Bombadil
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:20:33 PM |
|
For those who were wondering when I would release my profit calculator , it's here Loads of people were asking for it, but it isn't the profit switcher yet. But it's a big part of it, so tell me your findings. https://github.com/KBomba/cuda-profit-calc/releasesRequires NET4.5! It has all the hashrates set for a gtx750ti by default. Measured by taking the average of 10 accepts in which both my cards, EVGA SC & Gigabyte, contributed. Stock OC. Looks like you're off to a nice start Bombadil I took a quick look at what I'm calculating as the most profitable coins for each algo and I'm finding you don't have many of the profitable coins. Example X11: Urea LeagueCoin SuperCoin Example X13: BurnerCoin BlueChip MammothCoin Example Quark: CNotes Securecoin Quark Just a rough calculation but you'd be missing about 25% or more in profit on some algos. Won't matter much right now if you are just using it for nVidia cards as JPC and TAC are most profitable but this wouldn't work well for CPU or AMD GPUs as it's missing the higher paying coins that these can mine. Carlo I've seen Burnercoin and the Quark coins appearing (some of the others too, but too lazy to check ATM) , but you'll need to check and enter the CoinWarz/CoinTweak API key to get those numbers. Where are you getting your info like diff and blockreward from? Directly from coind?
|
|
|
|
bigjme
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:25:12 PM |
|
|
Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
|
|
|
darkcond0
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:25:49 PM |
|
Typo in the dates in the titles of the two new releases (May instead of June)
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:29:21 PM |
|
Typo in the dates in the titles of the two new releases (May instead of June)
that was me inventing a time machine.
|
|
|
|
leofur
Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:30:12 PM |
|
Typo in the dates in the titles of the two new releases (May instead of June)
that was me inventing a time machine. Hope not something AMD can copy
|
|
|
|
RavenXBR
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:32:36 PM |
|
For those who were wondering when I would release my profit calculator , it's here Loads of people were asking for it, but it isn't the profit switcher yet. But it's a big part of it, so tell me your findings. https://github.com/KBomba/cuda-profit-calc/releasesRequires NET4.5! It has all the hashrates set for a gtx750ti by default. Measured by taking the average of 10 accepts in which both my cards, EVGA SC & Gigabyte, contributed. Stock OC. Looks like you're off to a nice start Bombadil I took a quick look at what I'm calculating as the most profitable coins for each algo and I'm finding you don't have many of the profitable coins. Example X11: Urea LeagueCoin SuperCoin Example X13: BurnerCoin BlueChip MammothCoin Example Quark: CNotes Securecoin Quark Just a rough calculation but you'd be missing about 25% or more in profit on some algos. Won't matter much right now if you are just using it for nVidia cards as JPC and TAC are most profitable but this wouldn't work well for CPU or AMD GPUs as it's missing the higher paying coins that these can mine. Carlo I've seen Burnercoin and the Quark coins appearing (some of the others too, but too lazy to check ATM) , but you'll need to check and enter the CoinWarz/CoinTweak API key to get those numbers. Where are you getting your info like diff and blockreward from? Directly from coind? Adding CoinWarz API worked. Now seeing Quark coins... ;-)
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:32:45 PM |
|
Typo in the dates in the titles of the two new releases (May instead of June)
that was me inventing a time machine. Hope not something AMD can copy now excuse me while I GPU instamine bitcoin just after it was publicly released
|
|
|
|
zelante
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:33:34 PM Last edit: June 15, 2014, 07:45:35 PM by zelante |
|
i compile for my 660 ti and 750 ti one version of ccminer with compute_30,sm_30;compute_35,sm_35 all work, but why need two different version?
If YOU can get the Visual Studio CUDA integration to accept two different compute levels, I am all ears... nice image then compile and run on my rig i have msi 660 ti and 2 x msi 750 ti and this is running your ccminer30 for same cards and settings
|
|
|
|
prichina
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 82
Merit: 0
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:35:00 PM |
|
I'm getting only booooo's for Dimondcoin groestl ....what , this is my .bat for example
ccminer30.exe -a groestl -o stratum+tcp://mine3.dmd.nonce-pool.com:4030 -u prichina.ivo -p 123
What i'm doing wrong ? I've tryed every pool , and only reject's
|
|
|
|
USScrypto
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:40:32 PM |
|
I'm getting only booooo's for Dimondcoin groestl ....what , this is my .bat for example
ccminer30.exe -a groestl -o stratum+tcp://mine3.dmd.nonce-pool.com:4030 -u prichina.ivo -p 123
What i'm doing wrong ? I've tryed every pool , and only reject's
Use dmd-gr as algo, not groestl.
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:50:31 PM |
|
I'm getting only booooo's for Dimondcoin groestl ....what , this is my .bat for example
ccminer30.exe -a groestl -o stratum+tcp://mine3.dmd.nonce-pool.com:4030 -u prichina.ivo -p 123
What i'm doing wrong ? I've tryed every pool , and only reject's
-a dmd-gr as stated in the README.txt and in the --help
|
|
|
|
Bombadil
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:51:01 PM |
|
On the other hand, it's working just fine here
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:54:09 PM |
|
nice image then compile and run Ah wow, that was easy. Kind of awkward I didn't figure this out previously... Christian
|
|
|
|
prichina
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 82
Merit: 0
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:59:31 PM |
|
Looking good, 660 ti is rapeing dmd-gr, 7.1 Mhash's ^_^ Thanks to everyone for the help
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
June 15, 2014, 08:10:37 PM |
|
nice image then compile and run Ah wow, that was easy. Kind of awkward I didn't figure this out previously... Christian does it generate 2 exe ?
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
June 15, 2014, 08:11:43 PM |
|
does it generate 2 exe ?
no just one, but it will take twice as long to build the x13 fugue is a really tough one to build for Compute 2.0. Probably unrolled too aggressively.
|
|
|
|
zelante
|
|
June 15, 2014, 08:12:17 PM |
|
nice image then compile and run Ah wow, that was easy. Kind of awkward I didn't figure this out previously... Christian even great scientists are wrong in the details sometimes
|
|
|
|
bigjme
|
|
June 15, 2014, 08:18:58 PM |
|
nice image then compile and run Ah wow, that was easy. Kind of awkward I didn't figure this out previously... Christian Well i would rather run one compile and walk away then run 3 lmao. I take it that it switches to 3.5 on tye compute 5 cards properly? I.e. it doesnt drop performance on the different cards with all the computes together
|
Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
|
|
|
zelante
|
|
June 15, 2014, 08:23:59 PM |
|
nice image then compile and run Ah wow, that was easy. Kind of awkward I didn't figure this out previously... Christian Well i would rather run one compile and walk away then run 3 lmao. I take it that it switches to 3.5 on tye compute 5 cards properly? I.e. it doesnt drop performance on the different cards with all the computes together Yes, no drop for different cuda compute cards on same rig.
|
|
|
|
bigjme
|
|
June 15, 2014, 08:25:35 PM |
|
Now dont we all feel dumb for compiling them seperately now all configs will just link to one exe and life will be easier
|
Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
|
|
|
|