You seem to be going above and beyond what is required as an escrow?
I'm also another forum member responding to posts in this thread just like any other. I am objective, logical and factual about my responses.
You're a staff member and you're requesting to read all of my PM's ? I am concerned. I am not asking to collect BTC or provide any service. What is your interest in my account may I ask?
I have no interest in your account. I was just looking at your response. You implied "There is nothing to hide" so I am merely throwing that back at you.
The onus is on him if he wants their confidence to invest their BTC? you don't see that then I can't assist you further.
Nope. No one has to invest if they don't want to. Very simple. If you don't trust the developer to deliver, don't invest. If you don't trust the escrow or the system in place, don't invest. If you have no confidence, then you don't contribute or participate and you lose nothing.
I am not personally interested in picking a dispute with you. As you said you get the terms you make others aware of the terms you enforce the terms? that would be fair enough. Please stick to that only not promotion and excusing past mistakes - one going into business with a scammer and two having no control over the funds/tokens of people you encourage to invest, announcing at such a critical time.
I am encouraging you not to invest then.
Oh, it's good if there is no dispute then. I have nothing against anyone here, mostly, but when you accuse someone of being a scammer, please provide verifiable proof. Or open a scam accusation thread and pile up the evidence there. If you have any.
Some say the withdrawals were stopped almost immediately after his announcement to leave...others say it was recent. After asking more questions it seems larger amounts were disabled but small amounts could still be withdrawn. Then nothing at all. This suggests the wallet they were linked to ran dry and was being emptied.
Yeah, maybe the hot wallet ran out. Lot's of exchanges and online sites (gambling ones) do this. In fact, I think all of them do.
I think you personally dabs need to act more like an objective escrow and staff member and not become involved with the projects you are working with. From all the green trust you must be overall honest but I do not approve of your moral code and blame apportioning. You do not seem neutral in these projects you seem more like part of their team. You can not blame anyone who lost vidz because they didnt remove it before it turned scam. Where was it in the terms there was a deadline to remove the tokens?
What turned scam? Please provide proof. Absence does not mean scam. If the original developer actually got hit by a bus, that is unfortunate for him (and all the investors) but it is still not a scam. There is no deadline, but like all the other online wallets that disappeared with other people's funds, there was also no deadline. Don't keep your coins online. Most important rule of bitcoin land.
I am not part of any team. Some projects I escrow also fail and I refund the investors. I actually don't get paid if the ICO fails or conditions trigger a refund process. I could care less what you think of my moral code. It's different if you post about it and let the world know. If you keep it to yourself, I have no need to respond.
I do have a very simple "moral code". I do not lie, cheat, or steal, or tolerate those who do. It is my high code of ethics and personal dignity. For most, living under this code will be no problem, as it asks nothing of a person that is beyond reason. It only calls for honesty and integrity, characteristics that officers in the armed forces have always exemplified, promoting understanding and loyalty to truth and confidence in each other.
That's like working with big vern on a new exchange and saying I blame the people who lost money in cryptsy not vern, it was the hackers fault, his partners fault, anyone elses fault. You never blame the victims in a scam situation.
You deposit money in any exchange at your own risk. There is no need to blame anyone but themselves. But PureVidz nor Novus is not a scam. I do not see a "scam situation". I just see some unfortunate events.
As much as you don't want to blame "victims", then you can also see that asphyxia has no responsibility left for those who chose not to withdraw their funds when they still could have.
