Does anyone else think that Lauda should not be a moderator?
Nope. You seem to be the only person butthurt by his way of looking at things.
Lauda proceeds with her opinion when moderating the board.
Thats what a moderator is supposed to do
Lauda does not follow the rules of the board the same way other moderators do.
He does. Also I think you meant implement here. From what I've seen , he is the only person constantly active throughout the day in handling the reports(after Cyrus perhaps, but he is a Global moderator and has to handle reports from every board he can)
Lauda does not bother to explain reasons behind actions in a friendly way.
What does that have anything to do with moderating? He is posting as he would normally do, while moderating the newbs and the Croatian board in the background. Also you expect a person to explain something in baby-steps every time someone asks for an explanation? You're likely thinking of moderators as support group, which they are not
Lauda likes to be abrasive with people she is moderating.
How would you even know?
Lauda is power hungry.
Yeah right
. Help the community for more than 2 years and nobody says a thing. Get promoted to staff after being asked to, and you're suddenly power hungry
I move to have Lauda removed from being a moderator effective immediately.
Its quite cute that you think a bunch of people's opinion are enough to get one removed from a position in staff. That is even if you do get any support for your claims
Maybe Lauda is the fastest to handle reports because she does not bother to review the thread and facts at issue.
Once again, how do you know? And no, he does review every one of the reports from what I know
That rule is to avoid a spammer from using some loophole in the rules to avoid having action taken against them. It is not a free pass for a moderator to do whatever they want. If there is a single report or a single set of circumstances then each moderator should take the same action.
No moderators have different opinions as to when they consider something spam. For example, Mitchell and -ck are of the opinion that continuous promotion of custom faucet rotators which have ref link in every link, are to be considered "Ref spam". While Cyrus is quite tolerable about it, and hilariousandco does not consider it as ref spam at all(from what I know)
At any rate, which instance are you talking about where Lauda has misused his power?
How would you even know how many reports she handles?
Because there are times only a certain moderator is active, when I submit my reports and they are acted upon by Lauda. And the only other person who is constantly active as him in moderating is Cyrus.
I would question your ethics and appropriateness to be trusted.
You're making baseless claims against someone who you have no clue about. Now that is when I "I would question your ethics and appropriateness to be trusted." . Not that I would trust you anyway
Also just to be clear, Lauda is a guy. From what I know, it was a moderator who recommended the name or something
Why do you keep shilling for Lauda BTW? Are you one of her alts?
That is exactly the first thing I say to someone if they disagree with my accusation against someone /sarcasm
Lauda is one of the most reasonable people on this forum. You, on the other hand, are unreasonably upset because you asked a question and didn't like the answer. Motion denied.
Concurred
P.S: And no I'm neither Lutpin's nor Lauda's alt/shill , but I am familiar with both to entrust them
Also seriously, you expect people to believe that your account hasn't changed hands?
