Bitcoin Forum
June 19, 2024, 05:51:56 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 6230 6231 6232 6233 6234 6235 6236 6237 6238 6239 6240 6241 6242 6243 6244 6245 6246 6247 6248 6249 6250 6251 6252 6253 6254 6255 6256 6257 6258 6259 6260 6261 6262 6263 6264 6265 6266 6267 6268 6269 6270 6271 6272 6273 6274 6275 6276 6277 6278 6279 [6280] 6281 6282 6283 6284 6285 6286 6287 6288 6289 6290 6291 6292 6293 6294 6295 6296 6297 6298 6299 6300 6301 6302 6303 6304 6305 6306 6307 6308 6309 6310 6311 6312 6313 6314 6315 6316 6317 6318 6319 6320 6321 6322 6323 6324 6325 6326 6327 6328 6329 6330 ... 33461 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26403255 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1779


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
May 06, 2014, 08:00:58 AM


Explanation
p0peji
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 06, 2014, 08:02:52 AM

Great, that stupid POS news killed all the great downward momentum, now it is back to playing the waiting game...  Cry
windjc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070


View Profile
May 06, 2014, 08:03:57 AM

Dec 5th statement agrees wind..I just dunno how the PBOC sucks at enforcing it so badly.

I mean for the Chinese they have digested the good and the bad.. but I would agree they expect more bad...we'll see how Mother's Day ends up

The chinese businessman in the other thread explains it very well. Basically the PBOC is too big to typical involve itself with something as small as bitcoin (which shows how threatened they are by it). For this reason, because the PBOC communicates with only the top level bank officials, the top level bank officials feel its beneath their pay grade to deal with and it gets passed down and eventually lost, because the people authorized with the responsibility don't want to do it - its embarrassing for them. It is in fact the exact opposite of what many bitcoin enthusiasts imagine - bitcoin is actually TOO SMALL for the banks to want to deal with closing all the accounts.
TERA
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 06, 2014, 08:04:44 AM

Dec 5th statement agrees wind..I just dunno how the PBOC sucks at enforcing it so badly.

I mean for the Chinese they have digested the good and the bad.. but I would agree they expect more bad...we'll see how Mother's Day ends up

The chinese businessman in the other thread explains it very well. Basically the PBOC is too big to typical involve itself with something as small as bitcoin (which shows how threatened they are by it). For this reason, because the PBOC communicates with only the top level bank officials, the top level bank officials feel its beneath their pay grade to deal with and it gets passed down and eventually lost, because the people authorized with the responsibility don't want to do it - its embarrassing for them. In it in fact the exact opposite of what many bitcoin enthusiasts imagine - bitcoin is actually TOO SMALL for the banks to want to deal with closing all the accounts.

Here's the article:

http://bitcoinblog.de/2014/04/28/chinese-banks-dont-know-how-to-act-appropriate-cause-bitcoin-is-too-tiny/
billyjoeallen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007


Hide your women


View Profile WWW
May 06, 2014, 08:12:51 AM

Great, that stupid POS news killed all the great downward momentum, now it is back to playing the waiting game...  Cry

Kinda what I was thinking. The market's been high on Hopium for a damn month. No reason for it. Hangover's gonna be a bitch.
windjc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070


View Profile
May 06, 2014, 08:21:05 AM

Great, that stupid POS news killed all the great downward momentum, now it is back to playing the waiting game...  Cry

Kinda what I was thinking. The market's been high on Hopium for a damn month. No reason for it. Hangover's gonna be a bitch.

Hopium.

That's the ideal word for it.

The market reacts like its the worlds last bitcoin, everytime it has the slightest reason to.  Meanwhile, no new fiat is coming in and traders are just passing coins back and forth while money slowly leaves the exchanges.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3752
Merit: 10418


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
May 06, 2014, 08:25:21 AM

Great, that stupid POS news killed all the great downward momentum, now it is back to playing the waiting game...  Cry

Kinda what I was thinking. The market's been high on Hopium for a damn month. No reason for it. Hangover's gonna be a bitch.

Hopium.

That's the ideal word for it.

The market reacts like its the worlds last bitcoin, everytime it has the slightest reason to.  Meanwhile, no new fiat is coming in and traders are just passing coins back and forth while money slowly leaves the exchanges.

Hopium.  I concede that I have that affliction, too.
Davyd05
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 06, 2014, 08:30:38 AM

Dec 5th statement agrees wind..I just dunno how the PBOC sucks at enforcing it so badly.

I mean for the Chinese they have digested the good and the bad.. but I would agree they expect more bad...we'll see how Mother's Day ends up

The chinese businessman in the other thread explains it very well. Basically the PBOC is too big to typical involve itself with something as small as bitcoin (which shows how threatened they are by it). For this reason, because the PBOC communicates with only the top level bank officials, the top level bank officials feel its beneath their pay grade to deal with and it gets passed down and eventually lost, because the people authorized with the responsibility don't want to do it - its embarrassing for them. In it in fact the exact opposite of what many bitcoin enthusiasts imagine - bitcoin is actually TOO SMALL for the banks to want to deal with closing all the accounts.

Here's the article:

http://bitcoinblog.de/2014/04/28/chinese-banks-dont-know-how-to-act-appropriate-cause-bitcoin-is-too-tiny/

Probably clearer to a Chinese person what was defined on Dec 5th.. but that article with the two small argument sounds silly...there is easily enough here to blanket ban...

"Notice" requirement , at this stage , financial institutions and payment institutions are not allowed to Bitcoin price for the product or service , may not be sold or traded bitcoins as a central counterparty shall not be covered with bitcoin -related insurance business or insurance will be included bitcoin range not indirectly provide customers with bitcoins other services, including direct or : to provide customers with Bitcoin registration , trading, clearing and settlement services ; accepts bitcoins or bitcoins as payment and settlement tools ; carry with bitcoins RMB and foreign currency exchange services ; conduct Bitcoin storage , hosting, mortgages and other services ; issue with bitcoin -related financial products ; would bitcoins as trusts, investment funds and other investment targets .

no need for picking or choosing.. I think its highly likely we're just watching gov. manipulation happen with zero fucks given on being obvious or not.
Searing
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2898
Merit: 1464


Clueless!


View Profile
May 06, 2014, 08:36:49 AM

Dec 5th statement agrees wind..I just dunno how the PBOC sucks at enforcing it so badly.

I mean for the Chinese they have digested the good and the bad.. but I would agree they expect more bad...we'll see how Mother's Day ends up

The chinese businessman in the other thread explains it very well. Basically the PBOC is too big to typical involve itself with something as small as bitcoin (which shows how threatened they are by it). For this reason, because the PBOC communicates with only the top level bank officials, the top level bank officials feel its beneath their pay grade to deal with and it gets passed down and eventually lost, because the people authorized with the responsibility don't want to do it - its embarrassing for them. In it in fact the exact opposite of what many bitcoin enthusiasts imagine - bitcoin is actually TOO SMALL for the banks to want to deal with closing all the accounts.

Here's the article:

http://bitcoinblog.de/2014/04/28/chinese-banks-dont-know-how-to-act-appropriate-cause-bitcoin-is-too-tiny/

Probably clearer to a Chinese person what was defined on Dec 5th.. but that article with the two small argument sounds silly...there is easily enough here to blanket ban...

"Notice" requirement , at this stage , financial institutions and payment institutions are not allowed to Bitcoin price for the product or service , may not be sold or traded bitcoins as a central counterparty shall not be covered with bitcoin -related insurance business or insurance will be included bitcoin range not indirectly provide customers with bitcoins other services, including direct or : to provide customers with Bitcoin registration , trading, clearing and settlement services ; accepts bitcoins or bitcoins as payment and settlement tools ; carry with bitcoins RMB and foreign currency exchange services ; conduct Bitcoin storage , hosting, mortgages and other services ; issue with bitcoin -related financial products ; would bitcoins as trusts, investment funds and other investment targets .

no need for picking or choosing.. I think its highly likely we're just watching gov. manipulation happen with zero fucks given on being obvious or not.


I'm unclear does all this apply to bitcoin manufacturer's? ....in other words you have a company that 'builds' asic devices for sale ....does this also effect them?
Davyd05
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 06, 2014, 08:39:07 AM

Dec 5th statement agrees wind..I just dunno how the PBOC sucks at enforcing it so badly.

I mean for the Chinese they have digested the good and the bad.. but I would agree they expect more bad...we'll see how Mother's Day ends up

The chinese businessman in the other thread explains it very well. Basically the PBOC is too big to typical involve itself with something as small as bitcoin (which shows how threatened they are by it). For this reason, because the PBOC communicates with only the top level bank officials, the top level bank officials feel its beneath their pay grade to deal with and it gets passed down and eventually lost, because the people authorized with the responsibility don't want to do it - its embarrassing for them. In it in fact the exact opposite of what many bitcoin enthusiasts imagine - bitcoin is actually TOO SMALL for the banks to want to deal with closing all the accounts.

Here's the article:

http://bitcoinblog.de/2014/04/28/chinese-banks-dont-know-how-to-act-appropriate-cause-bitcoin-is-too-tiny/

Probably clearer to a Chinese person what was defined on Dec 5th.. but that article with the two small argument sounds silly...there is easily enough here to blanket ban...

"Notice" requirement , at this stage , financial institutions and payment institutions are not allowed to Bitcoin price for the product or service , may not be sold or traded bitcoins as a central counterparty shall not be covered with bitcoin -related insurance business or insurance will be included bitcoin range not indirectly provide customers with bitcoins other services, including direct or : to provide customers with Bitcoin registration , trading, clearing and settlement services ; accepts bitcoins or bitcoins as payment and settlement tools ; carry with bitcoins RMB and foreign currency exchange services ; conduct Bitcoin storage , hosting, mortgages and other services ; issue with bitcoin -related financial products ; would bitcoins as trusts, investment funds and other investment targets .

no need for picking or choosing.. I think its highly likely we're just watching gov. manipulation happen with zero fucks given on being obvious or not.


I'm unclear does all this apply to bitcoin manufacturer's? ....in other words you have a company that 'builds' asic devices for sale ....does this also effect them?

pretty sure as ..they pretty much couldn't sell them via alipay and or alibaba is it? yeah and http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/01/08/us-china-bitcoin-idUSBREA070F620140108
I mean.. perhaps they're just sadistic and are killing bitcoin of like young kids might kill insects... one appendage at a time

I will admit I do say fuck you to my sleeping schedule whenever China starts banning and the traders start the p&ds .. and I'm not even long or short.. lol
magicmexican
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 06, 2014, 08:41:52 AM

haha just woke up, and it bounced from 2550, what a shocker
chessnut
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1001



View Profile
May 06, 2014, 08:56:40 AM

Looks like all shorts on Huobi will have to be closed, sooner or later.

May the back stabbing begin!
p0peji
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 06, 2014, 09:00:03 AM

Looks like all shorts on Huobi will have to be closed, sooner or later.

May the back stabbing begin!

Why would only the shorts have to be closed?
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1779


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
May 06, 2014, 09:00:56 AM


Explanation
chessnut
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1001



View Profile
May 06, 2014, 09:03:10 AM

Looks like all shorts on Huobi will have to be closed, sooner or later.

May the back stabbing begin!

Why would only the shorts have to be closed?

In the statement, Leverage trading will cease. shorts will be closed on the 10th if not before.

"Close currency financing financial services implementing rules 1,5 month beginning at 0:00 on the 10th , the fire will stop currency net new financing financing currency after currency to pay off all of the facility or stopping leveraged finance transactions."
p0peji
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 06, 2014, 09:03:46 AM

Looks like all shorts on Huobi will have to be closed, sooner or later.

May the back stabbing begin!

Why would only the shorts have to be closed?

In the statement, Leverage trading will cease. shorts will be closed on the 10th if not before.

"Close currency financing financial services implementing rules 1,5 month beginning at 0:00 on the 10th , the fire will stop currency net new financing financing currency after currency to pay off all of the facility or stopping leveraged finance transactions."

And there is no such thing as a leveraged long?
chessnut
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1001



View Profile
May 06, 2014, 09:05:33 AM

Looks like all shorts on Huobi will have to be closed, sooner or later.

May the back stabbing begin!

Why would only the shorts have to be closed?

In the statement, Leverage trading will cease. shorts will be closed on the 10th if not before.

"Close currency financing financial services implementing rules 1,5 month beginning at 0:00 on the 10th , the fire will stop currency net new financing financing currency after currency to pay off all of the facility or stopping leveraged finance transactions."

And there is no such thing as a leveraged long?

No it's a real thing they do exist.
p0peji
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 06, 2014, 09:06:46 AM

Looks like all shorts on Huobi will have to be closed, sooner or later.

May the back stabbing begin!

Why would only the shorts have to be closed?

In the statement, Leverage trading will cease. shorts will be closed on the 10th if not before.

"Close currency financing financial services implementing rules 1,5 month beginning at 0:00 on the 10th , the fire will stop currency net new financing financing currency after currency to pay off all of the facility or stopping leveraged finance transactions."

And there is no such thing as a leveraged long?

No it's a real thing they do exist.

Do you have any idea of the meaning of the word "leveraged"?
TERA
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 06, 2014, 09:07:31 AM

I don't think China gov cares about asic miners - building miners is an actual good being produced, actual jobs being created, technology advancements, and money being pulled into the country with sales - often in fiat. I think what the China gov is mostly concerned with is the rampant daytrading on exchanges.
dreamspark
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 06, 2014, 09:08:53 AM

I think this market has completely lost its mind.

Also has anyone got a link to the 10th being a day something is supposed to be happening? Only thing I can find is about a Bitcoin conference or something.
Pages: « 1 ... 6230 6231 6232 6233 6234 6235 6236 6237 6238 6239 6240 6241 6242 6243 6244 6245 6246 6247 6248 6249 6250 6251 6252 6253 6254 6255 6256 6257 6258 6259 6260 6261 6262 6263 6264 6265 6266 6267 6268 6269 6270 6271 6272 6273 6274 6275 6276 6277 6278 6279 [6280] 6281 6282 6283 6284 6285 6286 6287 6288 6289 6290 6291 6292 6293 6294 6295 6296 6297 6298 6299 6300 6301 6302 6303 6304 6305 6306 6307 6308 6309 6310 6311 6312 6313 6314 6315 6316 6317 6318 6319 6320 6321 6322 6323 6324 6325 6326 6327 6328 6329 6330 ... 33461 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!