spooderman
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1022
|
 |
November 25, 2014, 10:09:31 PM |
|
jonoiv you just failed so hard. wow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"With e-currency based on cryptographic proof, without the need to
trust a third party middleman, money can be secure and transactions
effortless." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
ParabellumLite
|
|
November 25, 2014, 10:11:04 PM |
|
Buahahahahaa
2300>x means that x will be less than 2300.
Do MATH kid
Back to ignore forever, bye bye blackbird
No it doesn't it means: 2300 > soon 2300 (greater than) in a short amount of time. What you meant to say was... < 2300 soon. What you actually said doesn't make any sense. I really hope you are shorting, and you learn the hard way.  At times like this I wish there was a downvote button. |
|
|
|
|
|
NotLambchop
|
|
November 25, 2014, 10:14:23 PM |
|
...  The sign you used is > (greater than) ... Not the "PANTS!" sign? |
|
|
|
|
|
jonoiv
|
|
November 25, 2014, 10:17:02 PM |
|
jonoiv you just failed so hard. wow.
> Greater than < Less than Problem? |
|
|
|
|
spooderman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1022
|
|
November 25, 2014, 10:19:03 PM |
|
jonoiv you just failed so hard. wow.
> Greater than < Less than Problem? Yes, someone has already explained that he used the correct symbol :S |
|
|
|
|
|
jonoiv
|
|
November 25, 2014, 10:21:24 PM |
|
jonoiv you just failed so hard. wow.
> Greater than < Less than Problem? Yes, someone has already explained that he used the correct symbol :S He was trying to say the price will drop. and used the > greater than symbol he said 2300 > (greater than) soon. tell me how that means the price will be less than 2300? No.. exactly! He could have said Price sub 2300 soon. or < 2300 incoming. |
|
|
|
|
spooderman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1022
|
|
November 25, 2014, 10:24:14 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jonoiv
|
|
November 25, 2014, 10:26:26 PM |
|
If you don't understand English or maths...  |
|
|
|
|
spooderman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1022
|
|
November 25, 2014, 10:33:30 PM |
|
sorry to troll the wall thread with this but let's put this to bed. he said "2300 > soon" This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300. The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now). You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <. If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled  |
|
|
|
|
|
jonoiv
|
|
November 25, 2014, 10:40:43 PM |
|
sorry to troll the wall thread with this but let's put this to bed. he said "2300 > soon" This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300. The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now). You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <. If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled No it isn't... "soon" is an estimate of time. 2300 > soon He said 2300 (greater than) some time in the near future. His explination of 2300 > x. does not work because soon is not a unit of measurement for bitcoin price. soon is not unit, so therefore there is no way a greater than symbol can be used here. He meant to say < 2300 soon. Regardless, the price was 2308. So making such a massive prediction hardly makes him the Oracle of Delphi! |
|
|
|
|
|
SkyValeey
|
|
November 25, 2014, 10:40:55 PM |
|
Well I'm happy that on the other side of exchanges there're people with another kind of math  Another rule of that ppl is probably buy high sell low... |
|
|
|
|
Wilhelm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1265
|
|
November 25, 2014, 10:42:08 PM |
|
sorry to troll the wall thread with this but let's put this to bed. he said "2300 > soon" This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300. The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now). You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <. If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled As stated by Albert Einstein "You can't measure a fish by it's ability to climb a tree." "2300" and "soon" are not comparable. |
|
|
|
|
|
jonoiv
|
|
November 25, 2014, 10:42:47 PM |
|
Well I'm happy that on the other side of exchanges there're people with another kind of math Another rule of that ppl is probably buy high sell low...  |
|
|
|
|
|
jonoiv
|
|
November 25, 2014, 10:43:47 PM |
|
sorry to troll the wall thread with this but let's put this to bed. he said "2300 > soon" This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300. The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now). You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <. If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled As stated by Albert Einstein "You can't measure a fish by it's ability to climb a tree." "2300" and "soon" are not comparable. Thank You! Finally 1 person that understands |
|
|
|
|
|
SkyValeey
|
|
November 25, 2014, 10:48:28 PM |
|
sorry to troll the wall thread with this but let's put this to bed. he said "2300 > soon" This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300. The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now). You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <. If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled As stated by Albert Einstein "You can't measure a fish by it's ability to climb a tree." "2300" and "soon" are not comparable. It doesn't matter. Language is not pure logic. 90%+ of language isn't. ( for joniv "90%+" = not more than 90% but 10% LOL) You can't understand 2300> soon in another way like "soon will be less than 2300". Why? Because of place of number and meaning of > < Jonoiv is kid or he's stupid or he acts like he is wiser than everyone or he's stupid high kid acting wise man |
|
|
|
|
|
NotLambchop
|
|
November 25, 2014, 10:49:54 PM |
|
... Finally 1 person that understands Quick, sell him your coin before he smartens up!!1! Greater fools don't grow on trees you know. ...or do they? |
|
|
|
|
jaberwock
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1073
|
|
November 25, 2014, 10:55:33 PM |
|
why the charts are so weird last days? |
|
|
|
|
spooderman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1022
|
|
November 25, 2014, 10:56:34 PM |
|
something wrong with the data feed from stamp
|
|
|
|
|
|
jonoiv
|
|
November 25, 2014, 10:58:28 PM |
|
sorry to troll the wall thread with this but let's put this to bed. he said "2300 > soon" This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300. The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now). You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <. If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled As stated by Albert Einstein "You can't measure a fish by it's ability to climb a tree." "2300" and "soon" are not comparable. It doesn't matter. Language is not pure logic. 90%+ of language isn't. ( for joniv "90%+" = not more than 90% but 10% LOL) You can't understand 2300> soon in another way like "soon will be less than 2300". Why? Because of place of number and meaning of > < Jonoiv is kid or he's stupid or he acts like he is wiser than everyone or he's stupid high kid acting wise man why try and reverse use a symbol when you could have just used the correct one which is < less than, and put it in the correct place. Just admit you made a mistake and finally move on with your life |
|
|
|
|
macsga
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
|
|
November 25, 2014, 10:58:41 PM |
|
... Finally 1 person that understands Quick, sell him your coin before he smartens up!!1! Greater fools don't grow on trees you know. ...or do they? Your loneliness must be unbearable with all us fool bitcoiners in here. I sometimes wonder what a monster of IQ like you doing with some dumbasses like us. Why don't you try to communicate with any superior species on another forum, than the average monkey you meet in BTCTalk? I mean, it must be intolerable for you. I don't know if you can handle it any longer... Just saying...  |
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
