Bitcoin Forum
June 22, 2024, 09:51:47 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Should I delete post that are not discussing the merits of AMC in The AMC Thread?
Yes - 80 (41.9%)
No - 111 (58.1%)
Total Voters: 191

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 [145] 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [AMC]-The Official Active Mining Cooperative Discussion  (Read 223286 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
Streets 2.0
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 101


FRX: Ferocious Alpha


View Profile
July 12, 2013, 09:46:16 AM
 #2881

Remember that ActiveMining receives its dividends through the AMC shares it holds by tendering, so summing both is wrong.

Ok so AMC earned 141BTC then.  How did they almost triple their div in a week?

Each avalon machine is 1.1BTC a day, they would need 15-20 Avalons to generate that income.

Edit: on top of this, they are still doing 430GH/s, so nothing changed from last week.

In all seriousness... it might have been a typo.  183 satoshi's would have been expected, 1830 has to be a mistake.

Yet no response from Ken?  I would think if he made a mistake (again) he would have said so already.  I too would like to know why it was so high.  One can speculate why...

Is Ken allowed to sleep? Or does your approach to business require abandoning this barbarous habit?


NO! The CEO of a company should be directly contactable by individual shareholders AT ALL TIMES!
(ps this is a joke) Tongue Tongue

He will be up in and hour and fifteen minutes, he sets his alarm for 6am  Cheesy

Ashitank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 12, 2013, 11:33:36 AM
Last edit: July 13, 2013, 04:57:10 AM by Ashitank
 #2882

Remember that ActiveMining receives its dividends through the AMC shares it holds by tendering, so summing both is wrong.

Ok so AMC earned 141BTC then.  How did they almost triple their div in a week?

Each avalon machine is 1.1BTC a day, they would need 15-20 Avalons to generate that income.

Edit: on top of this, they are still doing 430GH/s, so nothing changed from last week.

Only issued shares get dividends unlike what happen with previous dividends.
discobean
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 104
Merit: 10



View Profile
July 12, 2013, 12:14:57 PM
 #2883

Remember that ActiveMining receives its dividends through the AMC shares it holds by tendering, so summing both is wrong.

Ok so AMC earned 141BTC then.  How did they almost triple their div in a week?

Each avalon machine is 1.1BTC a day, they would need 15-20 Avalons to generate that income.

Edit: on top of this, they are still doing 430GH/s, so nothing changed from last week.

Only issues shares get dividends unlike what happen with previous dividends.

That has nothing to do with them paying out 141BTC for a week of mining with a few Avalons.
Flashman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


Hodl!


View Profile
July 12, 2013, 12:28:13 PM
 #2884

Maybe it does, if he mistakenly paid out to unissued shares in the last few dividends, this is a catch up.

TL;DR See Spot run. Run Spot run. .... .... Freelance interweb comedian, for teh lulz >>> 1MqAAR4XkJWfDt367hVTv5SstPZ54Fwse6

Bitcoin Custodian: Keeping BTC away from weak heads since Feb '13, adopter of homeless bitcoins.
ArcticWolf
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 12, 2013, 12:28:33 PM
 #2885

Remember that ActiveMining receives its dividends through the AMC shares it holds by tendering, so summing both is wrong.

Ok so AMC earned 141BTC then.  How did they almost triple their div in a week?

Each avalon machine is 1.1BTC a day, they would need 15-20 Avalons to generate that income.

Edit: on top of this, they are still doing 430GH/s, so nothing changed from last week.

Only issues shares get dividends unlike what happen with previous dividends.

That has nothing to do with them paying out 141BTC for a week of mining with a few Avalons.

Possible explanation here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=252531.msg2712999#msg2712999
VBS explains it better a little further down as well

https://www.crypto-trade.com/ref/arcticwolf Try CryptoTrade.com, a new exchange for trading Currencies and Securities
chsados
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 662
Merit: 545



View Profile
July 12, 2013, 01:16:46 PM
 #2886

Remember that ActiveMining receives its dividends through the AMC shares it holds by tendering, so summing both is wrong.

Ok so AMC earned 141BTC then.  How did they almost triple their div in a week?

Each avalon machine is 1.1BTC a day, they would need 15-20 Avalons to generate that income.

Edit: on top of this, they are still doing 430GH/s, so nothing changed from last week.

In all seriousness... it might have been a typo.  183 satoshi's would have been expected, 1830 has to be a mistake.

Yet no response from Ken?  I would think if he made a mistake (again) he would have said so already.  I too would like to know why it was so high.  One can speculate why...

Is Ken allowed to sleep? Or does your approach to business require abandoning this barbarous habit?

As for 'One can speculate why...', give it up won't you? It has gotten stale and dare I say, very boring.  Cheesy

He has been asked directly on IRC by many people and wont respond, but is responding to other questions :S  Hopefully some time today he will make an announcement here.

lewicki
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 12, 2013, 01:19:05 PM
 #2887


He has been asked directly on IRC by many people and wont respond, but is responding to other questions :S


In what world in which people need to work to live, does it say that someone has to be glued to an IRC channel 24/7? It's been 10 minutes since someone started asking a question on IRC. Will you please cool it already?
kslaughter (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
July 12, 2013, 01:21:56 PM
 #2888


He has been asked directly on IRC by many people and wont respond, but is responding to other questions :S


In what world in which people need to work to live, does it say that someone has to be glued to an IRC channel 24/7? It's been 10 minutes since someone started asking a question on IRC. Will you please cool it already?

This is all part of the merger process.
chsados
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 662
Merit: 545



View Profile
July 12, 2013, 01:31:17 PM
 #2889


He has been asked directly on IRC by many people and wont respond, but is responding to other questions :S


In what world in which people need to work to live, does it say that someone has to be glued to an IRC channel 24/7? It's been 10 minutes since someone started asking a question on IRC. Will you please cool it already?

Feel free to hit the ignore button by my name.


He has been asked directly on IRC by many people and wont respond, but is responding to other questions :S


In what world in which people need to work to live, does it say that someone has to be glued to an IRC channel 24/7? It's been 10 minutes since someone started asking a question on IRC. Will you please cool it already?

This is all part of the merger process.

Insightful!
lewicki
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 12, 2013, 01:36:32 PM
 #2890

Probably back pay from previous dividend weekends which included the rest of the 40 million shares. Just a guess however.
ArcticWolf
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 12, 2013, 01:40:01 PM
 #2891

Probably back pay from previous dividend weekends which included the rest of the 40 million shares. Just a guess however.
Or possibly liquidation of AMC (or VMC) held assets that arent needed in the new merged company

https://www.crypto-trade.com/ref/arcticwolf Try CryptoTrade.com, a new exchange for trading Currencies and Securities
Vbs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 12, 2013, 02:39:35 PM
 #2892

Cross-post:

I think there are about ~5.9M issued, so the total would be more like ~BTC108, with BTC86 from mining and probably with BTC22 coming from the old growth fund (which was previously excessively eating at least 85% of all dividends, 5.9M/40M), since all current expenses are probably paid already. All in all, a big thank you from Ken to everyone who stuck around. Cool

Also, AMC-PT and ActiveMining divs come funneled from issued shares on AMC, so only look there to see the totals.

(AMC paid BTC141.12429300 to 7,711,710 shares, some of which represented pass-trough shares, so some of the BTC went back to the issuer; the real paid total to outstanding shares should be around the ~BTC108 above).
FloatesMcgoates
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 12, 2013, 03:44:33 PM
 #2893

Cross-post:

I think there are about ~5.9M issued, so the total would be more like ~BTC108, with BTC86 from mining and probably with BTC22 coming from the old growth fund (which was previously excessively eating at least 85% of all dividends, 5.9M/40M), since all current expenses are probably paid already. All in all, a big thank you from Ken to everyone who stuck around. Cool

Also, AMC-PT and ActiveMining divs come funneled from issued shares on AMC, so only look there to see the totals.

(AMC paid BTC141.12429300 to 7,711,710 shares, some of which represented pass-trough shares, so some of the BTC went back to the issuer; the real paid total to outstanding shares should be around the ~BTC108 above).

Interesting theory, but Ken has already stated that it was "because of the merger" and not because of the reasons outlined above, leaving me to wonder how a merger magically creates money
lewicki
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 12, 2013, 03:47:05 PM
 #2894

Interesting theory, but Ken has already stated that it was "because of the merger" and not because of the reasons outlined above, leaving me to wonder how a merger magically creates money

Backpay from the reinvestment shares that collected dividends from before the merger.
Vbs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 12, 2013, 03:55:53 PM
 #2895

Interesting theory, but Ken has already stated that it was "because of the merger" and not because of the reasons outlined above, leaving me to wonder how a merger magically creates money

The merger has the effect of killing the growth fund "shares" and "rules", so any BTC there can be used. Remember that the growth fund has been receiving around 85% of all dividends since mining started.

Using the movements from https://blockchain.info/address/1DJpsvnM7xTnQbWEhLYyCyfxQyxwupEzCa my estimate is that the growth fund has currently around BTC(262-8-80-22)*.85 = BTC129 less any expenses paid from those.
FloatesMcgoates
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 12, 2013, 03:59:11 PM
 #2896

Interesting theory, but Ken has already stated that it was "because of the merger" and not because of the reasons outlined above, leaving me to wonder how a merger magically creates money

The merger has the effect of killing the growth fund "shares" and "rules", so any BTC there can be used. Remember that the growth fund has been receiving around 85% of all dividends since mining started.

Using the movements from https://blockchain.info/address/1DJpsvnM7xTnQbWEhLYyCyfxQyxwupEzCa my estimate is that the growth fund has currently around BTC(262-8-80-22)*.85 = BTC129 less any expenses paid from those.

If you are on IRC with him all the time could you get a confirmation that this is the case? It kind of disturbs me that a CEO can't articulate something that seems rather easy to explain, I'm sure he sees how explaining a massive increase in BTC by giving an answer as vague as "because of the merger" raises several red flags.
VolanicEruptor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 12, 2013, 04:02:53 PM
 #2897

It's all part of the merger process!   Cheesy

LorenzoMoney
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 335
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 12, 2013, 06:57:19 PM
 #2898

Well, kids, Ken/Active Mining just paid out a nice dividend today.

What do all you critics say about that?


https://twitter.com/Lorenzo_Money -- Bitcoin Address: 1EttqaSSCksRAXrwejoChs5zmGjSikN9mC -- http://lorenzomoney.wordpress.com/
The Bulk of mankind is as well equipped for flying as thinking. - Jonathan Swift
DOGE COIN address: DSYMgD1HfmJFwNuc6Zvhp7PkrVD1QRBsgu
Ashitank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 12, 2013, 07:28:26 PM
 #2899

Well, kids, Ken/Active Mining just paid out a nice dividend today.

What do all you critics say about that?



Welcome to day before yesterday  Shocked  Wink  Cheesy
lewicki
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 12, 2013, 09:58:42 PM
 #2900

Stop buying AMC you idiots. Buy ActiveMining.
Pages: « 1 ... 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 [145] 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!