Bitcoin Forum
May 14, 2024, 06:37:07 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 3111 3112 3113 3114 3115 3116 3117 3118 3119 3120 3121 3122 3123 3124 3125 3126 3127 3128 3129 3130 3131 3132 3133 3134 3135 3136 3137 3138 3139 3140 3141 3142 3143 3144 3145 3146 3147 3148 3149 3150 3151 3152 3153 3154 3155 3156 3157 3158 3159 3160 [3161] 3162 3163 3164 3165 3166 3167 3168 3169 3170 3171 3172 3173 3174 3175 3176 3177 3178 3179 3180 3181 3182 3183 3184 3185 3186 3187 3188 3189 3190 3191 3192 3193 3194 3195 3196 3197 3198 3199 3200 3201 3202 3203 3204 3205 3206 3207 3208 3209 3210 3211 ... 33348 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26382916 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
Dragonkiller
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Available Now!


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 11:28:29 AM
 #63201

so was the china thing FUD?
1715668627
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715668627

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715668627
Reply with quote  #2

1715668627
Report to moderator
1715668627
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715668627

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715668627
Reply with quote  #2

1715668627
Report to moderator
1715668627
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715668627

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715668627
Reply with quote  #2

1715668627
Report to moderator
Even in the event that an attacker gains more than 50% of the network's computational power, only transactions sent by the attacker could be reversed or double-spent. The network would not be destroyed.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715668627
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715668627

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715668627
Reply with quote  #2

1715668627
Report to moderator
1715668627
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715668627

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715668627
Reply with quote  #2

1715668627
Report to moderator
1715668627
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715668627

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715668627
Reply with quote  #2

1715668627
Report to moderator
windjc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 11:34:10 AM
 #63202

so was the china thing FUD?

No. But it is not clear what real impact it will have on the amount of investments going into the Chinese exchanges.
Dragonkiller
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Available Now!


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 11:35:29 AM
 #63203

so was the china thing FUD?

No. But it is not clear what real impact it will have on the amount of investments going into the Chinese exchanges.

i see, thanks
Salivan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 195
Merit: 102

DiMS dev team


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 11:36:06 AM
 #63204


huge no man's land gap
mmitech
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001


things you own end up owning you


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 11:38:40 AM
 #63205

so was the china thing FUD?

nope it wasn't, all third payment parties are forbidden from dealing with Bitcoin exchanges, but this is not new or maybe new to Chinese, why ?

when you use third payment processors to deposit/withdraw your funds from exchanges you actually somehow skip the regulation process, and verifying your transaction will be a bit harder than when dealing with a bank.

what are the third payment parties ? they are similar to PayPal, but the most famous are Yeepay,Alipay,Paypal....  the second part was the introduce of trading fee, exchanges are registered as companies and have to pay Taxes as well and this explain the sudden increase in fees.

it is nothing wrong with this news, Mtgox has cancelled allot of funding methods, Bitstamp doesn't support any of these methods, and it is good for regulators and doesn't mean the end of bitcoin....


give it few weeks and this will be clear and people will stop panicking, though the price make a bit longer to recover from all of this bad energy going around us, the price did rise too fast this is why this happening now, if the price went slowly up I am sure this wouldn't happen.
bizz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 492
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 11:41:34 AM
 #63206

I say yes it was FUD because there is nothing new only some cool FUD headlines

Chinese gov said last week it will do heavy exchange regulation & no accepted btc in stores. What did people expect? That the heavy regulation means Russian payment providers???   Grin Of course that every Bitcoin bought will have to go through gov banks.
tutkarz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 501


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 11:42:28 AM
 #63207

I don't know who should be worried about 3rd party institutions, shouldn't bitcoin replace them anyway?
nanobrain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000


Dumb broad


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 11:42:40 AM
 #63208


Chinese speculators were not in fact very much of the overall Chinese exchange volume - most of it has come from outside mainland China. Meanwhile, the other exchanges and US and European investments have been the solid foundation of all the exchanges, but this fact had been lost in the run up in at ChinaBTC.

Thus, once investors see that 3rd party processors didnt have a sustainable impact on the market (i.e. Silk Road flash crash) investors flock back to secure best positions and additional investment comes in from off the sidelines anticipating a new run up.


I think the problem with this theory is twofold:
1. Getting fiat onto BTChina is difficult.
2. Most of the o/s funds went on there via BTC to take advantage of the zero trading fee...this is no longer an incentive although it is still cheaper than Gox/Stamp but more expensive than BTCe.

I'd be interested in your thoughts re the conundrum I have.  If Chinese users will have difficulty getting their Yuan off BTChina they will need coins instead, so this should mean all the CNY on the side should be being spent on BTC, driving the price up.   I guess there is a rush to get CNY off there before implementation of the new guidelines?
Dragonkiller
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Available Now!


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 11:43:43 AM
 #63209

so was the china thing FUD?

nope it wasn't, all third payment parties are forbidden from dealing with Bitcoin exchanges, but this is not new or maybe new to Chinese, why ?

when you use third payment processors to deposit/withdraw your funds from exchanges you actually somehow skip the regulation process, and verifying your transaction will be a bit harder than when dealing with a bank.

what are the third payment parties ? they are similar to PayPal, but the most famous are Yeepay,Alipay,Paypal....  the second part was the introduce of trading fee, exchanges are registered as companies and have to pay Taxes as well and this explain the sudden increase in fees.

it is nothing wrong with this news, Mtgox has cancelled allot of funding methods, Bitstamp doesn't support any of these methods, and it is good for regulators and doesn't mean the end of bitcoin....


give it few weeks and this will be clear and people will stop panicking, though the price make a bit longer to recover from all of this bad energy going around us, the price did rise too fast this is why this happening now, if the price went slowly up I am sure this wouldn't happen.

hopefully it's just for regulation and not a move to gradually stop bank funding. i don't think they will do that because that would effectively kill bitcoin in china, if they wanted to do that the statement they made a couple of weeks ago seems stupid. they probably would have just banned it straight away
gandhibt
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
December 17, 2013, 11:44:23 AM
 #63210

I say yes it was FUD because there is nothing new only some cool FUD headlines

Chinese gov said last week it will do heavy exchange regulation & no accepted btc in stores. What did people expect? That the heavy regulation means Russian payment providers???   Grin Of course that every Bitcoin bought will have to go through gov banks.

yep
Dragonkiller
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Available Now!


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 11:47:00 AM
 #63211


Chinese speculators were not in fact very much of the overall Chinese exchange volume - most of it has come from outside mainland China. Meanwhile, the other exchanges and US and European investments have been the solid foundation of all the exchanges, but this fact had been lost in the run up in at ChinaBTC.

Thus, once investors see that 3rd party processors didnt have a sustainable impact on the market (i.e. Silk Road flash crash) investors flock back to secure best positions and additional investment comes in from off the sidelines anticipating a new run up.


I think the problem with this theory is twofold:
1. Getting fiat onto BTChina is difficult.
2. Most of the o/s funds went on there via BTC to take advantage of the zero trading fee...this is no longer an incentive although it is still cheaper than Gox/Stamp but more expensive than BTCe.

I'd be interested in your thoughts re the conundrum I have.  If Chinese users will have difficulty getting their Yuan off BTChina they will need coins instead, so this should mean all the CNY on the side should be being spent on BTC, driving the price up.   I guess there is a rush to get CNY off there before implementation of the new guidelines?

according to alexa, 60% of visits to btcchina are from china, rest is from overseas
crazy_rabbit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1001


RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 11:48:02 AM
 #63212


Chinese speculators were not in fact very much of the overall Chinese exchange volume - most of it has come from outside mainland China. Meanwhile, the other exchanges and US and European investments have been the solid foundation of all the exchanges, but this fact had been lost in the run up in at ChinaBTC.

Thus, once investors see that 3rd party processors didnt have a sustainable impact on the market (i.e. Silk Road flash crash) investors flock back to secure best positions and additional investment comes in from off the sidelines anticipating a new run up.


I think the problem with this theory is twofold:
1. Getting fiat onto BTChina is difficult.
2. Most of the o/s funds went on there via BTC to take advantage of the zero trading fee...this is no longer an incentive although it is still cheaper than Gox/Stamp but more expensive than BTCe.

I'd be interested in your thoughts re the conundrum I have.  If Chinese users will have difficulty getting their Yuan off BTChina they will need coins instead, so this should mean all the CNY on the side should be being spent on BTC, driving the price up.   I guess there is a rush to get CNY off there before implementation of the new guidelines?

They have until the chinese new year to get their money off.
stompix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2884
Merit: 6323


Blackjack.fun


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 11:50:04 AM
 #63213

What happened to the "China wants to get rid of the $ , China is embracing BTC as a new currency? .
We're talking about a country that holds it's own currency , the yuan at bay to help exports.
Wake up people. It was a nice ride but we need a real country for the next step , and that ain't China!
dani
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 525
Merit: 500


..yeah


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 11:53:32 AM
 #63214

at some point I realised that this thread is a better articulated btc-e trollbox. So um, lets just, you know...

gandhibt
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
December 17, 2013, 11:54:10 AM
 #63215

What happened to the "China wants to get rid of the $ , China is embracing BTC as a new currency? .
We're talking about a country that holds it's own currency , the yuan at bay to help exports.
Wake up people. It was a nice ride but we need a real country for the next step , and that ain't China!

you can still send your fiat instantly with no fees to the exchange and buy bitcoins, same thing other way around, in china, am i correct?
UnDerDoG81
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2179
Merit: 1201


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 11:56:18 AM
 #63216

Will the BTC´s at BTCCHina only stay in China? Or is there a possibility for the chinese people to use Bitstamp/Gox and payout from there? I only wonder because the price dropped 50% with just 2 chinese rumours. But the BTCs are still in China. I really dont understand Bitcoin.

How can something rare drop in price only because people sell it to other people?
nanobrain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000


Dumb broad


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 11:56:46 AM
 #63217

Thanks Dragonkiller...that's an interesting stat.

And thanks for the info Crazy_Rabbit....I did see that yesterday but had forgotten in the tsunami of information.  BTW I love your "Rum and carrots" line...always makes me smile Smiley

Windjc...I was enjoying our discussion earlier until that youngun came in calling me names...hope we are still good, HoneyBadger?
JorgeStolfi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1003



View Profile
December 17, 2013, 12:00:01 PM
 #63218

How can something rare drop in price only because people sell it to other people?
"Rare" does not imply "high demand".
Voodah
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 17, 2013, 12:03:00 PM
 #63219

How can something rare drop in price only because people sell it to other people?
"Rare" does not imply "high demand".


Exactly. Well said.
Unpredictable
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 292
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 12:04:05 PM
 #63220

http://bitcointicker.co/combined/

They are dumping bitcoins in china
Pages: « 1 ... 3111 3112 3113 3114 3115 3116 3117 3118 3119 3120 3121 3122 3123 3124 3125 3126 3127 3128 3129 3130 3131 3132 3133 3134 3135 3136 3137 3138 3139 3140 3141 3142 3143 3144 3145 3146 3147 3148 3149 3150 3151 3152 3153 3154 3155 3156 3157 3158 3159 3160 [3161] 3162 3163 3164 3165 3166 3167 3168 3169 3170 3171 3172 3173 3174 3175 3176 3177 3178 3179 3180 3181 3182 3183 3184 3185 3186 3187 3188 3189 3190 3191 3192 3193 3194 3195 3196 3197 3198 3199 3200 3201 3202 3203 3204 3205 3206 3207 3208 3209 3210 3211 ... 33348 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!