seedtrue
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 963
Merit: 1002
|
|
August 16, 2016, 12:25:46 PM |
|
My quote also claims the developers gave poor mining instructions.
For me, this was the greatest part of the launch. It was not some easy clone that I could just click the mouse a few times and instamine the fuck out of it. It was like a puzzle. After I figured out the mining, I tried to help others get started, but even with detailed step-by-step guide, most could not get going. Hindsight, I wish I had rented tons more servers, and kept them running until the end. But, like you said: First, being used to so many launch shenanigans from other coins, I, like most other miners, am quick to throw around the word "scam". On the first day(after re-launch) I was pretty sure it was a quick scam. I should have known better after digging through the code, but in the cesspool that is the ALT ANN section of BitcoinTalk, you can never be too careful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The forum strives to allow free discussion of any ideas. All policies are built around this principle. This doesn't mean you can post garbage, though: posts should actually contain ideas, and these ideas should be argued reasonably.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
alyssa85
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1088
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
|
|
August 16, 2016, 06:02:04 PM |
|
I came across the following article which says there is a minimum vote weight for payouts. https://steemit.com/steemit/@teatree/curation-payout-on-steemit-now-has-a-minimum-vote-weightIs this true, and how does it work - the links in the article don't really give much information. Do you need 50 million vests per vote, or 50 million in total from all the votes? Anyone have any idea?
|
|
|
|
|
|
-aleco-
|
|
August 16, 2016, 11:39:13 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
August 17, 2016, 07:27:15 AM |
|
The effect of this is that low-SP users can't reduce their vote weight from the default, but even minimum-balance accounts can still vote with the default weight. The change was made because some attacker was using cheap accounts with low-weight votes to spam the blockchain. That is now prevented.
|
|
|
|
serejandmyself
|
|
August 17, 2016, 08:09:58 AM |
|
The effect of this is that low-SP users can't reduce their vote weight from the default, but even minimum-balance accounts can still vote with the default weight. The change was made because some attacker was using cheap accounts with low-weight votes to spam the blockchain. That is now prevented. i guess im a bit confused to how complete new commers will get curator reward now
|
|
|
|
AlexGR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
|
|
August 17, 2016, 12:22:18 PM |
|
The effect of this is that low-SP users can't reduce their vote weight from the default, but even minimum-balance accounts can still vote with the default weight. The change was made because some attacker was using cheap accounts with low-weight votes to spam the blockchain. That is now prevented. i guess im a bit confused to how complete new commers will get curator reward now In effect nothing changed for new singups. Their vote is the same. The change only affects "hackers" who were splitting the small vote in parts.
|
|
|
|
vlight
|
|
August 17, 2016, 12:53:12 PM |
|
It's not STEAM
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
August 17, 2016, 02:26:24 PM |
|
The effect of this is that low-SP users can't reduce their vote weight from the default, but even minimum-balance accounts can still vote with the default weight. The change was made because some attacker was using cheap accounts with low-weight votes to spam the blockchain. That is now prevented. i guess im a bit confused to how complete new commers will get curator reward now In effect nothing changed for new singups. Their vote is the same. The change only affects "hackers" who were splitting the small vote in parts. Correct. It isn't even something you could ever do via the web GUI. Only with CLI/API. Normal users are not affected at all by this change.
|
|
|
|
xtester
|
|
August 17, 2016, 02:51:03 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
bones261
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1827
|
|
August 17, 2016, 11:26:41 PM |
|
The effect of this is that low-SP users can't reduce their vote weight from the default, but even minimum-balance accounts can still vote with the default weight. The change was made because some attacker was using cheap accounts with low-weight votes to spam the blockchain. That is now prevented. i guess im a bit confused to how complete new commers will get curator reward now In effect nothing changed for new singups. Their vote is the same. The change only affects "hackers" who were splitting the small vote in parts. Correct. It isn't even something you could ever do via the web GUI. Only with CLI/API. Normal users are not affected at all by this change. It didn't let me vote with my newly mined account until I had mined a couple more blocks and had 3 SP. It was a hassle figuring out how to give my newly created account a posting key. BTW, love the other aspect of the hardfork. I'm mining a lot more blocks now.
|
|
|
|
abitmore
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
August 18, 2016, 03:03:36 AM |
|
WTB Vested accounts. 30M+ Vests. Serious inquiries only.
I guess the price would be no more than 10BTC I am looking to buy not sell. I was speculating.
|
|
|
|
AlehandroTheGreat
|
|
August 18, 2016, 03:48:04 AM |
|
I think Steem will move UP hardly on poloniex today.... Look on 1day MACD, today should be the moon
|
|
|
|
Yefet
|
|
August 18, 2016, 07:19:35 AM |
|
I think Steem will move UP hardly on poloniex today.... Look on 1day MACD, today should be the moon Wonder how you managed to draw MACD on Poloniex daily chart But even at Bittrex daily there's no definite MACD signal to buy yet, should wait another couple of days
|
|
|
|
SparkedDev
|
|
August 18, 2016, 09:46:20 AM Last edit: August 18, 2016, 11:03:43 AM by SparkedDev |
|
|
|
|
|
ljglug
|
|
August 18, 2016, 11:58:23 AM |
|
g until genesis time to produce block: 2016-03-24T16:00:00 1766029ms th_a witness.cpp:234 block_production_loo ] waitin g until genesis time to produce block: 2016-03-24T16:00:00 1767043ms th_a witness.cpp:234 block_production_loo ] waitin g until genesis time to produce block: 2016-03-24T16:00:00 1770038ms th_a witness.cpp:234 block_production_loo ] waitin g until genesis time to produce block: 2016-03-24T16:00:00 1771037ms th_a witness.cpp:234 block_production_loo ] waitin g until genesis time to produce block: 2016-03-24T16:00:00 1772019ms th_a witness.cpp:234 block_production_loo ] waitin g until genesis time to produce block: 2016-03-24T16:00:00 1773033ms th_a witness.cpp:234 block_production_loo ] waitin g until genesis time to produce block: 2016-03-24T16:00:00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Has been the emergence of such information, but I did not get any mining incentives, this is how it happened?
|
|
|
|
Yusuke26
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
August 18, 2016, 08:15:32 PM |
|
I have a beginner (or idiot?) question, does Steem store articles in their blockchain or in an SQL database?
|
|
|
|
|
reb0rn21
Legendary
Online
Activity: 1898
Merit: 1024
|
|
August 18, 2016, 11:31:42 PM |
|
Anyone has high SSD/HDD load on steem mining, using linux server 16.04 on vmware with 6GB ram and SSD, and to start steem need 30min with SSD 100% usage, also while mining sometimes SSD usage goes 100%?
|
|
|
|
|