Trimegistus
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1564
Merit: 1027
|
 |
November 11, 2016, 11:51:35 PM |
|
Use -i 0
That's what I've been doing! What I want is to be able to use -i 1/2 with my cheap CPU  |
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3794
Merit: 1723
|
|
November 11, 2016, 11:54:11 PM |
|
My v4 info:
AMD Fury - 100 H/s
280X - 70 H/s
280X - 85 H/s hynix > bios mod 7970 hynix low power use ! The 280 with 7970 bios? Yeah sometimes you can do that since its the exact same ASIC CHIP. Just rebranded. In my thread many flashed their 280x with 7970 bios for Gigabyte. |
|
|
|
|
|
denis1995
|
|
November 11, 2016, 11:55:05 PM |
|
So i'm on nanopool and showing about 11K Sol but I am at 12.2 k Sol on my ethman. I know its all about solutions yadda yadda, but 1.2K less sol is pretty massive. Anyone have better luck any place else?
You might want to try suprnova. Suprnova or flypool i didnt try suprnova i am already at flypool do you think suprnova is better? |
|
|
|
|
|
denis1995
|
|
November 11, 2016, 11:57:30 PM |
|
Been running v4.0 for ~18hrs now but flypool is showing 15% less hashrate.
Anyone have a similar issue with Flypool ?
Same from 600+ i see in flypool only 540 |
|
|
|
|
|
denis1995
|
|
November 12, 2016, 12:20:48 AM |
|
My v4 info:
AMD Fury - 100 H/s
280X - 70 H/s
280X - 85 H/s hynix > bios mod 7970 hynix low power use ! The 280 with 7970 bios? Yeah sometimes you can do that since its the exact same ASIC CHIP. Just rebranded. In my thread many flashed their 280x with 7970 bios for Gigabyte. Ok bro cman you send me the tread i will take a look tomorrow vecause i am already working.... And i am from the mobile spaying haha and if i need some help can you help me? |
|
|
|
|
|
pwpwpw
|
|
November 12, 2016, 12:28:03 AM |
|
4x r9 390 using i=0 one gpu fails consistently after 1-2hours, without the i setting, no fail 15h now. What is the difference between i=0 and no i setting ? Hashrate is the same. V3 miner didn't crash with i=0 something changed in v4. Using sempron 145 (locked), 4gb ram, win7 x64. 15.12 catalyst.
|
|
|
|
|
Walrusbonzo
|
|
November 12, 2016, 12:36:31 AM |
|
Use -i 0
That's what I've been doing! What I want is to be able to use -i 1/2 with my cheap CPU Even on my 4790k i7 with three RX480, -i 0 is still faster....  |
|
|
|
|
|
Bojcha
|
|
November 12, 2016, 12:42:15 AM |
|
Confirmed issue with rejects if you specify different values for "-i" parameter, for example, "-i 1,2". Will be fixed in next update. Speed improvements will be included too  Dude, you deserve a break. Its a long weekend. Sell some of your ZEC, buy a Ferrari and enjoy life. We are happy with your current software at the moment. He wants to keep the fee at 2.5%, and since silentarmy has caught up to Claymore's performance, he needs to jump ahead again. This should end somewhere between 100 and 150 sols/s on a Rx 480. Not if he does not somehow get use of newer GCNs. Probably newer opencl also. |
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3794
Merit: 1723
|
|
November 12, 2016, 01:09:28 AM |
|
My v4 info:
AMD Fury - 100 H/s
280X - 70 H/s
280X - 85 H/s hynix > bios mod 7970 hynix low power use ! The 280 with 7970 bios? Yeah sometimes you can do that since its the exact same ASIC CHIP. Just rebranded. In my thread many flashed their 280x with 7970 bios for Gigabyte. Ok bro cman you send me the tread i will take a look tomorrow vecause i am already working.... And i am from the mobile spaying haha and if i need some help can you help me? |
|
|
|
|
snowyNNN
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 422
Merit: 251
Pasl [Xci-r.i.p.] Eth Zcl Kmd Zen Rep Xmr Sc Neo
|
|
November 12, 2016, 01:17:12 AM |
|
My v4 info:
AMD Fury - 100 H/s
280X - 70 H/s
280X - 85 H/s hynix > bios mod 7970 hynix low power use ! The 280 with 7970 bios? Yeah sometimes you can do that since its the exact same ASIC CHIP. Just rebranded. In my thread many flashed their 280x with 7970 bios for Gigabyte. So Ok bro cman you send me the tread i will take a look tomorrow vecause i am already working.... And i am from the mobile spaying haha and if i need some help can you help me? Stop spamming! |
█▀▀▄░▄▀▀▄░▄▀▀▀░█░░░ Xmr Sc Pasc Rlc Zen ✦ (\__/) ✦
█▀▀░░█▀▀█░░▀▀▄░█░░░ Zcl Kmd Ltc Rep Dash (='.'=)
█░░░░█░░█░███▀░███░ Pasl [Xci-r.i.p.] Eth Btc ✦ (")_(") ✦ ▲▼ Anonymous ▲▼ Community Driven XULT.com
|
|
|
snakey
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1001
|
|
November 12, 2016, 01:19:54 AM |
|
Confirmed issue with rejects if you specify different values for "-i" parameter, for example, "-i 1,2". Will be fixed in next update. Speed improvements will be included too What about the rx470 8gb cards claymore? Old cards and the 480 are doing much better then the 470? |
|
|
|
|
|
delle54
|
|
November 12, 2016, 01:38:29 AM |
|
It seems logical, that a 480 is faster than a 470. Older cards are partially even faster because of the wider memory-bus, but they consume way more power than the 4xx.
|
|
|
|
|
|
denis1995
|
|
November 12, 2016, 01:48:35 AM |
|
It seems logical, that a 480 is faster than a 470. Older cards are partially even faster because of the wider memory-bus, but they consume way more power than the 4xx.
How much is the consuption by 470 or 480? |
|
|
|
|
snakey
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1001
|
|
November 12, 2016, 01:56:36 AM |
|
It seems logical, that a 480 is faster than a 470. Older cards are partially even faster because of the wider memory-bus, but they consume way more power than the 4xx.
Yes but the 4gb version of the 470 is doing almost as good as the 8GB version....The 480 is doing a lot better too. How many watts are the older cards doing compared the the 470/480? |
|
|
|
|
|
meeekz
|
|
November 12, 2016, 01:56:58 AM |
|
Is 3 rx 470's better than 2 rx 480's?
|
|
|
|
|
mewhoyou
|
|
November 12, 2016, 02:03:59 AM
Last edit: November 12, 2016, 02:18:43 AM by mewhoyou |
|
Is 3 rx 470's better than 2 rx 480's?
rx470 = 70 x 3 = 210 rx480 = 80 x 2 = 160  capture screen |
Ethereum the Next Big Thing?
|
|
|
|
delle54
|
|
November 12, 2016, 02:17:48 AM |
|
How many watts are the older cards doing compared the the 470/480? Compared to ETH, my 480 use about 115w (GPU) and the 280x ca. 350w (stock settings). On ZEC the power usage is much lower. |
|
|
|
|
|
bardacuda
|
|
November 12, 2016, 02:31:50 AM |
|
How many watts are the older cards doing compared the the 470/480?
The new RX series are significantly more power efficient. I believe an RX 480 consumes about 66% of the power of an R9 290 (~165W for 480 vs ~250W for a 290 when under heavy load) http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_radeon_r9_rx_480_8gb_review,5.html |
The future will rely on AI. SingularityNET lets anyone create, monetize, and use AI at scale. From the creators of Sophia the Robot. |
|
|
carlo_0000
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1003
|
|
November 12, 2016, 02:33:13 AM |
|
Can anyone tell me your speed with R9 380 4gb? I'am getting roughly 45 Sols/s.
mine 380 2G doing around 42-44 my 2 GB sapphire nitro 380ITX (1100/1400) gets 48-50 -i 1 v4.0 v4.0, Nitro R9-380 2GB (1000/1500) -I 0 48H/s, with -I 2 49H/s (CPU usage - 100%). must have better gpu (nitro) than mine, 44 is best i get, and max memory is 1450 (asus)-1475 (xfx&sapphire) 1500 crash and doing (1100/1400) is also not possible (or maybe with some more voltage) |
|
|
|
|
|
Xardas2014
|
|
November 12, 2016, 02:51:30 AM |
|
Don't be so wrapped up in Sol's that you waste power and actually make less money with more hash.  |
|
|
|
|
|
