Bitcoin will be at CES2013 (Official Thread)

[smoothie]

"Guys let's put up a box with fans and not call it a demo...let's call it a ....?"

Non-Proof of concept?

At least they used aluminum rather than cardboard. The 30k was well spent.

30k worth of aluminum, fans, and nexus's

[1714658861]

1714658861

[1714658861]

1714658861

[1714658861]

1714658861

[1714658861]

1714658861

[1714658861]

1714658861

[1714658861]

1714658861

[Seth Otterstad]

Surely BitPay, the most reputable business in bitcoin, would not want to process millions of dollars in payments to a scam company.  They must have done some kind of homework.  Have they made any comments about this?

[lucif]

Hehe. Too big to fall?

I said earlier, there is no business in Bitcoin having some sort of responsibility.

Slovens all around. Just Slovens.

[mrb]

I will overdeliver on this point.

Epic CES video being edited / uploaded.

teasers:

1)  I easily once again sneak in to CES
2)  BFL guy literally hands me an actual quarter (I have the quarter) and tells me to get a clue instead of talking with me about his product on display at CES
3)  I take a very informative and well-spoken interview from the Bitpay guys about their round of funding, and congratulated them on spreading the bitcoin gospel and generally working for good.  I further explained I am starting an ecig company and will be of course using bitpay as my bitcoin processor.
4)  start filming the box of fans & $100 androids & 3 plastic cases they brought to CES (from afar, they are sort of guarding their equipment at this point and I moved to the other side to interview the Bitpay guys) and explain that BFL has been given roughly 50x the amount of funding that bitpay has just received, but in the form of pre-orders.  At this point I'm pretty sure the BFL guys called Venetian security because...
5)  I get kicked out

Epic video on the way.  BFL a total scam, they act exactly as scammers would and I will show you a perfect side-by-side comparison of how a real business would look at CES vs. a total, utter scam.

Put your money where your mouth is: bet against "Butterfly Labs ASIC is real".

If you are right that BFL are scammers, then you will roughly triple your coins (there is only 51.55 BTC on your side, but 109.74 BTC on mine). But I suppose you are going to invent some excuse for not betting, like every single person in my sig...

[smoothie]

I will overdeliver on this point.

Epic CES video being edited / uploaded.

teasers:

1)  I easily once again sneak in to CES
2)  BFL guy literally hands me an actual quarter (I have the quarter) and tells me to get a clue instead of talking with me about his product on display at CES
3)  I take a very informative and well-spoken interview from the Bitpay guys about their round of funding, and congratulated them on spreading the bitcoin gospel and generally working for good.  I further explained I am starting an ecig company and will be of course using bitpay as my bitcoin processor.
4)  start filming the box of fans & $100 androids & 3 plastic cases they brought to CES (from afar, they are sort of guarding their equipment at this point and I moved to the other side to interview the Bitpay guys) and explain that BFL has been given roughly 50x the amount of funding that bitpay has just received, but in the form of pre-orders.  At this point I'm pretty sure the BFL guys called Venetian security because...
5)  I get kicked out

Epic video on the way.  BFL a total scam, they act exactly as scammers would and I will show you a perfect side-by-side comparison of how a real business would look at CES vs. a total, utter scam.

Put your money where your mouth is: bet against "Butterfly Labs ASIC is real".

If you are right that BFL are scammers, then you will roughly triple your coins (there is only 51.55 BTC on your side, but 109.74 BTC on mine). But I suppose you are going to invent some excuse for not betting...

Not all of us are gamblers. Pointing out the truth has nothing to do with gambling. LOL fail harder and try harder lol

[mrb]

Not all of us are gamblers. Pointing out the truth has nothing to do with gambling. LOL fail harder and try harder lol

By your definition, this is not gambling, since you call it "truth" and seem so certain about it.
The fact you refuse to bet, shows that you have low confidence in your claim that BFL are scammers

[lucif]

Iron argument bro! Haha

[lucif]

Hehe. BFL is not scam coz people want to believe... in duck tales (Who-hoo!)... And bet money on that.

You are the best )

[smoothie]

Not all of us are gamblers. Pointing out the truth has nothing to do with gambling. LOL fail harder and try harder lol

By your definition, this is not gambling, since you call it "truth"
The fact you too refuse to bet, shows that you don't believe your own claim that BFL are scammers 

Where did I ever say BFL are scammers? lol get your facts straight buddy.

Where did I define "gambling"? Once again fail harder and try harder LOL!

I refuse to bet because that is irrelevant. I don't need to bet to be convinced and help convince others that BFL is full of shit. LOL

[mrb]

Where did I ever say BFL are scammers? lol get your facts straight buddy.

Here:

That's the part most people miss. Scammers don't like when people tell the truth about their scam(s).

[smoothie]

Where did I ever say BFL are scammers? lol get your facts straight buddy.

Here:

That's the part most people miss. Scammers don't like when people tell the truth about their scam(s).

FOR THE SECOND TIME, Where does it say that I said BFL are scammers?

I said scammers...not BFL dipshit lol. Fail harder bro!  

Wow you fail at simple logic. Talking about scammers and BFL in the same paragraph doesn't mean I said BFL are scammers.

[lucif]

Bitpay: Do you realize in what boiling water did you put your balls deep?

[mrb]

FOR THE SECOND TIME, Where does it say that I said BFL are scammers?

I said scammers...not BFL dipshit lol. Fail harder bro!  

Wow you fail at simple logic. Talking about scammers and BFL in the same paragraph doesn't mean I said BFL are scammers.

Yes it does. This is called "context".

Example: if I write "This man is smoothie. I dislike morons." I never say "smoothie is a moron", but I imply it by context.

If not, why did you write the sentence? Who are you referring to by "scammers"? You need to learn to communicate more clearly.

[smoothie]

FOR THE SECOND TIME, Where does it say that I said BFL are scammers?

I said scammers...not BFL dipshit lol. Fail harder bro!  

Wow you fail at simple logic. Talking about scammers and BFL in the same paragraph doesn't mean I said BFL are scammers.

Yes it does. This is called "context".

If not, why did you write the sentence? Who are you referring to by "scammers"? You need to learn to communicate more clearly.

It's called implication.

You claimed I said that "BFL are scammers".

I never said that. Perhaps I implied it.

I was referring to ALL scammers when I said "scammers". Seriously you need to learn to follow more closely and make sure what you claim is in fact 100% true and not what you want to be true.

No I've said it in the "context" the way i wanted it. What you interpret it as is your fucking problem.

So no, you need to ask questions before talking/assuming things, and not that I need to communicate more clearly.

If you wanted to know what I meant, just ask. LOL

you failed so hard on this one buddy lol 

[mrb]

Perhaps I implied it.

Point demonstrated.

[smoothie]

Perhaps I implied it.

Point demonstrated.

LOL perhaps = maybe. Doesn't mean I did. Point not demonstrated.

Change subject: How much do you have in preorders with BFL? lol  

[lucif]

He sold his kidney

[smoothie]

He sold his kidney

And took out a credit loan at 45% apr to buy asic mini rigs lol

[mrb]

I don't need to bet to [...] help convince others that BFL is full of shit. LOL

Actually, yes. Your criticism of BFL completely fails to convince me. So, yes you would need to bet in order for me to take you seriously.

[smoothie]

I don't need to bet to [...] help convince others that BFL is full of shit. LOL

Actually, yes. Your criticism of BFL completely fails to convince me. So, yes you would need to bet in order for me to take you seriously.

So let's do this game again:

Where did I ever say that I care if you take me seriously?

It's just funny to see yourself stumble all over your claims about things that really didn't happen as you claimed it has.

 

Let's play again!

Go for it buddy. Bet your bitcoins! See if I care! lol