Bitcoin Forum
November 03, 2024, 02:45:01 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 [826] 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 ... 1135 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]  (Read 3426930 times)
S_tring
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 102


OPEN Platform - Powering Blockchain Acceptance


View Profile
June 24, 2014, 04:09:36 PM
 #16501

Cryptonight ccMiner is complete fail on my Win 8.1 rig running 5*750Ti. Runs for about 5 secs then CPU shoots to 100% and complete lock up happens.

OPEN Platform | Powering Blockchain Acceptance [ICO]
❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱Blockchain's First Payment API❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱
Whitepaper  ●  Slack  ●  Facebook  ●  Twitter  ●  Reddit  ●  Telegram
tsiv
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 137
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 24, 2014, 04:14:32 PM
 #16502

Death to all Windows rigs, mwahahahahhahaha.

This is the generic answer post.

I'm pretty sure I set both the Windows and Linux builds for a combined compute 3.0 and 3.5 build, that shouldn't be a problem in most cases. I'll see if I put together a compute 2.0 version as well, basically stripping out all the latest bells and whistles by Christian and building for 2.0. Anyway, back to the problems. I can't decide which of the other two likely suspects is more likely, trying to run too many threads to fit in the GPU memory (2 MB per thread, that's 8 x 40 x 2 = 640 MB on the default launch setting) or the kernel simply running too slow and triggering TRD. Should probably add a check if the large initial memory allocation succeeds or not but error checking is for little girls Tongue

Other thing I realized, I didn't think about rigs that have mixed types of GPUs in them, the launch parameters only takes a single value instead of a comma separated per-device list. Another thing on the todo list.

Any ideas on the crazy hash rates on non 750ti cards? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.msg7489618#msg7489618

I tried 4x10 to see if maybe it was a memory problem but still get the same result.

OS?
PVmining
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 330
Merit: 252



View Profile
June 24, 2014, 04:16:26 PM
 #16503

@tsiv
any thoughts about FCN and merged mining?


btw. your -l 8x60 is also with my rigs the fastest option i tried so far

Quote from: kopiemTu console output
[2014-06-24 17:57:02] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 227.50 H/s
[2014-06-24 17:57:02] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 230.30 H/s
[2014-06-24 17:57:03] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 229.45 H/s
[2014-06-24 17:57:03] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 229.19 H/s
[2014-06-24 17:57:03] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 229.90 H/s
[2014-06-24 17:57:04] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 230.12 H/s
[2014-06-24 17:57:13] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 225.29 H/s
[2014-06-24 17:57:13] accepted: 46/46 (100.00%), 1372.57 H/s (yay!!!)
cayars
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 24, 2014, 04:18:22 PM
 #16504

Death to all Windows rigs, mwahahahahhahaha.

This is the generic answer post.

I'm pretty sure I set both the Windows and Linux builds for a combined compute 3.0 and 3.5 build, that shouldn't be a problem in most cases. I'll see if I put together a compute 2.0 version as well, basically stripping out all the latest bells and whistles by Christian and building for 2.0. Anyway, back to the problems. I can't decide which of the other two likely suspects is more likely, trying to run too many threads to fit in the GPU memory (2 MB per thread, that's 8 x 40 x 2 = 640 MB on the default launch setting) or the kernel simply running too slow and triggering TRD. Should probably add a check if the large initial memory allocation succeeds or not but error checking is for little girls Tongue

Other thing I realized, I didn't think about rigs that have mixed types of GPUs in them, the launch parameters only takes a single value instead of a comma separated per-device list. Another thing on the todo list.

Any ideas on the crazy hash rates on non 750ti cards? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.msg7489618#msg7489618

I tried 4x10 to see if maybe it was a memory problem but still get the same result.

OS?

GeForce GT 740M is Windows 8 64 - 8GB memory
qty 1 GeForce GTX 660 Windows 7 32bit - 4GB memory
qty 2 GeForce GTX 660 Windows Server 2012 R2 - 16GB memory

Carlo

PS the following works great
qty 2 GeForce GTX 750 TI Windows Server 2012 R2 - 16GB memory
Samuray
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 291
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 24, 2014, 05:30:20 PM
 #16505

Is anyone tested COINKING multipool with x11 algo?
What can I espect(BTC) per day per 750Ti card?
Or is it better with cryptonight? (now that we have it)  Smiley

opus.224
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 247
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 24, 2014, 05:40:00 PM
 #16506

Just to confirm my tests:
Cryptonight working fine under WinXP_32. With 6X750Ti (3 Palit Dual and 3 MSI TF) I'm getting ~1.000 H/s. Palits are ~220, and MSI ~150 H/s.

On Win8.1_64, it won't even start.
 
opus.224
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 247
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 24, 2014, 05:40:54 PM
 #16507

Just to confirm my tests:
Cryptonight working fine under WinXP_32. With 6X750Ti (3 Palit Dual and 3 MSI TF) I'm getting ~1.000 H/s. Palits are ~220, and MSI ~150 H/s.

On Win8.1_64, it won't even start.
 

NVIDIA driver 335.28
Equitum
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 24, 2014, 05:51:33 PM
 #16508

On my 780 Ti, with -l 4x135 (get the highest performance from 4 threads, for whatever reason (the -l 8x60 that others on 750 Tis are using crashes the kernel)), I'm getting about 275 H/s on cryptonight.

Edit: Just tried the Wolf cpu miner and my i5-4670k @ 4.5 GHz gets 125-140 H/s >.>
restless
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001


View Profile
June 24, 2014, 06:10:56 PM
 #16509

It seems every thread/card will need a core dedicated.
On my old Pentium E5200@2.5GHz, 1 card needs 50-60% CPU time in order to run at 200+
Running on -d 1, desktop is fine, but any desktop usage (chrome) kills hashrate in half. Have to upgarde Cheesy
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070



View Profile
June 24, 2014, 06:40:46 PM
 #16510

It seems every thread/card will need a core dedicated.
On my old Pentium E5200@2.5GHz, 1 card needs 50-60% CPU time in order to run at 200+
Running on -d 1, desktop is fine, but any desktop usage (chrome) kills hashrate in half. Have to upgarde Cheesy

well i'll wait an optimized version then, seeing how every rig as at best a pentium g3220
RentaMouse
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 24, 2014, 06:47:33 PM
 #16511

Sounds like there will be some new Monero miners appearing, few basic pointers for you:

  • Don't mine to an exchange address ever, you have to setup your own wallet!
  • Monero doesnt make a point of being user friendly, but if you can get your mining rig working you can spend a few minutes reading the tutorial at monero.cc
  • Your wallet wont work until your bitmonerod has synced the blockchain, save time by downloading most of it from the link here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.0
  • The blockchain is currently around 1.3GB, so make sure you have at least 2GB free. Also be aware that the daemon can use a lot of Internet bandwidth if you let it, make sure your router's UPnP is disabled if you are on a capped connection
  • Pool reliability has improved, orphans arent an issue but be careful of new pools, you can end up hashing an old block for a few hours. Hedge your bets by splitting miners across a couple of pools if you can.
  • Most pools have a web IRC client if you dont have it already, #monero is good for support etc, I'm often there as CryptonotepoolUK Smiley
  • Cryptonote coins like Monero work differently to Bitcoin and all its children, dont assume that things which worked for the last 20 coins you mined will be the same here
  • Dont forget the payment ID when you send those hard earned coins to an exchange!


Pool admin @ http://cryptonotepool.org.uk/ - for miners who value reliability (and like orange)!
Currently donating all of our 1% pool fee to the dev fund - mine at CryptonotepoolUK and support XMR at no extra cost!
S_tring
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 102


OPEN Platform - Powering Blockchain Acceptance


View Profile
June 24, 2014, 06:55:52 PM
 #16512

Has anyone managed to mine Monero on Windows 8.1?

OPEN Platform | Powering Blockchain Acceptance [ICO]
❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱Blockchain's First Payment API❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱❱
Whitepaper  ●  Slack  ●  Facebook  ●  Twitter  ●  Reddit  ●  Telegram
totoy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 623
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 24, 2014, 07:21:22 PM
Last edit: June 24, 2014, 09:55:19 PM by totoy
 #16513

Has anyone managed to mine Monero on Windows 8.1?

I'm using Windows 8.1
with -l 6x40, i'm getting this

Code:
[2014-06-25 03:35:13] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 210.81 H/s
[2014-06-25 03:35:14] Stratum detected new block
[2014-06-25 03:35:15] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 211.14 H/s
[2014-06-25 03:35:29] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 205.14 H/s
[2014-06-25 03:35:29] accepted: 8/8 (100.00%), 205.14 H/s (yay!!!)
[2014-06-25 03:35:54] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 201.03 H/s
[2014-06-25 03:35:55] Pool set diff to 5000
[2014-06-25 03:35:55] Stratum detected new block
[2014-06-25 03:35:55] accepted: 9/9 (100.00%), 201.03 H/s (yay!!!)
[2014-06-25 03:35:55] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 211.58 H/s
[2014-06-25 03:36:40] Stratum detected new block
[2014-06-25 03:36:41] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 210.70 H/s
[2014-06-25 03:36:49] Stratum detected new block
[2014-06-25 03:36:50] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 210.81 H/s
[2014-06-25 03:37:08] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 204.50 H/s
[2014-06-25 03:37:09] accepted: 10/10 (100.00%), 204.50 H/s (yay!!!)
[2014-06-25 03:37:46] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 149.23 H/s
Odeyin
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 86
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 24, 2014, 07:28:37 PM
 #16514

CCMiner w/Cryptonight: I think the error with the windows drivers might be that one of the pointer addresses is either undeclared or unallocated. It definetly crashes because of a memory access error in the Nvidia driver dll's.
AdamWhite
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 605
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 24, 2014, 07:46:00 PM
 #16515

It seems every thread/card will need a core dedicated.
On my old Pentium E5200@2.5GHz, 1 card needs 50-60% CPU time in order to run at 200+
Running on -d 1, desktop is fine, but any desktop usage (chrome) kills hashrate in half. Have to upgarde Cheesy

this has not been my experience... i am using an old cpu (2 threads) and mining 5x750ti at ~210kh / card
dotvibe
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 304
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 24, 2014, 08:06:38 PM
 #16516

What pool are you guys using for Monero?
Starscream
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 24, 2014, 08:08:46 PM
 #16517

What pool are you guys using for Monero?
Whatever that is not being DDoSd lol xD
cayars
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 24, 2014, 08:09:17 PM
 #16518

CCMiner w/Cryptonight: I think the error with the windows drivers might be that one of the pointer addresses is either undeclared or unallocated. It definetly crashes because of a memory access error in the Nvidia driver dll's.

How did you find this out?
Which operating system were you running?
What nVidia driver version were you running?
cayars
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 24, 2014, 08:10:01 PM
 #16519

What pool are you guys using for Monero?
Whatever that is not being DDoSd lol xD

Yea, aint that the truth!
nomad1109
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


Medichain: The Medical Big-Data Platform


View Profile
June 24, 2014, 08:18:03 PM
 #16520

Sounds like there will be some new Monero miners appearing, few basic pointers for you:

  • Don't mine to an exchange address ever, you have to setup your own wallet!
  • Monero doesnt make a point of being user friendly, but if you can get your mining rig working you can spend a few minutes reading the tutorial at monero.cc
  • Your wallet wont work until your bitmonerod has synced the blockchain, save time by downloading most of it from the link here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.0
  • The blockchain is currently around 1.3GB, so make sure you have at least 2GB free. Also be aware that the daemon can use a lot of Internet bandwidth if you let it, make sure your router's UPnP is disabled if you are on a capped connection
  • Pool reliability has improved, orphans arent an issue but be careful of new pools, you can end up hashing an old block for a few hours. Hedge your bets by splitting miners across a couple of pools if you can.
  • Most pools have a web IRC client if you dont have it already, #monero is good for support etc, I'm often there as CryptonotepoolUK Smiley
  • Cryptonote coins like Monero work differently to Bitcoin and all its children, dont assume that things which worked for the last 20 coins you mined will be the same here
  • Dont forget the payment ID when you send those hard earned coins to an exchange!



I didn't even have time to look at any of the info regarding the wallet this morning, and when I started downloading that blockchain it was at 13% done and already over a gig of data... I will look at it again and try and download it tonight.

Thanks for the tips though, it is always helpful when there are big new changes that there are others who offer up what they know to save others some pain.

Smiley

Pages: « 1 ... 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 [826] 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 ... 1135 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!