Bitcoin Forum
June 21, 2024, 12:37:19 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin IS basically DESTROYED  (Read 47196 times)
tigerwood0432
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 493
Merit: 504



View Profile
May 08, 2016, 06:26:02 PM
 #81

Bitcoin destroyed because of china ? If it wasn't china buyers = bitcoin will worth nothing !


▄███████████████████████████████████████████▄
█████████████████████████████████████████████
██username 12345█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████
███▒▒▒▒▒▒▒███████████████████████████████████
███▒▒▒▒▒▒▒███████████████████████████████████
███▒▒▒▒▒▒▒███████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████
██1234567███12345678██12345678███12345678████
█████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████
████▒▒▒▒▒▒███████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████
▀███████████████████████████████████████████▀
CryptoPay


  GET IT NOW
Hellacopter
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 08, 2016, 06:27:43 PM
 #82

If some population in some determined country use and hold Bitcoins a lot more than the other people worldwide, that's don't mean that Bitcoin itself is destroyed, because in fact that's mean that those people are interested about Bitcoin more than others
TheDreadPirateDickstein
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 08, 2016, 06:30:49 PM
 #83

Bitcoin is basically destroyed now with 70% of the mining controlled by China, soon to be 98+%, and with Blockstream implementing their SegWit soft fork Trojan Horse so as Matonis admits can end up increasing the 21 million coins limit.

The entire ecosystem is headed for a clusterfuck.

I honestly believe this is the truth.  What is there to add ?

~CfA~

Oh i believe its destroyed but for entirely different reasons

I believe it was regulated into redundancy into a decentralized paypal

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬    delicia | delicia.io    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Decentralized Global Food Network | World's Only Solution to Food Wastage | Join Whitelist Now, Get 30% Bonus
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬    Whitepaper | Telegram | Medium | Twitter | FB | ANN    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Laniakea
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 08, 2016, 06:44:49 PM
 #84

Bitcoin might be destroyed (I think it's not) but there are successors anyways Smiley

Bitcoin started all this and all this won't die. It's about the idea.

BitconAssociation
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 08, 2016, 06:47:56 PM
 #85

USA can dominate the Bitcoin Beanie Babies scene tomorrow... They just have to shift a small percentage of their war funding to Bitcoin mining Beanie Babies production and focus Silicon valley

development on ASIC chip Beanie Babies manufacturing and they can dominate the scene. You chose your own battles...  Wink

FTFY. US government is not going to subsidize electricity to make a few guys rich when they turn it back into heat Smiley

They don't need to subsidize anything. Just sell superior hardware. Those that have access to cheap electricity will figure out the rest.

So this superior hardware will go to China? How will this affect centralization??
If shovels are made in New York, would you pan for gold in Manhattan?

We don't have to theorize on what would happen. GPU mining, for example, never became centralized in China despite the lower electric costs there.

Of course we have to theorize, otherwise this is a pointless conversation.
GPU mining was never centralized in China because Bitcoin's market cap was laughably small, because the power consumed was a fraction of the rig's cost, because people mining were weirdo hobbyists like me, who ran FurMark as an alternative, and because buying BTC directly was always more profitable.
Please.

1. GPU mining for bitcoins is alive and well. But it has to be done indirectly, through altcoins. GPU =>altcoin=>bitcoin, voila!

So if I flip burgers and buy BTC, I'm indirectly mining BTC? (Minimum wage paycheck) => (BTC), voila?
Some twisted thinking, but K.

Quote
2. GPU miners are different than ASIC miners in that you can resell the hardware (PCs, CPUs, RAMs + the GPUs themselves) after a few years and get something back or even repurpose the systems for something else. It has even less CAPEX if you start with used hardware. Obviously, buying older GPU hardware is not the same in terms of speed and power efficiency but people with subsidized power wouldn't care that much, would they? (Kind of like saying that no matter how slow the mining hardware is, it can still be profitable with extremely cheap or free electricity)

Mining BTC with GPUs is only feasible if by "subsidized power" you mean stolen, as in stolen from Mom or your national grid.

Quote
Still, it ain't happening (China centralization of GPUs).

What the west lacks, is access to cheap and fast ASIC equipment. There are people who can run mining hardware for free (flat electricity bill)

Flat electricity bill doesn't mean you can run an aluminum smelter in your apartment, or run bitcoin mining gear, or run an extension cord to your next door neighbor, who *doesn't* have a flat electricity bill.

You are simply looking for sneaky ways to swindle your landlord, and, in the process, fuck ordinary folks who don't steal electricity, because their rents go up because of *you*.  You're actually *worse* than Chinese miners stealing subsidized power, because you are *literally costing your neighbors money.*
No wonder people shy away from bitcoiners Sad

TL;DR: There is no such thing as free electricity. Unless by "free," you mean "steal without getting caught."
AlexGR
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049



View Profile
May 08, 2016, 07:06:27 PM
 #86

So if I flip burgers and buy BTC, I'm indirectly mining BTC? (Minimum wage paycheck) => (BTC), voila?
Some twisted thinking, but K.

The vast majority of altcoins don't even have altcoin X / USD pairs. You are forced through BTC first to cash them out. It's not that big of a step, or so twisted.

Quote
Mining BTC with GPUs is only feasible if by "subsidized power" you mean stolen, as in stolen from Mom or your national grid.

Mining (alts)=>btc (with GPU) is happening. As I said we don't need to theorize about it. It is happening. Now.


Quote
Flat electricity bill doesn't mean you can run an aluminum smelter in your apartment, or run bitcoin mining gear, or run an extension cord to your next door neighbor, who *doesn't* have a flat electricity bill.

You are simply looking for sneaky ways to swindle your landlord, and, in the process, fuck ordinary folks who don't steal electricity, because their rents go up because of *you*.  You're actually *worse* than Chinese miners stealing subsidized power, because you are *literally costing your neighbors money.*
No wonder people shy away from bitcoiners Sad

Lol Cheesy

Quote
TL;DR: There is no such thing as free electricity. Unless by "free," you mean "steal without getting caught."

Well someone is mining with those GPUs and it ain't the Chinese...
alyssa85
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1088

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!


View Profile
May 08, 2016, 07:16:52 PM
 #87

So if I flip burgers and buy BTC, I'm indirectly mining BTC? (Minimum wage paycheck) => (BTC), voila?
Some twisted thinking, but K.

The vast majority of altcoins don't even have altcoin X / USD pairs. You are forced through BTC first to cash them out. It's not that big of a step, or so twisted.



Apart from Ether - you can trade it against USD on BTC-e, Kraken, and now Gemini. These exchanges are hedging their bets in case bitcoin fails. All we need now is for Coinbase to join them and we have full house.

 
                                . ██████████.
                              .████████████████.
                           .██████████████████████.
                        -█████████████████████████████
                     .██████████████████████████████████.
                  -█████████████████████████████████████████
               -███████████████████████████████████████████████
           .-█████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       ..████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████..
       .   .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .      .████████████████████████████████████████████████.

       .       .██████████████████████████████████████████████
       .    ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
           .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████
              .████████████████████████████████████████████████
                   ████████████████████████████████████████
                      ██████████████████████████████████
                          ██████████████████████████
                             ████████████████████
                               ████████████████
                                   █████████
.YoBit InvestBox.|.BUY X10 AND EARN 10% DAILY.🏆
AlexGR
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049



View Profile
May 08, 2016, 07:31:59 PM
 #88

By your logic, everyone buying BTC is "indirectly mining" BTC. Would people mine alts if not for BTC?

Without btc, I don't think so - for a very large number of altcoins. BTC is the gold of the ecosystem. Most altcoins are so volatile that you can't trust them as store of value. Even if you believe in your altcoin it will most probably have worse economic characteristics compared to BTC, and thus you are mathematically certain that you will be "diluted" or devalued in the long run. In most cases, keeping your alts in ...btc, will allow you to buy more of the same alt later on.

It's not any coincidence that the btc=gold of crypto principle has been recognized by multipool miners where you can switch between various coins all the time (to maximize profitability) and then get paid in btc directly.

Quote
By the same logic, miners selling their mined BTC are "indirectly mining" USD. Because they wouldn't mine BTC if they couldn't sell it for USD.
So ya, twisted.

Some want to sell for usd, some want to hodl. The same applies even to asic btc miners.

Quote
Well ya, people like you, who think that stolen = free. Mind you, I have nothing against theft, I just don't want you to misunderstand what you are doing.

Lol... there are various scenarios where it doesn't involve theft. And if you are paying, well... it's not theft.
calkob
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 520


View Profile
May 08, 2016, 08:04:11 PM
 #89

Why would the fact that China is basically controlling mining do anything to Bitcoin?

The whole concept of bitcoin was based around decentralization.

If China controlls a large % of the hash power then it would only take the collaboration of a few to hit the dreaded 51% control point

What would be the point in hitting 51% all they would do is devalue the coins they own.
Blacula X
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 08, 2016, 08:09:15 PM
 #90

What would be the point in hitting 51% all they would do is devalue the coins they own.

You know, that would sorta make sense if the miners had to store their profits in BTC.
Which they do not -- they can sell BTC for USD.
Assuming that miners (who may not be planning to even stay in the mining game once their gear becomes unprofitable) have the same interests as the hodlers ... it doesn't make sense.
somacoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 497
Merit: 251



View Profile WWW
May 08, 2016, 08:27:37 PM
 #91

It's interesting how often China is mentioned in this thread!
Arrakeen
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


Offer escrow, receive negative trust


View Profile
May 08, 2016, 08:30:15 PM
 #92

It's interesting how often China is mentioned in this thread!

What's your point?  Obviously China will be mentioned if it's subject matter in OP...you mining signature payouts or something?
somacoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 497
Merit: 251



View Profile WWW
May 08, 2016, 08:33:43 PM
 #93

It's interesting how often China is mentioned in this thread!

What's your point?  Obviously China will be mentioned if it's subject matter in OP...you mining signature payouts or something?

Hello Arrakeen.

No, of course, China is mentioned. I was talking about the frequency of it being mentioned - it seems to be the center of discussion.

I would have expected many arguments to be found against China ruling Bitcoin, but there are little presented so far.

You have not contributed anything so far either Smiley
interbtc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 451
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 08, 2016, 08:53:24 PM
 #94

The mining industry unbalance and possible forks that may happen are all dictated by amount of interest people have in them.
So far China has shown that they are in the very top, but nothing is stopping anyone else to counter-weigh the hashrate to their advantage.
Just because they are investing and developing cutting edge chips for miners should not be looked upon with hate (tho i personally think it has more to do with envy)

And in regards to clusterfuck as you put it, the only thing that made such thing possible is when ASICs came into play. Back in the day when only cpus and gpus were
able to mine bitcoins, it was much evenly and fairly distributed power available to everyone. After ASIC boom, it was manufacturers and tech developers that were
given an unfair advantage, and a huge one. Them and the people with enough money to buy the said industy, while average Joe got left behind for greed and desire for power.
tmfp
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932
Merit: 1737


"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."


View Profile
May 08, 2016, 08:56:55 PM
 #95

It's interesting how often China is mentioned in this thread!

What's your point?  Obviously China will be mentioned if it's subject matter in OP...you mining signature payouts or something?

Hello Arrakeen.

No, of course, China is mentioned. I was talking about the frequency of it being mentioned - it seems to be the center of discussion.

I would have expected many arguments to be found against China ruling Bitcoin, but there are little presented so far.

You have not contributed anything so far either Smiley

Would you regard all of this as pure hyperbole then?

I am speaking on behalf of TPTB_need_war aka AnonyMint, who is quoted in the OP, because he is currently banned for 9 more days due to calling theymos and gmaxwell out on their censorship of a potential technical back door in Bitcoin. There is a simpler explanation of Satoshi's obviously intentional technical error. It is obviously intentional because it was quite well known by 2009 that the HMAC formulation is more secure yet Satoshi used the more suspect double hashing everywhere in BitCON.

I will be editing this post and adding answers and rebuttals to the various incorrect posts that litter this thread. Please check back and read this post, because I will not be posting again in this thread, and instead I will edit this post to add new information as others continue to make posts that need to be refuted.

Please quote my post because the mods will probably delete it and ban me again.

"Blockstream implementing their SegWit soft fork Trojan Horse"

Lmao this guy is losing it. The blockstream FUDsters know no limits on their nonsense. The trojan horse was the Bitcoin XT, then Bitcoin Classic hard fork attempts, not segregated witness, segwit is actual advance in scaling Bitcoin. Whatever, it's a waste of time dealing with this shit.

Segregrated Witness is not the problem. The problem is that Blockstream is sneaking in a new soft fork versioning protocol at the same time. This new versioning protocol when combined with collusion with China's oligarchy control over mining, will insure together the elite can change the protocol of Bitcoin at-will any time. Why do you think Blockstream has received $70+ million in investor funding from the financial community. Blockstream has no viable way to make a profit. The company exists as a way to take control over Bitcoin. Note that Classic and XT didn't really solve the centralization problem either, but at least they didn't hand soft fork versioning control to the devil.

They will send their propaganda machine here to discredit me. They always do that. Then they ban me. They don't want you to know the truth. I don't care anymore. You fools are doomed. This is my last post on this matter. I have other programming work to do. It is up to you fools to get organized and stop being useless eaters and cattle for the elite. I can lead you to water, but I can't teach your dumb asses to drink. I tried to teach, but I get drowned out by the trolls and propaganda who are hired to keep the truth from you.

Instead of a tinfoil hat, I swear the guy has an entire tinfoil skull.  The sky is perpetually falling every day and it's always Armageddon forever.  A healthy dose of skepticism is fair enough, but don't take it to extreme, bordeline-crackpot, levels.

Bitcoin is just fine.

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

So how many years from now china will own 98 % of mining power HuhHuh??

Here is a link to the cryptocoinnews.com article and also an estimate follows in the linked thread. Realize that is just one former cattle farmer who currently mines 50 of the 1200 BTC per day and he plans to increase that to 200 BTC of the 600 mined per day after the halving. Just one cattle farmer will be mining 30% of Bitcoin.

Why would they do anything detrimental to Bitcoin? It would hurt them more than anyone financially.

With an oligarchy in control of the mining, they can choose to increase transaction fees to the maximum the market can bear, not the competitive rate for transaction fees. They could also work together with Blockstream to increase the 21 million coin limit, so they can earn more coins. None of this would hurt Bitcoin, because obviously none of you care. You will suck BitCon's cock because you think it is a "better gold" as Satoshi advertised it to you in the white paper.

Additionally these mega mining farms in China don't attain their loans and nearly free electricity without returning favors to the elite who are in charge. In effect, this means Bitcoin has become just another fiat system. They can KYC identification requirements on it the future and pretty much do what ever they want. And you will lick their balls because you have no other choice. Don't tell me you will switch coins, because no other coin will have the adoption and mining security.

I find it really hilarious how you think you are supporting something that will change the world in a better way, yet it is just more of the same oligarch controlled BS that we've always had.

how is that centralised? there's over a billion chinese  Huh

It is rather good for Bitcoin, if a lot of people in China have some bitcoins

A billion aren't mining, only a few very well connected few. An oligarchy is taking form. The coins are only going to a few oligarchs

why they should destroy their own business? 51% will never happen, with their cheap electricity they are earning a shitload of money...

They want to maximize their profit and be in control of their destiny.

Most of these Chinese mining firms are pools, so like most pools that are extremely big, if they get too big, miners will hop to a different one.

It isn't just the pools that are the problem, but that the mining farms are large and concentrating the 51+% amongst a few oligarchs. This will only grow more centralized over time, because TPTB_need_war explained in his technical analysis, that profitable proof-of-work always accrues over time to maximum economies-of-scale. There are several reasons for that including propagation advantages of being the first to win more blocks, so don't waste hashrate mining on the wrong fork for a short period, which over time gradually depletes the other miners of relative profits. It is more complex than that. You need to read his entire analysis to understand.

I don't care if China controls most of the mining market, if people do care about that, they can purchase the mining power and start mining.

That is an incorrect understanding. As I explained above, the mining hashrate economically accrues to those miners with the greatest economies-of-scale. No one can buy mining equipment to offset that, because the miners in China are ostensibly getting nearly free electricity and nearly 0% interest loans. It is a corruption charged to the collective. Don't you understand how Communism works? We have this system now in the West too. Capitalism is dead. Long live Marxism!

I really don't care because I agree with you and many of us still don't sell our Bitcoins because if it goes mainstream in China or even a little popular, we'll be all rich/millionaires. The whole idealistic anarco utopia many still think Bitcoin is long dead, that's why Ethereum and other cool projects are emerging (even if they end up having the same fate eventually).

Look to be straightforward BTC hasn't been destroyed yet. It is very much living. I would suggest you to not worry about China and mining and focus on making profit with this system now.  Wink

Exactly. You guys don't care whether Bitcoin ends up as a totalitarian digital hell. You only care about making a profit hell or highwater, come what may.

So if China owns a large portion of the system, we're doomed? But what if bitcoins are centralized in America or in Europe? It's going to be an entire story, right? I mean, once again western power has an influence to this point.

Why are you building a strawman argument to deflect the debate away from the important issue. Obviously it doesn't matter where the oligarchy on mining is located. The only thing that matters is that profitable proof-of-work will always end up entirely centralized. TPTB_need_war has explained why this is the case because he an expert on the economics and technology, despite what some trolls might want to mislead you to believe.

BTC will do right when there will be decentralized exchangers.

And that will only happen because of my work to fix the jamming problem that plagued all DE designs. The trolls want to ridicule me, and I don't yet get the recognition. But that is okay. I just want you to know the truth.

.... with their cheap electricity they are earning a shitload of money...

What you mean is they're stealing a shitload of money.  

Taxpayer money converted into electricity by government-owned power utility.

Electricity converted into bitcoin and bitcoin into privatized money by miners.

In China bitcoin mining is essentially just a channel to steal tax money.  The fact that it hasn't been forced to shut down or use non-subsidized electricity by now is probably evidence that someone is taking bribes.  (What a surprise!  That NEVER happens in China!   Cheesy)

Finally someone with a brain stem! Congrats!

Yeah it is more of charging the expenses to the collective and keeping the profits for themselves. Same as the banksters did with the bailouts.

$1 million of your investor money every day going to those fat cats. And circulating back around as $70 million in grease money for Blockstream to rape you with.

Like the Capitalist West have been doing for years? The Chinese took a opportunity when they saw it and they used it... How can you blame them?

Yeah why care if the banksters keep the profits and charge the bailouts to the people. Love that Communist/Fascism, don't you?

well good for them if they are able to steal unfair and legal scam from government, called tax

Yeah it was great when the banksters stole the bailouts from the government! Excellent logic.  Roll Eyes

Good to see you want BitCON to be all about stealing. Nice world you want to promote.

Personally I'd be more worried if the hashrate was under NSA's jurisdiction.

Chinese miners have acted OK so far

You haven't studied the history of oligarchies. They can only act one way. Give it a little time. The collusion is taking form. By the time, you realize it, it will be too late to do anything about it or to change. Bitcoin will be too well established by that time, just like fiat is now. You will bend over and take in your ass, because you didn't think it was a problem when I told you and then when you realize you will have no more choice nor options to pursue.

Extraordinary Claims require Extraordinary Evidence
johnyj
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988
Merit: 1012


Beyond Imagination


View Profile
May 08, 2016, 10:54:07 PM
 #96

From the beginning, this has always been a possibility: A banker who can effectively create unlimited fiat money can easily acquire all the mining infrastructure and control the network hash power (Of course he don't need to do so through one single entity, it will look like that many people control the mining infrastructure, but when a vote happens people will discover that over 90% of hash power is controlled by a few entity and can go against majority of people's will)

PoW method is vulnerable to large capital taking over. This is the nature of PoW, so some people have suggested to use a PoW+PoS hybrid model for the future mining, but without major hash power, how do you implement this change into the network? Why miners should give up their dominance power today? It seems only a fork or re-design of a new coin can start afresh











philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4158
Merit: 8049


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
May 08, 2016, 11:05:47 PM
 #97

So if I flip burgers and buy BTC, I'm indirectly mining BTC? (Minimum wage paycheck) => (BTC), voila?
Some twisted thinking, but K.

The vast majority of altcoins don't even have altcoin X / USD pairs. You are forced through BTC first to cash them out. It's not that big of a step, or so twisted.
By your logic, everyone buying BTC is "indirectly mining" BTC. By the same logic, miners selling their mined BTC are "indirectly mining" USD. Because they wouldn't mine BTC if they couldn't sell it for USD.
So ya, twisted.

Quote
Quote
TL;DR: There is no such thing as free electricity. Unless by "free," you mean "steal without getting caught."

Well someone is mining with those GPUs and it ain't the Chinese...

Well ya, people like you, who think that stolen = free. Mind you, I have nothing against theft, just don't want you to misunderstand what it is that you are doing. Electricity is free to you, but your mom, your landlord, or the people around you have to pay for it.
So mining on "free" electricity is no different than starting a toilet paper business, because you can get free toilet paper from your school's toilets.
P.S. Don't.


I can explain to you  cases that 80 and 90 % discounts are perfectly legal.  My friend rented on floor of an office building then sublet it to a printing business he kept 2 small rooms about 10 to 15 %  of the floor.  The sublet has the printing guy paying 80% of the 13 cent a kwatt power bill.

My friend has had the lease for 15 to 16 years.  He usually got a 1000 a month power bill that was paid 800 printer 200 him.

He got screwed on the deal for 11 years as the real power split should have been 910 to 90  the printer used more gear and more ac in the summer.  Since my friend  was getting the rent at 80% which was correct he never bother to say the power should be 90-10.

bitcoin came along now the bill was 1150 that is now paid 920 -  230.

So he is not stealing but paying 30 bucks for 150 worth of power.

So we first mined s-1's then mined s-3's now mine s-7's    perfectly legal and not stealing.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
outatime1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 254

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!


View Profile
May 08, 2016, 11:20:18 PM
 #98

Maybe this is why satoshi holds a lot of bitcoin.  He can at least make sure that some of it doesn't get into the hands of anyone that wants to control 51%.

 
                                . ██████████.
                              .████████████████.
                           .██████████████████████.
                        -█████████████████████████████
                     .██████████████████████████████████.
                  -█████████████████████████████████████████
               -███████████████████████████████████████████████
           .-█████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       ..████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████..
       .   .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .      .████████████████████████████████████████████████.

       .       .██████████████████████████████████████████████
       .    ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
           .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████
              .████████████████████████████████████████████████
                   ████████████████████████████████████████
                      ██████████████████████████████████
                          ██████████████████████████
                             ████████████████████
                               ████████████████
                                   █████████
YoBit AirDrop $|
Get 700 YoDollars for Free!
🏆
TheDreadPirateDickstein
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 08, 2016, 11:22:21 PM
 #99

Mining has nothing to do with anything.

The combination of Gox plus the regulatory after effect is what killed the momentum.

Now it's only uses are for drugs, ISIS to self-finance, and alt coin pump and dumps.

I blame Charlie Shrem most of all....he's the one who invited the devil to dinner (Ben Lawsky).......LITERALLY!

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬    delicia | delicia.io    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Decentralized Global Food Network | World's Only Solution to Food Wastage | Join Whitelist Now, Get 30% Bonus
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬    Whitepaper | Telegram | Medium | Twitter | FB | ANN    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
TheDreadPirateDickstein
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 08, 2016, 11:29:56 PM
 #100

Maybe this is why satoshi holds a lot of bitcoin.  He can at least make sure that some of it doesn't get into the hands of anyone that wants to control 51%.

Yeah you're confusing yourself with LITECOIN/ 51% attack not possible with BTC

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬    delicia | delicia.io    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Decentralized Global Food Network | World's Only Solution to Food Wastage | Join Whitelist Now, Get 30% Bonus
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬    Whitepaper | Telegram | Medium | Twitter | FB | ANN    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!