Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns

[tspacepilot]

Just for clarifying, I get I think 51 cents per day with cryptcominer sig campaign, withdraws daily and fast, no fee.

Yes , we  have understand ,.. but that sig. campaign is only a Ponzi scheme .

Its daily payouts, so on the day that it crashes, you at most will lose that days payment for 51 cents

+ you lose credibility as you advertised a ponzi

+ you lose credibility by advertising gambling sites, while many people have their life destroyed by gambling?

Everyone that is not a baby is aware of the risks, not sure what is the problem

So where do you draw the line? Would you advertise anything if they pay you the most?

Me, yes, basically, I would.  Obviously that's probably not entirely true, but I don't feel like I'm personally endorsing whatever paid message is in my sig.  Maybe I should change my quote under my name to make this more explicit: "signature space is a paid advertisment, not personally endorsed by tspacepilot".

[capoeira]

Just for clarifying, I get I think 51 cents per day with cryptcominer sig campaign, withdraws daily and fast, no fee.

Yes , we  have understand ,.. but that sig. campaign is only a Ponzi scheme .

Its daily payouts, so on the day that it crashes, you at most will lose that days payment for 51 cents

+ you lose credibility as you advertised a ponzi

+ you lose credibility by advertising gambling sites, while many people have their life destroyed by gambling?

Everyone that is not a baby is aware of the risks, not sure what is the problem

my friend, there is a HUGE diference. you might think that everybody who enters a ponzi is aware of that it is one, but it's not the truth......else they woudn't comuflage it

[michietn94]

ShibaRoll signature campaign (Thread)
Payment period: every 10 days
Minimum posts: 30 posts Min per 10 days (1 day make 3 posts)
Payments: JM : BTC 0.000055BTC/post
Miscellaneous: 100 Posts max per 10 days.Just looking 20 Jr.Members only. You wont be paid for spamming, trolling, bumping and make all one liner/word posts.
Your posts should be constructive. Dont spam.

[Mitchell]

ShibaRoll signature campaign (Thread)
Payment period: every 10 days
Minimum posts: 30 posts Min per 10 days (1 day make 3 posts)
Payments: JM : BTC 0.000055BTC/post
Miscellaneous: 100 Posts max per 10 days.Just looking 20 Jr.Members only. You wont be paid for spamming, trolling, bumping and make all one liner/word posts.
Your posts should be constructive. Dont spam.

Thank you for telling me about this campaign. I have added them to the OP.

[Muhammed Zakir]

Bitbiz.io only accepting Jr. Members now. Please add it to OP.

I am offering 0.00006 BTC per post with no weekly minimum and 50 posts maximum, however you can earn more. If you have written at least 5 posts on BitBiz.io then you are entitled to 0.0001 BTC per post. Payments will be paid weekly every Sunday (please wait up to 48 hours).

Bitin.io is okay now. They paid to all and the enrollment is still going. I think it would be nice if '*' is removed.

  ~~MZ~~

[Mitchell]

Bitin.io is okay now. They paid to all and the enrollment is still going. I think it would be nice if '*' is removed.

  ~~MZ~~

Still waiting for the people that said they didn't get paid to post here about their payment / someone else posting her explaining why they didn't get paid. So, for now, the asterisk stays.

Bitbiz.io only accepting Jr. Members now. Please add it to OP.

I already have that in the OP...

[apsvinet]

Just for clarifying, I get I think 51 cents per day with cryptcominer sig campaign, withdraws daily and fast, no fee.

Yes , we  have understand ,.. but that sig. campaign is only a Ponzi scheme .

Its daily payouts, so on the day that it crashes, you at most will lose that days payment for 51 cents

+ you lose credibility as you advertised a ponzi

+ you lose credibility by advertising gambling sites, while many people have their life destroyed by gambling?

Everyone that is not a baby is aware of the risks, not sure what is the problem

So where do you draw the line? Would you advertise anything if they pay you the most?

As long as it's not immoral - yes. I've seen gambling addiction from a close perspective, lives ruined, the financial security of people close to the addicted person being risked, yet I don't condemn anyone that advertises for a gambling site. It's up to each and everyone to make their own conscious decision whether they want to use the service that the advertised site is offering.

[tspacepilot]

I agree.  People can become addicted to many, many things.  However, those same things are going to be used responsibly and without addiction by many more people.  The fact that someone can become addicted to something and have their life ruined is, imho, not a reason to ban or sideline or otherwise act weird about that particular thing.

[pawel7777]

Just for clarifying, I get I think 51 cents per day with cryptcominer sig campaign, withdraws daily and fast, no fee.

Yes , we  have understand ,.. but that sig. campaign is only a Ponzi scheme .

Its daily payouts, so on the day that it crashes, you at most will lose that days payment for 51 cents

+ you lose credibility as you advertised a ponzi

+ you lose credibility by advertising gambling sites, while many people have their life destroyed by gambling?

Everyone that is not a baby is aware of the risks, not sure what is the problem

So where do you draw the line? Would you advertise anything if they pay you the most?

As long as it's not immoral - yes. I've seen gambling addiction from a close perspective, lives ruined, the financial security of people close to the addicted person being risked, yet I don't condemn anyone that advertises for a gambling site. It's up to each and everyone to make their own conscious decision whether they want to use the service that the advertised site is offering.

Gambling addiction has nothing to do with the subject. The gambling site is advertised as gambling site, people who use it know that they are gambling.
It can have destructive effect on some individuals, but so can pretty much any activity. Huge number of lives/families are affected by car crashes - following your logic, is advertising an obvious scam more innocent than car adverts?

But if you're desperate to compare to gambling campaigns, it would be the same as advertising a "1% house edge Dice" knowing that the house edge is in-fact 100%.

The only reasonable justification for putting this shit in the sig, in my opinion are:

1 - You don't have a spine/morals at all, you would do anything for a quick profit (including selling your own mother) - in such case no comment.

2- You trust that cryptcominer is somehow, in a magical way, legit - no comment.

3- You think that anyone who would fall for such obvious scam is a moron and deserve to lose to learn a lesson. In such case, why don't pull a scam yourself and earn more than a lousy campaign earnings?

4- You think that the scam is so obvious, that no-one will fall for that and the scammers will lose all the 'investment' (campaign expenses). This one imho is the only sensible 'line of defense'.

[patt0]

Cryptcominer doesn't accept newbies in their campaign anymore. (and is probably not paying out anymore lol)
By the way, this is a great thread! xD

[u9y42]

We seem to be running out of good sig campaigns here - the Cloudbet campaign is ending tomorrow:

Hi folks,

We will be ending our signature campaign at the conclusion of this payment period on September 16.

Thank you to all those who have participated, and best of luck with your new campaigns.

Cheers,
Cloudbet

[Brewins]

Just for clarifying, I get I think 51 cents per day with cryptcominer sig campaign, withdraws daily and fast, no fee.

Yes , we  have understand ,.. but that sig. campaign is only a Ponzi scheme .

Its daily payouts, so on the day that it crashes, you at most will lose that days payment for 51 cents

+ you lose credibility as you advertised a ponzi

+ you lose credibility by advertising gambling sites, while many people have their life destroyed by gambling?

Everyone that is not a baby is aware of the risks, not sure what is the problem

So where do you draw the line? Would you advertise anything if they pay you the most?

As long as it's not immoral - yes. I've seen gambling addiction from a close perspective, lives ruined, the financial security of people close to the addicted person being risked, yet I don't condemn anyone that advertises for a gambling site. It's up to each and everyone to make their own conscious decision whether they want to use the service that the advertised site is offering.

Gambling addiction has nothing to do with the subject. The gambling site is advertised as gambling site, people who use it know that they are gambling.
It can have destructive effect on some individuals, but so can pretty much any activity. Huge number of lives/families are affected by car crashes - following your logic, is advertising an obvious scam more innocent than car adverts?

But if you're desperate to compare to gambling campaigns, it would be the same as advertising a "1% house edge Dice" knowing that the house edge is in-fact 100%.

The only reasonable justification for putting this shit in the sig, in my opinion are:

1 - You don't have a spine/morals at all, you would do anything for a quick profit (including selling your own mother) - in such case no comment.

2- You trust that cryptcominer is somehow, in a magical way, legit - no comment.

3- You think that anyone who would fall for such obvious scam is a moron and deserve to lose to learn a lesson. In such case, why don't pull a scam yourself and earn more than a lousy campaign earnings?

4- You think that the scam is so obvious, that no-one will fall for that and the scammers will lose all the 'investment' (campaign expenses). This one imho is the only sensible 'line of defense'.

See their profile and their trust, no one can claim they don't know they are a ponzi. People that put their money there know where they are entering.

[Kprawn]

Edendice - Closed
Cloudbet - Closed
Cryptcominer - Closed {Ponzi}

We seem to be running out of options. One of these days, there will be no signature campaign left on the board.   

[medUSA]

Cloudbet - Closed

Confirmed, posted by Cloudbet himself:

"Cloudbet Signature Campaign will end on September 16"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=609557.msg8823561#msg8823561

Time for me to search for a new campaign.

[pawel7777]

See their profile and their trust, no one can claim they don't know they are a ponzi. People that put their money there know where they are entering.

When people click the link in the sig, they don't get to see the trust feedback, do they?

[boumalo]

Cloudbet - Closed

Confirmed, posted by Cloudbet himself:

"Cloudbet Signature Campaign will end on September 16"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=609557.msg8823561#msg8823561

Time for me to search for a new campaign.

The 10-20% on revenue from PD is available and not listed here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=745779.0

[Yeezus]

Damn these campaigns are dropping like flies. It's very hard to get places on them now and it's going to be almost impossible if PD does infact close. Hopefully they wont though as it'll be a nightmare to earn a  little coin from your signature. Hoping for some other bitcoin businesses to start advertising this way in the near future.

Thanks for keeping the list going op. It's very helpful.

[tspacepilot]

Yah, I agree about the campaigns that seem to be dropping like flies.  I think that if PD closes their campaign, I'll prolly just stop wearing a sig-ad.  That'll be cleaner anyway.  And I don't want to advertize anything unless the pay rate is good.  For me, 0.1 per month is too low to worry about.

[redsn0w]

Yah, I agree about the campaigns that seem to be dropping like flies.  I think that if PD closes their campaign, I'll prolly just stop wearing a sig-ad.  That'll be cleaner anyway.  And I don't want to advertize anything unless the pay rate is good.  For me, 0.1 per month is too low to worry about.

0.1 btc is too low to post in this forum , remember this is only a  "plus"  .Your posting in this forum is "free"  , so I think 0,1 btc at month is very very good .

[boumalo]

Yah, I agree about the campaigns that seem to be dropping like flies.  I think that if PD closes their campaign, I'll prolly just stop wearing a sig-ad.  That'll be cleaner anyway.  And I don't want to advertize anything unless the pay rate is good.  For me, 0.1 per month is too low to worry about.

0.1 btc is too low to post in this forum , remember this is only a  "plus"  .Your posting in this forum is "free"  , so I think 0,1 btc at month is very very good .

0.1 seems pretty low but better than nothing

A Bitcoin business could become huge throwing a huge sig campaign here and paying well