Bitcoin Forum
November 18, 2024, 07:04:21 PM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 ... 91 »
  Print  
Author Topic: SILENTARMY v5: Zcash miner, 115 sol/s on R9 Nano, 70 sol/s on GTX 1070  (Read 209309 times)
jeanjean15
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 10, 2016, 08:17:28 AM
 #321

new vesrion with 45 sols per gtx 1070 can be runned on windows(10 x64) ? 

+1

Is it so hard to add windows support ?  Cry
liksagen
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 10, 2016, 09:20:07 AM
 #322

I see some peoples get about 165 sols/s  +-  using genoil miner with driver 16.10.3 
but the card should be [8GB] ( he test with RX 470 ).
kernel : zec-sa.cl
comand :
Code:
genoil.exe -k zec zec zec zec -c zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -u user.x1222 -p xnxx -i 20 -w 64 -P 0 -f 2 -z 0
give it try!
 

how about screenshot?
malefactor
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 10, 2016, 10:59:52 AM
 #323

RX480 with amdgpu-pro 16.30
Quote
Total 55.8 sol/s [dev0 54.0] 18 shares
Total 55.3 sol/s [dev0 52.4] 18 shares
Total 55.6 sol/s [dev0 54.7] 18 shares
Total 55.9 sol/s [dev0 55.7] 18 shares
Total 55.0 sol/s [dev0 55.7] 18 shares
Total 55.5 sol/s [dev0 56.2] 18 shares
Total 55.2 sol/s [dev0 56.1] 19 shares
Total 54.6 sol/s [dev0 54.8] 19 shares
Total 54.9 sol/s [dev0 55.3] 19 shares
Total 55.1 sol/s [dev0 53.1] 19 shares
Total 54.4 sol/s [dev0 52.6] 19 shares
Kernel: http://coinsforall.io/distr/input.cl.coll1 NVidia also have speedup.
I reduced number of collisions to found from 5 to 1, it seems 5 is too much, need mrb's comments.

Tested on 750ti - for me I see a few % reduction in performance.
laik2
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 652
Merit: 266



View Profile WWW
November 10, 2016, 11:04:15 AM
 #324

What S/s do you get from 750ti?
I have 760Ti collecting dust somewhere...If it can mine with good speed I'll have to revive it Smiley
Also we need solution for higher S/s on newer boards ...50S/s for RX480 vs 60S/s for 7970 seems a bit harsh...

Miners Mining Platform [ MMP OS ] - https://app.mmpos.eu/
malefactor
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 10, 2016, 11:10:39 AM
 #325

I see some peoples get about 165 sols/s  +-  using genoil miner with driver 16.10.3 
but the card should be [8GB] ( he test with RX 470 ).
kernel : zec-sa.cl
comand :
Code:
genoil.exe -k zec zec zec zec -c zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -u user.x1222 -p xnxx -i 20 -w 64 -P 0 -f 2 -z 0
give it try!
 

how about screenshot?

ok, I'm going to say this - and I'm probably wasting my time - but please, all, if you're not a programmer, and you don't understand what is being talked about, please just be patient and wait for the developers to release stuff.  These posts asking for these things are just not going to be answered.  All they do is clutter the discussion.

There is not a public miner available that deliver 165 sol/s on a single rx470.  And if you think there is, go bother people in that thread.  It's obvious that what is meant is "a rig of 6 or 7 RX470 cards".  Seriously, use your brain here; have you seen an explosion in hash rate at a point in time and a corresponding drop in price?  No?  Then probably there is no 6x improvement via a public miner. 
krnlx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 243
Merit: 105


View Profile
November 10, 2016, 11:38:11 AM
 #326

!!!!!

PCI-E SPEED IS AN ISSUE.

This 1070 card
Code:
LnkCap:	Port #0, Speed 8GT/s, Width x16, ASPM L0s L1, Exit Latency L0s <1us, L1 <4us

is faster then this

Code:
LnkCap:	Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x16, ASPM L0s L1, Exit Latency L0s <512ns, L1 <4us

by 15-20%

First card with one silentarmy thread loads by 89%, second one - 76%

You can check pci-e speed with this command
Code:
sudo lspci -vv
antantti
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
November 10, 2016, 11:48:01 AM
 #327

!!!!!
PCI-E SPEED IS AN ISSUE.


I noticed this too. You get better speeds if you connect your card to x16 slot without riser.
eXtremal
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2106
Merit: 282


👉bit.ly/3QXp3oh | 🔥 Ultimate Launc


View Profile WWW
November 10, 2016, 12:29:04 PM
 #328

I have another idea for optimize equihash round kernel, results will be in next 12-24h

Quote
You must have o/c'd. I don't believe 16.30 is 37% faster than 16.40.
Only memory, 1100/2160 and low DRAM timings preset (modded ROM).

TONUP██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
▄▄███████▄▄
▄▄███████████████▄▄
▄███████████████████▄
▄█████▄░▄▄▀█████▀▄████▄
▄███████▄▀█▄▀██▀▄███████▄
█████████▄▀█▄▀▄██████████
██████████▄▀█▄▀██████████
██████████▀▄▀█▄▀█████████
▀███████▀▄██▄▀█▄▀███████▀
▀████▀▄█████▄▀▀░▀█████▀
▀███████████████████▀
▀▀███████████████▀▀
▀▀███████▀▀
▄▄▄███████▄▄▄
▄▄███████████████▄▄
▄███████████████████▄
▄██████████████▀▀█████▄
▄██████████▀▀█████▐████▄
██████▀▀████▄▄▀▀█████████
████▄▄███▄██▀█████▐██████
█████████▀██████████████
▀███████▌▐██████▐██████▀
▀███████▄▄███▄████████▀
▀███████████████████▀
▀▀███████████████▀▀
▀▀▀███████▀▀▀
▄▄▄███████▄▄▄
▄▄███████████████▄▄
▄███████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████▄
▄████▀▀███▀▀███▀▀██▀███▄
████▀███████▀█▀███▀█████
██████████████████████
████▄███████▄█▄███▄█████
▀████▄▄███▄▄███▄▄██▄███▀
▀█████████████████████▀
▀███████████████████▀
▀▀███████████████▀▀
▀▀▀███████▀▀▀
████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
.
JOIN NOW
.
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
████████
laik2
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 652
Merit: 266



View Profile WWW
November 10, 2016, 12:59:26 PM
 #329

I have another idea for optimize equihash round kernel, results will be in next 12-24h

Quote
You must have o/c'd. I don't believe 16.30 is 37% faster than 16.40.
Only memory, 1100/2160 and low DRAM timings preset (modded ROM).
Excellent! We believe in you! Smiley

Miners Mining Platform [ MMP OS ] - https://app.mmpos.eu/
marvykkio
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


View Profile
November 10, 2016, 01:52:03 PM
 #330

version for windows? I have 2 x gtx 1070, have only windows
 Cry Cry
Nikolaj
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 445
Merit: 255


View Profile
November 10, 2016, 01:54:15 PM
 #331

version for windows? I have 2 x gtx 1070, have only windows
 Cry Cry

+1 windows please
Dr_Victor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 954
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 10, 2016, 01:57:05 PM
 #332

What can we get now from one gtx 1070?

yobit.net is banned from signatures
enerbyte
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 556
Merit: 501


View Profile
November 10, 2016, 02:38:24 PM
 #333

version for windows? I have 2 x gtx 1070, have only windows
 Cry Cry

+1 windows please

Support windows please
Genoil
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 438
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 10, 2016, 02:41:52 PM
 #334

version for windows? I have 2 x gtx 1070, have only windows
 Cry Cry

+1 windows please

Support windows please

https://github.com/Genoil/silentarmy/tree/windows

ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d
BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
adaseb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3878
Merit: 1733


View Profile
November 10, 2016, 03:04:41 PM
 #335


WHOA!

Thanks man

EDIT: I see there is no binary there yet. You got me all excited.
hacko.bg
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 10, 2016, 03:25:13 PM
 #336

Is Silentarmy able to work as standalone CPU miner? Or is there any other walkthrough for doing so?

Ubuntu 16.04 server, I get:

Code:
user@ubuntu:~/silentarmy$ make
echo 'const char *ocl_code = R"_mrb_(' >_kernel.h
cpp input.cl >>_kernel.h
/bin/sh: 1: cpp: not found
Makefile:25: recipe for target '_kernel.h' failed
make: *** [_kernel.h] Error 127
laik2
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 652
Merit: 266



View Profile WWW
November 10, 2016, 03:28:48 PM
 #337

Is Silentarmy able to work as standalone CPU miner? Or is there any other walkthrough for doing so?

Ubuntu 16.04 server, I get:

Code:
user@ubuntu:~/silentarmy$ make
echo 'const char *ocl_code = R"_mrb_(' >_kernel.h
cpp input.cl >>_kernel.h
/bin/sh: 1: cpp: not found
Makefile:25: recipe for target '_kernel.h' failed
make: *** [_kernel.h] Error 127

apt-get install build-essential

Miners Mining Platform [ MMP OS ] - https://app.mmpos.eu/
nerdralph
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 251


View Profile
November 10, 2016, 04:10:20 PM
 #338

!!!!!

PCI-E SPEED IS AN ISSUE.

This 1070 card
Code:
LnkCap:	Port #0, Speed 8GT/s, Width x16, ASPM L0s L1, Exit Latency L0s <1us, L1 <4us

is faster then this

Code:
LnkCap:	Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x16, ASPM L0s L1, Exit Latency L0s <512ns, L1 <4us

by 15-20%

First card with one silentarmy thread loads by 89%, second one - 76%

You can check pci-e speed with this command
Code:
sudo lspci -vv

I've already pointed out that you can improve performance by reducing MAX_SOLS.  I use 500 instead of 2000 on my fork.

Also, you want to look at link status (LnkSta), not link capabilities.  A port may be capable of x16, but may only run at x2 or x4 when you have more than one x16 card plugged in.


hacko.bg
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 10, 2016, 04:11:57 PM
Last edit: November 10, 2016, 04:24:37 PM by hacko.bg
 #339

Is Silentarmy able to work as standalone CPU miner? Or is there any other walkthrough for doing so?

Ubuntu 16.04 server, I get:

Code:
user@ubuntu:~/silentarmy$ make
echo 'const char *ocl_code = R"_mrb_(' >_kernel.h
cpp input.cl >>_kernel.h
/bin/sh: 1: cpp: not found
Makefile:25: recipe for target '_kernel.h' failed
make: *** [_kernel.h] Error 127

apt-get install build-essential

Got through this and still looking for OpenCL during build.

Code:

edit: Installing Intel OpenCL did do the trick, I've manage to build sa-solver. But now I do see the only one processor and there are 2 on this server.
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lOpenCL
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:20: recipe for target 'sa-solver' failed
make: *** [sa-solver] Error 1
hypercrypto
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 10, 2016, 04:36:16 PM
 #340

I think you should keep improving speed rather than support windows for now,  because they have claymore miner already with decent speeds

while as myself on linux we stuck with the half of their speed on windows with claymore miner i just got around 45~49 per card for modded rx 470....

I hope to consider this in the roadmap.... 
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 ... 91 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!