|
Bitboy12345
|
 |
October 28, 2016, 06:43:15 AM |
|
Smart investors sold waves today to buy Stratis, at least Stratis will have full node soon, way before Waves.
You are right on the money. This is not a fud. Just a fact that the above comparison is a testament to how slow the dev is working. Let us state the facts... waves hold 30k btc from ico . stratis has merely 900 . waves ico price jumps just a 100% while stratis has already zoom to 600% from its ico price and their development and transparency are no match for waves. Stratis will support the popular C# for the development of their NBitcoin node and sidechains while waves uses scala (with limited support from a team that has huge funds for ICO). How disappointing it is I may say. On the money , very well said. Go to other threads to promote your shitcoins Stratis and Komodo, stupid paid trolls, we dont care about your shitcoins, GTFO Lols at paid trolls. I've just over 205k waves, bought avg 38k. If trolls get paid this much, sign me up. Waves recovering well, 10/11th November key date! Whats happening on the 10/11? 10/11 of November - deadline when the Full nodes will be absolutely© ready according to Sasha' words. WAVES on Azure  Thats good news. People are quick to discredit the devs about nodes etc but what many don't realize is that nodes are a small piece of a big pie. Another point to consider is that the timing of the release is obviously being planned as strategic, hence it not having happened as punters would have liked. |
|
|
|
|
Bitboy12345
|
|
October 28, 2016, 07:34:24 AM |
|
Smart investors sold waves today to buy Stratis, at least Stratis will have full node soon, way before Waves.
You are right on the money. This is not a fud. Just a fact that the above comparison is a testament to how slow the dev is working. Let us state the facts... waves hold 30k btc from ico . stratis has merely 900 . waves ico price jumps just a 100% while stratis has already zoom to 600% from its ico price and their development and transparency are no match for waves. Stratis will support the popular C# for the development of their NBitcoin node and sidechains while waves uses scala (with limited support from a team that has huge funds for ICO). How disappointing it is I may say. On the money , very well said. Go to other threads to promote your shitcoins Stratis and Komodo, stupid paid trolls, we dont care about your shitcoins, GTFO fuckin trolls... lol  |
|
|
|
|
goldcoinminer
|
|
October 28, 2016, 07:53:07 AM |
|
Smart investors sold waves today to buy Stratis, at least Stratis will have full node soon, way before Waves.
You are right on the money. This is not a fud. Just a fact that the above comparison is a testament to how slow the dev is working. Let us state the facts... waves hold 30k btc from ico . stratis has merely 900 . waves ico price jumps just a 100% while stratis has already zoom to 600% from its ico price and their development and transparency are no match for waves. Stratis will support the popular C# for the development of their NBitcoin node and sidechains while waves uses scala (with limited support from a team that has huge funds for ICO). How disappointing it is I may say. On the money , very well said. Go to other threads to promote your shitcoins Stratis and Komodo, stupid paid trolls, we dont care about your shitcoins, GTFO Lols at paid trolls. I've just over 205k waves, bought avg 38k. If trolls get paid this much, sign me up. Waves recovering well, 10/11th November key date! Whats happening on the 10/11? 10/11 of November - deadline when the Full nodes will be absolutely© ready according to Sasha' words. WAVES on Azure Thats good news. People are quick to discredit the devs about nodes etc but what many don't realize is that nodes are a small piece of a big pie. Another point to consider is that the timing of the release is obviously being planned as strategic, hence it not having happened as punters would have liked. Hey dude! I bet you are one of the investors during the ICO that's why you have so much confident for the developers.. I have not seen sasha made some updates in this thread which was lock once.. Maybe he was too busy with his hired new professional working on the nodes which people are craving.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bitboy12345
|
|
October 28, 2016, 07:58:33 AM |
|
Smart investors sold waves today to buy Stratis, at least Stratis will have full node soon, way before Waves.
You are right on the money. This is not a fud. Just a fact that the above comparison is a testament to how slow the dev is working. Let us state the facts... waves hold 30k btc from ico . stratis has merely 900 . waves ico price jumps just a 100% while stratis has already zoom to 600% from its ico price and their development and transparency are no match for waves. Stratis will support the popular C# for the development of their NBitcoin node and sidechains while waves uses scala (with limited support from a team that has huge funds for ICO). How disappointing it is I may say. On the money , very well said. Go to other threads to promote your shitcoins Stratis and Komodo, stupid paid trolls, we dont care about your shitcoins, GTFO Lols at paid trolls. I've just over 205k waves, bought avg 38k. If trolls get paid this much, sign me up. Waves recovering well, 10/11th November key date! Whats happening on the 10/11? 10/11 of November - deadline when the Full nodes will be absolutely© ready according to Sasha' words. WAVES on Azure Thats good news. People are quick to discredit the devs about nodes etc but what many don't realize is that nodes are a small piece of a big pie. Another point to consider is that the timing of the release is obviously being planned as strategic, hence it not having happened as punters would have liked. Hey dude! I bet you are one of the investors during the ICO that's why you have so much confident for the developers.. I have not seen sasha made some updates in this thread which was lock once.. Maybe he was too busy with his hired new professional working on the nodes which people are craving.. Hey bro! Yes... could be, although I know the devs are more active on this forum https://wavestalk.org/ Check it out.  |
|
|
|
omedian
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 265
Merit: 100
DATABLOCKCHAIN.IO SALE IS LIVE | MVP @ DBC.IO
|
|
October 28, 2016, 08:15:42 AM |
|
If waves goes anywhere near 40k sats I will be picking some up Forsure with big announcements coming and polo add just makes sense to...
when will people figure out that polo will never list waves ... It doesn't matter, I'm one of the few who had a lot of trades going on Polo but I moved to Bittrex mainly because of Waves, I realized Polo didn't matter so much to me so now I'm also trading my other cryptos here. Polo won't matter when Bittrex will have the same volume because their devs weren't as lazy as theirs, both received the same package at the beginning to implement into their exchanges. Polo will add it when they'll realize they're missing on something but it doesn't matter if they don't. |
|
|
|
|
Bitboy12345
|
|
October 28, 2016, 08:27:50 AM |
|
If waves goes anywhere near 40k sats I will be picking some up Forsure with big announcements coming and polo add just makes sense to...
when will people figure out that polo will never list waves ... It doesn't matter, I'm one of the few who had a lot of trades going on Polo but I moved to Bittrex mainly because of Waves, I realized Polo didn't matter so much to me so now I'm also trading my other cryptos here. Polo won't matter when Bittrex will have the same volume because their devs weren't as lazy as theirs, both received the same package at the beginning to implement into their exchanges. Polo will add it when they'll realize they're missing on something but it doesn't matter if they don't. I'm speculating when I say I think the answer is even more obvious than the general consensus... at this stage of the game if you withdraw your tokens from bittrex into your waves client and visa versa you have to remove the 1W value in the front of your address to execute the request. The devs have made it clear that this minor will be addressed with the release of full nodes... having said that and taking into account that the waves team probably offered both exchanges (polo and trex) the same package, I'm guessing bittrex was willing to add waves irrespective of this minor differential and polo most likely agreed to add the currency once this crease was ironed out... that being when the nodes are released. There's no way in hell polo are gonna reject an opportunity to make some serious money by not adding waves at some point. |
|
|
|
|
St.Stephan
|
|
October 28, 2016, 08:33:08 AM |
|
If waves goes anywhere near 40k sats I will be picking some up Forsure with big announcements coming and polo add just makes sense to...
when will people figure out that polo will never list waves ... It doesn't matter, I'm one of the few who had a lot of trades going on Polo but I moved to Bittrex mainly because of Waves, I realized Polo didn't matter so much to me so now I'm also trading my other cryptos here. Polo won't matter when Bittrex will have the same volume because their devs weren't as lazy as theirs, both received the same package at the beginning to implement into their exchanges. Polo will add it when they'll realize they're missing on something but it doesn't matter if they don't. I'm speculating when I say I think the answer is even more obvious than the general consensus... at this stage of the game if you withdraw your tokens from bittrex into your waves client and visa versa you have to remove the 1W value in the front of your address to execute the request. The devs have made it clear that this minor will be addressed with the release of full nodes... having said that and taking into account that the waves team probably offered both exchanges (polo and trex) the same package, I'm guessing bittrex was willing to add waves irrespective of this minor differential and polo most likely agreed to add the currency once this crease was ironed out... that being when the nodes are released. There's no way in hell polo are gonna reject an opportunity to make some serious money by not adding waves at some point. Dream on. Sasha trashed Polo over ETC. Stated goal of Waves is to replace exchanges like Polo. Polo adds ZCash today. After a week with huge Waves volume on trx. Any mention of Waves? Nope. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bitboy12345
|
|
October 28, 2016, 08:38:29 AM |
|
If waves goes anywhere near 40k sats I will be picking some up Forsure with big announcements coming and polo add just makes sense to...
when will people figure out that polo will never list waves ... It doesn't matter, I'm one of the few who had a lot of trades going on Polo but I moved to Bittrex mainly because of Waves, I realized Polo didn't matter so much to me so now I'm also trading my other cryptos here. Polo won't matter when Bittrex will have the same volume because their devs weren't as lazy as theirs, both received the same package at the beginning to implement into their exchanges. Polo will add it when they'll realize they're missing on something but it doesn't matter if they don't. I'm speculating when I say I think the answer is even more obvious than the general consensus... at this stage of the game if you withdraw your tokens from bittrex into your waves client and visa versa you have to remove the 1W value in the front of your address to execute the request. The devs have made it clear that this minor will be addressed with the release of full nodes... having said that and taking into account that the waves team probably offered both exchanges (polo and trex) the same package, I'm guessing bittrex was willing to add waves irrespective of this minor differential and polo most likely agreed to add the currency once this crease was ironed out... that being when the nodes are released. There's no way in hell polo are gonna reject an opportunity to make some serious money by not adding waves at some point. Dream on. Sasha trashed Polo over ETC. Stated goal of Waves is to replace exchanges like Polo. Polo adds ZCash today. After a week with huge Waves volume on trx. Any mention of Waves? Nope. and how do you know this? did he say he trashed polo? Just because the goal is to replace exchanges that doesn't mean they wont add it. And what does zcash have to do with waves? |
|
|
|
lestherat
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 986
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 28, 2016, 08:44:48 AM |
|
If waves goes anywhere near 40k sats I will be picking some up Forsure with big announcements coming and polo add just makes sense to...
when will people figure out that polo will never list waves ... It doesn't matter, I'm one of the few who had a lot of trades going on Polo but I moved to Bittrex mainly because of Waves, I realized Polo didn't matter so much to me so now I'm also trading my other cryptos here. Polo won't matter when Bittrex will have the same volume because their devs weren't as lazy as theirs, both received the same package at the beginning to implement into their exchanges. Polo will add it when they'll realize they're missing on something but it doesn't matter if they don't. I'm speculating when I say I think the answer is even more obvious than the general consensus... at this stage of the game if you withdraw your tokens from bittrex into your waves client and visa versa you have to remove the 1W value in the front of your address to execute the request. The devs have made it clear that this minor will be addressed with the release of full nodes... having said that and taking into account that the waves team probably offered both exchanges (polo and trex) the same package, I'm guessing bittrex was willing to add waves irrespective of this minor differential and polo most likely agreed to add the currency once this crease was ironed out... that being when the nodes are released. There's no way in hell polo are gonna reject an opportunity to make some serious money by not adding waves at some point. Yes, this is the most sense, Poloniex dont want to deal with thousands of tickets, asking where are my waves, why cant deposit, where is my money, you know a lot of noobies asking how to deposit or withdrawal Waves. Dont hear to St.Stephan, he is only a fudster troll. |
|
|
|
|
|
Xtar
|
|
October 28, 2016, 09:00:36 AM
Last edit: October 28, 2016, 10:01:25 AM by Xtar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
omedian
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 265
Merit: 100
DATABLOCKCHAIN.IO SALE IS LIVE | MVP @ DBC.IO
|
|
October 28, 2016, 09:05:18 AM |
|
If waves goes anywhere near 40k sats I will be picking some up Forsure with big announcements coming and polo add just makes sense to...
when will people figure out that polo will never list waves ... It doesn't matter, I'm one of the few who had a lot of trades going on Polo but I moved to Bittrex mainly because of Waves, I realized Polo didn't matter so much to me so now I'm also trading my other cryptos here. Polo won't matter when Bittrex will have the same volume because their devs weren't as lazy as theirs, both received the same package at the beginning to implement into their exchanges. Polo will add it when they'll realize they're missing on something but it doesn't matter if they don't. I'm speculating when I say I think the answer is even more obvious than the general consensus... at this stage of the game if you withdraw your tokens from bittrex into your waves client and visa versa you have to remove the 1W value in the front of your address to execute the request. The devs have made it clear that this minor will be addressed with the release of full nodes... having said that and taking into account that the waves team probably offered both exchanges (polo and trex) the same package, I'm guessing bittrex was willing to add waves irrespective of this minor differential and polo most likely agreed to add the currency once this crease was ironed out... that being when the nodes are released. There's no way in hell polo are gonna reject an opportunity to make some serious money by not adding waves at some point. Yes, this is the most sense, Poloniex dont want to deal with thousands of tickets, asking where are my waves, why cant deposit, where is my money, you know a lot of noobies asking how to deposit or withdrawal Waves. Dont hear to St.Stephan, he is only a fudster troll. Having "some crypto" here and "some crypto" there is like comparing Spotify exclusives to Apple Music ones, for these two it's understandable as they bought rights on their exclusive stuff to be more attractive than the other music streaming services. For exchanges, exclusivity makes no sense: Polo, Bittrex, the future Waves decentralized exchange and others can simply add a coin whenever their own conditions are met without paying any fee. They don't want to be left behind because another exchange has that "huge new album" and they don't. |
|
|
|
|
Bitboy12345
|
|
October 28, 2016, 09:07:48 AM |
|
If waves goes anywhere near 40k sats I will be picking some up Forsure with big announcements coming and polo add just makes sense to...
when will people figure out that polo will never list waves ... It doesn't matter, I'm one of the few who had a lot of trades going on Polo but I moved to Bittrex mainly because of Waves, I realized Polo didn't matter so much to me so now I'm also trading my other cryptos here. Polo won't matter when Bittrex will have the same volume because their devs weren't as lazy as theirs, both received the same package at the beginning to implement into their exchanges. Polo will add it when they'll realize they're missing on something but it doesn't matter if they don't. I'm speculating when I say I think the answer is even more obvious than the general consensus... at this stage of the game if you withdraw your tokens from bittrex into your waves client and visa versa you have to remove the 1W value in the front of your address to execute the request. The devs have made it clear that this minor will be addressed with the release of full nodes... having said that and taking into account that the waves team probably offered both exchanges (polo and trex) the same package, I'm guessing bittrex was willing to add waves irrespective of this minor differential and polo most likely agreed to add the currency once this crease was ironed out... that being when the nodes are released. There's no way in hell polo are gonna reject an opportunity to make some serious money by not adding waves at some point. Yes, this is the most sense, Poloniex dont want to deal with thousands of tickets, asking where are my waves, why cant deposit, where is my money, you know a lot of noobies asking how to deposit or withdrawal Waves. Dont hear to St.Stephan, he is only a fudster troll. Having "some crypto" here and "some crypto" there is like comparing Spotify exclusives to Apple Music ones, for these two it's understandable as they bought rights on their exclusive stuff to be more attractive than the other music streaming services. For exchanges, exclusivity makes no sense: Polo, Bittrex, the future Waves decentralized exchange and others can simply add a coin whenever their own conditions are met without paying any fee. They don't want to be left behind because another exchange has that "huge new album" and they don't. exactly! |
|
|
|
|
Bitboy12345
|
|
October 28, 2016, 09:09:16 AM |
|
Nice update... thank you xtar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xtar
|
|
October 28, 2016, 09:57:11 AM
Last edit: October 28, 2016, 01:16:01 PM by Xtar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitboy12345
|
|
October 28, 2016, 10:08:37 AM |
|
Okay... thanks for the info. |
|
|
|
lestherat
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 986
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 28, 2016, 10:13:02 AM |
|
Holly crap i install that shit, if i got infected im gonna hunt Xtar |
|
|
|
|
Acura3600
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2960
Merit: 1243
|
|
October 28, 2016, 10:14:53 AM |
|
Holly crap i install that shit, if i got infected im gonna hunt Xtar Scan your PC with Malware Anti-bytes www.malwarebytes.com & the Program Spybot Search & Destroy - that can help |
|
|
|
|
|
Twiggy Smile
|
|
October 28, 2016, 10:19:35 AM |
|
### Please everybody who has a git account report the scammer to git asap! He/she/they are trying to impersonate the Waves Platform. The more reports git receives about an account the faster they will take it down.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
