tiennou
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2017, 12:59:45 PM |
|
it would be nice to know what kind of difference in hashrate is there before spending all that time and effort. It substantial. Like ~15% based on what I've read for GCN 4th gen.
|
|
|
|
wacko
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1014
|
|
January 17, 2017, 01:16:41 PM |
|
It substantial. Like ~15% based on what I've read for GCN 4th gen.
Thanks. I'm interested in the actual hashrates though, because there are other miners like the Claymore's that work in Windows. So, I'm getting 220 sol/s from RX 470/4, and curious whether installing and setting up a Linux system is worth it (if it's like 230 sol/s, then it's probably not, but can't decide without knowing the actual hashrates).
|
|
|
|
nerdralph
|
|
January 17, 2017, 02:10:06 PM |
|
Tried Tahiti & Pitcairn. Lots of "solution out of range" errors, even when I forced intensity 2.
|
|
|
|
nerdralph
|
|
January 17, 2017, 02:13:03 PM |
|
Great work Optiminer is there anyone here have tonga to share with me hashrate i got between 175 Sol/s and 199 Sol/s for each I'm getting 200-210 with 1.4.0. 900/1500 clocks, using 1325 memory strap. Ubuntu 14.04/fglrx.
|
|
|
|
dbct
|
|
January 17, 2017, 02:47:42 PM |
|
Just finished reading the whole topic, but still couldn't find what I was looking for. It's said that hashrate in Linux is faster for newer cards, but how much faster? What are the hashrates for RX 470 4GB and RX 480 8GB in Linux and Windows? For Linux noobs like myself it'll take the whole day to read all the guides out there and setup a Linux system so it would be nice to know what kind of difference in hashrate is there before spending all that time and effort. hello wacko we are working on what others have asked that relates to your question. we are working on a hasrate page that will reflect good hashrate reports from people using our linux based mining OS we have a raw page up at the moment but you can use it for comparison so you are able to diside if you want to go for windows or for a nice very easy to use linux based mining os (one of the miners that you can compare it great with is optiminer and we have there latest version incorporated) the link to the raw sheet https://getpimp.org/pimps-corner/hashrates/hope this helps you in your search for the perfect solution for yourself and your mining experience Sincerely, dbct Community/Testing/Support Manager Portable Instant Mining Platform (getPiMP.org)
|
dbct Community/Testing/Support Manager Portable Instant Mining Platform (getPiMP.org)
|
|
|
thilan29
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2017, 03:53:03 PM |
|
I'm getting an "argument index out of range" error with v1.4 on a 290. Works fine on 1.3.2. Tried changing intensity values, taking out "experimental-kernel" but no luck. Anyone else?
This is my bat file: optiminer.exe -s equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357 -u someuser -p z -d 2 -i 6 --experimental-kernel
|
|
|
|
johnkill
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2017, 05:23:52 PM |
|
I'm getting an "argument index out of range" error with v1.4 on a 290. Works fine on 1.3.2. Tried changing intensity values, taking out "experimental-kernel" but no luck. Anyone else?
This is my bat file: optiminer.exe -s equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357 -u someuser -p z -d 2 -i 6 --experimental-kernel
the same with me for r9 290, and sapphire trix 390.
|
|
|
|
cleverserge
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2017, 06:03:17 PM |
|
I'm getting an "argument index out of range" error with v1.4 on a 290. Works fine on 1.3.2. Tried changing intensity values, taking out "experimental-kernel" but no luck. Anyone else?
This is my bat file: optiminer.exe -s equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357 -u someuser -p z -d 2 -i 6 --experimental-kernel
Try -i 5
|
|
|
|
Holyblood89
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2017, 06:23:56 PM |
|
help me please. I sometimes miner sequence stops at the farms. --watchdog i can not understand <----sample can please
|
|
|
|
johnkill
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2017, 06:37:54 PM |
|
I'm getting an "argument index out of range" error with v1.4 on a 290. Works fine on 1.3.2. Tried changing intensity values, taking out "experimental-kernel" but no luck. Anyone else?
This is my bat file: optiminer.exe -s equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357 -u someuser -p z -d 2 -i 6 --experimental-kernel
Try -i 5 -i 5 ; -i 4 ; w/o -i the same error and 0 S/s v 1.3 ... work great and I back to 1.3.2 - its still better than last Claymore 11.1
|
|
|
|
thilan29
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:30:58 PM |
|
I'm getting an "argument index out of range" error with v1.4 on a 290. Works fine on 1.3.2. Tried changing intensity values, taking out "experimental-kernel" but no luck. Anyone else?
This is my bat file: optiminer.exe -s equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357 -u someuser -p z -d 2 -i 6 --experimental-kernel
Try -i 5 -i 5 ; -i 4 ; w/o -i the same error and 0 S/s v 1.3 ... work great and I back to 1.3.2 - its still better than last Claymore 11.1 Yeah I also get 0S/s at any intensity. The GPU is doing something though since the GPU usage shoots to 100%, so I'm not sure what is wrong. v1.3.2 works fine for me.
|
|
|
|
stoon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:44:22 PM |
|
v 1.4
Win 10, 15.12
6 x 290 = 1815 S/s @ 1300 watts 1.4 -75mv 900/1125 modded BIOS's
6 x Fury = 2010 S/s @ 748 watts 2.69 -96 800/400
1 x 290 + 5 x Nanos = 1995 @ 935 watts 2.13 -75 900/1125 + -96 800/400
Nice work.
|
|
|
|
optiminer (OP)
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:52:03 PM |
|
Just finished reading the whole topic, but still couldn't find what I was looking for. It's said that hashrate in Linux is faster for newer cards, but how much faster? What are the hashrates for RX 470 4GB and RX 480 8GB in Linux and Windows? For Linux noobs like myself it'll take the whole day to read all the guides out there and setup a Linux system so it would be nice to know what kind of difference in hashrate is there before spending all that time and effort. It is not too hard to install ubuntu. And you just need a basic installation and download and run the miner from there. If this is still too hard you can use something like ethos http://ethosdistro.com/
|
|
|
|
optiminer (OP)
|
|
January 17, 2017, 09:07:46 PM |
|
I'm getting an "argument index out of range" error with v1.4 on a 290. Works fine on 1.3.2. Tried changing intensity values, taking out "experimental-kernel" but no luck. Anyone else?
This is a problem with nicehash and v1.4. Use a different pool or run 1.3.2 on nicehash. Will try to provide a fix. The root of the problem is that nicehash sometimes uses extremely long extranonces . This violates some of the optimizations I made for v1.4.0 which causes this error (it should have printed a nice log message but there was a bug there which ended up in this cryptic message).
|
|
|
|
charles2k
|
|
January 17, 2017, 09:27:42 PM |
|
Great work Optiminer is there anyone here have tonga to share with me hashrate i got between 175 Sol/s and 199 Sol/s for each My MSI R9 380 2G default clock (980/1380) only 158 S/s (ethos 1.1.8., generic kernel, with experimental kernel it has erros)
|
|
|
|
jstefanop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2163
Merit: 1401
|
|
January 17, 2017, 09:28:15 PM |
|
I'm getting an "argument index out of range" error with v1.4 on a 290. Works fine on 1.3.2. Tried changing intensity values, taking out "experimental-kernel" but no luck. Anyone else?
This is a problem with nicehash and v1.4. Use a different pool or run 1.3.2 on nicehash. Will try to provide a fix. The root of the problem is that nicehash sometimes uses extremely long extranonces . This violates some of the optimizations I made for v1.4.0 which causes this error (it should have printed a nice log message but there was a bug there which ended up in this cryptic message). Are you going to fix the index out of range errors with the experimental kernel on tahiti cards?
|
|
|
|
thilan29
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2017, 09:33:38 PM |
|
I'm getting an "argument index out of range" error with v1.4 on a 290. Works fine on 1.3.2. Tried changing intensity values, taking out "experimental-kernel" but no luck. Anyone else?
This is a problem with nicehash and v1.4. Use a different pool or run 1.3.2 on nicehash. Will try to provide a fix. The root of the problem is that nicehash sometimes uses extremely long extranonces . This violates some of the optimizations I made for v1.4.0 which causes this error (it should have printed a nice log message but there was a bug there which ended up in this cryptic message). Thanks for the heads up. I went back to 1.3.2.
|
|
|
|
optiminer (OP)
|
|
January 17, 2017, 09:34:23 PM |
|
Are you going to fix the index out of range errors with the experimental kernel on tahiti cards?
AFAIK the index out of range errors only happen with nicehash, this does not depend on the kernel. The experimental kernels seem generally to produce wrong solutions on the GCN1 cards like thaiti. That's why I called them experimental I need to get hold of such a card to debug which can take some days.
|
|
|
|
cryptonitro
|
|
January 17, 2017, 09:58:05 PM Last edit: January 17, 2017, 10:14:44 PM by cryptonitro |
|
Hi i had gpu3 or gpu 5 stop working fast after launch , dont know how to target which one is it .... and reason
thx
|
The only project make me believe ... Holochain
|
|
|
nerdralph
|
|
January 17, 2017, 10:13:51 PM |
|
Are you going to fix the index out of range errors with the experimental kernel on tahiti cards?
AFAIK the index out of range errors only happen with nicehash, this does not depend on the kernel. The experimental kernels seem generally to produce wrong solutions on the GCN1 cards like thaiti. That's why I called them experimental I need to get hold of such a card to debug which can take some days. I think you've made enough fees to buy a couple old used cards. For my OpenCL test rigs I've go a few Pitcairn, a few Tonga, one Hawaii, one Tahiti, and one Ellesmere card.
|
|
|
|
|