yassprod
Member
 Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
 |
October 21, 2016, 12:43:50 AM |
|
Hey guys.
Just wondering about Waves exchange at Poloniex, anything new about that ?
Polo will probably add Waves after the release of the full nodes. You think so ? sasha already said that they have everything they need. wondering why they haven't added Waves yet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remember that Bitcoin is still beta software. Don't put all of your money into BTC!
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
Solidsnake2016
Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
|
|
October 21, 2016, 12:50:09 AM |
|
Hey guys.
Just wondering about Waves exchange at Poloniex, anything new about that ?
Polo will probably add Waves after the release of the full nodes. You think so ? sasha already said that they have everything they need. wondering why they haven't added Waves yet Probably weeding out all the bugs. The last thing we want is an unstable network. |
|
|
|
|
hiddensphinx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1457
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 21, 2016, 12:51:34 AM |
|
mETH IPO address only have 8.5 BTC left!!!!  |
|
|
|
yassprod
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
October 21, 2016, 12:54:18 AM |
|
Hey guys.
Just wondering about Waves exchange at Poloniex, anything new about that ?
Polo will probably add Waves after the release of the full nodes. You think so ? sasha already said that they have everything they need. wondering why they haven't added Waves yet Probably weeding out all the bugs. The last thing we want is an unstable network. i think you're right, after launching the full nodes they will surely add Waves |
|
|
|
|
Solidsnake2016
Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
|
|
October 21, 2016, 12:59:12 AM |
|
Hey guys.
Just wondering about Waves exchange at Poloniex, anything new about that ?
Polo will probably add Waves after the release of the full nodes. You think so ? sasha already said that they have everything they need. wondering why they haven't added Waves yet Probably weeding out all the bugs. The last thing we want is an unstable network. i think you're right, after launching the full nodes they will surely add Waves Just wait for the price to go down and accumulate more waves  |
|
|
|
|
yassprod
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
October 21, 2016, 01:02:28 AM |
|
Yes, that's what i'm doing. after trading a bit the last week now i'm waiting for the price to go down to buy more Waves
|
|
|
|
|
|
altseeker
|
|
October 21, 2016, 01:06:13 AM |
|
Hey guys.
Just wondering about Waves exchange at Poloniex, anything new about that ?
Polo will probably add Waves after the release of the full nodes. You think so ? sasha already said that they have everything they need. wondering why they haven't added Waves yet Probably weeding out all the bugs. The last thing we want is an unstable network. i think you're right, after launching the full nodes they will surely add Waves Don't be so sure of immediate listing after full nodes released, it will probably take some time besides we don't know what Poloniex thinks about waves. |
|
|
|
|
yassprod
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
October 21, 2016, 01:23:52 AM |
|
Hey guys.
Just wondering about Waves exchange at Poloniex, anything new about that ?
Polo will probably add Waves after the release of the full nodes. You think so ? sasha already said that they have everything they need. wondering why they haven't added Waves yet Probably weeding out all the bugs. The last thing we want is an unstable network. i think you're right, after launching the full nodes they will surely add Waves Don't be so sure of immediate listing after full nodes released, it will probably take some time besides we don't know what Poloniex thinks about waves. Maybe not immediate listing, but they will list for sure i think |
|
|
|
|
Solidsnake2016
Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
|
|
October 21, 2016, 01:35:04 AM |
|
Honestly, we don't need Polo. We're doing fine on Bittrex
|
|
|
|
|
yassprod
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
October 21, 2016, 01:38:30 AM |
|
Honestly, we don't need Polo. We're doing fine on Bittrex
i think we do, poloniex has more volume and more users, the price will surely blow up after listing on polo |
|
|
|
|
Solidsnake2016
Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
|
|
October 21, 2016, 01:45:22 AM |
|
Honestly, we don't need Polo. We're doing fine on Bittrex
i think we do, poloniex has more volume and more users, the price will surely blow up after listing on polo It could go either way. The price could dump if there are more shares available for sale than there are willing buyers at the current price. Whales could also take advantage of the high volume to unload their waves. |
|
|
|
|
yassprod
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
October 21, 2016, 01:48:34 AM |
|
Honestly, we don't need Polo. We're doing fine on Bittrex
i think we do, poloniex has more volume and more users, the price will surely blow up after listing on polo It could go either way. The price could dump if there are more shares available for sale than there are willing buyers at the current price. Whales could also take advantage of the high volume to unload their waves. Yes probaly, in crypto's world everything is possible |
|
|
|
|
lestherat
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 986
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 21, 2016, 03:14:15 AM |
|
Honestly, we don't need Polo. We're doing fine on Bittrex
i think we do, poloniex has more volume and more users, the price will surely blow up after listing on polo It could go either way. The price could dump if there are more shares available for sale than there are willing buyers at the current price. Whales could also take advantage of the high volume to unload their waves. Back in the past, btc whales unload their btc at 1 usd, now all of them are regret, Same thing with Waves, not point on unload it, instead, accumulate more and more, why to sell at .2 usd if you can sell slowly a part of your holds at 2 or 10 usd |
|
|
|
|
|
bitcoinuserz
|
|
October 21, 2016, 04:03:26 AM |
|
How long until the full node?
|
Korean Chinese Translator
Professional Korean translator.
|
|
|
|
@boutiuqe
|
|
October 21, 2016, 04:21:32 AM |
|
break 38k is new support  waves will dump hard.......... |
|
|
|
|
|
Twiggy Smile
|
|
October 21, 2016, 04:34:31 AM |
|
Enhancing Scalability with Improved Authenticated Dynamic Dictionaries Leonid Reyzin, Dmitry Meshkov, Alex Chepurnoy and Sasha Ivanov have recently released a paper in which they detail the improvements made over existing implementations of two-party and three-party authenticated dynamic dictionaries. This approach will be implemented on the Waves Platform, improving its performance, scalability and ease-of-access. With most cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, when a miner adds a block, other miners verify that every transaction within it is correct and accept the block into their version of the blockchain. Users that run a full node or an SPV node are required to watch the blockchain and/or perform partial verification. To verify each transaction, they need to know the balance of the payer’s account. The simple solution is to have every verifier maintain a dynamic dictionary data structure of account addresses and account balances. Unfortunately, as this data structure grows, verifiers need to invest into more RAM (and thus can no longer operate with commodity hardware) or accept significant slowdowns that come with storing data structures in secondary storage. Unlike the aforementioned system, authenticated dynamic dictionaries allow miners to hold the entire data structure and to modify it as transactions are processed. They publish proofs that every transaction resulted in the correct modification of the data structure. Verifiers are only required to hold a short version of the data structure that is modified to match its current state, as they verify these proofs, without ever having to store the structure itself. This system is especially useful in multi-asset systems where miners may choose to process transactions only for some types of assets but still need to verify all transactions. Read more - http://coremedia.info/index.php/waves-news/item/336-enhancing-scalability-with-improved-authenticated-dynamic-dictionarieshttps://twitter.com/coremedia_info/status/789228496249905153 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mokuton
|
|
October 21, 2016, 04:47:37 AM |
|
How long until the full node?
Pretty sure it won't be this weekend lol. Dumps incoming |
|
|
|
|
|
bcmine
|
|
October 21, 2016, 04:49:36 AM |
|
How long until the full node?
lets give me a date to you. its the birthday of sasha. |
|
|
|
|
lestherat
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 986
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 21, 2016, 05:36:43 AM |
|
How long until the full node?
Pretty sure it won't be this weekend lol. Dumps incoming Only a retards will dump now, is pretty stupid selling at this price, when we are close to full node release. All of you trolls dumping now trying to short, i hope get burned and buy back at 50k or 100k  |
|
|
|
|
|
kingorbust
|
|
October 21, 2016, 05:40:40 AM |
|
How long until the full node?
Pretty sure it won't be this weekend lol. Dumps incoming Only a retards will dump now, is pretty stupid selling at this price, when we are close to full node release. All of you trolls dumping now trying to short, i hope get burned and buy back at 50k or 100k who knows I did not sell at over 42 because I have no nerves for that. Bu I doubt people who sold over 40 or even at little less are retards. When the price jumped to 41,42, people were saying here the same: only idiots dump now. Well, actually, people who dumped at 42 and are now buinyt back at 38 are not idiots, but clever people and they profited nicely. |
▄████▄
▄████████▄
▄████████████▄
▄████████████████▄
████████████████████ ▄█▄ ▄███▄ ▄███▄ ▄████████████████▀ ▄██████████
▄▄▄▀█████▀▄▄▄▄▀█████▀▄▄▄ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ██
▄█████▄▀▀▀▄██████▄▀▀▀▄█████▄ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▄█▄ ▀██████████████▄
████████████████████████████ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀█▀ ██
▀████████████████████████▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▄█▄ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ██
▀████████████████████▀ ▀███▀ ▀███▀ ▀█▀ ▀███▀ ▄███████████████████████████████████▀
▀████████████████▀
▀████████████▀
▀████████▀
▀████▀
| ║║
║█
║█
║║ | .
| .
║║
██
║║
| .
| .
║║
██
║║
| .
| ║║
█║
█║
║║ | |
|
|
|
|
