|
ATA Group
|
 |
June 17, 2016, 05:51:33 PM |
|
backup your waves account:   WHats that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on crypto sites. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
TravelsAsia
|
|
June 17, 2016, 05:55:21 PM |
|
when will be launching on exchange for sure?
20 or 25th of june?
20th June on Bittrex  No Chance!!! I am calling it now! 25th at the soonest. Looking at the past history of this coin, more delays expected!!!! There is more chance me waking up to find an extra 5" swinging between my legs than Waves going to exchanges on the 20th. a I still don't know why they are bothering with a low liquidity exchange as opposed to Polo first. Lisk raised half the amount of money and they were able to secure that exchange ahead of time with an NDA. Yes one of the few things they got right on launch.  We have Bittrex. I don't care if it's late, I want them to make sure it's secure and communicate the progress with investors. This is the part mxxxx seems to miss in his post. Rather than pointing a finger at profit driven traders, he can learn more about transparency. Good luck Waves team. I believe in the project even if I'm not a big fan off some of your recent actions. |
|
|
|
|
johny08
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1045
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 17, 2016, 05:56:06 PM |
|
WTS 55.5k WVL @ 0.0006 (33.3 BTC) with monbux as escorow
PM
you can buy it back for 0.0005. if not you are buying it with the same price or loss. lets see, someone trading on weekend. i guess some drunk guys will do.  |
|
|
|
|
|
oldisoft
|
|
June 17, 2016, 05:59:24 PM |
|
DAO fail will do good for Waves. Lots of money will be put into waves once it starts trading
I mean how? How you are sure it will be good for waves? I think this is just prediction |
|
|
|
Dekker3D
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
|
|
June 17, 2016, 06:01:03 PM |
|
DAO fail will do good for Waves. Lots of money will be put into waves once it starts trading
I mean how? How you are sure it will be good for waves? I think this is just prediction It could be good to those who are still out there like Lisk or Waves if it comes out within the next few days. |
|
|
|
|
c1oud
|
|
June 17, 2016, 06:02:37 PM |
|
DAO fail will do good for Waves. Lots of money will be put into waves once it starts trading
I mean how? How you are sure it will be good for waves? I think this is just prediction Probably not just DAO but ETH as well. At least at first new platform will attract investors for possible better stability. |
▄████▄
▄████████▄
▄████████████▄
▄████████████████▄
████████████████████ ▄█▄ ▄███▄ ▄███▄ ▄████████████████▀ ▄██████████
▄▄▄▀█████▀▄▄▄▄▀█████▀▄▄▄ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ██
▄█████▄▀▀▀▄██████▄▀▀▀▄█████▄ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▄█▄ ▀██████████████▄
████████████████████████████ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀█▀ ██
▀████████████████████████▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▄█▄ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ██
▀████████████████████▀ ▀███▀ ▀███▀ ▀█▀ ▀███▀ ▄███████████████████████████████████▀
▀████████████████▀
▀████████████▀
▀████████▀
▀████▀
| ║║
║█
║█
║║ | .
| .
║║
██
║║
| .
| .
║║
██
║║
| .
| ║║
█║
█║
║║ | |
|
|
|
|
TravelsAsia
|
|
June 17, 2016, 06:07:26 PM |
|
DAO fail will do good for Waves. Lots of money will be put into waves once it starts trading
I mean how? How you are sure it will be good for waves? I think this is just prediction It could be good to those who are still out there like Lisk or Waves if it comes out within the next few days. It will be interesting to see where people decide to put their money after the DAO incident. |
|
|
|
|
Soul_eater_123
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 17, 2016, 06:08:16 PM |
|
Would make sense to delay the launch until they can at least integrate with Poloniex properly and more exchanges if possible. Launching purely on Bittrex is probably a mistake. If it's going to be delayed anyway - why not wait and do it properly?
Sure the trolls, kiddies and bounty scroungers will cry foul but who gives a shit about them? They don't give a f•ck about this project and are only concerned with dumping so they can invest in the next ICO. Forgot about them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bisquick
|
|
June 17, 2016, 06:16:00 PM |
|
DAO fail will do good for Waves. Lots of money will be put into waves once it starts trading
I mean how? How you are sure it will be good for waves? I think this is just prediction This kind of thing is bad for all cryptos!! |
|
|
|
|
|
sandwraithBTC
|
|
June 17, 2016, 06:16:42 PM |
|
Would make sense to delay the launch until they can at least integrate with Poloniex properly and more exchanges if possible. Launching purely on Bittrex is probably a mistake. If it's going to be delayed anyway - why not wait and do it properly?
Sure the trolls, kiddies and bounty scroungers will cry foul but who gives a shit about them? They don't give a f•ck about this project and are only concerned with dumping so they can invest in the next ICO. Forgot about them.
+1 why not poloniex as the first exchanger? we don't mind to wait but let Poloniex be the first exchange . Or Poloniex and bittrex launch at the same. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bisquick
|
|
June 17, 2016, 06:18:50 PM |
|
DAO fail will do good for Waves. Lots of money will be put into waves once it starts trading
I mean how? How you are sure it will be good for waves? I think this is just prediction This kind of thing is bad for all cryptos!! might even take polo down for good! |
|
|
|
|
|
ATA Group
|
|
June 17, 2016, 06:19:42 PM |
|
Would make sense to delay the launch until they can at least integrate with Poloniex properly and more exchanges if possible. Launching purely on Bittrex is probably a mistake. If it's going to be delayed anyway - why not wait and do it properly?
Sure the trolls, kiddies and bounty scroungers will cry foul but who gives a shit about them? They don't give a f•ck about this project and are only concerned with dumping so they can invest in the next ICO. Forgot about them.
+1 why not poloniex as the first exchanger? we don't mind to wait but let Poloniex be the first exchange . Or Poloniex and bittrex launch at the same. +2 Exactly they should give us a realistic date when it's going to launch on major exchanges. I don't mind if its going to be launched the next month. Most of the trolls didn't invest much in the project so screw them. |
|
|
|
|
Zenyoguibit
|
|
June 17, 2016, 06:21:17 PM |
|
Would make sense to delay the launch until they can at least integrate with Poloniex properly and more exchanges if possible. Launching purely on Bittrex is probably a mistake. If it's going to be delayed anyway - why not wait and do it properly?
Sure the trolls, kiddies and bounty scroungers will cry foul but who gives a shit about them? They don't give a f•ck about this project and are only concerned with dumping so they can invest in the next ICO. Forgot about them.
Totally agree, launch just in the middle of the storm it's not a good idea. in addition, why not wait for a while and launch (for less) on Polo & Bitt at the same time? |
|
|
|
|
Zenyoguibit
|
|
June 17, 2016, 06:26:10 PM |
|
Would make sense to delay the launch until they can at least integrate with Poloniex properly and more exchanges if possible. Launching purely on Bittrex is probably a mistake. If it's going to be delayed anyway - why not wait and do it properly?
Sure the trolls, kiddies and bounty scroungers will cry foul but who gives a shit about them? They don't give a f•ck about this project and are only concerned with dumping so they can invest in the next ICO. Forgot about them.
+1 why not poloniex as the first exchanger? we don't mind to wait but let Poloniex be the first exchange . Or Poloniex and bittrex launch at the same. +2 Exactly they should give us a realistic date when it's going to launch on major exchanges. I don't mind if its going to be launched the next month. Most of the trolls didn't invest much in the project so screw them. +3 That's the point, secure all the project, it doesn't matter if we need to expect for a reasonable time, LSK launch one month after. |
|
|
|
Compa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1006
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 17, 2016, 06:27:56 PM |
|
The dao got hacked and the price eth is down
it's a good time for waves will be launch on exchange, I think that waves will to the moon.
|
|
|
|
niki25
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 17, 2016, 06:29:59 PM |
|
Dev three days and my coins hasnt arrived, is this normal?
|
|
|
|
|
ifightformerkel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 17, 2016, 06:30:39 PM |
|
Would make sense to delay the launch until they can at least integrate with Poloniex properly and more exchanges if possible. Launching purely on Bittrex is probably a mistake. If it's going to be delayed anyway - why not wait and do it properly?
Sure the trolls, kiddies and bounty scroungers will cry foul but who gives a shit about them? They don't give a f•ck about this project and are only concerned with dumping so they can invest in the next ICO. Forgot about them.
+1 why not poloniex as the first exchanger? we don't mind to wait but let Poloniex be the first exchange . Or Poloniex and bittrex launch at the same. Maybe because poloniex? or the dao? got hacked today? btw. Poloniex is atm. down, only to me? |
|
|
|
|
|
Twiggy Smile
|
|
June 17, 2016, 06:34:30 PM |
|
Dev three days and my coins hasnt arrived, is this normal?
If you talk about ICO Waves. For those of you who have not yet withdrawn your Waves from your ICO accounts: please update your Chrome plug-in today, generate a new account, write down your seed and store it in a safe place (or use the back-up tool, which will be available in the latest version of the client). Enter this new address in your user area on the ICO site. You will also be able to withdraw your tokens directly to an exchange, should you wish to do so.https://blog.wavesplatform.com/waves-launch-at-exchanges-and-network-security-ef18ba6efcf6#.pmcw00p09 |
|
|
|
|
|
RATM69
|
|
June 17, 2016, 06:37:10 PM |
|
Would make sense to delay the launch until they can at least integrate with Poloniex properly and more exchanges if possible. Launching purely on Bittrex is probably a mistake. If it's going to be delayed anyway - why not wait and do it properly?
Sure the trolls, kiddies and bounty scroungers will cry foul but who gives a shit about them? They don't give a f•ck about this project and are only concerned with dumping so they can invest in the next ICO. Forgot about them.
+1 why not poloniex as the first exchanger? we don't mind to wait but let Poloniex be the first exchange . Or Poloniex and bittrex launch at the same. Maybe because poloniex? or the dao? got hacked today? btw. Poloniex is atm. down, only to me? Down to everyone |
|
|
|
|
|
