Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it

[Akito S. M. Hosana]

The 'apps' are either:
Backdoored (creator packed a Trojan or malware in it).

This might be worth it if no one checked EXE files for viruses. The best option would be if the puzzle creator themselves came across such a program and tested it—though that’s unlikely. 

So, you also think that the programmers are ambushing the creator? 

[farou9]

I have a theory regarding the remaining puzzles. I hope that those who find the key to the next puzzle will be able to delight me with bitcoins. Would you like to hear it?

I will give away 13% of all future finds 

My theory is called Three Numbers. They are 4, 7, and 9. It is applicable in this puzzle.
 Those who don't believe can apply the two previous puzzles using these numbers, and everything will fall into place!
 For the script creators, I would also ask you to send me the working script in a private message if you create it.
 If you want, I can write examples for you and post them here.

What do you want us to do with 4,7,9

[nomachine]

The 'apps' are either:
Backdoored (creator packed a Trojan or malware in it).

This might be worth it if no one checked EXE files for viruses. The best option would be if the puzzle creator themselves came across such a program and tested it—though that’s unlikely.  

So, you also think that the programmers are ambushing the creator?  

I don’t think anything, certainly not enough to elaborate on conspiracy theories. But we all do know what the purpose of malicious programs is, and it’s certainly not to rob the poor.  

[Akito S. M. Hosana]

Maybe it's not about testing Bitcoin's security at all. Maybe the puzzle creator is testing his own security and knowledge—and still having fun in the process.

Maybe. But... it’s just not fun anymore. It’s become monotonous and boring. There are lots of trolls who test my nerves here... 

[nomachine]

There are lots of trolls who test my nerves here... 

LMAO, I can't believe you just said that.  

[kTimesG]

I've got breaking news:

This puzzle isn't meant as a "let's have some fun at home" exercise.

It's a statement on Bitcoin's underlying security, not a raffle or "what's the best software that I never wrote" competition.

And anyone is free to share, or not share anything, troll, or not troll, use bots or not use bots, etc. None of those things really helps with anything though, except maybe showing the diversity of real human nature. We have here actual math fascists, drug heads, delusional "experts", AI-hallucinated breakthroughs, crooks, self-called hackers, and a lot more... as if that's what the puzzles are about.

[Akito S. M. Hosana]

We have here actual math fascists, drug heads, delusional "experts", AI-hallucinated breakthroughs, crooks, self-called hackers, and a lot more... as if that's what the puzzles are about.

Dude, which group do you classify yourself in here? A puzzle — a TED speaker on steroids, or what?  

[fantom06]

We have here actual math fascists, drug heads, delusional "experts", AI-hallucinated breakthroughs, crooks, self-called hackers, and a lot more... as if that's what the puzzles are about.

Dude, which group do you classify yourself in here? A puzzle — a TED speaker on steroids, or what?  

He's afraid of not being able to catch his luck by the tail, that's why he's furious.

[kTimesG]

We have here actual math fascists, drug heads, delusional "experts", AI-hallucinated breakthroughs, crooks, self-called hackers, and a lot more... as if that's what the puzzles are about.

Dude, which group do you classify yourself in here? A puzzle — a TED speaker on steroids, or what?  

I'm the casino's Blackjack dealer - informing you that the Gambler's Fallacy isn't a made-up hoax, no matter what everyone wants you to believe. Too bad this is a legal obligation in Las Vegas, but a no-mans-land conspiracy theory, totally refused as acceptable when it comes to addiction to these puzzles.

And I said several times already that I'm not even bothering to solve address puzzles, nor 135. It's a losing bet, there are much other better things to do in life.

[Niekko]

I feel very sorry for k*G, he’s at war against a group of flat‑Earthers.

[Akito S. M. Hosana]

I feel very sorry for k*G, he’s at war against a group of flat‑Earthers.

I don’t know what he’s doing here. Maybe he’s trying to earn merit? I think there’s a better way to approach some other topics. He’s not convincing here at all—in fact, he seems even less natural. 

[nomachine]

I don’t know what he’s doing here. Maybe he’s trying to earn merit?

Well, you got us. It's all about fame on the forum and the number of badges. I'm really out now...

[kTimesG]

I feel very sorry for k*G, he’s at war against a group of flat‑Earthers.

I don’t know what he’s doing here. Maybe he’s trying to earn merit? I think there’s a better way to approach some other topics. He’s not convincing here at all—in fact, he seems even less natural. 

He is an asshole

This asshole proved that you can do sequential EC points iteration 2x times faster than JLP's code (which is used in almost 100% of all other tools). No one cares.

This asshole presented a better 3-Kangaroo variation months before RCKangaroo, which no one bothered to put in practice, however a few ideas went straight into RetiredCoder's "updated version" for matching Wild-Wild collisions to solve the key. I guess, no one cares, unless they are fed with code as well. And preferably to compile on Windows.

What can I say guys. I still have a few aces down my sleeve, which I will play totally elsewhere. Meanwhile, good luck with all your Python and C++ scripts, see you in a couple of years.

[Bram24732]

I feel very sorry for k*G, he’s at war against a group of flat‑Earthers.

I don’t know what he’s doing here. Maybe he’s trying to earn merit? I think there’s a better way to approach some other topics. He’s not convincing here at all—in fact, he seems even less natural. 

He is an asshole

Maybe, but anything technical he writes is 100% right.

[Virtuose]

I feel very sorry for k*G, he’s at war against a group of flat‑Earthers.

I don’t know what he’s doing here. Maybe he’s trying to earn merit? I think there’s a better way to approach some other topics. He’s not convincing here at all—in fact, he seems even less natural. 

He is an asshole

Maybe, but anything technical he writes is 100% right.

The guy systematically answers with ChatGPT, only ChatGPT always puts "—" between words like at all—in fact, instead of a simple hyphen. Nobody used that before. So it's pretty easy to recognize the intruders and it's quite sad that more and more people don't think for themselves anymore, as if they were lobotomized. And it's not just Akito here... So if you trust someone who systematically asks ChatGPT to answer for him, good luck with your lucidity ^^

[Bram24732]

I feel very sorry for k*G, he’s at war against a group of flat‑Earthers.

I don’t know what he’s doing here. Maybe he’s trying to earn merit? I think there’s a better way to approach some other topics. He’s not convincing here at all—in fact, he seems even less natural. 

He is an asshole

Maybe, but anything technical he writes is 100% right.

The guy systematically answers with ChatGPT, only ChatGPT always puts "—" between words like at all—in fact, instead of a simple hyphen. Nobody used that before. So it's pretty easy to recognize the intruders and it's quite sad that more and more people don't think for themselves anymore, as if they were lobotomized. And it's not just Akito here... So if you trust someone who systematically asks ChatGPT to answer for him, good luck with your lucidity ^^

I don’t mind chatGPT as long as the content is correct.
Most people here using chatGPT seem to have a hard time using it, from what I can see of the quality of answers.

Also, I don’t need to trust anyone. Just pointing to the fact that what he says is correct. Has nothing to do with me trusting the guy or not.

[White hat hacker]

I feel very sorry for k*G, he’s at war against a group of flat‑Earthers.

I don’t know what he’s doing here. Maybe he’s trying to earn merit? I think there’s a better way to approach some other topics. He’s not convincing here at all—in fact, he seems even less natural. 

He is an asshole

Maybe, but anything technical he writes is 100% right.

The guy systematically answers with ChatGPT, only ChatGPT always puts "—" between words like at all—in fact, instead of a simple hyphen. Nobody used that before. So it's pretty easy to recognize the intruders and it's quite sad that more and more people don't think for themselves anymore, as if they were lobotomized. And it's not just Akito here... So if you trust someone who systematically asks ChatGPT to answer for him, good luck with your lucidity ^^

Many use Chat Gpt to fix grammar or simplify sentences so everyone can understand. Just because something looks like it's formatted by ChatGPT doesn't mean it was fully written by AI.

[analyticnomad]

I feel very sorry for k*G, he’s at war against a group of flat‑Earthers.

I don’t know what he’s doing here. Maybe he’s trying to earn merit? I think there’s a better way to approach some other topics. He’s not convincing here at all—in fact, he seems even less natural.  

He is an asshole

I'm humbly new (not to mention woefully ignorant) to all of this but .... I'd rather listen to a correct asshole than an incorrect saint.

[AlexanderCurl]

This asshole proved that you can do sequential EC points iteration 2x times faster than JLP's code (which is used in almost 100% of all other tools). No one cares.


Who really cares about sequential EC points iterations without any other logic attached to it like converting to hex representation and checking for bloomfilter hit or whatever.
Guess that way 2x times faster will be the same as JLP  code.

[Akito S. M. Hosana]

Who really cares about sequential EC points iterations without any other logic attached to it like converting to hex representation and checking for bloomfilter hit or whatever.
Guess that way 2x times faster will be the same as JLP  code.

Well, ‘cause he never actually gave any full code or full logic for real. It’s all just conceptual, theoretical stuff he’s talkin’ about. Nothin’ tangible. Dude’s basically a conceptual artist, honestly.