Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 02:11:29 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Should I delete post that are not discussing the merits of AMC in The AMC Thread?
Yes - 80 (41.9%)
No - 111 (58.1%)
Total Voters: 191

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 [74] 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 ... 156 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [AMC]-The Official Active Mining Cooperative Discussion  (Read 223286 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
steveioio
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 28, 2013, 09:49:57 PM
 #1461

i think there is only one good exit from this mess.

everyone holding shares now should be granted amount of shares he paid of stated ipo price 0.0005


No they shouldn't - it's called speculative trading and you lost dude. Hard luck.
bbxx
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500


cryptoshark


View Profile WWW
June 28, 2013, 09:52:04 PM
 #1462

i think there is only one good exit from this mess.

everyone holding shares now should be granted amount of shares he paid of stated ipo price 0.0005


No they shouldn't - it's called speculative trading and you lost dude. Hard luck.

in worst case i will be -1 btc total Smiley
i bought at 0.00089 and then k. made sell wall at 0.0005
he promised he will do something
and he didnt

lolstate
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 28, 2013, 09:55:16 PM
 #1463



Eh, does anyone here advancing doom and gloom know how to read an order book? The panic-stricken weak hands have unfortunately sold and many will regret it in the days to come. One savvy buyer could swoop in now and take the price back to 0.0025 on both btct and BitFunder. And then the buyers will flood back in at 0.0025, their confidence restored, since we are not going to 0.0 as they feared. All very predictable Grin.

Complete fantasy. These are not going anywhere back near 0.0025 until and unless hard evidence is put on the table and real progress is made. Do you know how many fingers have been burned today? The canny operators got out at .004 - they have made their money and they are not going to risk it on AMC again until things progress on the evidence front. Going nowhere.

Unfortunately the burnt fingers were mostly weak hands. A stock is healthier without them - that's the cruel truth. The canny operators are the ones who did not sell. Today's opportunistic sellers who plan to buy back in will most likely make a loss unless they time it well. The price will be back at 0.0025 within a few days.
ajk
Donator
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 447
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 28, 2013, 09:56:28 PM
 #1464

Well things are definitely put into question now and I think Ken over estimated how the news would effect the market, everyone calling it pump and dump was also helpful, it is what it is and cant be right all the time every dog has his day so bears and the like, laugh it up,

still holding and hoping for the best
steveioio
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 28, 2013, 09:57:18 PM
 #1465



in worst case i will be -1 btc total Smiley
i bought at 0.00089 and then k. made sell wall at 0.0005
he promised he will do something
and he didnt



Not quite. If price of AMC is below a certain price at some point in the future you will be reimbursed. I can't remember what the price level is. You restricted your losses today, not too bad but many have done much worse.
steveioio
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 28, 2013, 10:01:04 PM
 #1466



Unfortunately the burnt fingers were mostly weak hands. A stock is healthier without them - that's the cruel truth.

In what universe? By what measure is a stock better without hundreds of its investors? They are only there to supply funding and if they are not there there is no funding. 'Weak hands' is a nonsense term you are talking about peoples hard earned money and you are surprised that they sold when 50% has come off the share in a morning?! Get a life.
bbxx
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500


cryptoshark


View Profile WWW
June 28, 2013, 10:01:23 PM
 #1467

this security is like scamcoin

JKC or whatever

first btalk low price, pump, cryptsy (bitfunder), pump
btct (btc-e), pump

announcments, massive pump
bid walls etc

and when massive dump till the bottom
walls are gone

coin creator and early adopers are now rich
and some newbies, noobs, belivers are bagholders
lolstate
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 28, 2013, 10:09:48 PM
 #1468



Unfortunately the burnt fingers were mostly weak hands. A stock is healthier without them - that's the cruel truth.

In what universe? By what measure is a stock better without hundreds of its investors? They are only there to supply funding and if they are not there there is no funding. 'Weak hands' is a nonsense term you are talking about peoples hard earned money and you are surprised that they sold when 50% has come off the share in a morning?! Get a life.

Where did I say a stock is better without hundreds of investors? It is better with strong hands, not weak hands. I'm not surprised the weak hands sold, it was all very predictable: the price dropped, they panicked, they sold. If the price had risen they would have bought more. The right thing to do in this situation is to hold the shares bought with money you are prepared to lose in full.
steveioio
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 28, 2013, 10:14:27 PM
 #1469

The right thing to do in this situation is to hold the shares bought with money you are prepared to lose in full.

Yes strong investors not weak ones. We don't like weak people, girly, pathetic WEAK scum.
lolstate
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 28, 2013, 10:18:20 PM
 #1470

The right thing to do in this situation is to hold the shares bought with money you are prepared to lose in full.

Yes strong investors not weak ones. We don't like weak people, girly, pathetic WEAK scum.

What are you talking about? 'Weak hand' is a metaphor, not a literal description.
CMMPro
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 28, 2013, 10:19:54 PM
 #1471

Glad I got out...this house of cards is collapsing.

Diamondstarfall
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10



View Profile
June 28, 2013, 10:23:28 PM
 #1472

Someone tell me I didn't get this wrong.

There were already 40million shares issued which were sold at 0.0005 correct?

now ken is issuing 4million more, 2 on bitfunder, 2million on btct at 0.0025.

Am I crazy? or this ratio is completely messed up. Does he honestly think he can just issue 4more million shares at 0.0025 so he can raise his other 40million share value by 5 times thus increasing his company value....
steveioio
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 28, 2013, 10:25:26 PM
 #1473



What are you talking about? 'Weak hand' is a metaphor, not a literal description.

Are you insane? The OP is referring to weakness of character. He is not referring to a position of weakness as one would have for example with a weak hand in a card game. Please keep up.
joele
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 28, 2013, 10:26:07 PM
 #1474

Cheap share now, will buy more. I'm a Ken believer  Cheesy
ArcticWolf
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 28, 2013, 10:27:14 PM
 #1475

Bought in at .0008 for BTC2. Even if I lose it all its only BTC2.
Im in for the long haul

https://www.crypto-trade.com/ref/arcticwolf Try CryptoTrade.com, a new exchange for trading Currencies and Securities
lolstate
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 28, 2013, 10:28:02 PM
 #1476



What are you talking about? 'Weak hand' is a metaphor, not a literal description.

Are you insane? The OP is referring to weakness of character. He is not referring to a position of weakness as one would have for example with a weak hand in a card game. Please keep up.

What are you talking about? I am the OP. 'Weak hand' is a metaphor.
bbxx
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500


cryptoshark


View Profile WWW
June 28, 2013, 10:28:42 PM
 #1477

Cheap share now, will buy more. I'm a Ken believer  Cheesy

good. till my 0.0015 ask plz Smiley
joele
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 28, 2013, 10:34:08 PM
 #1478

Dang, I'm too slow, did not buy the 0.0009, now it's going up and up.
stereotype
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 28, 2013, 10:37:07 PM
 #1479



What are you talking about? 'Weak hand' is a metaphor, not a literal description.

Are you insane? The OP is referring to weakness of character. He is not referring to a position of weakness as one would have for example with a weak hand in a card game. Please keep up.

What are you talking about? I am the OP. 'Weak hand' is a metaphor.

A demonstration why a barrier of entry may be necessary at some time in the future with these markets. Some of the stuff written here is by petulant children, who need an education.
Take note Burnside, et al.

btct22
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 615
Merit: 502



View Profile
June 28, 2013, 10:38:08 PM
 #1480

Hi Ken,

Can you please post additional information to back up your R & D announcement, such as screen cap/scan of a email/letter from eASIC verifying the claimed results or at a minimum some evidence that you have indeed been working together. 

The KnC chips are claimed to be 100GH/s each so the "World's Fastest Bitcoin Mining Chip" has already been challenged.  Here is the text from KnC's latest newsletter:

Chip Progress report
The more technical audience amongst our customers have been asking for a lot details on the chips we will use. The information we have available to you today is that Jupiter will be a 4 chip design and Saturn a 2 chip design.
This means that we can achieve a minimum of 100GH/s per chip. Which we think most people will agree, puts us far ahead of our current competitors.



Pages: « 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 [74] 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 ... 156 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!