Like everyon previoulsy, I find this project interesting, and I'll sure keep a look at it
! But tell me, is it me or it is a lot Lisk-like ? 100 000 000 millions of coins, bounties proportions a bit equal, etc. ? Maybe this is a "fake" feeling because of Lisk presence this last times, but that's what catched my eye at the second I saw the thread !
It's exactly Lisk-like, which is obviously a red flag. And I expect to see more coins use a similar ICO-style.
It'll probably be the 'flavor of the month (or months)'... something succeeds, and we get a million similar coins. Like when we had country coins, anonymous coins, and so on.
In this case, it's the simple fact that Lisk brought in an insane amount of money from their ICO. So other devs said, why not us? You would have thought they'd change the ICO terms at least somewhat, however. It's too copy-cat.
It doesn't mean the devs here won't deliver, or it may be an interesting project. But it is a red flag. Worst case I expect a lot of interest, the traditional initial ICO price rise ... then... well, who knows.
Although I do agree that our coin allocation plan is strikingly similar to Lisk's, it is worth noting that both the project are completely different from each other in terms of the technology utilized in the platform and the target market.
Furthermore, we are going to publish detailed information about the core team members. As most of whom are already well known and respected in the crypto community, investors can guarantee that they are here to stay.
Hope that clears things up!
