[User Generated] - Known alts of anyone

[Avirunes]

I don't see anything wrong  with my post. And watch out your words you're accusing me a cheater. I've change the address for the requirement of loneshark signed message. I can't do that because my old address is coins.ph

But I do see. You have deleted your facebook posts. Also just a question , there were no such rule asking limited followers/friends in account so why did you used two accounts to post which you could have already posted from your one account.

[1715063891]

1715063891

[1715063891]

1715063891

[1715063891]

1715063891

[jamalaezaz]

Socal: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=265035
Palay: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=830027

are alts.


Proof:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1755744.new#new

[Cactushrt]

I don't see anything wrong  with my post. And watch out your words you're accusing me a cheater. I've change the address for the requirement of loneshark signed message. I can't do that because my old address is coins.ph

But I do see. You have deleted your facebook posts. Also just a question , there were no such rule asking limited followers/friends in account so why did you used two accounts to post which you could have already posted from your one account.

The post was a long time ago and  what's wrong if I deleted my facebook posts? Im sure all of the users post in that giveaway thread are also deleted their post.

Edit: Is there anything wrong using many wallet add? I've seen many members here are also using more wallet add. So if a user use have more wallets they are cheater? I changey address because I want to signed message that's all I'm not cheating here.

[Gunthar]

I don't see anything wrong  with my post. And watch out your words you're accusing me a cheater. I've change the address for the requirement of loneshark signed message. I can't do that because my old address is coins.ph

But I do see. You have deleted your facebook posts. Also just a question , there were no such rule asking limited followers/friends in account so why did you used two accounts to post which you could have already posted from your one account.

The post was a long time ago and  what's wrong if I deleted my facebook posts? Im sure all of the users post in that giveaway thread are also deleted their post.

Nope: because Winner's local rules says "one social account allowed". Hence: deleted previous posts to steal again the giveaway with an alt. (Am i watching my mouth enough now?)
~Gun

[Cactushrt]

I don't see anything wrong  with my post. And watch out your words you're accusing me a cheater. I've change the address for the requirement of loneshark signed message. I can't do that because my old address is coins.ph

But I do see. You have deleted your facebook posts. Also just a question , there were no such rule asking limited followers/friends in account so why did you used two accounts to post which you could have already posted from your one account.

The post was a long time ago and  what's wrong if I deleted my facebook posts? Im sure all of the users post in that giveaway thread are also deleted their post.

Nope: because Winner's local rules says "one social account allowed". Hence: deleted previous posts to steal again the giveaway with an alt. (Am i watching my mouth enough now?)
~Gun

Are you really reading what Winner's rule? One post per social media account and why Winner paid my post if i use one account only? I used my other accounts for that giveaway. Use your mind

[Gunthar]

I don't see anything wrong  with my post. And watch out your words you're accusing me a cheater. I've change the address for the requirement of loneshark signed message. I can't do that because my old address is coins.ph

But I do see. You have deleted your facebook posts. Also just a question , there were no such rule asking limited followers/friends in account so why did you used two accounts to post which you could have already posted from your one account.

The post was a long time ago and  what's wrong if I deleted my facebook posts? Im sure all of the users post in that giveaway thread are also deleted their post.

Nope: because Winner's local rules says "one social account allowed". Hence: deleted previous posts to steal again the giveaway with an alt. (Am i watching my mouth enough now?)
~Gun

Are you really reading what Winner's rule? One post per social media account and why Winner paid my post if i use one account only? I used my other accounts for that giveaway. Use your mind

You are wasting your time man, attempting to play dumb and making things even worse. You have used BOTH accounts on that campaign and DELETED your first account posts to cheat with your second account:

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=369170063423758&id=100009923017248&ref=bookmarks


BTC: 3Cven2boFaLw5b3FF1A72acbMp1QqSZYeK

~snip

Thanks for the posts.

BTC was just sent to y'all.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=369170063423758&id=100009923017248&ref=bookmarks

BTC: 3Cven2boFaLw5b3FF1A72acbMp1QqSZYeK

Thanks for the post.

Please stop climbing on mirrors dude...
~Gun

[shorena]

-snip-

Id prefer if you would move this to a dedicated thread, e.g. in scam accusation and it would probably help if "Winner" would chime in.

[Cactushrt]

I don't see anything wrong  with my post. And watch out your words you're accusing me a cheater. I've change the address for the requirement of loneshark signed message. I can't do that because my old address is coins.ph

But I do see. You have deleted your facebook posts. Also just a question , there were no such rule asking limited followers/friends in account so why did you used two accounts to post which you could have already posted from your one account.

The post was a long time ago and  what's wrong if I deleted my facebook posts? Im sure all of the users post in that giveaway thread are also deleted their post.

Nope: because Winner's local rules says "one social account allowed". Hence: deleted previous posts to steal again the giveaway with an alt. (Am i watching my mouth enough now?)
~Gun

Are you really reading what Winner's rule? One post per social media account and why Winner paid my post if i use one account only? I used my other accounts for that giveaway. Use your mind

You are wasting your time man, attempting to play dumb and making things even worse. You have used BOTH accounts on that campaign and DELETED your first account posts to cheat with your second account:

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=369170063423758&id=100009923017248&ref=bookmarks


BTC: 3Cven2boFaLw5b3FF1A72acbMp1QqSZYeK

~snip

Thanks for the posts.

BTC was just sent to y'all.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=369170063423758&id=100009923017248&ref=bookmarks

BTC: 3Cven2boFaLw5b3FF1A72acbMp1QqSZYeK

Thanks for the post.

Please stop climbing on mirrors dude...
~Gun

Yes move this to scam accusations and let's see. Winner os not like you dumb he's checking the accounts and see if the account is already claim.the giveaway.

[Gunthar]

-snip-

Id prefer if you would move this to a dedicated thread, e.g. in scam accusation and it would probably help if "Winner" would chime in.

Done https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1756723.msg17541011#msg17541011


Accounts connected: butcherboss, deeprocks

Proof:

The user posts a loan request here:

Loan Amount: 0.02 Btc
Amount to be repaid: 0.022 Btc
Repayment Date:  22nd Jan 2017
Bitcoin Address: 19mHdWGZ5y3Ww34cQhBHZxvKescGbd68Lt
Collateral This account. I can provide signed message from this address 19mHdWGZ5y3Ww34cQhBHZxvKescGbd68Lt (unedited post on Nov 14 2015)

(Archive)

with an address that is part of this wallet (Archive) containing only 4 addresses. Funds are moved in and out from/to this alt address (Reference):

Code:

Multipliers: (center to extreme)
---------------------------------------------------
1   0.7   0.5   1.1   2.6   5   10   15   25
---------------------------------------------------
Max amount playable: 2
--

Odds: 98.416%
Max win: 50 BTC
Name: SuPeRmAn999
Bitcoin Address: 14xUE6sTBr6nRFv2gxHvk4aqiGvQkxrCpe

Code:

Multipliers: (center to extreme)
---------------------------------------------------
0.2   0.4   0.8   1.2   1.8   2   22.2   444   555
---------------------------------------------------
Max amount playable: 0.09
--

Odds: 98.358%
Max win: 49.949999999999996 BTC
Name: SuPeRmAn999
Bitcoin Address: 14xUE6sTBr6nRFv2gxHvk4aqiGvQkxrCpe

(Archive)


Addresses

Code:

14xUE6sTBr6nRFv2gxHvk4aqiGvQkxrCpe
19mHdWGZ5y3Ww34cQhBHZxvKescGbd68Lt

[Lauda]

Accounts connected: WW5, bitsum, ThisIsMeLOL , Affilate User
-snip-

These were already present in the table. You should always double check and mention this in your report in order to save time.

-snip-

This is the improper format, for both reporting (or self-admitting) alts and signing a Bitcoin message. I've listed your alt anyways.

Hello thanks for posting this,we would like to confirm that we are no the same person,but we are working on the same team,he is a moderator of my forum and we have some services where we are collaborating,not only on the blog set up service but outside of the crypto currency..

I don't buy the story.

It is almost a month now and i am still connected with some other users.I have provided the proof that it is indeed an online wallet and sent a PM to Lauda which is of no use and he wants me to settle with the user who framed me by linking the account. If lauda cannot verify and make things right to a thread he created which i think will benefit in the longer run he has to hand over to some one who can verify things .

You're a random, thus you should occasionally PM me with updates with your case if it is unresolved. Your last sentence sounds butthurt. Anyhow, I've de-listed you.
I've updated everything. In order to appear on the list of 'Top Contributors', now you're required to have at least 5 points. This is mentioned in the OP.

[Timelord2067]

crazyivan u=102057 post in this thread: WTS LEGENDARY Account https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1753284.0 http://archive.is/4uLq3 (Locked thread) started by coindetective u=378830

I d never disclose account details until there is a buyer. Lots of people might take advantage of it.

Cheers.

then realising their mistake posts a follow up:

Sorry guys, my kid brother owns the other account, guess he posted under my name. Anyway, I ve told him to close this topic cause I m not sure if selling acc s even allowed here.  

This isn't the first time the "Kid Brother" has taken carzyivan's name:

Nice service, I believe can reach ROI and make some money using some smart reinvesting routine. Also, they do have a 10% discount rate till tomorrow.

Cheers Crazyivan.

the very next post: http://archive.is/wy5JV#selection-9709.0-9903.12

It seems to me LTC  price s recovered a bit but mining difficulty has gone up as well. All in all, profitability stays constant there.

Cheers bud.

Both users are actively promoting the thread, but neither makes disclosure that they are "Kid Brother's"

The OP's author Minerjoe u=301406 isn't very truthful with their clients either:

FROM OTHERS:

crazyivan 0: -0 / +0   2016-10-30   0.00000000      I have traded some alts with this guy, he sent his coins first, easy to negotiate, everything went well.

this is almost three full months *after* crazyivan and his Kid Brother coindetective vouch for Minerjoe 08 August 2016, 20:35:51  1. HOW TO MAKE MONEY IN CRYPTO WITH MINERJOE - HASHFLARE https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1579210.0 http://archive.is/wy5JV

Minerjoe's first vouch comes from an old study of mine bapparabi u=543461

Timelord2067 37: -0 / +4   2016-04-25   0.00000000   Reference   Accounts connected: jonatuzc, Sweetbtc, SanaButt, UKUSA22, bapparabi - Sign workers up to Capture Campaigns but don't payout as promised. Avoid.

bapparabi has plenty of one way to them vouches for "doing a simple task" by other UIDs.

after agustina2 gives a word of caution to the project, our old fiend zend7 makes an enquiry about Minerjoe's service.

Timelord2067 37: -0 / +4   2016-09-07   0.00000000   Reference   zend7, BitcoinSupremo, smho_16, Cereberus are Alts of morocco.man / from10to1280

while agustina2 's trust isn't so glowing:

Lauda 0: -1 / +11   2016-12-03   0.00000000   Reference   Account has been sold and had ties to Engg.Chaks in the past. Account sales encourage all kinds of shady behavior.
Timelord2067 37: -0 / +4   2016-12-01   0.00000000   Reference   This UID has been bought and sold a number of times, you should do due diligence if considering trading as it may not be with the same person you previously did business with.

Daffadile u=704045 then gives a glowing vouch, but their own trust wall tells another story:

monbux 250: -0 / +25   2017-01-03   0.00000000   Reference   Blatant spammer that couldn't read.
CryptoDatabase 0: -0 / +0   2016-10-19   0.00000000   Reference   Do not come to my projects posting lies just so you can add posts to your sig campaigns.

Alt account is JasonXG, also a sig campaign participant.
DarkStar_ 0: -0 / +0   2016-09-17   0.00000000      Spammer.

Daffadile u=704045 gives out a dozen vouches for work done, but receives not one vouch in return.

Perhaps some of these UIDs are set up solely to vouch for others to make other UID's appear to be more attractive?

windale u=555761 likewise gives an "I'm in post" and it is crazyivan that replies, not Minerjoe.

rphk u=838709 makes a nearly meaningless post with poor grammer, spelling and punctuation, yet minerjoe understands them and agrees to a partial refund, then crazyivan chimes in with a suggestion.

first impartant thing is trust proof, your strategy and photo proof shows like legit one. what about small investors less than 0.1 btc , and also long run strategy also needs to be considered . business in crypto currency always not guaranteed. Hope you will doing profitable for the investors.  

Ok, I see your point, I ll send back 50% of referral fee for any investment equal of over 0.1 BTC. Bellow that there s really no point losing time since we talk about $1-2 referral fees.

mrsalve u=400666 gives a vouch and is so moved by the experience, now has the OP's product as their signature on their profile.

My guess is mrsalve u=400666 , windale u=555761 and rphk u=838709 are the Alts that MinerJoe bought from crazyivan in the trust wall post (once they had been used by crazyivan in the thread).

I'm also going out on a limb by suggesting crazyivan u=102057 and coindetective u=378830 are alts, further, without any proof other than their trust walls, I'm also going to throw Bitcoin-Police u=380696 into the mix for consideration.

18 April 2013, 14:25:09 Date Registered:    crazyivan u=102057
18 September 2014, 02:28:06 Date Registered:    coindetective u=378830
23 September 2014, 21:24:52 Date Registered:    Bitcoin-Police u=380696 http://archive.is/J9uYf


So, we have:

Accounts Connected:

crazyivan, coindetective, Bitcoin-Police

Code:

Engaging in paid vouching with multiple alts - see ref.

Accounts Connected:

Minerjoe, mrsalve, windale, rphk

Code:

Minerjoe purchased alts to vouch for their services.

Accounts seemingly unconnected but vouching:

bapparabi, Daffadile, zend7

Miscellaneous:

18 September 2015, 18:59:59 Date Registered:    windale
21 September 2015, 19:36:19 Last Active:    Bitcoin-Police u=380696 http://archive.is/J9uYf

connected after-all?

[V.Lace]

crazyivan u=102057 post in this thread: WTS LEGENDARY Account https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1753284.0 http://archive.is/4uLq3 (Locked thread) started by coindetective u=378830

I d never disclose account details until there is a buyer. Lots of people might take advantage of it.

Cheers.

then realising their mistake posts a follow up:

Sorry guys, my kid brother owns the other account, guess he posted under my name. Anyway, I ve told him to close this topic cause I m not sure if selling acc s even allowed here.  

This isn't the first time the "Kid Brother" has taken carzyivan's name:

Nice service, I believe can reach ROI and make some money using some smart reinvesting routine. Also, they do have a 10% discount rate till tomorrow.

Cheers Crazyivan.

the very next post: http://archive.is/wy5JV#selection-9709.0-9903.12

It seems to me LTC  price s recovered a bit but mining difficulty has gone up as well. All in all, profitability stays constant there.

Cheers bud.

Both users are actively promoting the thread, but neither makes disclosure that they are "Kid Brother's"

The OP's author Minerjoe u=301406 isn't very truthful with their clients either:

FROM OTHERS:

crazyivan 0: -0 / +0   2016-10-30   0.00000000      I have traded some alts with this guy, he sent his coins first, easy to negotiate, everything went well.

this is almost three full months *after* crazyivan and his Kid Brother coindetective vouch for Minerjoe 08 August 2016, 20:35:51  1. HOW TO MAKE MONEY IN CRYPTO WITH MINERJOE - HASHFLARE https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1579210.0 http://archive.is/wy5JV

Minerjoe's first vouch comes from an old study of mine bapparabi u=543461

Timelord2067 37: -0 / +4   2016-04-25   0.00000000   Reference   Accounts connected: jonatuzc, Sweetbtc, SanaButt, UKUSA22, bapparabi - Sign workers up to Capture Campaigns but don't payout as promised. Avoid.

bapparabi has plenty of one way to them vouches for "doing a simple task" by other UIDs.

after agustina2 gives a word of caution to the project, our old fiend zend7 makes an enquiry about Minerjoe's service.

Timelord2067 37: -0 / +4   2016-09-07   0.00000000   Reference   zend7, BitcoinSupremo, smho_16, Cereberus are Alts of morocco.man / from10to1280

while agustina2 's trust isn't so glowing:

Lauda 0: -1 / +11   2016-12-03   0.00000000   Reference   Account has been sold and had ties to Engg.Chaks in the past. Account sales encourage all kinds of shady behavior.
Timelord2067 37: -0 / +4   2016-12-01   0.00000000   Reference   This UID has been bought and sold a number of times, you should do due diligence if considering trading as it may not be with the same person you previously did business with.

Daffadile u=704045 then gives a glowing vouch, but their own trust wall tells another story:

monbux 250: -0 / +25   2017-01-03   0.00000000   Reference   Blatant spammer that couldn't read.
CryptoDatabase 0: -0 / +0   2016-10-19   0.00000000   Reference   Do not come to my projects posting lies just so you can add posts to your sig campaigns.

Alt account is JasonXG, also a sig campaign participant.
DarkStar_ 0: -0 / +0   2016-09-17   0.00000000      Spammer.

Daffadile u=704045 gives out a dozen vouches for work done, but receives not one vouch in return.

Perhaps some of these UIDs are set up solely to vouch for others to make other UID's appear to be more attractive?

windale u=555761 likewise gives an "I'm in post" and it is crazyivan that replies, not Minerjoe.

rphk u=838709 makes a nearly meaningless post with poor grammer, spelling and punctuation, yet minerjoe understands them and agrees to a partial refund, then crazyivan chimes in with a suggestion.

first impartant thing is trust proof, your strategy and photo proof shows like legit one. what about small investors less than 0.1 btc , and also long run strategy also needs to be considered . business in crypto currency always not guaranteed. Hope you will doing profitable for the investors.  

Ok, I see your point, I ll send back 50% of referral fee for any investment equal of over 0.1 BTC. Bellow that there s really no point losing time since we talk about $1-2 referral fees.

mrsalve u=400666 gives a vouch and is so moved by the experience, now has the OP's product as their signature on their profile.

My guess is mrsalve u=400666 , windale u=555761 and rphk u=838709 are the Alts that MinerJoe bought from crazyivan in the trust wall post (once they had been used by crazyivan in the thread).

I'm also going out on a limb by suggesting crazyivan u=102057 and coindetective u=378830 are alts, further, without any proof other than their trust walls, I'm also going to throw Bitcoin-Police u=380696 into the mix for consideration.

18 April 2013, 14:25:09 Date Registered:    crazyivan u=102057
18 September 2014, 02:28:06 Date Registered:    coindetective u=378830
23 September 2014, 21:24:52 Date Registered:    Bitcoin-Police u=380696 http://archive.is/J9uYf


So, we have:

Accounts Connected:

crazyivan, coindetective, Bitcoin-Police

Code:

Engaging in paid vouching with multiple alts - see ref.

Accounts Connected:

Minerjoe, mrsalve, windale, rphk

Code:

Minerjoe purchased alts to vouch for their services.

Accounts seemingly unconnected but vouching:

bapparabi, Daffadile, zend7

Miscellaneous:

18 September 2015, 18:59:59 Date Registered:    windale
21 September 2015, 19:36:19 Last Active:    Bitcoin-Police u=380696 http://archive.is/J9uYf

connected after-all?

I cant wait you will see what is coming for you.  Karma is a bitch  I always say

[crazyivan]

crazyivan u=102057 post in this thread: WTS LEGENDARY Account https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1753284.0 http://archive.is/4uLq3 (Locked thread) started by coindetective u=378830

I d never disclose account details until there is a buyer. Lots of people might take advantage of it.

Cheers.

then realising their mistake posts a follow up:

Sorry guys, my kid brother owns the other account, guess he posted under my name. Anyway, I ve told him to close this topic cause I m not sure if selling acc s even allowed here.  

This isn't the first time the "Kid Brother" has taken carzyivan's name:

Nice service, I believe can reach ROI and make some money using some smart reinvesting routine. Also, they do have a 10% discount rate till tomorrow.

Cheers Crazyivan.

the very next post: http://archive.is/wy5JV#selection-9709.0-9903.12

It seems to me LTC  price s recovered a bit but mining difficulty has gone up as well. All in all, profitability stays constant there.

Cheers bud.

Both users are actively promoting the thread, but neither makes disclosure that they are "Kid Brother's"

The OP's author Minerjoe u=301406 isn't very truthful with their clients either:

FROM OTHERS:

crazyivan 0: -0 / +0   2016-10-30   0.00000000      I have traded some alts with this guy, he sent his coins first, easy to negotiate, everything went well.

this is almost three full months *after* crazyivan and his Kid Brother coindetective vouch for Minerjoe 08 August 2016, 20:35:51  1. HOW TO MAKE MONEY IN CRYPTO WITH MINERJOE - HASHFLARE https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1579210.0 http://archive.is/wy5JV

Minerjoe's first vouch comes from an old study of mine bapparabi u=543461

Timelord2067 37: -0 / +4   2016-04-25   0.00000000   Reference   Accounts connected: jonatuzc, Sweetbtc, SanaButt, UKUSA22, bapparabi - Sign workers up to Capture Campaigns but don't payout as promised. Avoid.

bapparabi has plenty of one way to them vouches for "doing a simple task" by other UIDs.

after agustina2 gives a word of caution to the project, our old fiend zend7 makes an enquiry about Minerjoe's service.

Timelord2067 37: -0 / +4   2016-09-07   0.00000000   Reference   zend7, BitcoinSupremo, smho_16, Cereberus are Alts of morocco.man / from10to1280

while agustina2 's trust isn't so glowing:

Lauda 0: -1 / +11   2016-12-03   0.00000000   Reference   Account has been sold and had ties to Engg.Chaks in the past. Account sales encourage all kinds of shady behavior.
Timelord2067 37: -0 / +4   2016-12-01   0.00000000   Reference   This UID has been bought and sold a number of times, you should do due diligence if considering trading as it may not be with the same person you previously did business with.

Daffadile u=704045 then gives a glowing vouch, but their own trust wall tells another story:

monbux 250: -0 / +25   2017-01-03   0.00000000   Reference   Blatant spammer that couldn't read.
CryptoDatabase 0: -0 / +0   2016-10-19   0.00000000   Reference   Do not come to my projects posting lies just so you can add posts to your sig campaigns.

Alt account is JasonXG, also a sig campaign participant.
DarkStar_ 0: -0 / +0   2016-09-17   0.00000000      Spammer.

Daffadile u=704045 gives out a dozen vouches for work done, but receives not one vouch in return.

Perhaps some of these UIDs are set up solely to vouch for others to make other UID's appear to be more attractive?

windale u=555761 likewise gives an "I'm in post" and it is crazyivan that replies, not Minerjoe.

rphk u=838709 makes a nearly meaningless post with poor grammer, spelling and punctuation, yet minerjoe understands them and agrees to a partial refund, then crazyivan chimes in with a suggestion.

first impartant thing is trust proof, your strategy and photo proof shows like legit one. what about small investors less than 0.1 btc , and also long run strategy also needs to be considered . business in crypto currency always not guaranteed. Hope you will doing profitable for the investors.  

Ok, I see your point, I ll send back 50% of referral fee for any investment equal of over 0.1 BTC. Bellow that there s really no point losing time since we talk about $1-2 referral fees.

mrsalve u=400666 gives a vouch and is so moved by the experience, now has the OP's product as their signature on their profile.

My guess is mrsalve u=400666 , windale u=555761 and rphk u=838709 are the Alts that MinerJoe bought from crazyivan in the trust wall post (once they had been used by crazyivan in the thread).

I'm also going out on a limb by suggesting crazyivan u=102057 and coindetective u=378830 are alts, further, without any proof other than their trust walls, I'm also going to throw Bitcoin-Police u=380696 into the mix for consideration.

18 April 2013, 14:25:09 Date Registered:    crazyivan u=102057
18 September 2014, 02:28:06 Date Registered:    coindetective u=378830
23 September 2014, 21:24:52 Date Registered:    Bitcoin-Police u=380696 http://archive.is/J9uYf


So, we have:

Accounts Connected:

crazyivan, coindetective, Bitcoin-Police

Code:

Engaging in paid vouching with multiple alts - see ref.

Accounts Connected:

Minerjoe, mrsalve, windale, rphk

Code:

Minerjoe purchased alts to vouch for their services.

Accounts seemingly unconnected but vouching:

bapparabi, Daffadile, zend7

Miscellaneous:

18 September 2015, 18:59:59 Date Registered:    windale
21 September 2015, 19:36:19 Last Active:    Bitcoin-Police u=380696 http://archive.is/J9uYf

connected after-all?

Yes, coindetective and crazyivan accounts re connected, CONNECTED BY BLOOD. I repeat, I have a younger brother who uses my main computer from time to time and he posted stuff under my account by mistake. SO WHAT???
As soon as I figured out what he did, I asked him to close down the thread in question and he did. If you would have some decency to ask me that, I d confirm this. Posting this kind of shit without verification makes me think you really do not have a life. Suggesting I ve been engaged in paid vouching or selling vouches is a lie and pure BS. I have almost 5500 posts on this forum, 80+ trusted rating, been around for a long, long time and you come here and accuse me of this shit. Get your points by helping out people dude, not this way.  

Cheers and good luck to you. If this is all you do the entire day, you ll DEFINITELY need it.

[Timelord2067]

Archived for future reference: http://archive.is/xvrrA#selection-7399.0-7399.80

I cant wait you will see what is coming for you.  Karma is a bitch  I always say

BTW, did V.Lace just threaten me?

[V.Lace]

Archived for future reference: http://archive.is/xvrrA#selection-7399.0-7399.80

I cant wait you will see what is coming for you.  Karma is a bitch  I always say

BTW, did V.Lace just threaten me?

Karma is the threat,  I cant wait too see when Karma bites your Oreo cookie butt hole.

Archive this also,  do not forget to archive your oreo cookies.

[HaXX0R1337]

It is almost a month now and i am still connected with some other users.I have provided the proof that it is indeed an online wallet and sent a PM to Lauda which is of no use and he wants me to settle with the user who framed me by linking the account. If lauda cannot verify and make things right to a thread he created which i think will benefit in the longer run he has to hand over to some one who can verify things .

You're a random, thus you should occasionally PM me with updates with your case if it is unresolved. Your last sentence sounds butthurt. Anyhow, I've de-listed you.

I knew you would come up with your catch phrase butthurt i am not buddy,i provided the proof that it is indeed an online wallet long back and no one responded to it and so is the reason i PM ed you a month back but you said you cannot do anything and i have to settle with the person who connected me.I knew the truth will come out eventually and so i waited so that the wallet explorer will show it is indeed an online wallet , i do not mind being connected if i knew the person but since this is a lending platform too i am not sure if connecting with a random account is a cool thing,but what surprised me is that the users connected to me never came up to clear things up so is the reason i wanted to clear this up without much fuss

[JohnyBigs]

Archived for future reference: http://archive.is/xvrrA#selection-7399.0-7399.80

I cant wait you will see what is coming for you.  Karma is a bitch  I always say

BTW, did V.Lace just threaten me?

I am afraid he just did so yes 

[TRF]

User WorldClassic (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=906089) and Wiggen (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=944719 ) are the same person.

He try to run a ponzi for cheating People. Please DT1 tag this user.

Proof:

Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1756937.msg17552157#msg17552157

WiggeN Sending address 16sxRhuxWmoJN1QBepPwma3CvjW5Fqv5nE  to EscortBanking  (running by WorldClassic)  - (https://blockchain.info/address/15b4da6d74211285b968b5c29c6ff639ed2cd1b2)  is the same address staked by Wikiboy  (https://hackforums.net/member.php?action=profile&uid=3261390)  in his tread (https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=5477914)

But WorldClassic said "Yes I am WikiBoy so what ? Actually HF have removed the positive reps of some of the member which too includes me  and about the above questions "

Archived Proof:
https://archive.fo/N7SOf
https://archive.fo/6TM0J

Screen shot:

WorldClassic admit t be Wikiboy from HF



WikiBoy Staked Address

[erikalui]

Need help to find the alt of this user: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=842024

Have reported the scam here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1478882.msg14907229#msg14907229

As mentioned in the above thread, I've already filed a police complaint but have got no feedback from the person. I'll be sending a notice too to Citrus and hence need help to find this person's alt on the forum as I am sure that I am not his first target.

[Timelord2067]

Need help to find the alt of this user: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=842024

Have reported the scam here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1478882.msg14907229#msg14907229

As mentioned in the above thread, I've already filed a police complaint but have got no feedback from the person. I'll be sending a notice too to Citrus and hence need help to find this person's alt on the forum as I am sure that I am not his first target.

Code:

Name: 	akash8871 u=842024 http://archive.is/06VYL
Posts: 	2
Activity: 	2
Position: 	Newbie
Date Registered: 	16 May 2016, 01:23:09
Last Active: 	24 May 2016, 19:03:23

I HAVE 9000 INR IN CITRUS WALLET

I WANT TO EXCHANGE IT IN BITCOIN.

INTERESTED PING ME ASAP.

SKYPE : a_k_a_s_h_

FACEBOOK : https://www.facebook.com/cenation0786

There's a

Code:

Name: 	nicenationl u=879403 http://archive.is/m0Pdk
Posts: 	0
Activity: 	0
Position: 	Brand new
Date Registered: 	18 July 2016, 21:17:01
Last Active: 	18 July 2016, 21:17:03

and also

Code:

Name: 	HatakeKakashi u=808431 http://archive.is/lYacD
Posts: 	459
Activity: 	238
Position: 	Full Member
Date Registered: 	22 March 2016, 03:26:15
Last Active: 	19 January 2017, 14:06:30

Bitcoin address: 	17F5ZfMipb4WVgdhvj7KASTKDsLGkrmMyy

Trust: 	-2: -1 / +0

that might warrant following up.

Good luck and I hope you find the scammer.