Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it

[nochkin]

What you're saying makes no sense. Because if there were a bot that could access the private key of Puzzle 71 in just a few seconds by revealing its public key and steal the funds, then surely it could access the private key of Puzzle 135 in just a few minutes as well! And you're claiming this is due to the public key of Puzzle 135 being exposed? Your claim is completely baseless and biased. It seems your only intent is to deceive and mislead other users. If you really found a puzzle's private key, you can go ahead and use your own method to send your transaction—but don’t try to lay that trap for us again

I think you are missing the point on how big numbers work. Puzzle 135 is way-way-way bigger space to search through compared to 71.
It's not double, it's several quintillions more. No way you could find it in "a few minutes".

[mahmood1356]

What you're saying makes no sense. Because if there were a bot that could access the private key of Puzzle 71 in just a few seconds by revealing its public key and steal the funds, then surely it could access the private key of Puzzle 135 in just a few minutes as well! And you're claiming this is due to the public key of Puzzle 135 being exposed? Your claim is completely baseless and biased. It seems your only intent is to deceive and mislead other users. If you really found a puzzle's private key, you can go ahead and use your own method to send your transaction—but don’t try to lay that trap for us again

I think you are missing the point on how big numbers work. Puzzle 135 is way-way-way bigger space to search through compared to 71.
It's not double, it's several quintillions more. No way you could find it in "a few minutes".

I based my statements on what you yourself said. The keyspace of Puzzle 71 is not particularly small either, but according to your claim, bots are capable of accessing the private key in a very short time simply by having the public key. Now, considering that Puzzle 135 has a larger keyspace—which I acknowledge—with the speed you attribute to these bots, don’t you think there has been ample time since the creation of these puzzles for the private key of Puzzle 135 to be discovered and the funds to be transferred? It appears that some of these claims may be misleading. Could it be that you are the same individual who took the Puzzle 69 funds from the person who found it?

[nochkin]

I based my statements on what you yourself said. The keyspace of Puzzle 71 is not particularly small either, but according to your claim, bots are capable of accessing the private key in a very short time simply by having the public key. Now, considering that Puzzle 135 has a larger keyspace—which I acknowledge—with the speed you attribute to these bots, don’t you think there has been ample time since the creation of these puzzles for the private key of Puzzle 135 to be discovered and the funds to be transferred? It appears that some of these claims may be misleading. Could it be that you are the same individual who took the Puzzle 69 funds from the person who found it?

The keyspace of 71 is small enough to get the private key within short period of time.
But 135 is much larger space. No, I don't think there is enough time to get the private key of 135 within similar period of time.
Your claim about "there has been ample time since the creation of these puzzles for the private key of Puzzle 135 to be discovered" is incorrect.
It seems like you did not read my message above. Please do.

It does not matter if i'm the same individual or not. The space for 135 is significantly larger compared to 71. My individuality would not make it smaller.

[3dmlib]

Mempool bot competition #2:

Address: 12B2uyEpoRsLDmJDLHJK5n4LeG946XtqM2
Puzzle 75 address space.
30 usd price.
Public key will be exposed tomorrow 27 June 2025 between 13.00 and 14.00 UTC.
Every participant BTC address which will be visible at least once in mempool RBF timeline will get 10 usd in BTC.

Thanks.

[bibilgin]

How exactly do the prefixes help you solve the puzzle? Or which prefixes have you found?

I have explained this topic before.
I have 252 1PWo3JeB9j prefixes.
I have a lot of wallets with 48+ bit matches. (over 3k +)

My wallets that are close to me;

1PWo3JeB9jrpyPqE6SjTbwjLYKxKYUoJp5
1PWo3JeB9jrUyFawqGsVdTfd1tTvQCrWGN
1PWo3JeB9jrSXEFRQRdQx8h8Zsz49raZr9

It helps me find prefixes similar to 1PWo3JeB9j with a few calculations and also helps with the sister wallet.

https://t.me/+JCW1umP2hN05MzQ0

You can join my group. I have decided not to correspond with anyone here on prefix or other issues.

[kTimesG]

Mempool bot competition #2:

Address: 12B2uyEpoRsLDmJDLHJK5n4LeG946XtqM2
Puzzle 75 address space.

I don't understand what's the point of doing this.

I can solve your pubKey (or any other 75-bit public key for that matter) in at most 10 seconds from the moment it's grabbed from the mempool initial TX.

[E36cat]

Mempool bot competition #2:

Address: 12B2uyEpoRsLDmJDLHJK5n4LeG946XtqM2
Puzzle 75 address space.

I don't understand what's the point of doing this.

I can solve your pubKey (or any other 75-bit public key for that matter) in at most 10 seconds from the moment it's grabbed from the mempool initial TX.

he wants to test if his bot is faster than other bots i guess

[andrzejalatkows]

great!

[3dmlib]

he wants to test if his bot is faster than other bots i guess

Exactly.
Other participants also can do it.
And this is free for them, instead of me.

[Akito S. M. Hosana]

I can solve your pubKey (or any other 75-bit public key for that matter) in at most 10 seconds from the moment it's grabbed from the mempool initial TX.

And the Philosopher, Alberto and Nomachine, they just remain quiet on the topic of bots. Even though they were the first here to discuss it.

[Wanderingaran]

I can solve your pubKey (or any other 75-bit public key for that matter) in at most 10 seconds from the moment it's grabbed from the mempool initial TX.

And the Philosopher, Alberto and Nomachine, they just remain quiet on the topic of bots. Even though they were the first here to discuss it.

Maybe they’re tired of grindin’ in the terminal for just 30 bucks 

[kTimesG]

I can solve your pubKey (or any other 75-bit public key for that matter) in at most 10 seconds from the moment it's grabbed from the mempool initial TX.

And the Philosopher, Alberto and Nomachine, they just remain quiet on the topic of bots. Even though they were the first here to discuss it.

There's the semi-ethical issue that some adhere to. In my view, equal to hiding the shit under the carpet and pretending no one smells it. Maybe that works in fiat economy (everyone pretends they're fine though public debt only goes up exponentially), but not with math.

The basis of Bitcoin having any value is properly managing the security of the keys. If one is dumb enough to not grasp this concept, they well deserve their TX to be replaced, because they failed to understand the fundamentals: your key = your money. Not your key, not your money. And it's not your key if you basically spread it to everyone, everywhere.

There's a simple fix for that: don't do it at all. Don't trust Mara? Then don't attempt to solve weak puzzles, just to later complain your investment went down the drain.

[3dmlib]

There's the semi-ethical issue that some adhere to.

I don't see any ethical issue at all in bot puzzle competition.
I think it even bring more interest to just plain puzzle solving.
All resources about this puzzle have information about this mempool issue.
If solver is just stupid or lazy to read more info, this is his problem.

[Frequence]

he wants to test if his bot is faster than other bots i guess

Exactly.
Other participants also can do it.
And this is free for them, instead of me.

Bro, that doesn’t make any sense. Bots are fast, use the 100 bit range instead.
We have done test and I can confirm that will be done within seconds .. increase the range if you want real fun

Again:( Miners Thanks bro )

[3dmlib]

Bots are fast

Bots are different. They use different endpoints, APIs and algorithms.
This is interesting for me now. Even more interesting than just plain solving puzzle, which I already did a lot.
If nothing changes in puzzle then this bots will be actual many-many years from now.

[HABJo12]

I can solve your pubKey (or any other 75-bit public key for that matter) in at most 10 seconds from the moment it's grabbed from the mempool initial TX.

And the Philosopher, Alberto and Nomachine, they just remain quiet on the topic of bots. Even though they were the first here to discuss it.

There's the semi-ethical issue that some adhere to. In my view, equal to hiding the shit under the carpet and pretending no one smells it. Maybe that works in fiat economy (everyone pretends they're fine though public debt only goes up exponentially), but not with math.

The basis of Bitcoin having any value is properly managing the security of the keys. If one is dumb enough to not grasp this concept, they well deserve their TX to be replaced, because they failed to understand the fundamentals: your key = your money. Not your key, not your money. And it's not your key if you basically spread it to everyone, everywhere.

There's a simple fix for that: don't do it at all. Don't trust Mara? Then don't attempt to solve weak puzzles, just to later complain your investment went down the drain.

   

Dear Sir what us your opinion on using slipstream usage ? Not on the concept but on the website crediibility ? Can you beleive them ?

[mcdouglasx]

There's the semi-ethical issue that some adhere to.

I don't see any ethical issue at all in bot puzzle competition.
I think it even bring more interest to just plain puzzle solving.
All resources about this puzzle have information about this mempool issue.
If solver is just stupid or lazy to read more info, this is his problem.

This is the kind of reasoning used by those who say, "I'm not a thief for stealing his wallet; it's not my fault that the fool fell asleep with his wallet in his hand"

Obviously, it's unethical and immoral.
It's like breaking into a friend's house, seeing his seed, and stealing it, then saying he should have been more careful.

Now that it has no legal implications, that is something else.

[kTimesG]

This is the kind of reasoning used by those who say, "I'm not a thief for stealing his wallet; it's not my fault that the fool fell asleep with his wallet in his hand"

Obviously, it's unethical and immoral.
It's like breaking into a friend's house, seeing his seed, and stealing it, then saying he should have been more careful.

Now that it has no legal implications, that is something else.

Satoshi himself kindly disagrees. Whoever has the key, owns the funds. Now, my friend should just use private key 0x01 and transfer his life savings into that address, right? No one will ever touch it.

Last time I checked, it wasn't unethical or illegal to add two numbers together.

What's next, unethical to use quantum computers to break all cryptocurrencies? Seriously? You'd need to have a word with China about how non-ethical it is to break RSA first, since they just did that, before getting slammed by all big tech giants following along.

[mcdouglasx]

This is the kind of reasoning used by those who say, "I'm not a thief for stealing his wallet; it's not my fault that the fool fell asleep with his wallet in his hand"

Obviously, it's unethical and immoral.
It's like breaking into a friend's house, seeing his seed, and stealing it, then saying he should have been more careful.

Now that it has no legal implications, that is something else.

Satoshi himself kindly disagrees. Whoever has the key, owns the funds. Now, my friend should just use private key 0x01 and transfer his life savings into that address, right? No one will ever touch it.

Last time I checked, it wasn't unethical or illegal to add two numbers together.

What's next, unethical to use quantum computers to break all cryptocurrencies? Seriously? You'd need to have a word with China about how non-ethical it is to break RSA first, since they just did that, before getting slammed by all big tech giants following along.

Take the coins from someone you know and let them know it was you. See if the law says the coins belong to the person with the key. You'll probably be arrested, as is normal for a crime.

What Satoshi said is a philosophical and technical approach to the idea that anyone with your keys can spend them, because that's actually the case. But that doesn't mean it doesn't have ethical and legal implications.

[3dmlib]

Take the coins from someone you know and let them know it was you. See if the law says the coins belong to the person with the key. You'll probably be arrested, as is normal for a crime.

What Satoshi said is a philosophical and technical approach to the idea that anyone with your keys can spend them, because that's actually the case. But that doesn't mean it doesn't have ethical and legal implications.

Online casino is "very ethical" business Playing on poor people souls weaknesses.