can regain your trust by uploading those several gigabytes of log files of the gambling not somewhere, so users can see for themselves that it's profitable in the long term?

This would be interesting on so many levels, because I also have a hard time believing in long term profitability for anyone other than the gambling sites owners.

[GannickusX]

It must be that I am an idiot because I have some idiot accusation against me AND my team.

You know why Bitcoin is not mainstream and never will be? People like you. associating and accusing someone incorrectly.

Yes you have ruined our service, It is a scam? No it is not. It is fully legit and all funds are kept in separate accounts and then fed off to dice sites. Once there is a profit or loss its reported back.

Summary. You guys are the idiots. You just ruined a fully above board service that works well.

I hope you are happy with yourselves. I know you get some perverse pleasure from calling someone a scammer even when you have no evidence.

Here is the evidence: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1266058.20 You are guaranteeing profit meaning that your site is either a direct scam or a ponzi, both cases, same story.

There is no evidence. Because we are not scamming anyone.

We have NEVER said we guarantee profit ever. Actually far from it, Its gambling. we have turned people away who have asked us otherwise.

So before you join the scam bandwaggon. please read.

So, what's the point of your site then? I might aswell just gamble myself instead of paying for bots to gamble for me when they can lose just as easily? I see no point there and it's obvious that you are trying to scam people.

The bot is a better gambler than you as it doesn't make rash decisions. Its tried and tested and gambles 24/7 for 30 days. Because it is a standalone bot It has no house edge like the dice sites automated bots. Yes it can lose, but any gambling can lose. But it is more likely to make a profit compared to humans.

If you can do that I would be very impressed.

It's not obvious, because we are not. This service is fully legit. But if you want to join the haters go for it.

There are no strategies in house edge gambling games, your bots can't do better than me no matter what ''strategy'' they use, if it has the same possibility of loosing long term why would anyone want to PAY for using something that will end up loosing anyways? Makes absolutely no sense.

[Lutpin]

Because it is a standalone bot It has no house edge like the dice sites automated bots.

Bullshit.
The house edge is managed on the server side for EVERY site, you cant do anything about that.
Obvious bullshit is obvious.

So as well as the house edge you are contending with the bot probability edge which are both against you. With our bot you don't have the probability edge to contend with.

Oehm, I don't even...

Code:

This person is dumb, quite stupid and gets involved without understanding situations, very inarticulate. Real lack of brain.

Love your feedback, thanks.

[PassiveDice]

"The bot has no house edge" - bullshit.
The house edge is managed on the server side for EVERY site, you cant do anything about that.
Obvious bullshit is obvious.

I think you missunderstand.

Of course there is a house edge on the server side. But there is also a probability of win on the automated bots that you can use on sites.

If you want something similar to the bot we are offering. You will have to use the automated bot on their site. Which also has an edge.

So as well as the house edge you are contending with the bot probability edge which are both against you. With our bot you don't have the probability edge to contend with.

obvious dumbness is obvious Lutpin.

You are all leaving me back feedback but none of you have any evidence and cannot show me any evidence that would stand up in court. It is all stupid accusations, You really area dumb lot.

[Lauda]

You really area dumb lot.

Calling people names is only going to get you into more trouble. This is not the type of behavior that one would expect from a "team" behind a service. I've already told you this before; be professional.

[PassiveDice]

You really area dumb lot.

Calling people names is only going to get you into more trouble. This is not the type of behavior that one would expect from a "team" behind a service. I've already told you this before; be professional.

Sorry Lauda,

Easier said than done when people are accusing your team with dumb remarks though.

[Lutpin]

Easier said than done when people are accusing your team with dumb remarks though.

Since I (and all others) am "dumb and quite stupid",
please explain me this additional "probability edge" other bots have and yours don't.

[PassiveDice]

Easier said than done when people are accusing your team with dumb remarks though.

Since I (and all others) am "dumb and quite stupid",
please explain me this additional "probability edge" other bots have and yours don't.

As an example. you have sites that have their own robot. So you can just watch or go AFK w/e. It gives you options like Base Bet, Return to base after loss etc etc

You don't think that robot is in any way biased towards the house? even with the house edge... Why would they introduce it if it was not going to make them money?

our bots do not have that. They play as if it was a person but allow you to do the same... go afk. in fact our bots allow you to go afk for much longer.

We are about to introduce a quick withdrawal so you do not have to wait 30 days. We just thought that was a good period for investment.

[Lutpin]

As an example. you have sites that have their own robot. So you can just watch or go AFK w/e. It gives you options like Base Bet, Return to base after loss etc etc
You don't think that robot is in any way biased towards the house? even with the house edge... Why would they introduce it if it was not going to make them money?
our bots do not have that. They play as if it was a person but allow you to do the same... go afk. in fact our bots allow you to go afk for much longer.

Oehm, most sites can roll with the house edge they got. There is no need for them to make their auto-bet "biased towards the house".
All bets are provably fair, the bot makes exactly what its told to do - hence there is no difference in using their auto bet to using your bot.
No additional "probability edge" or whatsoever.

Why would they introduce it if it was not going to make them money?

If one bet "makes you money" (speaking of EV here), what about 2 bets? or 10?
The more BTCs are wagered on a site, the higher their EV is (dumbed down, won't go into several other things). That's why they introduce auto-bets.