Bitcoin Forum
June 30, 2024, 02:06:29 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 ... 639 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][XRB]Cryptocurrency's killer app: RaiBlocks micropayments  (Read 774991 times)
kryptopojken
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 767
Merit: 532


View Profile
April 05, 2016, 09:11:48 AM
 #661

Faucet was the most fair distribution imo
MALCOM X X X
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 297
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 05, 2016, 09:15:30 AM
 #662

Faucet was the most fair distribution imo

Yes i'm agree with you..
And why we should make this community bigger..?
DEV never listening what community want..

We should make POLL in this community..
Remember community what make this coin worth... and bigger..
jibble
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 05, 2016, 09:18:07 AM
 #663

this is the idea i put forward this morning

"Would it be possible to have an adaptive faucet with changing numbers depending on demand of the coin

there is no way to make it perfect and last the full 24 hours , but having the faucet distribute a specific number of coins on each request depending on how busy and how many requests it gets in say an hour , or the the day before .

if the faucet on day one empties in 12 hours , then half the reward , if there are still some coins left in the faucet on day 2 because it didnt quite reach as many the second day , increase slightly to reflect demand. "

kryptopojken
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 767
Merit: 532


View Profile
April 05, 2016, 09:18:28 AM
 #664

But I get the feeling that Dev got irritated that ppl are "mining" and selling so now he wants to make a profit himself...am I right?
MALCOM X X X
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 297
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 05, 2016, 09:20:31 AM
 #665

But I get the feeling that Dev got irritated that ppl are "mining" and selling so now he wants to make a profit himself...am I right?

Because he got nothing... and captcha solver.. enjoying the money..
kryptopojken
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 767
Merit: 532


View Profile
April 05, 2016, 09:21:28 AM
 #666

He can solve captcha too Cheesy
MALCOM X X X
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 297
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 05, 2016, 09:23:00 AM
 #667

He can solve captcha too Cheesy

He done it alone before.. before he caught.. Grin
wasref
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 555
Merit: 500


View Profile
April 05, 2016, 09:23:40 AM
 #668

i dont mind dev keeping 10% but faucet is fair ofcourse if people cheat then nothing can be done you just make it harder
mightyghz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100



View Profile
April 05, 2016, 09:26:56 AM
 #669

reduce faucet rewards in 2-10 times less, and if at the end of the month/week/day plan for distribution won't be done go and sell in auction
MALCOM X X X
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 297
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 05, 2016, 09:28:15 AM
 #670

Look before jibble make a thread about trading section..

DEV always filled faucet address when its empty..

And look now..  Grin
MALCOM X X X
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 297
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 05, 2016, 09:30:47 AM
 #671

reduce faucet rewards in 2-10 times less, and if at the end of the month/week/day plan for distribution won't be done go and sell in auction


I agree with reduce reward.. back to original distribution..

but.. Grin
3worlduser
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 306
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 05, 2016, 09:43:14 AM
 #672

And what is the DEV position about this issue, in the first place he made the auction without asking anybody, and the only explanation he gave was that "some people found the captcha to complicated and that an auction was the simple way to distribute the coin, and the only difference was that the BTC were for him and not for captcha-miners"....is the same guy that wanted to distribute to the maximum number of people? that didn't wanted his coin to be monopolized? how an auction help a coin to not be monopolized, if it will just be on the hands of the guys with more economical power?

jibble
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 05, 2016, 09:50:56 AM
 #673

And what is the DEV position about this issue, in the first place he made the auction without asking anybody, and the only explanation he gave was that "some people found the captcha to complicated and that an auction was the simple way to distribute the coin, and the only difference was that the BTC were for him and not for captcha-miners"....is the same guy that wanted to distribute to the maximum number of people? that didn't wanted his coin to be monopolized? how an auction help a coin to not be monopolized, if it will just be on the hands of the guys with more economical power?

one of his main issues was  , the amount of time and effort that distracted him away from developing , it was a full time job just keeping the website and faucet functioning , then add onto that 50 angry faucet solvers complaining when the faucet dried out cos the daily amount in the faucet was claimed , i think it might of be an "ah fuck it moment"

he was spending all his time trying to do right by people , causing him not to be able to actually code for the coin and even then it was constant complaints , i think he choose it for the easy less trouble option , so he could get back to work coding
3worlduser
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 306
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 05, 2016, 10:04:46 AM
 #674

And what is the DEV position about this issue, in the first place he made the auction without asking anybody, and the only explanation he gave was that "some people found the captcha to complicated and that an auction was the simple way to distribute the coin, and the only difference was that the BTC were for him and not for captcha-miners"....is the same guy that wanted to distribute to the maximum number of people? that didn't wanted his coin to be monopolized? how an auction help a coin to not be monopolized, if it will just be on the hands of the guys with more economical power?

one of his main issues was  , the amount of time and effort that distracted him away from developing , it was a full time job just keeping the website and faucet functioning , then add onto that 50 angry faucet solvers complaining when the faucet dried out cos the daily amount in the faucet was claimed , i think it might of be an "ah fuck it moment"

he was spending all his time trying to do right by people , causing him not to be able to actually code for the coin and even then it was constant complaints , i think he choose it for the easy less trouble option , so he could get back to work coding

so he decided to monopolize the coin so that he get daily profit and leave the control of the coin to the 7 guys with more money. I just don't understand how that fit in an equal distribution?

TheBomber999
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1001


"shh, he's coding..."


View Profile
April 05, 2016, 10:07:52 AM
 #675


I think 475k Mrai per lot is to much Smiley

You either die a developer, or live long enough to see yourself become the scammer.
O muori da programmatore, o vivi tanto a lungo da diventare uno scammer.
jibble
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 05, 2016, 10:14:52 AM
 #676

And what is the DEV position about this issue, in the first place he made the auction without asking anybody, and the only explanation he gave was that "some people found the captcha to complicated and that an auction was the simple way to distribute the coin, and the only difference was that the BTC were for him and not for captcha-miners"....is the same guy that wanted to distribute to the maximum number of people? that didn't wanted his coin to be monopolized? how an auction help a coin to not be monopolized, if it will just be on the hands of the guys with more economical power?

one of his main issues was  , the amount of time and effort that distracted him away from developing , it was a full time job just keeping the website and faucet functioning , then add onto that 50 angry faucet solvers complaining when the faucet dried out cos the daily amount in the faucet was claimed , i think it might of be an "ah fuck it moment"

he was spending all his time trying to do right by people , causing him not to be able to actually code for the coin and even then it was constant complaints , i think he choose it for the easy less trouble option , so he could get back to work coding

so he decided to monopolize the coin so that he get daily profit and leave the control of the coin to the 7 guys with more money. I just don't understand how that fit in an equal distribution?

I am not condoning auctioning but it wouldn't always be the same 7 people buying the blocks , it would be 7 blocks a week and would likely of ended up more diluted and shared more than if faucet remained the way it was going .

anders lokka
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 05, 2016, 10:17:26 AM
 #677

Fair Distribution = Shut up and give me your fucking btc.  Grin Grin Grin

Free faucet distribution has turned into: "how much are you willing to pay? More you pay, more chance to grab mrai"
So fair.....

I have performed the most faster yobit ico sold out in 29 Minutes.
NEW PROJECT SOON!!!
3worlduser
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 306
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 05, 2016, 10:23:54 AM
 #678

And what is the DEV position about this issue, in the first place he made the auction without asking anybody, and the only explanation he gave was that "some people found the captcha to complicated and that an auction was the simple way to distribute the coin, and the only difference was that the BTC were for him and not for captcha-miners"....is the same guy that wanted to distribute to the maximum number of people? that didn't wanted his coin to be monopolized? how an auction help a coin to not be monopolized, if it will just be on the hands of the guys with more economical power?

one of his main issues was  , the amount of time and effort that distracted him away from developing , it was a full time job just keeping the website and faucet functioning , then add onto that 50 angry faucet solvers complaining when the faucet dried out cos the daily amount in the faucet was claimed , i think it might of be an "ah fuck it moment"

he was spending all his time trying to do right by people , causing him not to be able to actually code for the coin and even then it was constant complaints , i think he choose it for the easy less trouble option , so he could get back to work coding

so he decided to monopolize the coin so that he get daily profit and leave the control of the coin to the 7 guys with more money. I just don't understand how that fit in an equal distribution?


I am not condoning auctioning but it wouldn't always be the same 7 people buying the blocks , it would be 7 blocks a week and would likely of ended up more diluted and shared more than if faucet remained the way it was going .



come on how hard is to create a couple of gmail account and push the bids up? how hard would be to someone with enough money to buy all the coins for a week put high bids the next one and sell all his coins on a secondary market and then magically erase the bid on the forum? that kind of price manipulation is what I'm talking, and all this behind the transparency of a google forum

TheBomber999
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1001


"shh, he's coding..."


View Profile
April 05, 2016, 10:27:36 AM
 #679

IMHO, These auctions likes a dump in exchange by dev

You either die a developer, or live long enough to see yourself become the scammer.
O muori da programmatore, o vivi tanto a lungo da diventare uno scammer.
jibble
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 05, 2016, 10:31:26 AM
 #680

And what is the DEV position about this issue, in the first place he made the auction without asking anybody, and the only explanation he gave was that "some people found the captcha to complicated and that an auction was the simple way to distribute the coin, and the only difference was that the BTC were for him and not for captcha-miners"....is the same guy that wanted to distribute to the maximum number of people? that didn't wanted his coin to be monopolized? how an auction help a coin to not be monopolized, if it will just be on the hands of the guys with more economical power?

one of his main issues was  , the amount of time and effort that distracted him away from developing , it was a full time job just keeping the website and faucet functioning , then add onto that 50 angry faucet solvers complaining when the faucet dried out cos the daily amount in the faucet was claimed , i think it might of be an "ah fuck it moment"

he was spending all his time trying to do right by people , causing him not to be able to actually code for the coin and even then it was constant complaints , i think he choose it for the easy less trouble option , so he could get back to work coding

so he decided to monopolize the coin so that he get daily profit and leave the control of the coin to the 7 guys with more money. I just don't understand how that fit in an equal distribution?


I am not condoning auctioning but it wouldn't always be the same 7 people buying the blocks , it would be 7 blocks a week and would likely of ended up more diluted and shared more than if faucet remained the way it was going .



come on how hard is to create a couple of gmail account and push the bids up? how hard would be to someone with enough money to buy all the coins for a week put high bids the next one and sell all his coins on a secondary market and then magically erase the bid on the forum? that kind of price manipulation is what I'm talking, and all this behind the transparency of a google forum

you have a good point , i was focusing solely on the auction under fair conditions but you are right it can be very very easily manipulated
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 ... 639 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!