[ANN][COS] COSMOS, internet of blockchains

[rasec]

ATOM was trading around $4.30 before the binance listing, went as high as $6.70 after they've announced it, now it's under $4.00... doesn't make any sense lol

[1714230503]

1714230503

[1714230503]

1714230503

[1714230503]

1714230503

[1714230503]

1714230503

[igorttomic]

Cosmos/Bitcoin/Tether (14 May) #ATOM $ATOM #BTC $BTC #USDT $USDT: https://www.publish0x.com/cryptostation/cosmosbitcointether-14-may-atom-atom-btc-btc-usdt-usdt-xjjgeq

[igorttomic]

Cosmos/Tether (18 May) #ATOM $ATOM #USDT $USDT: https://www.reddit.com/r/cosmosnetwork/comments/bq6smx/cosmostether_18_may_atom_atom_usdt_usdt/

[jaekwon]

Renaming this thread to "Cosmos, internet of blockchains".

https://twitter.com/jaekwon/status/1130171337887166470

"Internet of blockchains" and the "interchain" are descriptive terms that shouldn't be trademarked nor owned by any single entity.  We're all building toward the interchain, and Cosmos is one frame of reference.  Long live Cosmos, internet of blockchains!

[Prateek_sharma]

Having read your whitepaper, there's no question of your copying the Blocknet's technical approach. You're using DPoS and sidechains/sharding; we're using an inter-chain network overlay, a blockchain router, p2p messaging and atomic protocols.

However, when it comes to how you represent/market yourselves, there's a striking similarity in both concept and wording.
Consider, for example, the third paragraph of your whitepaper: this echoes, almost verbatim, the following:
- a sentence in the second paragraph of our last blog post
- a sentence in our last radio interview
- many other instances, over the course of at least the past year, in which we've described our goal as preserving the security properties of
blockchains in inter-chain scenarios.

Can you please paste the sentence from the second paragraph of your last blog post that you find strikingly similar?  I just want to make sure we're talking about the same parts.

Sure: "The Blocknet is an inter-blockchain application platform, devoted to creating solutions to inter-chain interoperability without sacrificing the security properties of blockchains."

I can't - and I'm not trying to - stop you from using "internet of blockchains" or phrases about "preserving security properties."
I'm not accusing you of plagiarism either.
But I request, as a matter of prior art, that you both (a) find equivalent but different ways of describing your project, and (b) that consider acknowledging - where relevant - that we precede you in pursuing the vision of inter-chain interoperability and were the first in carving out the concepts that you've arrived at.

I have no qualms changing the phrase.  "Network of blockchains"?  We'll take that then

Nice one. Sounds good :-)

I didn't pursue any vision of blockchains until early 2014.  Well, even before then, if you count the fact that since 2013 I had developed exchange software for a crypto-crypto exchange to compete with Cryptsy.  I abandoned that (https://github.com/jaekwon/ftnox-backend) and started working on Tendermint because it is what enables secure PoS.  And we have to get away from PoW in order for the security of many chains to be independent of each other.

http://tendermint.com/blog/security-of-cryptocurrency-protocols/

Looking at BlockNet's vision, it seems like we're fully aligned.  We're not even competing, we're both developing toward a shared system from different angles.  To call us plagiarizing is a stretch... we've created and proposed solutions to longstanding problems in the crypto space.

Absolutely. I'm explicitly not accusing you of plagiarism.

Here, I've changed our tagline.  We'll update them on our website too.  I acknowledge that jl777 has had great ideas, inevitable ideas.  I'd like for us to take part in the journey.  The internet of blockchains will not be centralized, or hierarchical.  Like the WorldWideWeb that preceded it, it is connected in every possible way.

Onward to a decentralised internet! For the record though, jl777 has nothing to do with the Blocknet. He's behind that SuperNET thing, right?
Anyway, yes, it's great that there are a few projects working toward "web 3.0".

All the best with the project,

Arlyn

Hi folks :-)

Arlyn here from the Blocknet.

A while back I chatted with Jaekwon (see above) about Cosmos's use of "internet of blockchains" and we mutually agreed that Cosmos would use "network of blockchains" instead.

I'd like to ask whether this project would mind changing "internet of blockchains" to "network of blockchains" on the following pages:
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/cosmos
- Cosmos website: https://cosmos.network/
- Github: https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos


Thanks very much, and best of luck networking blockchains together!


Arlyn

Re-posting because it got lost.

Awaiting your response (or to its duplicate on the Cosmos forum, or to the few requests on Twitter).

Well!! Did you know Cosmos coin price is increasing very rapidly in the crypto market, as several crypto experts predict that the price of cosmos will rise high in the future. on the other hand, according to coinpedia
cosmos price prediction, the price will reach the moon in the future.

What's your point of view on cosmos price prediction?

[synechist]

Having read your whitepaper, there's no question of your copying the Blocknet's technical approach. You're using DPoS and sidechains/sharding; we're using an inter-chain network overlay, a blockchain router, p2p messaging and atomic protocols.

However, when it comes to how you represent/market yourselves, there's a striking similarity in both concept and wording.
Consider, for example, the third paragraph of your whitepaper: this echoes, almost verbatim, the following:
- a sentence in the second paragraph of our last blog post
- a sentence in our last radio interview
- many other instances, over the course of at least the past year, in which we've described our goal as preserving the security properties of
blockchains in inter-chain scenarios.

Can you please paste the sentence from the second paragraph of your last blog post that you find strikingly similar?  I just want to make sure we're talking about the same parts.

Sure: "The Blocknet is an inter-blockchain application platform, devoted to creating solutions to inter-chain interoperability without sacrificing the security properties of blockchains."

I can't - and I'm not trying to - stop you from using "internet of blockchains" or phrases about "preserving security properties."
I'm not accusing you of plagiarism either.
But I request, as a matter of prior art, that you both (a) find equivalent but different ways of describing your project, and (b) that consider acknowledging - where relevant - that we precede you in pursuing the vision of inter-chain interoperability and were the first in carving out the concepts that you've arrived at.

I have no qualms changing the phrase.  "Network of blockchains"?  We'll take that then

Nice one. Sounds good :-)

I didn't pursue any vision of blockchains until early 2014.  Well, even before then, if you count the fact that since 2013 I had developed exchange software for a crypto-crypto exchange to compete with Cryptsy.  I abandoned that (https://github.com/jaekwon/ftnox-backend) and started working on Tendermint because it is what enables secure PoS.  And we have to get away from PoW in order for the security of many chains to be independent of each other.

http://tendermint.com/blog/security-of-cryptocurrency-protocols/

Looking at BlockNet's vision, it seems like we're fully aligned.  We're not even competing, we're both developing toward a shared system from different angles.  To call us plagiarizing is a stretch... we've created and proposed solutions to longstanding problems in the crypto space.

Absolutely. I'm explicitly not accusing you of plagiarism.

Here, I've changed our tagline.  We'll update them on our website too.  I acknowledge that jl777 has had great ideas, inevitable ideas.  I'd like for us to take part in the journey.  The internet of blockchains will not be centralized, or hierarchical.  Like the WorldWideWeb that preceded it, it is connected in every possible way.

Onward to a decentralised internet! For the record though, jl777 has nothing to do with the Blocknet. He's behind that SuperNET thing, right?
Anyway, yes, it's great that there are a few projects working toward "web 3.0".

All the best with the project,

Arlyn

Hi folks :-)

Arlyn here from the Blocknet.

A while back I chatted with Jaekwon (see above) about Cosmos's use of "internet of blockchains" and we mutually agreed that Cosmos would use "network of blockchains" instead.

I'd like to ask whether this project would mind changing "internet of blockchains" to "network of blockchains" on the following pages:
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/cosmos
- Cosmos website: https://cosmos.network/
- Github: https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos


Thanks very much, and best of luck networking blockchains together!


Arlyn

Re-posting because it got lost.

Awaiting your response (or to its duplicate on the Cosmos forum, or to the few requests on Twitter).

Renaming this thread to "Cosmos, internet of blockchains".

https://twitter.com/jaekwon/status/1130171337887166470

"Internet of blockchains" and the "interchain" are descriptive terms that shouldn't be trademarked nor owned by any single entity.  We're all building toward the interchain, and Cosmos is one frame of reference.  Long live Cosmos, internet of blockchains!

Great to have closure on this at last! I look forward to the next generation of interchain dapps that will rely on both Cosmos and Blocknet services.

Dropping these here to affirm that this is a mutual understanding between the two of us. I don't control anyone at the Blocknet (reason: decentralization), so this is not a corporate statement, but my personal view is that the potential to build a decentralized ecosystem is better realised by our working toward it together.

[igorttomic]

Cosmos/Tether(23 May) #ATOM $ATOM #USDT $USDT https://www.publish0x.com/cryptostation/cosmostether23-may-atom-atom-usdt-usdt-xgdkex

[igorttomic]

ATOM / BTC technical analysis [BINANCE]: https://www.publish0x.com/ta-crypto-market/atom-btc-technical-analysis-binance-xommlz

[CoinCodex]

Cosmos is currently moving sideways, can we expect a bullish outcome?

https://coincodex.com/article/3758/cosmos-price-analysis-atom-bulls-eye-7-while-bears-targets-5/

[Meladon]

Is the lunie wallet the right place to access my ICO Atom tokens?

thx in advance

[traveler007]

Is this a true that Binance is using Cosmos thecnology in their DEX exchange? Where I can find information in which way Cosmos helps to Binance in this?

[elitecstrike]

Hacking the Cosmos: CosmWasm and Key Management
Bringing the Web Assembly (Wasm) VM and superior key management to the Cosmos SDK to increase user functionality.
https://medium.com/regen-network/hacking-the-cosmos-cosmwasm-and-key-management-a08b9f561d1b

[igorttomic]

Cosmos (ATOM) - The Internet Of Blockchains: https://www.publish0x.com/introduction-to-cryptocurrencies/cosmos-atom-internet-blockchains-xnqrym

[zerkalisz]

HackAtom Seoul Dates: July 19-21, 2019
Cosmos is proud to present its premiere hackathon of the year—the 2019 HackAtom is coming to Seoul, South Korea. 
https://www.buidl.asia/hackatom?utm_content=buffere6b30&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

[gartmah]

Go Tech Talk: Intro to Cosmos and Building a Blockchain in Go

Jack Zampolin, Product Manager for the Cosmos SDK, will give an intro to Cosmos talk at a networking event co-hosted by CoinStructure.

https://cosmos.network/events/go-tech-talk

[elitecstrike]

Choosing the right Wallet for your Cosmos ATOM (Web, Android, iOS & Hardware Wallet)

https://medium.com/simply-vc/choosing-the-right-wallet-for-your-cosmos-atom-web-android-ios-hardware-wallet-7a39a275efee

Several teams worked diligently to create ATOM-compatible wallets for security, relying on the passive build-up of their ATOM assets and participation in network management. This tutorial will look at two of your favorite Cosmos community wallets.

[sandrozc]

3 Crypto Projects That Silently Entered Top 20 In 2019 You Probably Did Not Notice : https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoMarkets/comments/cgtiaq/3_crypto_projects_that_silently_entered_top_20_in/

[joosep]

Coinbase’s August 5 blog post suggests that the exchange is considering adding eight new cryptocurrencies and among them Cosmos. Potential assets will have to abide by the required regulatory laws, while meeting the technical standards of the Coinbase.

https://blog.coinbase.com/coinbase-continues-to-explore-support-for-new-digital-assets-4d2ecbcbd38c

[sandrozc]

Cosmos: Learn about Cosmos, a proof-of-stake coin that allow delegators and validators to earn reward through staking and a coin that allow communication between different blockchain  : https://www.publish0x.com/cryptoforex-street/cosmos-learn-about-cosmos-proof-stake-coin-allow-delegators-xyyzvl

[cuttie018]

I've been searching for yours on Google and Twitter for some time. Not much information about you. Why is this so? Have you only got your BCT activities here?