tytanick -- can you consider putting a "version lock" for each of the rigs.
Meaning if a certain version work well for the rig and you dont want to upgrade it for now, you can apply a "lock" setting to that miner.
Those that do not have the lock ativated, would be upgraded automatically as per normal.
This gives miners better control over their rigs.
Otherwise, since upgrades are automatically applied, if a bad code or something happens, some miners with large farms especially will be very upset....
What say you?
Its worth to adding to my list.
But it would needs to be different concept, like "choose version".
I must think about this.
But nobody else have problems with ewest optiminer, i also dont have any issues ... hmm
I also hade different concept.
If i make update i always test it on my testing rigs and then on my production rigs.
If everytihng is ok i am releasing to all.
But i think that i could do "beta upgrade" button which will be manual operation for each rig to upgrade in other people enviroments.
And after update wont hany any issues on bigger scale then i will force to all users this update - this is my idea.
But still locking version hmmmmm.
It would be meaby better to create newer and newer versions and dont delete old ones so if someone would like to upgrade miner then would have to select from list and press APPLY.
There is plenty of space on usb drives
3.4 GB in R OS version
4.7 GB in RX OS version.
So perhaps i will make new versions as separate miner that could be selected from list.
It is preposition but i must consider this.
And also i dont want to make it a big mess like 200 miners to select in future
What do you think guys ?
Ofcourse miner selection list will be reorganized, it will be ajax table which be segregated in categories by alghoritm, version, name etc, and ofcourse releasing date, sorting.
Still
