djm34 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
January 07, 2016, 05:06:57 PM |
|
As far as I understand (please correct me, djm34, if I'm wrong), the 50% gain is based on the latest opensource kernel by djm34, NOT the one on the sp_ fork, which includes about 10% improvement by sp_ and another 10% by myself. So the gain at the end should be about 30%.
don't know for sure actually, if you can tell me what is the hashrate of the opensource code (or which sp version to use, I can do a comparison, I think sp change on blake mixing was incorporated before I gave a quote)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
Al_may
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
January 07, 2016, 05:37:14 PM |
|
As far as I understand (please correct me, djm34, if I'm wrong), the 50% gain is based on the latest opensource kernel by djm34, NOT the one on the sp_ fork, which includes about 10% improvement by sp_ and another 10% by myself. So the gain at the end should be about 30%.
don't know for sure actually, if you can tell me what is the hashrate of the opensource code (or which sp version to use, I can do a comparison, I think sp change on blake mixing was incorporated before I gave a quote) with SP_ ver .74 my 970's get 563 with his ver 7.7 I get 368 Kh/s on neoscrypt
|
|
|
|
Grout
|
|
January 07, 2016, 08:15:42 PM |
|
87a38017a306d45152261735da5a2c21473bd7891886783cd960b05bb2f45a67 Even if you don't reach the goal, consider this a thank you for your previous work and an incentive to opensource a little more, and troll a little less ;-)
|
|
|
|
djm34 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
January 07, 2016, 09:06:11 PM |
|
As far as I understand (please correct me, djm34, if I'm wrong), the 50% gain is based on the latest opensource kernel by djm34, NOT the one on the sp_ fork, which includes about 10% improvement by sp_ and another 10% by myself. So the gain at the end should be about 30%.
don't know for sure actually, if you can tell me what is the hashrate of the opensource code (or which sp version to use, I can do a comparison, I think sp change on blake mixing was incorporated before I gave a quote) with SP_ ver .74 my 970's get 563 with his ver 7.7 I get 368 Kh/s on neoscrypt ok so it is even more than 50% (I don't have a 970, I only have 980's)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
jakals
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
January 07, 2016, 09:10:27 PM |
|
As far as I understand (please correct me, djm34, if I'm wrong), the 50% gain is based on the latest opensource kernel by djm34, NOT the one on the sp_ fork, which includes about 10% improvement by sp_ and another 10% by myself. So the gain at the end should be about 30%.
don't know for sure actually, if you can tell me what is the hashrate of the opensource code (or which sp version to use, I can do a comparison, I think sp change on blake mixing was incorporated before I gave a quote) with SP_ ver .74 my 970's get 563 with his ver 7.7 I get 368 Kh/s on neoscrypt ok so it is even more than 50% (I don't have a 970, I only have 980's) will you look at adding support for cuda 2.1 djm ? or is it not applicable
|
|
|
|
djm34 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
January 07, 2016, 09:10:57 PM |
|
87a38017a306d45152261735da5a2c21473bd7891886783cd960b05bb2f45a67 Even if you don't reach the goal, consider this a thank you for your previous work and an incentive to opensource a little more, and troll a little less ;-)
Thanks for your support, can't promise much on the trolling part though (which is usually a reaction on something I consider as trolling) Djm
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
January 07, 2016, 09:13:45 PM |
|
As far as I understand (please correct me, djm34, if I'm wrong), the 50% gain is based on the latest opensource kernel by djm34, NOT the one on the sp_ fork, which includes about 10% improvement by sp_ and another 10% by myself. So the gain at the end should be about 30%.
don't know for sure actually, if you can tell me what is the hashrate of the opensource code (or which sp version to use, I can do a comparison, I think sp change on blake mixing was incorporated before I gave a quote) with SP_ ver .74 my 970's get 563 with his ver 7.7 I get 368 Kh/s on neoscrypt ok so it is even more than 50% (I don't have a 970, I only have 980's) Hmmmm no.... your version should do 650-700 while mine does 560 on the 970.
|
|
|
|
djm34 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
January 07, 2016, 09:23:04 PM |
|
As far as I understand (please correct me, djm34, if I'm wrong), the 50% gain is based on the latest opensource kernel by djm34, NOT the one on the sp_ fork, which includes about 10% improvement by sp_ and another 10% by myself. So the gain at the end should be about 30%.
don't know for sure actually, if you can tell me what is the hashrate of the opensource code (or which sp version to use, I can do a comparison, I think sp change on blake mixing was incorporated before I gave a quote) with SP_ ver .74 my 970's get 563 with his ver 7.7 I get 368 Kh/s on neoscrypt ok so it is even more than 50% (I don't have a 970, I only have 980's) will you look at adding support for cuda 2.1 djm ? or is it not applicable I can look, however I can't promise; I tried on the previous version and didn't succeed.
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
djm34 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
January 08, 2016, 08:07:24 AM |
|
No. After Djm34 has released his new sourcecode I will add a few percent and add it to my fork as I usually do. Then you can donate.
thank you for allowing me to test the moderation
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
ldw-com
|
|
January 08, 2016, 08:58:44 AM |
|
Only 88% more in donations needed. Almost there!
|
|
|
|
djm34 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
January 08, 2016, 09:07:14 AM |
|
Only 88% more in donations needed. Almost there! tbh, considering the pledge only started yesterday, this is rather good (and someone donated 0.1btc before the start of the pledge)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
ldw-com
|
|
January 08, 2016, 09:18:09 AM |
|
Only 88% more in donations needed. Almost there! tbh, considering the pledge only started yesterday, this is rather good (and someone donated 0.1btc before the start of the pledge) Ah okay! That's better! Well, if you keep this thread alive, i'm sure you'll make it Good luck!
|
|
|
|
djm34 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
January 08, 2016, 09:23:38 AM |
|
Only 88% more in donations needed. Almost there! tbh, considering the pledge only started yesterday, this is rather good (and someone donated 0.1btc before the start of the pledge) Ah okay! That's better! Well, if you keep this thread alive, i'm sure you'll make it Good luck! Thanks djm
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
bathrobehero
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
|
|
January 08, 2016, 10:04:38 AM |
|
Any chance we get numbers on a 970? Also, are these stock figures or with OC?
|
Not your keys, not your coins!
|
|
|
djm34 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
January 08, 2016, 10:15:12 AM |
|
Any chance we get numbers on a 970? Also, are these stock figures or with OC? Those numbers are with OC actually, overclocking the memory clock helps a bit like with all memory hard algo. Regarding the 970, I don't have one... so it is difficult to say...
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
January 08, 2016, 10:23:51 AM |
|
Any chance we get numbers on a 970? Also, are these stock figures or with OC? Those numbers are with OC actually, overclocking the memory clock helps a bit like with all memory hard algo. Regarding the 970, I don't have one... so it is difficult to say... djm34 ... is there a way we can gauge how far into the pledge we are as time goes on? ... maybe an update in the op once every few days or something? ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
djm34 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
January 08, 2016, 10:31:26 AM |
|
Any chance we get numbers on a 970? Also, are these stock figures or with OC? Those numbers are with OC actually, overclocking the memory clock helps a bit like with all memory hard algo. Regarding the 970, I don't have one... so it is difficult to say... djm34 ... is there a way we can gauge how far into the pledge we are as time goes on? ... maybe an update in the op once every few days or something? ... #crysx sure, just need to use the block explorer: https://blockchain.info/address/16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw (+0.1btc actually) I can add that link to the OP
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
djm34 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
January 09, 2016, 11:43:37 AM |
|
As far as I understand (please correct me, djm34, if I'm wrong), the 50% gain is based on the latest opensource kernel by djm34, NOT the one on the sp_ fork, which includes about 10% improvement by sp_ and another 10% by myself. So the gain at the end should be about 30%.
don't know for sure actually, if you can tell me what is the hashrate of the opensource code (or which sp version to use, I can do a comparison, I think sp change on blake mixing was incorporated before I gave a quote) with SP_ ver .74 my 970's get 563 with his ver 7.7 I get 368 Kh/s on neoscrypt ok so it is even more than 50% (I don't have a 970, I only have 980's) Hmmmm no.... your version should do 650-700 while mine does 560 on the 970. ok I did a few check with the sp/pallas version (74), this new version is "only" 25% faster at this point.
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
January 09, 2016, 02:10:14 PM |
|
Djm34, does this version work fast on cuda 7.5? How does it compare to itself compiled on 6.5? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Grout
|
|
January 09, 2016, 04:55:59 PM |
|
87a38017a306d45152261735da5a2c21473bd7891886783cd960b05bb2f45a67 Even if you don't reach the goal, consider this a thank you for your previous work and an incentive to opensource a little more, and troll a little less ;-)
Thanks for your support, can't promise much on the trolling part though (which is usually a reaction on something I consider as trolling) Dammit! Refund please! :-D
|
|
|
|
|