[ANN] Rubies (RBIES) Gaming and casino entertainment currency.

[CryptoDatabase]

Any plans to fix the wallet soon? It is getting frustrating having to resync the blockchain every time I try to send coins. Not even kidding, this is the 8th time I have had to resync the blockchain.

This time though it didn't show that my wallet was out of sync, I was just behind the block explorer by 100 or so blocks and the wallet said it was up to date.

Some side info, my RBIES wallet runs 24/7.

Same thing happen to me had my wallet resync everytime I open and it took almost a day to resync I stopped staking my wallet and just wait for the update,a friend also has similar experience,the wallet really needs attention.

Yes, this is a big problem for me as I have to send out payments for my game from it.

Earlier I sent out payments and didn't realize the wallet was on a different fork as it didn't show it was out of sync like normal, only realized when one of my players said they didn't get their coins when my wallet showed 5 confirmations.

[1714712614]

1714712614

[1714712614]

1714712614

[1714712614]

1714712614

[CryptoDatabase]

A small tip that should go a long way,

If your wallet is on the current correct block create a zipped folder of your block files. This way if it forks you can just delete your current block files and use a copy that is good.

Something I should have done but regretfully haven't.

[BTCforJoe]

A small tip that should go a long way,

If your wallet is on the current correct block create a zipped folder of your block files. This way if it forks you can just delete your current block files and use a copy that is good.

Something I should have done but regretfully haven't.

My god. Never realized to do this before. Thanks man, you just saved me a bunch of hours and bandwidth lol

[CryptoDatabase]

An update on my wallet situation.

My last successful stake was on October 30th, my wallet contains around 200 failed stakes without even 1 successful stake. Each failed stake is roughly 1-5 seconds after the next and goes on like this for hours on end before the wallet forks and have to resync.

This cycle keeps repeating itself no matter what.

[mammix2]

An update on my wallet situation.

My last successful stake was on October 30th, my wallet contains around 200 failed stakes without even 1 successful stake. Each failed stake is roughly 1-5 seconds after the next and goes on like this for hours on end before the wallet forks and have to resync.

This cycle keeps repeating itself no matter what.

Hi, can you tell me what block number you are on, and which version of the wallet you are using, also, if its a deamon / windows or MacOS platform you are in

[CryptoDatabase]

An update on my wallet situation.

My last successful stake was on October 30th, my wallet contains around 200 failed stakes without even 1 successful stake. Each failed stake is roughly 1-5 seconds after the next and goes on like this for hours on end before the wallet forks and have to resync.

This cycle keeps repeating itself no matter what.

Hi, can you tell me what block number you are on, and which version of the wallet you are using, also, if its a deamon / windows or MacOS platform you are in

Right now it is current with the block explorer on BetterBets showing 193261 blocks. After my last post another string of 200+ mined stakes came in this time all but 4 actually staked.

I'm not using a daemon or anything, the wallet is hosted on a HP 2000 Windows 10 laptop

[mammix2]

Everything seems fine at the moment. I know the past has been a bit unstable, but since the latest wallets were released using a standardized version of OpenSSL things seem ok. The most important thing is that all the wallets i have checked or helped out with other users recently have all been on the correct block height, which points toward the consensus issues we had in the past were caused by OpenSSL
1 of the things that makes a blockchain that relies on staking unstable, is the distribution, or lack of. If you look at the block explorer top 100 you can see the majority of distribution is still within the first 25 wallets. While this is a lot better that some other projects it still shows where forking can occur. I look at the statistics every day and can see the difficulty value fluctuate regularly. This means people with large balances are not leaving their wallets open 24/7, or at least constantly staking a portion of their balances. When a wallet with a large balance that has been offline for a while, comes back online their staking potential is much greater, and can cause the their wallet to stake intensely, until the difficulty rises to compensate. This has always been an issue with any blockchain, especially if more that 1 wallet is doing the same intense staking simultaneously.

Usual rules...

>>Connectivity<<
1) If your wallet is showing as offline, firstly restart it. if it still doesn't connect, check the debug.log and look for any 'misbehaving' messages
2) If it still shows offline after restarting it or you do see misbehaving messages in the debug log. You will need to re-sync. I've posted detailed steps on how to do this in previous posts

>>Missing staking rewards<<
1) Every wallet at some stage will inevitably show an invalid or unaccepted stake, this is caused by the block being found by more that 1 wallet at the same time, so the reward for that block will only be given to 1 of those wallets.
2) If you have recently had to re-sync you may need to rescan for missing transactions, especially if you have had many successive invalid transactions due to a fork. Kill the wallet and start it form the command line but also use the -rescan switch e.g.

Code:

rubies-core-qt-win-v1.2.1.0.exe -rescan

If anyone still has connectivity or wallet issues let us know.

I hope this info help

[CryptoDatabase]

Everything seems fine at the moment. I know the past has been a bit unstable, but since the latest wallets were released using a standardized version of OpenSSL things seem ok. The most important thing is that all the wallets i have checked or helped out with other users recently have all been on the correct block height, which points toward the consensus issues we had in the past were caused by OpenSSL
1 of the things that makes a blockchain that relies on staking unstable, is the distribution, or lack of. If you look at the block explorer top 100 you can see the majority of distribution is still within the first 25 wallets. While this is a lot better that some other projects it still shows where forking can occur. I look at the statistics every day and can see the difficulty value fluctuate regularly. This means people with large balances are not leaving their wallets open 24/7, or at least constantly staking a portion of their balances. When a wallet with a large balance that has been offline for a while, comes back online their staking potential is much greater, and can cause the their wallet to stake intensely, until the difficulty rises to compensate. This has always been an issue with any blockchain, especially if more that 1 wallet is doing the same intense staking simultaneously.

Usual rules...

>>Connectivity<<
1) If your wallet is showing as offline, firstly restart it. if it still doesn't connect, check the debug.log and look for any 'misbehaving' messages
2) If it still shows offline after restarting it or you do see misbehaving messages in the debug log. You will need to re-sync. I've posted detailed steps on how to do this in previous posts

>>Missing staking rewards<<
1) Every wallet at some stage will inevitably show an invalid or unaccepted stake, this is caused by the block being found by more that 1 wallet at the same time, so the reward for that block will only be given to 1 of those wallets.
2) If you have recently had to re-sync you may need to rescan for missing transactions, especially if you have had many successive invalid transactions due to a fork. Kill the wallet and start it form the command line but also use the -rescan switch e.g.

Code:

rubies-core-qt-win-v1.2.1.0.exe -rescan

If anyone still has connectivity or wallet issues let us know.

I hope this info help

My wallet currently contains 303k RBIES with 291k of those being on one address, would it help if this was spread over more addresses? The last time my wallet forked I was only staking around 40k or so RBIES, the other times it was 3-4x that amount that it was stuck on.

[mammix2]

Everything seems fine at the moment. I know the past has been a bit unstable, but since the latest wallets were released using a standardized version of OpenSSL things seem ok. The most important thing is that all the wallets i have checked or helped out with other users recently have all been on the correct block height, which points toward the consensus issues we had in the past were caused by OpenSSL
1 of the things that makes a blockchain that relies on staking unstable, is the distribution, or lack of. If you look at the block explorer top 100 you can see the majority of distribution is still within the first 25 wallets. While this is a lot better that some other projects it still shows where forking can occur. I look at the statistics every day and can see the difficulty value fluctuate regularly. This means people with large balances are not leaving their wallets open 24/7, or at least constantly staking a portion of their balances. When a wallet with a large balance that has been offline for a while, comes back online their staking potential is much greater, and can cause the their wallet to stake intensely, until the difficulty rises to compensate. This has always been an issue with any blockchain, especially if more that 1 wallet is doing the same intense staking simultaneously.

Usual rules...

>>Connectivity<<
1) If your wallet is showing as offline, firstly restart it. if it still doesn't connect, check the debug.log and look for any 'misbehaving' messages
2) If it still shows offline after restarting it or you do see misbehaving messages in the debug log. You will need to re-sync. I've posted detailed steps on how to do this in previous posts

>>Missing staking rewards<<
1) Every wallet at some stage will inevitably show an invalid or unaccepted stake, this is caused by the block being found by more that 1 wallet at the same time, so the reward for that block will only be given to 1 of those wallets.
2) If you have recently had to re-sync you may need to rescan for missing transactions, especially if you have had many successive invalid transactions due to a fork. Kill the wallet and start it form the command line but also use the -rescan switch e.g.

Code:

rubies-core-qt-win-v1.2.1.0.exe -rescan

If anyone still has connectivity or wallet issues let us know.

I hope this info help

My wallet currently contains 303k RBIES with 291k of those being on one address, would it help if this was spread over more addresses? The last time my wallet forked I was only staking around 40k or so RBIES, the other times it was 3-4x that amount that it was stuck on.

no that's fine. once the balance starts to stake it will be split up into new addresses anyway. If you expand the coin control panel you will see all the smaller amounts that make up the entire balance

[mammix2]

hi all,
The stake weight has dropped quite low again, can you check that your wallets are staking ok?

[CryptoDatabase]

hi all,
The stake weight has dropped quite low again, can you check that your wallets are staking ok?

Ah yes mine was out of sync, resyncing from an old copy now. Is there anything that can be done to stop this from happening?

[hopenotlate]

Not sure what is a correct syake amount for my wallet ( is there any rough formula to have a first check at it) but am staking seemengly correctly.

I only noticed if I keep my wallet closd for some days straight when I reopen it the stake amount  I I receive is bigger than usual and opposite happens when I keep it open for 24/7.
Lately I open and close it randomly so not sure what should be an average right amount I should receive under normal conditions.

[gordonhill]

Happy THANKSGIVING to our American players & friends. Enjoy and have fun!!

#thanksgivingthursday

]


KEEP PLAYING AT BETTERBETS.IO

Cheers!! ●‿●

[mammix2]

Arrrgh!!, this is screwing my brain with all this re-synching...

Still looking into this, bare with us.

[coin-investor]

Is there a chance that Rbies recover it's old glory,although the volume is still high but it's coming from people dumping the coin,this is still a good coin to invest but update on this thread is to long.

[gordonhill]

Hi guys, Betterbets.io RBIES wallet are under maintenance.

Once the maintenance concluded we will notify all of you.


Note : No coins will be lost or burn.



KEEP PLAYING AT BETTERBETS.IO

Cheers!! ●‿●

[jojotequila11]

thank you....

[Lanzador]

Is there a chance that Rbies recover it's old glory,although the volume is still high but it's coming from people dumping the coin,this is still a good coin to invest but update on this thread is to long.

The problem is that they told to people like me to keep the 'RBIES', because they were going to add them to moneypot so we can invest.

After 6 months of waiting for nothing I decided to sold over 200k Rbies +

It is pretty ridiculous - every time Rubies are on their deathbed, MP comes out and gives us a reason to keep them all

[CryptoDatabase]

Is there a chance that Rbies recover it's old glory,although the volume is still high but it's coming from people dumping the coin,this is still a good coin to invest but update on this thread is to long.

The problem is that they told to people like me to keep the 'RBIES', because they were going to add them to moneypot so we can invest.

After 6 months of waiting for nothing I decided to sold over 200k Rbies +

It is pretty ridiculous - every time Rubies are on their deathbed, MP comes out and gives us a reason to keep them all

From a developers viewpoint, it takes a while to write code and organize things, then test it to make sure it is working properly.

Patience is a virtue, I'm sure those that have dumped will have some regret in the coming weeks.

[robelneo]

Is there a chance that Rbies recover it's old glory,although the volume is still high but it's coming from people dumping the coin,this is still a good coin to invest but update on this thread is to long.

The problem is that they told to people like me to keep the 'RBIES', because they were going to add them to moneypot so we can invest.

After 6 months of waiting for nothing I decided to sold over 200k Rbies +

It is pretty ridiculous - every time Rubies are on their deathbed, MP comes out and gives us a reason to keep them all

From a developers viewpoint, it takes a while to write code and organize things, then test it to make sure it is working properly.

Patience is a virtue, I'm sure those that have dumped will have some regret in the coming weeks.

I  totally agree had a lot of coins on my wallets but these devs promise for an update and future upgrade,I believe them because it is not easy to  create an update or organize things as long as the dev comes and post on the thread about the latest news it is still ok.