At least try to convince us
We're trying to.No doubt lisk is great but their architecture is somewhat complicated for newbie
programmers to start writing decentralzied apps.We cover up the capabilities what Lisk failed to offer
in terms of programming.For example,lisk doesn't have Plugin exporting methods,ASC does.This is one
of the differences, incase you'd like to know more,please message us I'm very open to discuss it with you.
It's interesting you take the time to answer him but not me.
So do they other guys.
Sorry but I might have missed your post.Also IPO stuff keeps us busy but I try to reply to most of the comments where people need technical specs.
Because let's face it.
1) The developers won't show their face, they just want our money and run
2) The hired guns just want their fee,
1.Have you seen Satoshi ? You trust in bitcoin right ?
Tell me did you see the actual developers or do just just speak to them on chat?
If yes why are their hiding. They want over 400K for 'development' but can't even show their face? How rude is that!!!
Again,it doesn't matter.You're telling me other projects didn't turn scam where their devs had posted their faces ? It's a wrong notion.The IPO money doesn't go in our pockets,it goes to escrows who are quite trusted around the forum.
They smell "ICO" money; Waves, Rise, Lisk and now want their peace. But look how lazy these guys are.
This (
https://ascendancy.io/whitepaper.pdf) is not a whitepaper. This is a useless word presentation a first grader can make.
Hypothetical.I will work on documenting it.Thanks for the suggestion and sorry it wasn't upto your standards.
What else do you expect the website to have ?
How can you expect people to trust you can actually develop a simple blog for that matter
1 if you hide behind your pc
2 make a bogus presentation/whitepaper with WORD
3 your website contains no information but just a few hundred words with bla bla.
Not even a simple contactform
1.Trust in the project.
2.Whitepaper will be worked on.
3.Making a fancy website makes our project more trustworthy ? I think not.
On fiver.com you probably pay 30 bucks for both the website and content...
So now you want to create your own framework for 400k... well first build a website then we will see further.
Because yes even if the dev get 400k with or without showing their faces they will probably hire real developer for let's say 10-15k to actually make it.
Making a framework is different from making a website.Not sure what exactly you're ranting about.
First of all, sorry for the people who did get parted with their money. But honestly all the red signals were there.
- Legit questions not being answered
- Anonymous developers
- "Escrow" address not managed by the escrow holders
- Lack of a white paper
etc. etc.
@Joel as I said before and will say again youwere a hired gun, but equally guilty in this mess/scam.
You are always the first to rant about anything and I was surprised to see you even participated in this ICO, but then thought you needed more money seeing all those ICO money
But then i remembered something.
People invested because of the people associating in this ICO. In this case you.
Because you rant a lot but you build your profile to be trusted and a guy who would never associated in a scam.
For that reason when i read this comment:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1464725.msg14828207#msg14828207http://archive.is/tyoip"Good Project.Usually I don't risk money with AltCoins,yours seem organised .I hope it remains the same throughout.Bought 100 Oph's for now ,I will invest more after seeing the numbers in the second stage."
So I decided to invest in the OPHION ICO.
And what happened, like the ASC team they run away with the money.
It's not often that you actively participate but in both SCAMS there are many references:
https://i.imgur.com/Hg7UaxS.png[
1 You promoted both (1 more actively then the other). In the OPHION scam you even offered your help promoting it.
2 Both scammers sign their messages with: - name
3 And if i look at the image (see the selected text from the scammer), it's the same aggression tone we can expect from you.
4 In the OPHION scam you opened this scam accusation thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1479475.0Too prove what? Your innocence?
5 In both scams 2 'guys/developers' tagged their name the same way. Or was it to remember in what character they were?
@The scam hunters.
You might want to look more into Joel Jantsen.
1 He's by far not innocent in this Project
2 But I don't think the above is just a coincidence
@GLEB
You should check the above and verify it, because you may be behind the wrong guy(s). In the OPHION scam they made a false Linkedin page too.
And from what I just read you helped the community with your skillset.