chup
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 736
Merit: 262
Me, Myself & I
|
 |
November 11, 2016, 08:05:32 AM |
|
As I'm reading this n-th time like listening broken record, do You mind showing pool approval of this one_single_card_one_minute_hashing_snapshot? Thx. When one of my 280x goes north of 87H/s pool usually reports invalid shares. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The forum was founded in 2009 by Satoshi and Sirius. It replaced a
SourceForge forum.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
sorry2xs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Dark Passenger Bitcoin miner 2013,Bitcoin node
|
 |
November 11, 2016, 08:07:30 AM |
|
|
Please tip the Node 1MPWKB23NsZsXHANnFwVAWT86mL24fqAjF; KO4UX
THAT NO GOOD DO GOODER BAT!!!
|
|
|
mishax1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1017
|
|
November 11, 2016, 08:10:50 AM |
|
The first time I ran v4.0 I got ~82H/s on my 280x , now I can't recreate it, now getting ~70H/s, and I didn't use any special settings at all.. any thoughts guys?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casmania
|
|
November 11, 2016, 08:12:43 AM |
|
As I'm reading this n-th time like listening broken record, do You mind showing pool approval of this one_single_card_one_minute_hashing_snapshot? Thx. When one of my 280x goes north of 87H/s pool usually reports invalid shares. My 7970 card run at 70-75H/s with 900/1250 MHz frequency with the hacked bios. So it is possible to run higher. |
|
|
|
|
wpsd
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
November 11, 2016, 08:32:11 AM |
|
Hmm I'm still don't understand why not publishing linux version ? Is it technical problem ? or license problem  Claymore said: "I'm not so greedy as some people say Smiley It's not about money, there are several reasons why I'm not going to release ZCash miner for Linux in near future - most of haters who say that I stole SA engine are on Linux so let's they use some different miner. Also I don't like to see as someone applies IDA to my miner to see how it works. Also I don't like Linux, it's a pain for me. NVidia: if I release miner for NVidia, these haters will again say that I stole SA engine. So there will not be NVidia version. I think other devs will create public miners with similar speed for Linux and NVidia soon." LOL funny community. mining is more important. Does the v1.1 support client.reconnect stratum protocol ? |
|
|
|
|
ultralord
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
November 11, 2016, 08:34:19 AM |
|
How does -i 0,1,2 effect hashrate? I'm running -i 2 on 390 and rx 480. I have some 370s that I want to test out. Saw someone mentioned -i 1 on them @ 40 sols. Is intensity limited to GPU compute units/bus width? Will certain cards not be able to handle -i 2?
|
|
|
|
|
chup
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 736
Merit: 262
Me, Myself & I
|
 |
November 11, 2016, 08:34:38 AM |
|
My 7970 card run at 70-75H/s with 900/1250 MHz frequency with the hacked bios. So it is possible to run higher.
I believe what I see. Right now I'm seeing less then a minute hash snapshot of one 280x gone to invalid shares nirvana. It will be possible when I see it hashing stable with pool approval. |
|
|
|
ioglnx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
|
|
November 11, 2016, 08:37:45 AM |
|
Maybe for those linux users..create a fund to compensate his efforts.
I personally think a native Windows version is much better than all these ported miners we see and nobody really able to compile them because of mising deps, wrong make files and old day crap ubuntu.
Given the time and brainpower he puts into it, it is worth thinking about this option.
And I can understand everyone who stops doing anything for the community when trolls come up and insulting someone. Sofar Claymore did a great job in squeezing the cards.
|
GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³
Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
|
|
|
Luke2939
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Building Wealth through AI and the power of the bl
|
|
November 11, 2016, 08:39:07 AM |
|
This might sound really stupid but, is it possible to mine on a 32 bit windows 7 note book ? Is there a CPU miner for it? I ready to burn my notebook  |
|
|
|
chafer99
Member
Offline
Activity: 99
Merit: 10
|
|
November 11, 2016, 08:40:39 AM |
|
The first time I ran v4.0 I got ~82H/s on my 280x , now I can't recreate it, now getting ~70H/s, and I didn't use any special settings at all.. any thoughts guys?
I had similar problems on v3.0 with -i 2 param. After failover switch, my R-370 decrease from 35H/s to 25H/s. |
|
|
|
|
zebk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
November 11, 2016, 08:53:26 AM |
|
If someone wants to disassembly his code under windows, nobody can stop him  . Beleive me The developer Claymore is concerned about disassembling his software. It is OK to pay a small fee but several routines used in ZCash miner, the developer already made them for other miners (ETH miner) and he reused it (I would do the same) so it is questionable why the developer uses a DefFee of 2.5% in ZEC while he uses a DefFee of 1% in ETH. He indirect incentive miners to “have a look” at his software miner, disassembling it (eg. reverse engineering with IDA). And it is a matter of time: 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, depends the free time of the who is re-creating the program. |
|
|
|
|
|
semajjames
|
|
November 11, 2016, 09:11:50 AM |
|
I got this output on v4.0
ZEC - Total Speed: 234.442 H/s, Total Shares: 12, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ZEC: GPU0 77.947 H/s, GPU1 77.873 H/s, GPU2 0.000 H/s, GPU3 78.623 H/s
ZEC: 11/11/16-06:17:20 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/11/16-06:17:22 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/11/16-06:17:23 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 11/11/16-06:17:29 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ZEC: Share accepted (32 ms)!
ZEC: 11/11/16-06:17:31 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
GPU0 t=53C fan=5%, GPU1 t=66C fan=2%, GPU2 t=68C fan=57%, GPU3 t=67C fan=79%
WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
WATCHDOG: GPU 5 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
WATCHDOG: GPU 5 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
Restarting OK, exit...
there is no GPU4 or 5 and its GPU2 that hung.
thanks
Boysie
GPU 3 |
|
|
|
|
v3miner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
November 11, 2016, 09:16:12 AM |
|
I'm having issues with my rigs rebooting randomly after some time using V4, did not have these problems before.
Can't seem to nail down any obvious cause for this.
All rigs are running Windows 7 Pro and ASUS STRIX RX 480 8GB with powered risers. -i 0 vs -i 2 seems to have no effect on stability.
Anyone else having issues like this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotmetal
|
|
November 11, 2016, 09:21:26 AM |
|
I'm having issues with my rigs rebooting randomly after some time using V4, did not have these problems before.
Can't seem to nail down any obvious cause for this.
All rigs are running Windows 7 Pro and ASUS STRIX RX 480 8GB with powered risers. -i 0 vs -i 2 seems to have no effect on stability.
Anyone else having issues like this?
Overclocked BIOS? |
|
|
|
|
|
Hotmetal
|
|
November 11, 2016, 09:21:49 AM |
|
I got this output on v4.0
ZEC - Total Speed: 234.442 H/s, Total Shares: 12, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ZEC: GPU0 77.947 H/s, GPU1 77.873 H/s, GPU2 0.000 H/s, GPU3 78.623 H/s
ZEC: 11/11/16-06:17:20 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/11/16-06:17:22 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/11/16-06:17:23 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 11/11/16-06:17:29 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ZEC: Share accepted (32 ms)!
ZEC: 11/11/16-06:17:31 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
GPU0 t=53C fan=5%, GPU1 t=66C fan=2%, GPU2 t=68C fan=57%, GPU3 t=67C fan=79%
WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
WATCHDOG: GPU 5 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
WATCHDOG: GPU 5 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
Restarting OK, exit...
there is no GPU4 or 5 and its GPU2 that hung.
thanks
Boysie
GPU 3 What exactly does GPU 3 mean / imply? |
|
|
|
|
sorry2xs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Dark Passenger Bitcoin miner 2013,Bitcoin node
|
|
November 11, 2016, 09:26:57 AM |
|
when launching the miner what is the top line state
|
Please tip the Node 1MPWKB23NsZsXHANnFwVAWT86mL24fqAjF; KO4UX
THAT NO GOOD DO GOODER BAT!!!
|
|
|
mettalmag
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1084
Merit: 1003
≡v≡
|
|
November 11, 2016, 09:36:52 AM |
|
any ideas how to mine with two workers in config one with 95$ other one with 5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
pwpwpw
|
|
November 11, 2016, 09:41:55 AM |
|
I got this output on v4.0
ZEC - Total Speed: 234.442 H/s, Total Shares: 12, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ZEC: GPU0 77.947 H/s, GPU1 77.873 H/s, GPU2 0.000 H/s, GPU3 78.623 H/s
ZEC: 11/11/16-06:17:20 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/11/16-06:17:22 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/11/16-06:17:23 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 11/11/16-06:17:29 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ZEC: Share accepted (32 ms)!
ZEC: 11/11/16-06:17:31 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
GPU0 t=53C fan=5%, GPU1 t=66C fan=2%, GPU2 t=68C fan=57%, GPU3 t=67C fan=79%
WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
WATCHDOG: GPU 5 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
WATCHDOG: GPU 5 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
Restarting OK, exit...
there is no GPU4 or 5 and its GPU2 that hung.
thanks
Boysie
GPU 3 I have the same thing, one card fails, had no problems with v1-v3, using i=0, what exactly changed in v4? Problem is that the miner restarts with one less gpu after the hang. Is there a way to simply close the miner instead of restarting ? I mean close with like pressing key Q instead of taskkill, if taskkill is used then it crashes the PC sometimes. |
|
|
|
|
Ursul0
|
|
November 11, 2016, 10:06:33 AM |
|
@Claymore
looks like some sync related bug - I've got a mixed rig here: it has 370, 470 and 480s.
If I run different intensity (2 for 400 and 1 for 370) I get about 15% of shares rejected.
If all is set to "-i 2" - no problem, rejects below 1%
|
|
|
|
|
ultralord
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
November 11, 2016, 10:10:50 AM |
|
@Claymore
looks like some sync related bug - I've got a mixed rig here: it has 370, 470 and 480s.
If I run different intensity (2 for 400 and 1 for 370) I get about 15% of shares rejected.
If all is set to "-i 2" - no problem, rejects below 1%
What rates are you getting for your 370 and what clock settings? |
|
|
|
|
|
