jeanjean15
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2016, 08:17:28 AM |
|
new vesrion with 45 sols per gtx 1070 can be runned on windows(10 x64) ?
+1 Is it so hard to add windows support ? ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif)
|
|
|
|
liksagen
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2016, 09:20:07 AM |
|
I see some peoples get about 165 sols/s +- using genoil miner with driver 16.10.3 but the card should be [8GB] ( he test with RX 470 ). kernel : zec-sa.cl comand : genoil.exe -k zec zec zec zec -c zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -u user.x1222 -p xnxx -i 20 -w 64 -P 0 -f 2 -z 0 give it try! how about screenshot?
|
|
|
|
malefactor
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2016, 10:59:52 AM |
|
RX480 with amdgpu-pro 16.30 Total 55.8 sol/s [dev0 54.0] 18 shares Total 55.3 sol/s [dev0 52.4] 18 shares Total 55.6 sol/s [dev0 54.7] 18 shares Total 55.9 sol/s [dev0 55.7] 18 shares Total 55.0 sol/s [dev0 55.7] 18 shares Total 55.5 sol/s [dev0 56.2] 18 shares Total 55.2 sol/s [dev0 56.1] 19 shares Total 54.6 sol/s [dev0 54.8] 19 shares Total 54.9 sol/s [dev0 55.3] 19 shares Total 55.1 sol/s [dev0 53.1] 19 shares Total 54.4 sol/s [dev0 52.6] 19 shares
Kernel: http://coinsforall.io/distr/input.cl.coll1 NVidia also have speedup. I reduced number of collisions to found from 5 to 1, it seems 5 is too much, need mrb's comments. Tested on 750ti - for me I see a few % reduction in performance.
|
|
|
|
laik2
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2016, 11:04:15 AM |
|
What S/s do you get from 750ti? I have 760Ti collecting dust somewhere...If it can mine with good speed I'll have to revive it ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Also we need solution for higher S/s on newer boards ...50S/s for RX480 vs 60S/s for 7970 seems a bit harsh...
|
|
|
|
malefactor
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2016, 11:10:39 AM |
|
I see some peoples get about 165 sols/s +- using genoil miner with driver 16.10.3 but the card should be [8GB] ( he test with RX 470 ). kernel : zec-sa.cl comand : genoil.exe -k zec zec zec zec -c zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -u user.x1222 -p xnxx -i 20 -w 64 -P 0 -f 2 -z 0 give it try! how about screenshot? ok, I'm going to say this - and I'm probably wasting my time - but please, all, if you're not a programmer, and you don't understand what is being talked about, please just be patient and wait for the developers to release stuff. These posts asking for these things are just not going to be answered. All they do is clutter the discussion. There is not a public miner available that deliver 165 sol/s on a single rx470. And if you think there is, go bother people in that thread. It's obvious that what is meant is "a rig of 6 or 7 RX470 cards". Seriously, use your brain here; have you seen an explosion in hash rate at a point in time and a corresponding drop in price? No? Then probably there is no 6x improvement via a public miner.
|
|
|
|
krnlx
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2016, 11:38:11 AM |
|
!!!!! PCI-E SPEED IS AN ISSUE. This 1070 card LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 8GT/s, Width x16, ASPM L0s L1, Exit Latency L0s <1us, L1 <4us is faster then this LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x16, ASPM L0s L1, Exit Latency L0s <512ns, L1 <4us by 15-20% First card with one silentarmy thread loads by 89%, second one - 76% You can check pci-e speed with this command
|
|
|
|
antantti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2016, 11:48:01 AM |
|
!!!!! PCI-E SPEED IS AN ISSUE.
I noticed this too. You get better speeds if you connect your card to x16 slot without riser.
|
|
|
|
eXtremal
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2016, 12:29:04 PM |
|
I have another idea for optimize equihash round kernel, results will be in next 12-24h You must have o/c'd. I don't believe 16.30 is 37% faster than 16.40. Only memory, 1100/2160 and low DRAM timings preset (modded ROM).
|
|
|
|
laik2
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2016, 12:59:26 PM |
|
I have another idea for optimize equihash round kernel, results will be in next 12-24h You must have o/c'd. I don't believe 16.30 is 37% faster than 16.40. Only memory, 1100/2160 and low DRAM timings preset (modded ROM). Excellent! We believe in you! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
marvykkio
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2016, 01:52:03 PM |
|
version for windows? I have 2 x gtx 1070, have only windows ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif)
|
|
|
|
Nikolaj
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2016, 01:54:15 PM |
|
version for windows? I have 2 x gtx 1070, have only windows ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif) +1 windows please
|
|
|
|
Dr_Victor
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2016, 01:57:05 PM |
|
What can we get now from one gtx 1070?
|
yobit.net is banned from signatures
|
|
|
enerbyte
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2016, 02:38:24 PM |
|
version for windows? I have 2 x gtx 1070, have only windows ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif) +1 windows please Support windows please
|
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3864
Merit: 1732
Up to 300% + 200 FS deposit bonuses
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2016, 03:04:41 PM |
|
WHOA! Thanks man EDIT: I see there is no binary there yet. You got me all excited.
|
|
|
|
hacko.bg
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2016, 03:25:13 PM |
|
Is Silentarmy able to work as standalone CPU miner? Or is there any other walkthrough for doing so? Ubuntu 16.04 server, I get: user@ubuntu:~/silentarmy$ make echo 'const char *ocl_code = R"_mrb_(' >_kernel.h cpp input.cl >>_kernel.h /bin/sh: 1: cpp: not found Makefile:25: recipe for target '_kernel.h' failed make: *** [_kernel.h] Error 127
|
|
|
|
laik2
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2016, 03:28:48 PM |
|
Is Silentarmy able to work as standalone CPU miner? Or is there any other walkthrough for doing so? Ubuntu 16.04 server, I get: user@ubuntu:~/silentarmy$ make echo 'const char *ocl_code = R"_mrb_(' >_kernel.h cpp input.cl >>_kernel.h /bin/sh: 1: cpp: not found Makefile:25: recipe for target '_kernel.h' failed make: *** [_kernel.h] Error 127
apt-get install build-essential
|
|
|
|
nerdralph
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2016, 04:10:20 PM |
|
!!!!! PCI-E SPEED IS AN ISSUE. This 1070 card LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 8GT/s, Width x16, ASPM L0s L1, Exit Latency L0s <1us, L1 <4us is faster then this LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x16, ASPM L0s L1, Exit Latency L0s <512ns, L1 <4us by 15-20% First card with one silentarmy thread loads by 89%, second one - 76% You can check pci-e speed with this command I've already pointed out that you can improve performance by reducing MAX_SOLS. I use 500 instead of 2000 on my fork. Also, you want to look at link status (LnkSta), not link capabilities. A port may be capable of x16, but may only run at x2 or x4 when you have more than one x16 card plugged in.
|
|
|
|
hacko.bg
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2016, 04:11:57 PM Last edit: November 10, 2016, 04:24:37 PM by hacko.bg |
|
Is Silentarmy able to work as standalone CPU miner? Or is there any other walkthrough for doing so? Ubuntu 16.04 server, I get: user@ubuntu:~/silentarmy$ make echo 'const char *ocl_code = R"_mrb_(' >_kernel.h cpp input.cl >>_kernel.h /bin/sh: 1: cpp: not found Makefile:25: recipe for target '_kernel.h' failed make: *** [_kernel.h] Error 127
apt-get install build-essential Got through this and still looking for OpenCL during build. edit: Installing Intel OpenCL did do the trick, I've manage to build sa-solver. But now I do see the only one processor and there are 2 on this server. /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lOpenCL collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Makefile:20: recipe for target 'sa-solver' failed make: *** [sa-solver] Error 1
|
|
|
|
hypercrypto
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2016, 04:36:16 PM |
|
I think you should keep improving speed rather than support windows for now, because they have claymore miner already with decent speeds
while as myself on linux we stuck with the half of their speed on windows with claymore miner i just got around 45~49 per card for modded rx 470....
I hope to consider this in the roadmap....
|
|
|
|
|