changesl
Member
Offline
Activity: 160
Merit: 10
|
|
November 12, 2016, 02:32:52 PM |
|
I saw that there is a way to run Linux miner's on Windows 10 64bits. Is this possible? i'm am wondering too Yes, through Cygwin64! I've just done it. wow , it seems does not work for me,.... how do you install cyg? miner@480-11 ~ $ dir optiminer-zcash miner@480-11 ~ $ cd optiminer-zcash miner@480-11 ~/optiminer-zcash $ ./optiminer-zcash -h -bash: ./optiminer-zcash: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even if you use Bitcoin through Tor, the way transactions are handled by the network makes anonymity difficult to achieve. Do not expect your transactions to be anonymous unless you really know what you're doing.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
densets
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
November 12, 2016, 02:33:12 PM |
|
Optiminer/Zcash GPU miner v0.3.0: 175Sol/s R9 Nano, 135S/s R9 290, 120S/s RX470 New zcash GPU miner for Linux: https://github.com/Optiminer/OptiminerZcash92It is closed source and contains a dev fee. v0.3.0 Supports: Linux 64bit only. Radeon cards only. Example speed: R9 Nano: 175S/s R9 290: 135S/s RX 470: 120S/s Please report problems and experience here (or on github). Enjoy! Claymore show them what you got Just compile this for Windows 7/10 and increase your dev fee income. Many more home miners and small farms on Windows than Linux. how did you compile it if there is no source?
|
|
|
|
suggsy89
|
|
November 12, 2016, 02:33:59 PM |
|
I saw that there is a way to run Linux miner's on Windows 10 64bits. Is this possible? i'm am wondering too Yes, through Cygwin64! I've just done it. Nice tip!!! And the performance is similar as using native Linux? Very similar I would say, but not as good as full linux. These are my 480's now. Total 264.6 sol/s [dev0 91.3, dev1 88.3, dev2 89.8] 230 shares Total 264.5 sol/s [dev0 89.7, dev1 87.6, dev2 90.9] 231 shares Total 266.1 sol/s [dev0 90.1, dev1 86.6, dev2 91.5] 231 shares Total 266.3 sol/s [dev0 89.5, dev1 86.0, dev2 90.5] 231 shares Total 266.3 sol/s [dev0 90.8, dev1 84.8, dev2 92.6] 232 shares Total 266.9 sol/s [dev0 89.2, dev1 85.9, dev2 93.5] 232 shares Total 267.4 sol/s [dev0 89.0, dev1 85.8, dev2 93.3] 233 shares Total 265.2 sol/s [dev0 88.0, dev1 80.6, dev2 93.1] 233 shares Total 263.3 sol/s [dev0 89.6, dev1 81.4, dev2 86.0] 233 shares Total 261.7 sol/s [dev0 89.8, dev1 79.0, dev2 84.1] 233 shares Total 262.5 sol/s [dev0 90.3, dev1 79.5, dev2 85.2] 233 shares Total 261.1 sol/s [dev0 86.2, dev1 80.1, dev2 83.7] 233 shares Total 261.1 sol/s [dev0 85.2, dev1 78.7, dev2 82.7] 233 shares Total 260.5 sol/s [dev0 85.9, dev1 77.4, dev2 83.2] 233 shares Total 260.5 sol/s [dev0 85.4, dev1 80.9, dev2 82.0] 233 shares Total 260.4 sol/s [dev0 85.7, dev1 80.6, dev2 81.8] 234 shares Total 259.9 sol/s [dev0 84.9, dev1 81.3, dev2 81.1] 235 shares Total 260.7 sol/s [dev0 86.1, dev1 86.2, dev2 82.9] 235 shares Total 260.9 sol/s [dev0 85.3, dev1 85.6, dev2 87.2] 235 shares Total 261.1 sol/s [dev0 84.1, dev1 88.0, dev2 88.1] 236 shares Total 261.4 sol/s [dev0 84.7, dev1 87.2, dev2 88.2] 239 shares Total 261.6 sol/s [dev0 89.4, dev1 86.5, dev2 90.8] 240 shares Total 260.7 sol/s [dev0 90.2, dev1 87.6, dev2 89.3] 240 shares Total 259.7 sol/s [dev0 90.1, dev1 87.8, dev2 88.6] 240 shares Total 261.2 sol/s [dev0 90.1, dev1 87.9, dev2 89.0] 240 shares Total 263.5 sol/s [dev0 90.2, dev1 88.4, dev2 93.1] 241 shares Total 263.5 sol/s [dev0 90.5, dev1 88.0, dev2 94.3] 242 shares
|
|
|
|
Walrusbonzo
|
|
November 12, 2016, 02:34:19 PM |
|
Total 257.4 sol/s [dev0 84.5, dev1 87.4, dev2 75.8] 3 shares Total 256.5 sol/s [dev0 83.0, dev1 87.8, dev2 75.9] 3 shares Total 256.5 sol/s [dev0 84.0, dev1 84.8, dev2 77.2] 3 shares Total 256.9 sol/s [dev0 84.3, dev1 86.2, dev2 76.1] 3 shares Total 258.3 sol/s [dev0 83.3, dev1 86.3, dev2 77.0] 3 shares Total 256.2 sol/s [dev0 83.7, dev1 88.4, dev2 77.5] 3 shares Total 256.5 sol/s [dev0 83.0, dev1 87.9, dev2 80.0] 3 shares Total 256.4 sol/s [dev0 82.5, dev1 87.1, dev2 84.1] 3 shares Total 256.8 sol/s [dev0 84.3, dev1 85.0, dev2 85.5] 3 shares Total 256.8 sol/s [dev0 85.7, dev1 83.8, dev2 86.1] 3 shares Total 256.4 sol/s [dev0 86.7, dev1 85.3, dev2 86.6] 3 shares Total 256.1 sol/s [dev0 87.4, dev1 84.1, dev2 88.5] 4 shares Total 257.0 sol/s [dev0 88.1, dev1 84.4, dev2 88.6] 5 shares Total 254.9 sol/s [dev0 86.1, dev1 82.3, dev2 89.2] 5 shares Total 254.6 sol/s [dev0 85.9, dev1 81.5, dev2 89.0] 6 shares Total 255.7 sol/s [dev0 86.0, dev1 81.2, dev2 91.8] 6 shares Total 255.8 sol/s [dev0 86.1, dev1 82.5, dev2 90.6] 7 shares Total 256.0 sol/s [dev0 87.5, dev1 82.5, dev2 90.7] 7 shares Total 255.7 sol/s [dev0 85.3, dev1 84.8, dev2 90.3] 7 shares Total 255.6 sol/s [dev0 86.5, dev1 85.0, dev2 88.8] 7 shares Total 255.0 sol/s [dev0 84.5, dev1 84.3, dev2 89.8] 8 shares This is ridiculously fast... 3 x RX480 Waiting on you now Claymore I already get this with 3 x RX480 and Claymore 4.0
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1710
|
|
November 12, 2016, 02:37:14 PM |
|
How do I figure out which GPU this is. I got an i3 which is Dual core with Hyperthreading.
05:41:53:741 730 GPU0 t=87C fan=60%, GPU1 t=89C fan=30%, GPU2 t=61C fan=72%, GPU3 t=64C fan=31%, GPU4 t=67C fan=80%, GPU5 t=54C fan=0% 05:41:53:757 730 em hbt: 0, fm hbt: 78, 05:41:53:757 730 watchdog - thread 0, hb time 94 05:41:53:757 730 watchdog - thread 1, hb time 110 05:41:53:757 730 watchdog - thread 2, hb time 32 05:41:53:757 730 watchdog - thread 3, hb time 141 05:41:53:757 730 watchdog - thread 4, hb time 94 05:41:53:757 730 watchdog - thread 5, hb time 16 05:41:53:757 730 watchdog - thread 6, hb time 110 05:41:53:757 730 watchdog - thread 7, hb time 63 05:41:53:757 730 watchdog - thread 8, hb time 16 05:41:53:757 730 watchdog - thread 9, hb time 110 05:41:53:757 730 watchdog - thread 10, hb time 78 05:41:53:757 730 watchdog - thread 11, hb time 125 05:41:53:757 730 watchdog - thread 12, hb time 85598 05:41:53:757 730 WATCHDOG: GPU 6 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 05:41:53:757 730 watchdog - thread 13, hb time 85520 05:41:53:757 730 WATCHDOG: GPU 6 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 05:41:53:757 730 watchdog - thread 14, hb time 85645 05:41:53:757 730 WATCHDOG: GPU 7 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 05:41:53:757 730 watchdog - thread 15, hb time 85567 05:41:53:757 730 WATCHDOG: GPU 7 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 05:41:54:802 730 Restarting OK, exit...
|
|
|
|
suggsy89
|
|
November 12, 2016, 02:44:53 PM |
|
I already get this with 3 x RX480 and Claymore 4.0 I couldn't get the speed, my CPU usage is 2% now though, not 20%
|
|
|
|
Walrusbonzo
|
|
November 12, 2016, 02:47:47 PM |
|
I already get this with 3 x RX480 and Claymore 4.0 I couldn't get the speed, my CPU usage is 2% now though, not 20% Mine too, -i 0 with a 4790k i7
|
|
|
|
suggsy89
|
|
November 12, 2016, 02:51:22 PM |
|
I already get this with 3 x RX480 and Claymore 4.0 I couldn't get the speed, my CPU usage is 2% now though, not 20% Mine too, -i 0 with a 4790k i7 Ah the old i7 So what bios mods, would you mind sharing? Would be interesting to know your clock speeds as ZEC likes high clocks.
|
|
|
|
Walrusbonzo
|
|
November 12, 2016, 02:54:06 PM |
|
I already get this with 3 x RX480 and Claymore 4.0 I couldn't get the speed, my CPU usage is 2% now though, not 20% Mine too, -i 0 with a 4790k i7 Ah the old i7 So what bios mods, would you mind sharing? Would be interesting to know your clock speeds as ZEC likes high clocks. Performance wise, BIOS mods, copied 1750 strap to 2000. 1300/2150 clock speeds, using MSI AB to set them.
|
|
|
|
suggsy89
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:00:17 PM |
|
I'm using 1500 strap @ 1125 and 2000 @ 900mv I'll have to look at the timings again I guess. [General] NoGUI=0 [Adapter] Index=0 Index=0 [GPU] Mode=Manual P1_CLK=608 P1_VID=820 P2_CLK=910 P2_VID=850 P3_CLK=940 P3_VID=860 P4_CLK=975 P4_VID=870 P5_CLK=1000 P5_VID=880 P6_CLK=1100 P6_VID=890 P7_CLK=1125 P7_VID=900 [Memory] Mode=Manual P1_CLK=2000 P1_VID=900 [Fan] Mode=Manual MinRPM=3000 MaxRPM=3400 TargetTemp=58 [Power] Mode=Manual MaxTemp=70 PowerTarget=10 [I2C] PhaseGain=DDD000 VoltageOffset=0 LLC=1 CurrentScale=60
|
|
|
|
goen
Member
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:06:09 PM |
|
I already get this with 3 x RX480 and Claymore 4.0 I couldn't get the speed, my CPU usage is 2% now though, not 20% Mine too, -i 0 with a 4790k i7 Ah the old i7 So what bios mods, would you mind sharing? Would be interesting to know your clock speeds as ZEC likes high clocks. Performance wise, BIOS mods, copied 1750 strap to 2000. 1300/2150 clock speeds, using MSI AB to set them. how much power draw from wall?
|
|
|
|
ioglnx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:09:51 PM |
|
Getting these on a Win7 x64 Intel Core Duo e4300 2GB RAM and 2 RX480: Total 188.4 sol/s [dev0 97.2, dev1 93.0] 477 shares Total 189.1 sol/s [dev0 95.7, dev1 92.3] 477 shares Total 189.3 sol/s [dev0 94.4, dev1 91.9] 477 shares Total 190.4 sol/s [dev0 93.2, dev1 93.5] 477 shares Total 190.7 sol/s [dev0 95.0, dev1 94.0] 477 shares Total 190.4 sol/s [dev0 98.9, dev1 94.6] 477 shares Total 190.3 sol/s [dev0 97.9, dev1 89.8] 477 shares Total 190.0 sol/s [dev0 99.3, dev1 89.4] 477 shares Total 190.0 sol/s [dev0 99.9, dev1 90.1] 477 shares Total 190.7 sol/s [dev0 98.8, dev1 91.7] 477 shares Total 189.5 sol/s [dev0 95.2, dev1 92.1] 477 shares Total 189.0 sol/s [dev0 96.0, dev1 90.9] 478 shares Total 189.9 sol/s [dev0 97.3, dev1 93.1] 479 shares Total 189.6 sol/s [dev0 97.2, dev1 94.1] 479 shares Total 189.2 sol/s [dev0 95.8, dev1 93.8] 479 shares Total 190.4 sol/s [dev0 95.2, dev1 93.0] 479 shares Total 191.3 sol/s [dev0 95.9, dev1 99.5] 479 shares Total 190.2 sol/s [dev0 93.9, dev1 100.8] 480 shares Total 189.2 sol/s [dev0 88.6, dev1 101.6] 480 shares Total 189.4 sol/s [dev0 88.8, dev1 100.5] 480 shares Total 191.0 sol/s [dev0 92.9, dev1 102.7] 480 shares Total 190.3 sol/s [dev0 93.3, dev1 102.9] 480 shares Total 189.5 sol/s [dev0 92.1, dev1 99.6] 480 shares
Better than on my Nvidia GTX1080 and GTX1070 on Windows 10 x64 1607, 32GB Ram and Xeon 1650v3 @4.2GHz which are doing just: Total 387.7 sol/s [dev0 72.2, dev1 80.7, dev2 73.5, dev3 82.7, dev4 77.7] 71 shares Total 388.1 sol/s [dev0 71.3, dev1 81.5, dev2 72.2, dev3 81.2, dev4 77.6] 71 shares Total 390.0 sol/s [dev0 71.8, dev1 83.6, dev2 70.0, dev3 81.7, dev4 77.1] 71 shares Total 388.8 sol/s [dev0 71.2, dev1 83.4, dev2 71.4, dev3 79.8, dev4 78.0] 71 shares Total 388.3 sol/s [dev0 69.0, dev1 84.4, dev2 70.4, dev3 79.4, dev4 79.6] 71 shares Total 390.0 sol/s [dev0 74.5, dev1 82.0, dev2 70.8, dev3 79.4, dev4 76.7] 71 shares Total 389.5 sol/s [dev0 73.5, dev1 80.9, dev2 72.5, dev3 76.2, dev4 77.9] 71 shares Total 388.1 sol/s [dev0 73.1, dev1 81.0, dev2 71.0, dev3 81.8, dev4 77.0] 71 shares Total 385.6 sol/s [dev0 74.6, dev1 81.2, dev2 71.2, dev3 81.4, dev4 73.0] 71 shares Total 385.2 sol/s [dev0 74.8, dev1 86.2, dev2 68.9, dev3 82.5, dev4 72.3] 71 shares Total 386.0 sol/s [dev0 76.0, dev1 87.2, dev2 68.6, dev3 82.8, dev4 71.1] 71 shares Total 387.9 sol/s [dev0 76.7, dev1 87.3, dev2 69.3, dev3 84.4, dev4 72.8] 71 shares Total 386.2 sol/s [dev0 76.0, dev1 85.7, dev2 71.0, dev3 83.8, dev4 71.3] 71 shares Total 386.6 sol/s [dev0 76.4, dev1 84.8, dev2 69.5, dev3 85.6, dev4 73.2] 71 shares Total 386.7 sol/s [dev0 77.4, dev1 86.4, dev2 70.6, dev3 84.9, dev4 73.7] 71 shares Total 387.0 sol/s [dev0 74.0, dev1 87.8, dev2 68.8, dev3 84.0, dev4 74.3] 71 shares Total 386.5 sol/s [dev0 70.2, dev1 90.0, dev2 68.1, dev3 88.4, dev4 72.1] 71 shares Total 387.3 sol/s [dev0 69.7, dev1 90.7, dev2 70.1, dev3 88.0, dev4 74.4] 71 shares Total 388.5 sol/s [dev0 71.1, dev1 91.0, dev2 70.7, dev3 87.0, dev4 77.8] 71 shares Total 389.1 sol/s [dev0 71.3, dev1 92.1, dev2 71.9, dev3 87.2, dev4 77.1] 71 shares Total 388.9 sol/s [dev0 71.8, dev1 89.5, dev2 72.2, dev3 85.3, dev4 75.5] 71 shares Total 386.8 sol/s [dev0 70.6, dev1 88.0, dev2 71.2, dev3 83.0, dev4 73.3] 71 shares Total 388.0 sol/s [dev0 72.2, dev1 87.8, dev2 71.8, dev3 84.2, dev4 76.1] 71 shares Total 387.0 sol/s [dev0 72.8, dev1 85.2, dev2 71.3, dev3 84.1, dev4 74.3] 71 shares Total 387.4 sol/s [dev0 72.8, dev1 83.2, dev2 71.9, dev3 84.4, dev4 74.2] 71 shares Total 387.1 sol/s [dev0 74.5, dev1 82.2, dev2 72.7, dev3 85.5, dev4 74.2] 73 shares Total 386.5 sol/s [dev0 77.4, dev1 81.0, dev2 71.7, dev3 84.4, dev4 74.9] 74 shares
|
GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³ Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
|
|
|
meeekz
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:18:56 PM |
|
MSI Radeon RX 470 DirectX 12 Radeon RX 470 ARMOR 4G OC 4GB 256-Bit
Is this a decent GPU. $169 Thanks
|
|
|
|
Etolay
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:19:24 PM |
|
Wow im getting 390 sols with optiminer. 150 more than claymores miner.
Impressive speeds with this one.
2 x r9 290 and 1x rx 470.
|
|
|
|
ioglnx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:25:21 PM |
|
its Powercolor RX480 Red Dragon with just 6 PIN Power.. Just edited the strap of bios.
When i used claymore i used -i2 this is silentarmy kernel
|
GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³ Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
|
|
|
fr4nkthetank
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2294
Merit: 1182
Now the money is free, and so the people will be
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:26:21 PM |
|
MSI Radeon RX 470 DirectX 12 Radeon RX 470 ARMOR 4G OC 4GB 256-Bit
Is this a decent GPU. $169 Thanks
Don't know, mem clock is a bit slow. I've actually ordered just one to check it out. Should get it next week
|
|
|
|
delle54
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:52:09 PM |
|
This is not an Optiminer Thread!
|
|
|
|
AriesIV10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1006
Mine for a Bit
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:56:14 PM |
|
MSI Radeon RX 470 DirectX 12 Radeon RX 470 ARMOR 4G OC 4GB 256-Bit
Is this a decent GPU. $169 Thanks
This is a good GPU. The MSI RX470 Gaming X does have 1 more gb ram and has more clock with a cost of $199. I have MSI RX470 Gaming X and really like it and would buy it again.
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1710
|
|
November 12, 2016, 04:05:02 PM |
|
MSI Radeon RX 470 DirectX 12 Radeon RX 470 ARMOR 4G OC 4GB 256-Bit
Is this a decent GPU. $169 Thanks
This is a good GPU. The MSI RX470 Gaming X does have 1 more gb ram and has more clock with a cost of $199. I have MSI RX470 Gaming X and really like it and would buy it again. That one is not a Gaming X, its the ARMOR Series which is slightly lower end. However for ETH and ZEC Mining I don't think it will make a difference. Maybe it varies in games. But in my opinion, I looked at the ARMOR and compared it to the GAMING X and the ARMOR seems like cheap crap build quality wise. Same with that ASUS 470 STRIX. Its good that they have long warranties at least.
|
|
|
|
WhyMe
|
|
November 12, 2016, 04:05:31 PM |
|
Fresh w7 install. Same error on fresh w10 install. Mining works for a moment, then when i close miner and relaunch it, i've this -36 error. It's a new rig so i've no idea about this problem. Result is the same with miner 4.0 or 2.1 10:58:45:932 994 GPU 0, GpuMiner kx(2) failed -36 Any idea ? Thanks
|
|
|
|
|